GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

These are all LIES.  The majority, if not all, of these funds will be quickly absorbed by the necessary changes in administering these “new” evaluations and by the need to create assessments in all subjects besides math and english. 
The districts on Long Island are having these and more problems because of the ridiculous requirements imposed by the new evaluation systems.
The DOE has no interest in creating a fair and useful system of evaluation.  They are rushing to implement any system that they can use as a blunt instrument to fire those with higher salaries and support more school closings.  Of course, this will all be done in the name of school reform.
It’s all part of Bloomberg’s Last Gasp in his Reign of Destruction.

Don’t forget the $80 million for ARIS.

Getting rid of the PSAL and the only meaningful tool average parents have to evaluate their children’s schools — way to look out for the children!

Don’t forget to reduce the DoE’s legal department from 300 to the pre-Bloomberg size of 12.  That another cut of $21 million (based on $75,000 per shyster).  Get rid of those ridiculous Acuity and Predicative Exams – another $10 million.  Get rid of the consultants – $1.5 million. 

If anyone else has some other Tweed cuts, please post.

What about the hundreds of thousands of dollars paid to “professional development” from organizations such as Teacher’s College and AUSSIE? We have had those in our school and they are useless wastes of money.

let’s see if I got this right. No raises or new contract for going on five years, during which teachers endure non-stop stream of negative propaganda from NY Post.  Now either teachers accept a flawed evaluation model that risks their careers or Walcott loses $300 mil to spend on support staff and more PD.

“Puts data into spreadsheet with complex equations flashing at the speed of light for two hours”. Bing. Sorry Walcott, seems you lose.  

“RThey4real comments below make me wonder if there is some online spreadsheet that outlines how the NYCDOE budget is allocated?”

You can google up various measures of this, but it takes some work to get a really granular snapshot, and then even more work to follow it back in time.  This has been a side project of mine but I’ve been too busy to make any progress for the last few months.  But your instinct to ask for actual budget data is commendable, though not shared by anyone else here as far as I’ve seen.

Skedula – On average $15,000 a year.

 So that would be apx. 15K X 500 schools using it =7,500,000 annually. There are probably other annual services the NYCDOE and schools purchase like iLearn, etc. Plus the amount associated with maintaining ARIS since Wireless Generation has that contract. Incredible.

I generally only provide a source when I’m making a factual assertion.  But I guess I’ll take that as a no.

Evidence
that “teacher evaluations” and other ALEC/Gates/USDOE-driven corporate
reforms are more likely to bankrupt school districts than to improve them:

“Race-Top-costs-leave-schools-behind” 

http://www.lohud.com/article/20120129/NEWS02/301290044/

Excerpt:

But of 54 districts in Westchester, Rockland and Putnam counties,
eight got no federal money. And 31 districts received grants of less than
$50,000.

At the same time, school officials are finding
they will have to spend significantly more — perhaps 50 to 100 times as much,
in some cases — to meet Race to the Top’s demanding requirements. These include
the rapid development of a new teacher and principal evaluation system that
many educators oppose and preparation for the adoption of new national learning
standards, known as the Common Core, by 2014.

“No one did the
math,” said Ken Mitchell, South Orangetown’s superintendent. “Race to the Top
was fast-tracked, and there was no discussion about the costs.

And
on the equally specious SIG (School Improvement Grant) funding:

Cost
doesn’t spell success for Colorado schools using consultants to improve
achievement – The Denver Posthttp://www.denverpost.com/investigations/ci_19997418#ixzz2EEawYvP3

Excerpt:

The federal School Improvement Grant program
“is likely to go down in the annals as one more pretty expensive, failed
initiative,” said Rick Hess, director of education policy studies for the
American Enterprise Institute, an independent public-policy think tank. He
called the amount spent on lightweight, seminar-leading consultants
“ludicrous.”

“What’s being done with this money is
unimpressive,” Hess said, adding that the rush to spend it “really
lends itself to a lot of fly-by school improvement.”

Education-reform experts say “external
providers” can play an important role in turning around failing schools,
and that viewing schools with an outside, higher-level lens can lead to more
radical reconstruction, but they are disturbed that neither the federal government
nor the majority of states keep track of this spending. And an
estimate of 25 percent — more than $1 billion nationwide — is outrageous, some
said.

“There is not $1 billion worth of good
consultants; there aren’t enough good consultants in the country,” said
Van Schoales, chief executive of the education advocacy nonprofit A+ Denver.

[PHOTO]

Fourth-grader Omar
Ponce de Leon, 9, plays at Greenlee Elementary, the recipient of federal grant
money to help it turn around. The school, which failed to meet targets for
reading in 2004 and for math in 2005, has hired a new principal and recruited a
mostly new staff. (Craig F. Walker, The Denver Post)

Not interested in proving you wrong. No sport in that. More interested in seeing I’d younstumbled in some non-trivial numbers. No such luck.

I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that the budgets for SCA’s projects are padded or bloated, but do you have any proof of this? Keep in mind that real estate isn’t cheap here, even in disadvantaged neighborhoods, and that costs are escalated by some of the nation’s most onerous workplace rules and labor prerequisites.

And I feel as happy about your proposal to halt construction work that would improve schools and add badly needed seats as I suspect you would feel if I proposed to make up $250,000,000 by asking all DOE employees and retirees to pay a mere 5% of their health insurance premiums for a single year. 

True, I suppose we don’t have a collectively bargained and constitutionally protected right to clean and functional school facilities that aren’t bursting at the seams, sports programs for our kids, or a system for collecting parent and teacher feedback on how the schools are performing, but when the department is consuming $22,000 per kid every 365 days, I assume you can understand why  I don’t consider these things to be expendable luxuries. 

BLOOMDOE had a total of 12 lawyers at the DOE when bloomdoe took office.  Today, there are over 300 lawyers working at the doe!!!!!!  can you believe this people…READ THIS PEOPLE do you see this corruption all around us!!

look it up dude,,why are you surprised??

you can just tell that its not walcotts words but rather bloomdoe using strings and in the background like the wizard of oz…lol

GOTHAM NEWS,,WHERE ARE ALL THE BLOGGERS…DOES ANYBODY READ THIS STUFF….THEN WE ALL WONDER WHY WE GET STUCK WITH POLITICIANS LIKE BLOOMDOE AND KLEIN AND WALCOTT POODLE….WHERE ARE ALL THE READERS…DOES ANYONE HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY

One of many ironies at the intersection of the debates about funding and evaluations is that it takes lawyers to bring 3020-a proceedings.  The argument that there is already a mechanism to terminate “ineffective” teachers (and that it is the city’s fault, and only the city’s fault, if it chooses not to bring proceedings) depends on the assumption that the city has the staffing to use that mechanism.