GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

big fish in a small pond

NYC among just two dozen districts without teacher eval plans

Not having a teacher evaluation agreement puts New York City in an increasingly elite group: Of the state’s 694 school districts, just 27 haven’t agreed on an evaluation system.

And almost all of the other lagging districts have much less ground to negotiate with their teachers unions than the city does: They have fewer students, on average, than some city high schools.

According to the latest update from the State Education Department, 442 districts have already had their evaluations systems approved. About 180 have received feedback from the department and are expected to revise and resubmit before the Jan. 17, 2013, deadline set by Gov. Andrew Cuomo. And about 45 have submitted plans recently and are waiting to hear whether they pass muster.

That leaves just 27 districts that have not submitted even a first draft of a teacher evaluation plan, despite increasingly strident admonitions that state officials at least six weeks to review whether plans adhere to legal requirements and department guidance.

“The clock is ticking,” State Education Commissioner John King said in a statement today. He added, “There are still over two dozen districts that have not submitted APPR plans. The longer they wait, the more difficult it will be to complete our review by the deadline. We’ll move as fast as we can, but we will not sacrifice the quality of the review.”

New York City’s plan, if it is completed, will be far harder to review than those of other school districts that still have not turned in a teacher evaluation plan. All together, the 26 districts enroll just over 80,000 students, roughly the same number as are in ninth grade in city high schools. The largest of the districts, Yonkers, is often grouped with New York City in the state’s “Big Five” urban school districts, but even it has just 23,000 students. None of the other districts enrolls more than 10,000 students, and on average, they serve just 2,300 students each.

Of the remaining Big Five districts, two — Rochester and Syracuse — have already had their plans approved. Buffalo submitted a plan in July, but the teachers union there is refusing to negotiate over required revisions because of a contract fight.

Cuomo set the Jan. 17 deadline early this year to urge districts to negotiate new teacher evaluations with their unions earlier than the state’s evaluation law would require. Districts that do not have plans approved by then will risk losing increases in their state school aid. In New York City, Department of Education and union officials both say they are committed to trying to reach an agreement in time but will not sign off on a bad plan just to get the state funds.

Some elements of new evaluations are set in law, but many others are up for negotiation. They include the assessments that will be used to judge student growth for 20 percent of the annual score, the observation model that must account for at least 31 percent, and other subjective elements such as student surveys or peer review that can factor into the final rating.

  • Dirk Peters

    Regarding the deadlock: The UFT won’t tie value-added measures to teacher evaluation, and rightly so. This article looks like good PR for the DOE. It puts the impetus for action on the union, even as it fails to quote their representative. The potential consequences are real, as Cramer rightly points out, but the article panders to that fear by playing up the sense of drama. A more mature piece of journalism would quote multiple sources while considering the more nuanced concerns that have kept the two parties from even coming to the bargaining table. The bias may not be intentional, but it is clearly present.

  • Michael Fiorillo

    Where’s the quote from E$E, telling us how much teachers really need and want this evaluation deal?

  • http://perdidostreetschool.blogspot.com/ reality-based educator

    This post functions as little more than a public relations propaganda piece for the NYSED, the NYCDOE, the Regents and the education reform agenda.

    In other words, another typical day at Gotham Schools – all the corporate education reform-framed news that’s fit to post!

    Oh, btw, they’re fund-raising.

    Because you just can’t get this kind of corporate education reform-slanted propaganda anywhere else – except for the DN, the Post, the Times, the Observer, Ed Week, The New Yorker, The New Republic, The Atlantic, Whitney Tilson’s blog, DFER press releases, Gates Foundation pamphlets, Michelle Rhee’s Facebook page…

  • Nycdoenuts

    So soo wrong!

    Just curious where you have been for the last few years. The union has already tied value-add measures to teacher evaluations. In fact, they have defended th system on multiple occasions and in multiple media.

    I found the piece, on the other hand, to be fine. I didn’t see a bias toward fairness at all and it was even mature.

    (Dirk, I realize it hasn’ been the best week for you guys, but but how is jumping on the press going to help? just curious)

  • http://twitter.com/leoniehaimson leonie haimson

    So three of the big 5, NYC Yonkers & Buffalo do not have approved plans.  What percent of the state population does that make?

  • Bandito

    Evaluations? We don’t need no steenkin’ evaluations!

  • FuNnY StUfF MaN

    SO FUNNY AS THE D.O.E. STATED THAT IF EVALUATIONS AREN’T PUSHED THROUGH, THEIR WOULD BE CONSEQUENCES, MOSTLY THE NON HIRING OF ANY NEW TEACHERS.  AH HAHA HA HA HAAAAA …….. HUHH?  DOESN’T THE D.O.E. KNOW THAT WE DON’T WANT NEW TEACHERS, WE WANT THE ATR’S TO BE PLACED FIRST!  WHAT IS THE D.O.E. SMOKIN’ MANN?  ”WELL WE WON’T HIRE ANY NEW TEACHERS” — REALLY??  AHHA HAHA AHAAAA!!!!!!!  NO KIDDIN’??

  • Nycdoenuts

    Thanks to a rain storm on Long Island:

    Population of NYS: 19,465,000
    About 3.11 million school age children (22% under 18 (less the 6% who are under 5)).
    About 1,170,000 in those three big districts.

    About 37.6%.

    Just over one third of public school students in New York State are operating under the old eval system. Whatever will they do?

    Of course, that doesn’t count students who go to private or charter schools (neither of which are going to use the APPR anyway), so the percentage is probably a little higher.

  • please go bloom hypocrisy

    NYC  annual budget 63 BILLION
    amount of money to lose if no agreement 200 million
    pocket change

  • Roma Giudetti

    Yes but no one else puts it all in one place like they do.

  • Guest

    they must be fair bc as a reformer who thinks the system is for kids not your jobs i find them biased to uft all the time – the story is so much bleaker than they paint it

  • Wise Owl

    I want a survey done by the teachers on Bloomberg! Let’s rate him and his ugly puppet Walcott! Ladies and gents: As long as we don’t have a contract nothing counts nothing! And that includes the new evaluations. I know that schools are already illegally doing the Danielson. And if the A.P.s do not write the teachers up unsatisfactory they are threatened by the principals to get written up U. VOTE NO for new evaluations no matter what they promise you. It is a rigged system so that you fail. STRIKE! STRIKE! STRIKE!

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

1 comment so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031