GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

transfer notice

City moves to make transfers easier for high school students

Students with long travel times to school may soon find it easier to learn close to home.

For years, the city has not allowed students to transfer high schools because of travel time unless their commute is longer than 90 minutes. But the Department of Education wants to reduce the required length by 15 minutes, according to a proposed rule change that was released today.

In another proposed rule change, students who seek to switch schools for safety reasons will no longer have to justify their request with a police report. Instead, according to the proposal, the department will consider transfer requests from students who are bullied or harassed at school.

Advocates praised the proposals, which face a school board vote later this month. It will also be welcome news for students whose long commute times were not enough to qualify for a transfer under existing department policies.

“I think a 90-minute commute is unrealistic,” said Insideschools editor Clara Hemphill. Many students voluntarily commute long distances to attend schools of their choice, “but to require them to do it ridiculous.”

The open high school admissions process allows middle school students to pick which high school they’d like to attend, but “a lot of kids sign up for schools not realizing how far away it is,” said Hemphill, whose web site helps families navigate the public school system. Once they realize the length of the commute, it’s usually too late to change schools.

Hemphill said long commute times is a contributing factor to chronic absenteeism.

The shortened 75-minute minimum commute time is still more than double what the average New Yorker’s commute is. But the time a student saves if he transferred to a school closer to the 35-minute average adds up to 10 days over the course of a school year.

Hemphill said it would also be welcomed by students who have unsuccessfully sought a transfer after their families moved, making commutes from new homes longer than they had anticipated.

Obtaining a transfer became increasingly difficult in 2003, when the city switched its high school admissions process to a system that matched students to schools based on mutual preference. Before then, a student could transfer if the schools’ two principals agreed to it.

The admissions system gave students more choice over which schools they wanted to attend, but the department was less flexible for those seeking to switch schools after they started. Transfers are granted in a handful of extreme scenarios: long commutes, a health issue or a safety risk.

The city is also revising the way that safety transfer requests will be considered. Now, “harassment, intimidation, and bullying are expressly made grounds for a safety transfer,” according to the proposed changes.

The Panel for Educational Policy, which has never rejected a city proposal, will vote on Dec. 20.

 

  • Oneloveloveone

    Finally, I good education story that makes sense for students. Thanks Geoff, Gotham needed at least one feel good story this week.

  • Whendotheyleave

    This is horrible. Kids will abandon schools they dont like or fail in and overcrowd even further the remaining good ones. Killing schools to keep a few parents quiet- DOE as usual

  • Mr. Blue

    Why don’t we let students transfer if the school doesn’t meet their needs?  If for example, the programs and classes that they expected when they signed up in the eighth grade are not offered?  What if the student decided that at his interest at thirteen years old in law, medicine, motel managaement etc, no longer holds any interest?  Suppose that student now is interested in botany or chemistry or dance?  Shouldn’t the students have the right to change their minds?

  • Nina

    Perfect! This is a step in the right direction. I don’t know why the DOE makes transfers so difficult. If a student is not satisfied in the school he/she is currently attending, he/she should be given the chance to transfer anywhere. It is public education, not private. We’re paying for this, so our kids deserve the best, and how do they get the best? By selecting where they want to go. Transferring schools shouldn’t only apply to 9th graders, but to 10th graders as well. 2 years here, 2 years there. Perfect.

  • http://twitter.com/leoniehaimson leonie haimson

    There has never been a real explanation from DOE about why they have made transferring between schools so difficult.  It is really inconsistent with their claim of providing more parent “choice.” The rationale I heard from Liz Sciabarra of OSEPO is that they have found transferring “very destabilizing for schools and families.”  I think its far more destabilizing for families for a child to be stuck in a HS he is unhappy in.   One wonders if they make it so difficult because it might undermine their precious accountability system.  This is a step in the right direction; but not far enough.

  • NYCparent

    Nina — re I don’t know why the DOE makes transfers so difficult. 

    Here’s the reason — when the DOE started on its “small high schools” initiative, it wanted to prove their value through their graduation rates.  To do that, they made it next to impossible for students to transfer out, since those students would have counted against the graduation rates.  It has been heartbreaking to see students having to make ersatz “career” choices in 8th grade through  ludicrously “themed” schools, and to miss out on the full, broad-based experience that high school should be.

  • RThey4real

    Sciabarra was right. I work in a school that receives a lot of kids transferring out- more like being washed out- of the selectives and boutiques. The kid had 12 choices and 1 matched. If it turns out to be wrong, you already have a chance to change once in 10th grade. That’s enough. Any school with an organized four year course of study cannot take a lot of kids transferring in for 11th or 12th grades. Can someone think beyond just their own child for once?????????

  • Former Turnaround Teacher

    There is a real problem with our current system.  Only the large comprehensive high schools seem to have to take transfers.  Over the past few years at Lehman, as a PLA school our students recieved letters at the end of every year, informing them that they went to a “failing” school, and that they had an automatic right to transfer out under NCLB.  Quite demoralizing for both students and staff to have to handout those letters during the school day and tell the students they are in a failing school.

    Anyways, many of the students who then did decide to transfer were told that all of the schools they wanted to transfer to were “full” and that they were stuck at Lehman.  (Seems like they are violating NCLB to me).  In fact one of the only places that would accept our kids was Clinton, which is already extremely overcrowded, and currently on the closure list too. 

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

83 comments so far today

Events Calendar

Archives

June 2013
M T W T F S S
« May  
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930