GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

Deja vu

Students and staff say, again, that Lehman is on the upswing

As Elaine Gorman, a top official in the Department of Education's Division of Portfolio Planning, looks on, seniors Lindita Nuculli and Samantha Calero talk about Lehman High School's strengths.

For the third time in a year, students and teachers at Herbert H. Lehman High School lined up Monday night to tell city officials why the school should remain open.

They were there a year ago, when the city first shortlisted the school for possible closure. And they were back there this spring for a spate of meetings and protests over the city’s plan to close and reopen the school according to a federally prescribed overhaul process — a process Lehman only narrowly escaped.

Yesterday evening, Department of Education officials returned to Lehman to warn that closure is on the horizon again.

At an emotional “early engagement” meeting—a meeting between officials, school staff, community members that is the first step in the closure process—current and former teachers and students defended the large, East Bronx school, arguing that the Department of Education’s reform policies are to blame for Lehman’s decline. Department officials have held early engagement meetings at Lehman twice before, but the school ultimately remained open.

In a presentation at the beginning of the meeting, principal Rose Lobianco said the school is already on the slow and steady path to improvement, thanks to the creation of a small learning academy structure that splits students into several “academies,” with their own assistant principal leaders, based on academic interest.

“What we’re trying to accomplish at Lehman High School is almost like what the city is doing out there, but in one place,” she said, referring to the department policy of closing large, struggling schools and replacing them with several small schools. “Personalizing it through the small school structure is one way of addressing some of the concerns.”

“So, we’ve seen growth,” she added. “Even though it’s small change, small change can lead to great progress. This can help us build capacity, and I believe in that capacity.”

For years, Lehman has been posting dismal numbers for its graduation rate, attendance, and other the metrics that make up the department’s annual school progress reports—numbers that belie the school’s former reputation as a sought after option for students. Earlier this year, department officials sited those statistics when they argued that the school needed a dramatic intervention like closure.

But Lobianco said Lehman has already experienced the systemic shift it needs: enrollment has dropped from close to 3,500 to about 2,950, she said, and “I do believe we can do it with 3,000 students. That enrollment drop is an intervention.”

Lobianco is in her second year as principal of Lehman, a position she inherited when its former principal, Janet Saraceno, left the school, following a department investigation that found students’ grades were improperly altered while she was principal. Saraceno,received a $25,000 bonus to take the job in 2008.

Elaine Gorman, a top official in the department’s portfolio division, led the meeting. She listened on as teachers, students and parents passed a microphone around the Lehman auditorium for nearly two hours, sharing stories about the school’s strengths.

The handful of juniors and seniors who spoke praised the work ethic of their teachers and a new peer-to-peer mentoring program.

“Peer Group Connection is a great program, where the seniors help out the freshmen,” said Samantha Calero, a senior.  Now, “I see the freshmen in the hallways and they give me high fives and they ask me questions. That’s what we really need to see changes in the school.”

Lindita Nuculli said her teachers encouraged her to stay after school make up credits and take college-level courses, even after she enrolled at Lehman behind schedule.

“Freshman year, I came in about four months late into the school year, because I had surgery, and I was told that I was going to have to repeat a year,” she said. “I’m a senior now, in my fourth year, 42 credits, and graduating on time, because my teachers encouraged me. And I’m going to go to college with six college credits already.”

And at Lehman, “You email the principal at twelve o’clock at night, and she literally emails you back eight minutes later” Nuculli added, to cheers from the audience. “It feels really good to walk around when the principal knows your name.”

One staffer, dressed head-to-toe as the Lehman mascot, a lion, stood at the back with a sign that read “Lehman High School has high standards, excelling in career and college readiness,” in a nod toward one bright spot on Lehman’s most recent progress report: its B grade for college readiness.

Few speakers referred to the department’s aborted plans to put Lehman through a rigorous federal school reform routine called “turnaround” earlier this year. In the name of turnaround, school leaders temporarily renamed the school and required all teachers to reapply for their jobs, with the intention of weeding out the weakest. But that plan fell-through in the summer when the city lost a lawsuit with the teachers and principals unions over it. Some schools, including John Dewey High School and the High School of Graphic Communication Arts, struggled to overcome the confusion and tension that that ensued.

But several speakers said parent involvement was a missing ingredient in Lehman’s efforts to improve so far.

“We should have all parents available in these meetings, why is it that when I’m responsible for about 60 students, only about 20 parents are here?” said Al Bruno, who has taught English for the past five years at Lehman. “We need more parent involvement.”

But the real problem the school will have to address down the line, Bruno said in an interview, is the large numbers of students at Lehman who are behind grade level and behind on the credits they need to graduate.

The department “sees Fs, they see that we are failing, but as I stated, a good percentage of our students are long-term absences,” he said. “That really works against us.”

  • Nyr683

    people people people, have we not figured it out yet.  They will close Lehman and then put about maybe another 45 other “small” schools in the building.  The ranting will go on and when the PEP stamps closed in a few months the small school process will begin…cmon dont you guys get it….vote for john liu if you want this bs to stop

  • http://fastloanssameday.com/ Payday Loan

    There has been a lot of silliness talked about Lehman High School. Wake up! 

  • Nyr683

    the principal at lehman makes approx. $130,000 a year.  So now they will have approx. 5 new prinicpals at lehman and do the math…..130000 x 5 ….what an expense having to pay all those principals in the building…close to a million a year just for principals….another bloomdoe blunder oh when do they leave office….the doe cronies i mean

  • Former Turnaround Teacher

    Thank you for covering this Rachel.  I think Mr. Bruno’s point is one that is important and overlooked.  After a school gets to the point where it is an “F” it is almost impossible to turn that school into a “B” or “A” school in less than 3 years.  If you are an “F” school it means that many of your 9th and 10th graders have fallen behind on credits, regents requirements, and likely have poor attendance.  Not all of those students can suddenly turn it around in one year and graduate on time.  That is why the department’s strategy of, close if you don’t improve in one year, is rediculous.  Schools need multiple interventions with careful help over the course of several years before the schools will see the fruits of labor.  This is even harder when the policies weigh down on the morale of all the stake holders.

    As Rachel points out, this is the third year in a row Lehman has had an Early Engagement Meeting for Closure, We also had two “Joint Public Hearings” (one for a co-location, one for turnaround,) and two “PEP” votes for those two changes.  That is 7 major public hearings in 3 years.  From what I have heard, although the turnout was fairly large last night, it was the smallest we have had.  At some point fatiuge gives in, and the parents no longer want to travel an hour to hear the same old story from the DOE.  These policies not only, decrease staff and student morale, they also decrease parent morale.

  • Nyr683

    do you or do you not realize that lehman is a large high school and the only reason they want to close it is to replace it with small schools..what are you saying about thank you rachel and all that….cmon guy get tothe real jist of the story and that is any large high school is a failure under bloomdoe

  • Former Turnaround Teacher

    Of course I know that the plan is to close all large schools, and this is mainly to break the union, which is generally stronger in the old large schools which have more veteran staffs.  I still think it is important that people know there are still members of these communities that want to see this school saved.  Even though we know there is no way we can stop the policy of school closure under the current DOE and UFT leaderships, it is still important to take a stand.

    As per your comment below, I am behind Liu 100%

  • Mr. Flerporillo

    FTT — I’m no Nate Silver, or even a James Carville, but it would seem to me that Quinn would benefit hugely from the current “anyone but Quinn” dynamic.  If Quinn’s largely seen as a Bloomberg stooge, then she’s largely locked up the pro-Bloomberg vote, which is an extremely significant chunk.  If she can get enough additional votes to get to 40% and avoid a runoff, I don’t see how she can lose this, barring a complete collapse (which is always possible).  Also, to the extent a Quinn collapse is prompted by slush-fund issues, nobody is more poorly positioned to take advantage of that than John Liu.

  • Former Turnaround Teacher

    Flerp – I couldn’t agree with you more.  Just because I am behind Liu, doesn’t mean I think he has a shot at winning.  I would say there is a 80% chance Quinn is the Democratic candidate which would almost assure her a victory.  Of her rivals, the one who seems to stand the best shot is DeBlasio.  Which is why as I said before, it needs to be known that the communities are against these practices, since there is little chance we will get a new Mayor that doesn’t not want to keep the status quo.

  • Jumpster101

     To jump on this thread, I wouldn’t bet on Quinn winning the Democratic nod. I think many of the folks who voted for Bloomberg initially will know that Quinn is wrong for NY. Many voters are still upset that Quinn helped endorsed everyone’s 3rd term. We have to hope that the UFT doesn’t endorse Quinn. Stuff like this will come out about her, and how shady of a person she is; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8uhR3-8xK6s&feature=youtu.be

    We do not want Christine Quinn as mayor and should be prepared to fight for either Liu or DeBlasio. My guess is that DeBlasio has a better chance than Liu for various reasons.

    We are not in full blown election season but we need to be aware of what people are saying. And with that said, listen closely to Mulgrew, he seems to say things that favor Quinn. NOT GOOD!

  • Enough is enough

    Omg just close these schools already! Enough is enough. These schools aren’t improving or getting any better. If anything, the students and teachers and faculty are all mentally suffering because these kids or very savage. I think we should let Bloomberg and DoE need to do what they need to do. And if the result is still poor, then let them fix it. Stop fighting for the schools to stay open because you know deep down in your hearts that the school is HORRIBLE.

  • Nel

    Not Edward R. Murrow High School, Midwood High School, or even the infamous James Madison High School in Brooklyn. The three M’s of Brooklyn. Do you think the DOE will ever target Murrow, a hugely overcrowded school with 4,000+ students and an 80% graduation rate? Or Madison, a large school with 3,000+ students and a 70% graduation rate? The DOE has already targeted the highly rated Midwood High School, by giving it a very low B (soon to be C), and forcing a zoned program in place that accepts academically deficient students from the neighborhood (Flatbush), and it’s definitely making the school progressively worse, but the same isn’t being done to Murrow or Madison (and Madison has a long negative history). Maybe the DOE is overlooking some schools, or maybe, the DOE is secretly planning in the near future to crush these schools as well. It’s always a different scenario, and you never know what’s next with the DOE.

  • Laura R

    There is such a dismal understanding of how a school is closed or stays open.  Lehman gets a D after receiving ann F and we are still talking about them?  Other schools that got C’s were closed.  How does Lehman stay open after an F and a D?  The city is an embarrassment when it comes to these decisions as clearly, there is no rhyme or reason.  They phase out one, but not another.  I think the city feels so dumb since they gave former principal Saraceno a 25K bonus and watched her ruin the school.  Since then, Saraceno was given a plum job in a network that oversees closures (how ironic).  Well she lawyered up and had plenty to spread about Tweed if they didn’t hook her up, so kudos to her.
    Anyway, schools like Lehman, Clinton, and any other large school (exceptr Truman who pulled an A due to heavy manipulation and scare tactics by their principal) are prehistoric and overpopulated.  There’s too much dead wood. 
    Lehman will continue to get D’s and F’s but it doesn’t matter because they survived until the last months of the Bloomberg destruction so they will end up winning in the end.  Bottom line is that the school has level I and II kids so they work with what they have, leave em alone already.  You need a school like Lehman to exist so the other schools can thrive with A’s and B’s.  Lehman is the perfect dumping ground.  Let them hang out. 

  • Chalee Jenkins

    Lets face it and be real! These same “officials” don’t care about your voice! They did the same thing to other schools like JFK. This whole process works in 3′s. Small learning communities, community hearing and then, the axe. They want charter schools in your building because it means race to the top dollars and cents. They will force your school to fail by placing the worst of the worst, (over the counter) students into your school which will in essence, will lead to a lower than B progress report as planned.  Margaret Rogers at Fordham plaza, has no sympathy for your school as she places these students into your school. She has never been a principal in any capacity nor does she understand how a school is run. I am sure that she cannot even write a lesson plan that is in alignment with the CCSS nor can she spell CCSS. She is out to kill your school! Good luck Lehman! File a class action suit for educational neglect and get your school back.  

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

1 comment so far today

Events Calendar

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031