GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

state of the union

In retirees, UFT leadership finds loyal — and unusual — support

CAPTION

UFT President Michael Mulgrew speaks at the union’s annual retiree luncheon in Florida last week. (Photo: UFT)

At a synagogue in Surfside, Fla., last month, about 40 former teachers gathered for cupcakes, cheesecake, and a PowerPoint presentation by a pair of union representatives from New York. The teachers were members of the United Federation of Teachers retiree chapter, and the representatives had been sent by the UFT and New York State United Teachers to pass along information about budget counseling, Medicare, and pet insurance.

Ken Goodman, the UFT Florida retiree chapter leader, called the meeting to order by announcing updates about the following month’s annual retiree luncheon. Buses would pick the members up from Surfside and ferry them to the event in Boca Raton, where UFT President Michael Mulgrew would deliver the keynote address just weeks before his re-election bid.

Despite being out of the classroom — in many cases, for decades — retirees make up a large portion of Mulgrew’s constituency. And because the UFT is one of the only unions in the country to allow retirees to vote in leadership elections, they are powerful. Even when they live far from New York City, the UFT’s 60,000 retiree members staunchly defend the union they helped shape in the 1960s and 1970s, and they volunteer in droves when the union mobilizes its members to support candidates or lobby on education or healthcare.

“We provide a service for those kind[s] of issues for the union, and the union helps us too on the issues we care about,” said Tom Murphy, the head of the UFT’s retiree chapter. He added that, after seeing how engaged UFT retirees remain, the American Federation of Teachers was considering allowing retirees in other locals to vote in union elections as well.

Retired teachers can choose to remain part of the UFT, spending a small portion of their pension on dues. Almost all do. Of the UFT’s 200,000 total members, nearly 60,000 are retirees, and about 8,000 of them live in Florida for at least part of the year. The UFT’s New York office devotes the entire 17th floor of its downtown skyscraper to retiree services. The chapter also has sections in Arizona, California, Georgia, Nevada, North Carolina, Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico, and Israel.

In Florida, the retiree chapter’s Boca Raton office buzzes with activity. (The union spent $162,538 on rent for the office in 2012.) The staff—most of them retirees themselves—fields phone calls and emails about pensions and health coverage. They reach out to members, alerting them to programming such as beginning French classes.

“We’re constantly giving them information,” Goodman said. “For the most part, our members like to be involved.”

Read the whole series.

Read the whole series.

The union and Democratic politicians also rely on Florida retirees to help them get out the vote. In last year’s U.S. presidential election, UFT members in Florida were active phone bankers, officials say, both for President Barack Obama and Patrick Murphy, who narrowly defeated incumbent Allen West, a Republican, in Florida’s 18th Congressional district. (Murphy also got an assist from West himself, who made a series of inflammatory statements that lost him local support.)

The retirees are sometimes called the “daytime union,” according to Murphy. “We’re available when our in-service working members are not,” he said. “If they need some of us to testify someplace or populate a hearing … many of us are able to do that.”

In addition to helping Obama win Florida last year, retirees contributed to Mulgrew’s 91 percent victory in 2010. Mulgrew would have won easily without their support, however, which suggests that—for now at least—there’s no schism between how retirees and current teachers vote.

But retirees may be among the most inclined to keep the union on its current track.

Once members retire, “the priorities change,” Goodman said. “We want to make sure our benefits are maintained.”

Many of the retirees at the Miami-Dade area meeting in Surfside, happy with those benefits, say they plan on voting again for Mulgrew, who is running as part of the Unity slate. Unity first took power in the 1960s, when many of the current retirees were in the classroom.

“I generally vote Unity … if I like the status quo,” said retiree Gloria Taft, 66, who taught math at I.S. 75 in Staten Island. She said she didn’t know much about the other candidates.

Two groups — Movement of Rank-and-File Educators and New Action — are running slates of candidates to challenge Unity, although only MORE is aiming to unseat Mulgrew. While the two minority parties are likely to gain some seats, they face an uphill battle to win spots in the union’s central leadership.

One reason is that retirees vote at significantly higher rates than active teachers. Nearly half of them voted in 2010, while less than a quarter of active teachers did so. But the number of votes that retirees can contribute is capped, meaning that each vote tends to count for something less than one. Retiree votes were initially capped at 18,000, but the UFT delegate assembly increased that to 23,500 last year in response to growth in both total union membership and the retiree chapter.

The shift drew criticism for reducing the influence of current teachers — who will be more directly affected by policies that the union supports or opposes.

“Should all other voter turnout stay the same, it’s possible that in this election the retirees will account for 50 percent” of the vote, said Sydney Morris, co-founder of Educators 4 Excellence. The group encourages its members to become more involved in the union, including pushing them to vote in union elections. It opposed raising the retiree vote cap, arguing that current teachers should have a larger voice than retirees in the elections.

Retired high-school teacher Adrianne Brum “absolutely” will vote this year; she does so in every election. “I pay for that,” she said. She, and many of her peers, praised the UFT for securing good benefits for them and keeping them well-informed about the benefits. Brum and others said those protections are a priority when they vote.

“The union worked very hard to give us the kind of security we do have,” Brum said, adding that critics of teachers unions “think we’re getting away with murder.”

“We put up with much lower pay so we can have these perks,” she said.

Murphy said he also sees retired members concerned about what’s happening in the classroom — particularly the push to tie teacher evaluations to student test scores.

Simon Schlanger, 74, who has been a UFT member for 50 years, also said he was planning to vote for Mulgrew. But though Schlanger, who was a social studies teacher and guidance counselor in the Bronx, cares about how teachers are treated, he said his primary concern was not about his own security.  “It’s making sure the kids get a good education,” he said.

  • Former Turnaround Teacher

    Tuesday March 12, 2013…the day the earth stood still. Or rather the day when E4E actually said something that I agree with. The retirees should not have their vote increased in fact they should not be allowed to vote at all. The majority of the issues that the union deals with are about CURRENT CLASSROOM TEACHERS. So while it is nice that the retirees are active in our union, I am sure most would have no problem increasing class size, and giving up teacher protections if it meant better benfits for them.

  • KenMH

    Why do our NYC citizens tolerate the fact that our elected officials have to negotiate issues affecting the education of 1.1 million children with union leadership that is elected largely by retirees, many (most?) of whom don’t even live in NYC?

    I’m no fan of public sector unions in general, but the UFT situation in NYC is mind-boggling.

  • Tim_Parent

    Let’s be fair. Many (most?) working UFT members don’t live in New York City, either — especially (tellingly?) the ones with school-aged children.

  • KenMH

    Yes, but they are active teachers. One might think that active teachers in NYC should have a privileged voice in negotiating issues pertaining to public education in NYC. (I don’t, but I understand the argument.) However, I’m not sure how one could justify retired teachers having a privileged voice in negotiating issues pertaining to public education in NYC. Frankly, I think it’s a disgrace.

  • A.S.Neill

    There are two main arguments for allowing retired teachers to vote in UFT elections and I believe they are both sound (remember, they do not have full votes but only fractional votes).

    First, by their long years of dedication, service, and in most cases by their personal beliefs, they have been the bedrock of making the UFT a durable and strong union and generally are totally dedicated to the future of quality public education in this country. Many of them in fact built this union with Albert Shanker, risked their careers in strikes, and showed their activism over and over. To simply discard their voice in union affairs is both dishonorable in my opinion, and a loss of wise counsel from long years of experience. Frankly to cut them off sounds a bit like the same attitude of the DOE that wants to U rate long experienced teachers as just too old to understand all the new fancy ed reform agenda.

    Second, as a group UFT retirees remain very politically active. For example, many of them traveled to Wisconsin when that state was trying pass right-to-work laws. In this service, they can be active in ways that full time teachers cannot be. No doubt many would do this anyway even if not part voting members of the UFT, but they continue to help the UFT, support public education and the cause of unionism in general and I believe this should be recognized through a voice in our union.

    I understand that current active members of the UFT should legitimately have the strongest voice in union affairs as it does now, but union means by definition a partnership, and including our retirees in part of that voice makes us stronger for the above reasons.

  • I noticed that…

    Explain the fractional vote of the retirees in the upcoming election. What do they vote on? It would be very helpful since I will be a retiree very soon. A.S. you bring out some irrefutable points. I feel that my voice in this and all future union election is important and for it to be left out would upset me. But, I cannot understand one thing – why the cap?

    If Mulgrew believes in the retired members that came before him and Randi ever stepped foot inside a classroom and those retirees made the union the
    powerhouse it is today, why not allow all 60,000 retirees to vote? Last year,
    the UFT constitution was changed to increase the cap to 23,500 which is only 39% of the retirees, but what happens to the other retirees? Are they excluded from voting? How does the UFT determines who
    are the chosen retirees that can cast their votes?

    When I’m finally in my retirement mode, I plan to vote for a leadership
    who will look out, not only for the retirees, but for the active members, who
    will make sure those members have contractual provisions that will protect them from the abuse that comes constantly from administration, that the leadership will fight to get the members a decent, reasonable contract with retroactivity and not a contract that ends up being a 5-year contract with 0%, 0%, 0%,0%, 2% increase, and the every member is treated with the utmost respect and they are placed in a school because the ATR pool was eliminated and where our union can proudly hold their heads up high knowing that the leadership did not sell the members out.

  • http://twitter.com/nycdoenuts nycdoenuts

    Ken,
    I think its the first time I’ve agreed with one of your opinions. You should support MORE in the upcoming elections :D

  • flerp

    “When I’m finally in my retirement mode, I plan to vote for a leadership who will look out, not only for the retirees, but for the active members,”

    It’s none of my affair, but it would seem to me that nobody’s better positioned to vote for leadership that looks out for the active members than the active members. Retirees look out for the retirees. To the extent some retirees look out for the interests of active members out of the goodness of their heart, the active members can do that just as well out of their own self-interest, and without having to worry about what other interests the retirees might have.

  • A.S.Neill

    Not sure the “self-interest” argument really works here flerp. Consider when Bush II wanted to privatize Social Security. Although his plan would not have affected existing or near retirees, many have considered their political opposition very critical in the defeat of Bush’s privatization plan. Goodness of their heart only? Perhaps, but what I think you fail to consider that this is also an inter-generational issue. Active teachers will be retirees at some point, so retiree self-interest also is active teacher self-interest as well, at least at some future point rationally considered. So yea, I want retirees to have some self-interest as well, since I plan some day to be one of them. So I guess this is my third argument for giving them a voice.

  • Jonathan

    I understand that my colleagues want an increase in democracy, so do I, but I hope they are not taken in by outsiders sounding democratic-sounding phrases, but harboring deep animus towards us.

    New Action opposed the constitutional amendments to increase the retiree vote and expand the Executive Committee. But we would vehemently oppose the attempt of anti-union “reformers” to dictate the internal workings of our union.

    Increasing democracy is a hard fight, but we cannot win it by allying with those who would deny teachers any voice at all on how our schools are run.

    Jonathan

  • flerp

    You’re kind of making my point. Active teachers’ interests are inherently somewhat aligned with retirees because of their self-interest–i.e., they will one day be those retirees. So arguably active members can be trusted to look out for retirees, just like you say you’re doing. Retirees’ interests are not aligned with active teachers, because they will not one day be active teachers. So arguably they can’t be trusted to look out for active members. So arguably it always makes more sense to give active members more voice and retirees less.

  • normsco

    Clear Gotham bias, looking for any excuse to quote E4E. How amazing that Gotham doesn’t quote MORE but quotes E4E which given an opportunity to test its outreach chose to sit out the election, knowing full well their vote would be abysmal. How does this astroturf group funded by ed deformer which basically agrees with Unity/Mulgrew on the ed eval issue — run the UFT and E4E commercials side by side — E4E people — all 10 of them – will vote Unity. And I love the mention of New Action which gets 10 Exec Bd seats in exchange for endorsing Mulgrew in the election (something not mentioned in the literature they hand out in schools). Talk about democracy? MORE could out poll New Action and get no Exec bd seats while NA gets 10 seats even if they get fewer votes than e4E would get.

  • normsco

    Retirees get a fractional vote only if the numbers voting exceed 23,500 this time. It used to be 18000 but was raised in anticipation of this election. MORE opposed this change. As a retiree I do not feel I have many opportunities to do union work if I want and do not need a vote to do it. Retirees should not control the election that has a major impact on people actually working. That ultimately weakens the union as it undermines fundamental democracy. There is a whole package of reforms MORE is developing that the UFT can use given that one party has controlled the UFT since its inception and may end up breaking the record of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union as they are within shouting distance. When Reagan said “tear down that wall” he was talking about Unity Caucus.

  • http://www.protectportelos.org/ Francesco Portelos

    You walk through 52 Broadway and see the black and white pictures of these retirees when our union was stronger. That’s not our union anymore. It’s been weakened from the inside. Like a Trojan Horse. We owe a lot to the retirees and their hard work, however for them to vote on OUR conditions today doesn’t seem right. I should go to some retiree chapter meetings and share my story and ask what would happen if this was done during their day. Perhaps I’ll go to Florida in two weeks, play some golf and tell them “I’m in a room 20 miles away from my school for over 300 days and not charged.” They’ll ask “did they rally for you? Did you tell Mike? ” then I’ll laugh and say this isn’t the same union you left behind.

  • normsco

    Ken
    We finally agree. Note how the AFT is talking about getting more locals to allow retirees to vote — so that a Chicago never happens again. Keep the old guard in control. As for Tim — with a massive turnover in the teacher corps over the decade I would bet a lot more teachers are living in the city. And with ed deform being so unfriendly to teachers with young children (Principal: I don’t care that your child is sick, without childcare, etc — you stay till 6PM) the move to the suburbs has been lessened.

  • http://twitter.com/edintheapple Peter Goodman

    Retirees only vote in union elections – contract ratifications are active members only … crucial decisions regarding active teachers are made at the polling place – about 90% of retirees vote while only 50% of active members vote in general elections … trying to divide active from retirees is foolish and dangerous … the very future of public education is at risk … as well as future pension and health benefits … all union members, active, retired, teachers, paras, etc., must fight together – all union members, regardless of political party within the union must volunteer to participate in rallies and demonstrations and mostly in supporting union endorsed candidates … I have no idea who the union will endorse for mayor … I have doubts myself … but I intend to support to the fullest the UFT endorsed candidates for all positions … not only voting but convincing friends and neighbors to do the same.

  • normsco

    There is no division here only common sense. In MORE the retiree group is full engaged and involved as many are in the Unity. We don’t need full fledged voting rights to validate the work we do. Within a year or two the number of retirees will be a higher number than the number of working teachers. Many retirees are not engaged in the daily battles in education as the most active people in both Unity and MORE are and have been. We should advise and support working teachers, not dilute their ability to shape their careers.

  • Mike

    Retirees don’t vote on contracts, do they?

  • KenMH

    My understanding is that they don’t, but they shouldn’t vote on leadership or anything else as well. Retirees should have no preferential direct or indirect role in affecting public schools in NYC beyond whatever role they might have as ordinary citizens. Clearly they have huge influence in selecting UFT leadership which in turn plays a huge role in determining the fate of our public school system.

  • Mike

    I’m mildly sympathetic to your position, but I think its much more of an internal issue — one of union democracy. I think the impact on kids is mininmal and indirect. I’m much more concerned about the influence of wealthy interests — rich donors, corporate lobbyists, etc. whose money gives them an outsized influence over policy. Think, for instance, about the numbers of teachers who were forced to give passing grades to failing students because they were working in new, Gates-funded schools that needed to produce good numbers. I can’t imagine any comparable effect that the retiree vote has had, at least until we have a closely divided union electorate where retirees can swing the results.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

2 comments so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031