GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

the freshman

New Brooklyn lawmaker wants first crack at school closure ban

Walter T. Mosley

Walter Mosley, with Hakeem Jeffries, speaking to supporters on Election Day last year. (Credit: The Local: Fort Greene / Clinton Hill)

Brand new Brooklyn Assemblyman Walter T. Mosley  wants to pick up where his high-profile predecessor left off: trying to block Mayor Bloomberg’s efforts to close schools.

Before he was elected to Congress last year, Hakeem Jeffries was the lead sponsor on a bill that called on a two-year moratorium for closures in New York City. It passed overwhelmingly in the Democratic-controlled Assembly, but then lost momentum. First, it died in the Republican-controlled Senate and then lost its sponsor when Jeffries headed to Washington, D.C.

Now, union officials and other advocates who oppose the Bloomberg administration’s school closure policies are looking for a new lawmaker to carry the torch for this year’s session.

“There’s quite a few people who are looking at doing it,” teachers union president Michael Mulgrew told GothamSchools this week.

Despite his long-shot chances as a freshman lawmaker, Mosley said he stands ready to take the reigns.

“Other lawmakers might want to take it as their own, but right now we’re proposing it as our own,” said Mosley, who said he campaigned in part on the promise that he’d breathe life into Jeffries’s old bill.

“To me, it’s only right that we press the pause button and reevaluate what we’re doing from a government standpoint to make sure that every child is treated fairly,” Mosley added.

The bill seeks to immediately halt school closures in New York City and would last through the 2015-2016 school year. During the moratorium period a state-controlled committee of education experts would be convened to review the impact that closures have the school system.

Union officials familiar with the bill said that they doubted the bill could be passed and signed into law before March, when the city’s school board is scheduled to vote on — and likely approve — 26 school closures.

Closures are a hallmark policy of the Bloomberg’s brand of education reform in New York City and 140 schools have been shuttered on his watch.  Many of the schools were large, low-performing high schools, which the city has replaced with hundreds of smaller schools that have, on average, yielded higher graduation rates while serving less needy students.

But to close a school is a contentious process that brings fierce and organized opposition from the school community and the teachers union. Recently, criticism has come from new places as well. Three of four Democratic mayoral candidates recently called for a moratorium and top-ranking state education officials have expressedconcern  that the closures disproportionately affect students with the highest need.

Bloomberg has also replaced them with 163 charter schools, many of which share space in district school buildings in an arrangement called co-locations.

Another bill, introduced last week for the second year in a row by Harlem Assemblyman Keith Wright, would give communities the power to approve co-location proposals for their local schools.

Sources say that it’ll be difficult for Mosley to end up as the bill’s lone sponsor since those decisions are made by Assembly leaders.

Mosley, a former district leader, won with both Jeffries’s and Mulgrew’s endorsement. Despite his opposition to school closures, Jeffries also supported charter school co-locations and drew praise from education reform groups during his Congressional race. The UFT chose not to endorse him in his primary race against Councilman Charles Barron.

Mosley wrote on his campaign web site that he wants to “ensure that parents have a choice about where to send their child to school,” but he said in an interview that charter schools “are not an option for everyone.”

“They are an exception, an alternative way of educating our children,” Mosley said.

Whoever ends up the Assembly sponsor, Avella thinks the bill has legs this year in the Senate, where legislation that threatens Bloomberg’s education agenda has historically gone to die.

Avella told GothamSchools yesterday that he is hoping to tap into the Senate’s new power-sharing dynamic, which includes a coalition of five Democrats who are voting as an independent conference.

The leader of that coalition, Jeff Klein, has in the past battled with the teachers union for voting to raise the charter cap and do away with seniority layoffs. But he sided with the union on school closures. 

Klein’s Bronx district includes Lehman High School, which has been the chopping block for years. A year ago, Klein joined with the school community to oppose a closure proposal.

“The community, teachers and administration have been working tirelessly on their own ‘turnaround’ policy for the high school which is showing positive results in just the few months it has been implemented,” Klein wrote in a letter to the department last year, according to the Bronx Times. “I would ask that phase-out be stalled for at least another year to give the new principal and administration more time to implement their programs.”

As a co-leader of the Senate — alongside Republican Dean Skelos — Klein now wields far greater power over what bills get voted on and could decide to back the bill. Avella said he hoped to win Klein and the other four Democrats in the independent coalition over.

Klein’s spokesman did not respond to requests for comment.

  • GUEST

    Now they’re trying to stand up to His Eminence?  After he has destroyed the education of thousands of high school students in this city by closing so called “failing” schools and replacing them with schools run by Principals, few of whom are capable of properly evaluating a teacher and making suggestons for improvement as most of them have no business being Principals.  In the process, he has destroyed the career of hundreds of aspiring education administrators who were playing the game by the rules; who were achieving experience both as a classroom teacher and then an Assistant Principal.  And to what end?

    The small schools are doing better?  That’s what Bloomberg claimed this morning on his radio show.  NYC is a model school system and everything is improved said this man who lives in his own dream world.

    Mr. Mayor why don’t you try teaching math in CUNY where thousands of students who have presumably passed a Math Regents exam (thanks to needing only 35% of the credit on the Algebra regents to be considered to have passed along with a cheat sheet because it is too much in this day and age to have a student lerarn the quadratic formula or the definitions of the trig functions) and try to hide all this nonsense by notmaking the new Regen ts exams available on the State Ed Department web site along with the solutions and more importantly the conversion charts.  Of curse, the graduation rates go up with “tougherr” standards.  How many of the students who couldn’t graduate frm the so called “failing” schools are now graduating frm these boutique schools with Principals who lack the experience to be Principals?

    And then he ranted on the Teacher Evaluatin  system.  O curse, section 3020A is still in effect where a competent Principal can properly write up a teacher and remove said teacher from the system following a program of improvement.  Everybody knows what’s gong on.  But it will take a long time, if ever, to put the school system back together again.  In the interim, thousands and thousands of students have had their education destroyed by this madman.  A man who thinks he’s sane and the rest of the world is crazy.  The future of the system is at stake by Mulgrew hanging tough.

  • KitchenSink

    Again, I ask – would any of these elected officials taking such a strong stance against school closures send their own children to one of these schools?  Color me doubtful.

  • Night Rider

    I guess all of your charter school buddies could just move into these buildings, take the pick of the litter, and then kick out the trouble makers right? 

  • Brandon x

    The best is gonna be watching Lehman HS get voted on to close down right under senator Klein’s nose. That’s when u really know how little power u have in your own community, blocks away from the Lehman bldg. Watching it phase out and get voted on 8-5 by the “PEP” team. Then you will see the true power of #1 mayor Bloomberg just demolish a senator in his own neighborhood leaving him looking like a total fool. This is when I will realize that the DOE takes no parent involvement serious.

  • GeorgeDeljaj2

    Senators or councilmen/women, neighborhood councils, etc have NO SAY in anything that happens in their own community. It’s the funniest thing. The DOE DOMINATES all mentioned political figures. Jimmy Vacca’s headquarters are 50 feet from Lehman HS and he has NO POWER!

  • GUEST

    …because they have chosen to abdicate this power to the madman running Ciity Hall and his lackeys.  It could have and should have been stopped when it started, when the first couple of Brooklyn and Bronx High Schools were destroyed.  Simple legislation would have stopped this.  But then again the UFT cold hve put the pressure on to stop this madness.  Nobody acted to protect the schools.  Nobody acted to protect the teachers.  Nobody acted to protect the kids from this madness.  The madman was allowed to destroy everything that once upon a time made this school system great and establish all this bs that is faced today….using Regents exam for purposes they were never intended, begining this myth that schools were “failing” their kids because high school diplomas were not handed out like candy….starting this myth that a school system could survive when the students came to school with an attitude that school was not important to their future lives.  The result is what we have today.

  • A.S.Neill

     Well, probably not. But the real question is whether those who close schools would want to send own children to the schools where the kids from closed schools are going to go to next. And I’m pretty sure the answer to that question is no also. Because those are the schools they will be planning to close next.

    Its pretty clear the DOE is engaging in a shell game, trying currently to blame teachers for what the DOE cannot solve and really have no idea how to solve. As I’ve pointed out many times here, the only really solidly based research solution is universal quality pre-K which is expensive and long term. The search for the quick fix is just a politician’s gimmick to convince the public that something is being done. But there is no quick fix, and obsessingly focusing on that means there is no fix at all.   

  • Middle Class Parent

     Silly.  You know as well as any of us that demographics play a huge role in any parents decision.  So, no, they wouldn’t send their kids to DOE dumping grounds.

  • Akademos

    Closure is not the real issue. It’s the know-nothin’-but-results, rig-results, abuse-people-and-systems-across-the-board, corrupt and insane business model. Everybody who is uninfected knows it’s a failure and an atrocity.

  • Unfairly blaming the teachers

    I appreciate the sentiments of these leaders.

    At the same time, it’s “too much too little too late” now that nearly all of the “Big Box” regular high schools, and so many of the regular middle schools, have been eerily closed down and converted into multiplexes for a number of programs, each with their own principals and vice principals, each with generic names like “Freedom School for Justice and the Arts” or “The High School of Equality and Science” or “The New Democracy School for the Humanities and Mathematics,” etc.

    You get the formula.

    Anyway, if these “new” schools-within-a-former-school were truly producing appreciably better results (not just Emperor Bloomie’s New Clothes type of “better results”), then maybe the loss of the economies of scale of the Big Box schools would be justified.

    But this is not the case.  The students are the victims of this process.  And so are the teachers whose jobs were eliminated in the process, as 50% were not retained in the conversions because they were not cronies with the right people (teacher excellence ignored of course!).  And so are the taxpayers, who are shelling out way more per student this way.

    But those hulking Big Box buildings stand there largely the same as they were when being used for the purposes they were built for: just waiting to reopen under their original names, as one big school again.  Maybe these leaders can start to make that happen.

    PS: When a principal in an inner city big box school is successful at turning around that school, like Mr. Waronker was several years back, in that middle school in the Bronx, the DOE should be taking that success, studying it from every conceivable angle, and replicating it with the help and advice of the Mr. Waronkers in the system–in order to not have to close down so many more of these big box schools. 
    But no, what did the DOE do with that success story? Promptly removed him (!) from his successful situation, and shipped him off to Harvard, only to reincarnate him in the role of an elementary school experimental boondoggler. Go figure….

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

4 comments so far today

Events Calendar

Archives

June 2013
M T W T F S S
« May  
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930