GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

boys club

Aiding Boys and Girls High’s survival are powerful political allies

Chancellor Dennis Walcott and City Councilman Al Vann joined Boys and Girls High School Principal Bernard Gassaway to honor the school's boys basketball team for winning the city championships last year.

Among the dozen high schools the city spared from closure this week despite lagging scores, one stands out as lower-performing than almost all of the rest.

It also stands out for having an unusually powerful set of political allies.

Brooklyn’s Boys and Girls High School has poor student performance, an abysmal graduation rate — 38.6 percent last year  — and few applicants.

“If one looks at the data and the metrics by which all principals and schools are graded, it is very apparent that we are all not measured by the same yardstick,” said Geraldine Maione, the principal of William E. Grady Career and Technical High School, a higher-performing school that the city briefly proposed for closure last year.

It’s a fact that Principal Bernard Gassaway has acknowledged. “Statistically, they’ve closed schools that have better stats,” he told community members at an event in June, before the city’s latest round of performance data.

The secret to the school’s survival, people inside and outside the school say, appears to be a tight-knit advisory board of political and community heavyweights from the Bedford-Stuyvesant section of Brooklyn who say they have pulled strings at the school for years.

“There’s no way that Boys and Girls High School as you know it today would still be in existence if it were not for the advisors,” Gassaway said in June. He declined to comment for this story; his comments all come from public appearances and previous interviews with GothamSchools.

The supporters include Regent Lester Young, City Councilman Al Vann, Assemblywoman Annette Robinson, State Sen. Velmanette Montgomery, and Adelaide Sanford, the vice chancellor emeritus of the Board of Regents. Conrad Tillard, a pastor at Nazarene Congregational Church, and Bedford-Stuyvesant Restoration Chief Executive Officer Colvin Grannum are also members of the advisory board, which meets monthly at the school.

The civic leaders of Bed-Stuy, which has long had one of the city’s most vibrant black communities, say keeping Boys & Girls open is crucial to maintaining the neighborhood’s identity.

“There’s a lot of history here. This is part of who we are as a community and a people,” Vann told GothamSchools last month at a meeting held to weigh the school’s future. “You can’t close that.”

Board members have raised money for the school, including through a private foundation they helped set up this year; coordinated events to bring in the local community; and met with top Department of Education officials to secure funds for a new library. They also said they have influenced the Department of Education’s hiring decisions at the school, and Gassaway has said they encouraged him to seek immunity from being ousted even if the school got worse.

The advisory board’s goal is to restore Boys and Girls High School as the school of choice for students in Bedford-Stuyvesant. The school was nicknamed the “Pride and Joy of Bed-Stuy” during its heyday in the 1990s, when more than 4,000 students crowded into its halls and performance skyrocketed.

Enrollment has fallen at Brooklyn's Boys and Girls High School by nearly 75 percent over the last decade.

But even though the moniker still rolls off many local residents’ tongues, few want to send their children to Boys and Girls. Last year, enrollment was down to 1,470 — and only about 450 students came from five zip codes closest to Bedford-Stuyvesant, according to data provided by the school. This year, only about 1,200 students are enrolled.

The decline began after the retirement of Frank Mickens, a brash but beloved principal who brought order and boosted graduation rates during the 1980’s and 1990’s. Mickens’ tough disciplinary tactics earned him praise, but he also warehoused disruptive students in the school’s auditorium until they dropped out, according to a class-action lawsuit filed by former students that the city settled in 2008. Vann and Young told GothamSchools last year that they were not familiar with the lawsuit.

The advisory board formed in 2007, shortly after Mickens retired and was replaced by a protégé, Spencer Holder, who was later named in the lawsuit.

Members said they were not satisfied with Holder’s leadership in part because he did not solicit input from local leaders the way Mickens had. “His plans were not based on the community,” Jitu Weusi, a longtime community activist and advisory board member, told GothamSchools in May. “He never once came to the community to say look, I want you all to give me some help, some advice.”

The city replaced Holder in 2009 with Gassaway, who had also worked under Mickens. Gassaway had recently retired as superintendent of the city’s alternative schools district, a job he had gotten with Young’s endorsement.

“I weighed in on Gassaway, let them know that we strongly support him,” Vann said of conversations he and other members had with city officials, including then-chancellor Joel Klein, about the school’s leadership. Young declined to comment on what he discussed with city officials in private meetings about the school.

The advisory board directed Gassaway to meet with Klein and ask for sufficient time to turn the school around before being ousted or installing another school in the building — at least three years.

“Klein’s commitment was that he’d give them whatever resources he needed to get the job done,” Vann said.

Gassaway said he also told Klein he would have to make things worse at Boys and Girls before they could get better.

Last year, the school’s 38.6 percent four-year graduation rate was 15 points below the average rate for the nine other high schools the department wants to close this year and 25 points below the city rate. Just 3 percent of students graduated ready for college, compared to 30 percent citywide. And student and staff satisfaction has fallen sharply, according to city surveys.

Department of Education officials say many factors go into the decision to close a school, with academic achievement the most important. Former Chief Schools Officer Eric Nadelstern said one reason the city might hold back on phasing out a comprehensive high school is that it might have trouble finding enough seats in other schools for the hundreds of students who would normally enroll there.

That’s not the case for Boys and Girls. The school’s enrollment has plummeted by 40 percent since Gassaway took over, and the city says at least half of the school’s redbrick building on Fulton Street is going unused.

“Without a doubt, you could fit another school here,” Gassaway, who has been more outspoken than many principals, said last year.

Nadelstern, who has criticized the Department of Education since he left in 2011 but supports its policy of closing low-performing schools, said a school’s historical significance can also keep it off the chopping block. Besides Boys and Girls, the only other school that the department awarded two straight F grades but did not propose closing was DeWitt Clinton High School, which also has a robust alumni association and top-flight sports program.

But Boys and Girls might well have a stronger political edge, Nadelstern said.

“It could just be that Vann and Young and the advisory group got to Dennis [Walcott],” he said. “It could be that simple.”

Department officials did not respond to requests to explain why they decided not to add Boys and Girls to the year’s closure list.

Walcott, the city’s schools chancellor, is among the department officials who have defended the school under Gassaway’s leadership. Gassaway was allowed to remove Boys and Girls from the roster of schools that faced a controversial overhaul strategy known as “turnaround” last year, something principals at other schools tried but failed to do. Deputy Chancellor Marc Sternberg has praised Gassaway’s leadership multiple times. And last year, asked about the school’s low scores, Walcott said the department would stand behind Gassaway as the principal worked to implement a plan to serve the school’s many high-need students.

“Our commitment is to Boys and Girls and making sure that we help them achieve those goals that Bernard set,” Walcott said.

Having strong allies has helped schools evade closure before. Last year, the city withdrew its proposal to shrink Wadleigh Secondary School for the Performing Arts after influential politicians in Harlem sprung to the school’s defense. It also withdrew plans to close and reopen Grover Cleveland High School, which State Assemblywoman Catherine Nolan attended and defended.

And even though Wadleigh and Grover Cleveland stayed open, the city replaced both of their principals. Boys and Girls’ backers said this week that they expect to see Gassaway still at the school next September.

“I’d say he absolutely still has confidence from us,” Vann said.

But Young, the advisory board member, could have to contend with colleagues on the State Board of Regents, who say they do not understand why the city has not applied the same standards universally. ”Everybody should be treated equitably with the same metrics,” said Regent Kathleen Cashin, a former Brooklyn school superintendent.

Outside Boys and Girls this week, students and residents from Bedford-Stuyvesant were split over the school’s quality. But no one denied the significance that the school has to the neighborhood.

“Boys and Girls is synonymous with Bed-Stuy. It’s a landmark. People say, ‘I live this far from Boys and Girls,’” said Damien Brown, a longtime resident. “Generations of people have gone to school here.”

Lisa Jones said she would be happy to send her young child to the school. “It’s an excellent school,” she said. “I have two family members who went there.”

Jahquan Williams, a junior at the school, said academics weren’t up to par for most students but he doubted that the school would be closed. Asked why, Williams said, “Boys and Girls is the pride and joy of Bed-Stuy. That’s a known nickname.”

Additional reporting contributed by Rachel Cromidas and Emma Sokoloff-Rubin

  • Nyr683

    more politics in education and they say its for the kids…..lol, cant make it up

  • Former Turnaround Teacher

    It has been obvious for a few years that the schools who are spared from closure are the ones that are the most politically connected.  I am fine with Boys and Girls staying open, but I think the DOE needs to commit to giving them real support.

    Keep in mind that the school flourished in the 80′s and 90′s, but has been on a steep decline throughout the Bloomberg years…hmmm.

  • Mr. L

    There’s one point on this article that I find most interesting and it’s that the Principal of Boys & Girls has stated that things need to get worse before they get better. This is so true. In a system where social promotion is a way of life it’s easy to talk about high expectations and increased academic rigor, etc. However, if you want to truly enact these reforms and eliminate the unspoken policy that if a kid shows up for a least a “reasonable” chunk of time (three days a week? two or three weeks worth of class in a marking period?) and they don’t misbehave to too great a degree that somehow this means they get a 65. 

    I teach at low-performing school and it’s so hard to get my students to take the consequences of not making an effort seriously. Students are incredulous when they attend regularly but do no work and fail. They will come to me and say, “But I was there. I participated in class discussions and I didn’t cause problems.” They have been conditioned to expect a 65 in exchange for this pattern of behavior, so I can’t blame them for being surprised when I demand that they actually produce work that is challenging and which presumes that all of the kids I work with are smart and capable. 

    So if you want to turn this kind of a school around, the first thing you need to do is set real standards and fail kids who don’t show up, don’t do work, and who don’t apply themselves in a meaningful way. But if you actually do this then your graduation rate falls and lots of your statistics drop. In the current paradigm this sort of path is not an option. Instead, schools are expected to raise standards, hold kids’ feet to the fire academically, work from a perspective of high expectations, deliver rigorous lessons, and do it all not only with shrinking budgets and dwindling resources…not to mention an axe over their heads…but to do it while simultaneously not just not letting statistics drop but RAISING them measurably.

    How is that supposed to work?

    If you want to make an omelette you have to break a few eggs. If you want to end social promotion and inflated statistics, if you want to hold kids to higher standards and mean it, then you have to expect some sticker shock when the next round of statistics comes out. It’s that simple. However, that doesn’t play well in the 24-hour news cycle and it looks lousy as an election year platform. 

    Additionally, kids need Career & Technical Training aimed at landing them real jobs in the real world. Not everybody wants to go to college, and not everybody should. We just have an educational industrial complex that needs to be fed. The problem with a free market economy is that you have to have continual growth, and everything else takes a backseat to that. College tuitions go up and up and that market needs to be fed. That doesn’t mean it’s good for kids or good for the US.

    All politics and playing favorites aside, when you want to clean your closet and you pull everything out of it you make a heck of a mess before you can put it all back together. If you take apart an engine it’s a lot of clutter, but if you put it back together right it sure works great. A school is no different. If you want to build something that lasts, you’ve got to do a little tearing apart first. Until we are ready to do that it’s all just cosmetic tweaks and rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.

  • C’mon, Son

    Geoff Decker, is Bernard Gassaway paying you for all this fluff journalism? You’ve written about him numerous times in various publications and never even questioned his effectiveness despite his poor performance. If teachers can be rated “unsatisfactory” (according to today’s Daily News article) at a higher rate then other schools in the city based on their performance, how can the same not be said about Gassaway based on the same data?

  • Mr. J

    Your commentary is the closest account to the truth than anything that I have read recently about to fixing low performing schools.

  • Woodydanetony

    Correction to timeline.

    Mickens retired in June 2004. Grad rate for that year was 53% ( NYS Accountability Report 2003-2004). Holder became principal in September 2004 and was forced to resign in June of 2009. The Advisory Board was established in April 2009. Gassaway became principal in July
    2009 .

  • Wmelonboyrr

    Keeping this crap school open only proves there are no real rules for closure plans in the DOE. The truth is that no charter school or other small schools want the “real estate” that Boys n Gurks has to offer. Who the hell wants to go out to Bedstuy Brooklyn? It’s a disgusting area filled with dirt, drugs, and despair. The real estate is LOW and no one wants it. Keep this crap school with it’s 38% graduation rate open. It’s a “dropout warehouse” as the Bloomberg administration calls em’, but hey, this ones got plenty of blacks who like to talk n talk n talk. The city likes blacks and has to show they thruw em’ a bone once n a while.
    Way to go Boys n Girls. Perfect scenario just like when Bloomberg said, “screw it, let me just put that black guy Walcott in charge” so I can shut everyone up. Cathy Black was a poor choice but they’ll forget it once I make this uncle Tom the head boss.
    What a disgrace. No criteria at all. Some schools with F’s are ok and some schools who missed a B rating by a hair and were given barely a C, closed. Retards!!!

  • http://twitter.com/PFSANY Mary Conway-Spiegel

    Glad the community got behind B&G.
    But more than glad…extremely frustrating to see the photograph with all the support…EACH “failing” school could/should/must have that photograph taken.

    Every “failing” school needs: time and resources (“whatever it takes”) to get worse before they get better.

    Sad/Frustrating.

  • Black Curve

    If you’re a black principal, you get a pass. There is a learning curve for principals where blacks get special points for being black. So if you’re a black principal, you really get nice special help. If you’re a white principal, sorry, your school closes because you are assumed to have been smart enough to master the art of scoring high on the quality review, you know, have your teachers check the appropriate answers on their teacher review of the schools performance, file all the parent questionnaires (even if forging the parents signatures) and making up some AP courses that add bonus points to the QR. if you’re black, you get “visual” points for being black so your school stays open. Marc Sterberg is quoted as saying “I like what the principal at Boys and Girls HS is doing”.
    They have a 38% graduation rate. Way to go Marc!

  • Black Curve

    Mary,
    It’s a great photo of the “black panthers” in education. If you’re black, you’re good. If you’re white, don’t fight.

  • Black Curve

    If anyone is interested, I copied the photo of the “Black Panthers in Education” from this article.  I’m going to be making tee-shirts with this photo slapped on the front.  It’s a great shirt and shows what the DOE is looking for.  Now you see the true secret black association within the DOE.

  • Django

     Watermelon boy??? Is that the best you can do??? I bet you thought you were going to get a lot angry replies, huh??

  • 1 in 100,000

    I don’t know if Gassaway’s (or any principal’s) race offers them protection — I’ve seen as many black principals demoted as supported — but you certainly have a point that the DOE has very low expectations for him and the students at that school is demonstrated by Sternberg’s support of him despite abysmal stats. I think gassaway is a special case — he’s got some special deal/relationship with the DOE that allows him to stay as principal in exchange for something the DOE wants. Either it’s for taking high numbers of low performing kids or flushing staff and students out to pave the way for charters (as a closer) or just to exist as a place holder until the city can figure out what to do with the building.

  • Sp262

    I am not surprised.  How would politicians in the ghetto maintain their position without ignorant subjects? These students will be the voters of tomorrow and keeping them uneducated will ensure that the spawns of the current politicians will have a place in society.

  • Sp262

     If the DOE believed that Bernard could do any better they would have taken action. If they believed that the kids deserved any better they would have taken action.  They have so wrongly concluded that these kids are such losers only a loser can be the administrator in  the building.

  • Black Curve

    These ghetto kids gotta go somewhere. Instead of wrecking other schools, the DOE is finally smart enough to keep this dump (dropout warehouse) open. I get it now, thank you. 38% grad rate and keep the school open?? We are the laughing stock of the world. Could you see Japan getting a hold of this story. They would have a field day with this. What a disgrace but I’m so glad it’s happening. There are no rules anymore. The DOE should start closing A rated schools just to mix it up a little.
    Seriously, the deal you mention with Gassaway is a great point. He keeps the future welfare recipients within his school for a few years before they drop out or go to jail, whichever the other 62% of the non graduating students wind up. You need at least 3 of these schools per borough to hold the lowest performing students so they don’t ruin the stats for the other schools. Just surprising to see so much support for a terrible situation.
    I can only wonder if the parents of kids in 8th grade actually place Boys n Girls HS as a choice on their kids applications. I would have to assume that they get bonus EBT points if they send their kids to this school, maybe that’s the incentive.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

18 comments so far today

Events Calendar

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031