GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

the road to city hall

Mayoral hopefuls stump before anti-Bloomberg education group

Comptroller John Liu was one of four likely mayoral candidates to speak at an event in Harlem hosted by a group that opposes the Bloomberg administration’s school policies.

In a series of short stump speeches last night to a group fiercely opposed Mayor Bloomberg, four Democratic mayoral contenders delivered abbreviated versions of their visions for the future of education in New York City.

Given just five minutes to speak, the candidates didn’t have much time to get into specifics — something that, 10 months before the primary election, most are being careful about doing.

If anything, the night was an opportunity to make a good first impression for New Yorkers for Great Public Schools, the group formed by union and progressive community leaders to oppose the Bloomberg administration’s schools policies in the mayoral election. Interspersed among the candidates’ speeches, parents and religious leaders criticized the co-locations, budget cuts, and school closures that have taken place under Mayor Bloomberg.

The appearance was also an important one to make for candidates who hope their path to victory includes a coveted endorsement from the teachers union.

As each candidate was being introduced, he or she took a seat next to United Federation of Teachers President Michael Mulgrew in the front pew. Then each candidate had five minutes — which sometimes stretched closer to 10 — to make his or her case to the audience of more than 1,000 parents, community leaders, and activists who had crowded into Harlem’s First Corinthian Baptist Church.

The first candidate to speak was Public Advocate Bill de Blasio, who criticized the Bloomberg administration’s handling of school closures and co-locations.

“Are we actually trying to save schools, or are we taking the cheap way out and closing schools that could be saved?” de Blasio asked. (De Blasio has previously said he supports school co-locations, though not in the way Bloomberg has handled them.)

But de Blasio did not go as far as two other contenders, Bill Thompson and Comptroller John Liu. Both said they would put an immediate end to closures, while Liu called for a moratorium on co-locations as well, promises that went over well with the spirited crowd.

City Council Speaker Christine Quinn, an early favorite in polls who is seen as Bloomberg’s closest ally, received the chilliest reception of the night. Her stump speech drew booing, led by Donny Moss, an activist who is one of Quinn’s fiercest detractors, not normally on education issues.

Quinn focused her speech on making kindergarten mandatory, something she encouraged legislators to do this year, and on the council’s efforts to boost middle school quality. She did not speak about school closures or co-locations, both of which she has said before that she supports.

“Quinn was dragging around the ball and chain of Michael Bloomberg, which will help her with some audiences, but clearly didn’t help her with this one,” said David Bloomfield, a professor of education at Brooklyn College who attended the event.

Organizers said after the event that they had come away optimistic that all of the candidates would represent a change from the status quo.

“All of the candidates started spelling out ways they will take the schools in a new direction by unifying New Yorkers around a positive agenda for reform,” said Zakiyah Ansari, a parent activist who is part of New Yorkers for Great Public Schools. “Each in their own way focused on supporting neighborhood schools which offers a clear difference from the divisive assault on communities of forced school closings.”

  • Nyr683

    yes do not vote for quinn bloombergdoe in a dress 

  • Nyr683

    quinn is bloomberg dressed in a disguise dress do not vote for quinn

  • Larry Littlefield

    Here is the reality of the dealmaking.  As part of the Albany deal to reduce pension benefits for future hires to less than the recently retired were promised to begin with, the unions got something.

    The Mayor can retroactively enrich pensions anytime he or she wants, as long as he or she claims the employees would pay for it.  Based on a series of assumptions.  Of course every retroactive enrichment in the past has been held to cost nothing.  And actuaries are paid to pretend that what whoever is paying them wants them to say is true.

    If you want to know what the deal will be about that, that’s it.  Perhaps the UFT would agree to pretend the schools were wonderful in exchange.  Or something.  That would last until they got the pension enrichment.  As under Bloomberg.

  • KitchenSink

    The job is impossible; the system is too big.  Can anyone name one successful chancellor?  (I’d say “one successful education mayor” but we haven’t had mayoral control before Bloomberg.)  And don’t give me Alvarado – I’m talking staying power.

    What would happen if they just eliminated the chancellor and left all the decision making up to the CSDs?  Let 32+ much more manageable flowers bloom and let’s see which best practices arise.  I’d vote for a mayoral candidate that had such a bold idea as opposed to pandering to the “enemies of deform.”

  • East Sider

    Rudy Crew did a pretty good job until dumped by Rudy … mayor’s always controlled the board and picked and fired chancellors.

    The last time we allowed CSDs full authority there weren’t enough handcuffs in the state to haul away mincreant CSB members.

    For more than a decade mayoral control worked well in Boston – as measured by parents and teachers.

    Maybe it’s the people not the system.

  • KitchenSink

    I taught under Crew.  I’d like to know what this “pretty good job” was about. 

    Admittedly I was concerned about curriculum and instruction and not pensions at that point in my career.  There was no vision, no direction.  I was handed literally a half dozen thick, mimeographed home made workbook packets as the “curriculum” by my district superintendent.  Crew was complicit in allowing the lack of any sort of academic expectations that have plagued the system for generations to continue.

    SLTs were a good idea but they were toothless from the start.  On a smaller scale (like a single district), SLTs could gain traction.  But because they involve principals giving up power and leading consultatatively rather than by fiat, they need the kind of support that can’t be offered on such a large scale.

    Agreed about the corruption.  But in a democracy, there are ways to deal with that.  Mandate that local school board elections happen during mayoral election years, guaranteeing a higher turnout.  Then you won’t have local operatives machinating the couple hundred votes that used to be needed to win a school board seat in an off year.  Make it easy for voters to recall/impeach school board members.

    I’m not against mayoral control. I’m just disappointed at the lack of creativity from people who say the system has failed so miserably under Bloomberg.  It feels like John Kerry, Michael Dukakis, John McCain and Mitt Romney are running for mayor, kind of pathetic.

  • Auctions3d

    I’m tired of being held captive by Bloomberg and his gang. Enough. No more mayoral control. We haven’t had a raise in over 4 years. How is Bloomberg’s business enterprises doing?

  • FQuinn

    Quinn?  Are you serious?  WHEN IS THE UFT GOING TO FORCEFULLY COME OUT AND SUPPORT LIU OR THOMPSON OR DEBLASIO????  WHEN???  DO IT ALREADY MULGREW!!!!!!!!  Stop hesitating and don’t allow this Bloomberg PUPPET Quinn to get in. 

  • bee

    Mayoral Control is not the answer. We’ve seen what a disaster it is. We’ve also seen that people from the community have no voice. We’ve seen that teachers have no voice. The PEP meetings are infuriating- hundreds of people speaking against co-locations and other issues, while Bloomberg’s puppets look bored, play on their blackberries and then do Bloomberg’s bidding. I can’t vote for someone who wants to continue with co-locations, and enabling charter entrepreneurs like Moskowitz and others of her ilk to steal precious resources from neighborhood and magnet public schools. DiBlasio was on the school board, shame on him, in fact was that not were his political career began? He should know better this is just politics. As for picking a chancellor, any mayor needs to ensure that the chancellor is qualified- no waivers. A chancellor should have a solid teaching background- have spent time actually working in the trenches as well as real supervisory experience as both principal ( no Leadership Academy please ) and time as a superintendent. School boards were far from perfect, but as elected positions, we at least had a say in who was on them- and we had a voice. My vote is going to Liu.

  • Nyr6832

     yeah people like you

  • Nyr683

     yeah quinn yeah quinn finally someone with a brain

  • JJ

    This group is funded by the teachers union. And this blog has quoted Zakiyah as working for like 3 different organizations. ALL FUNDED BY THE TEACHERS UNION. Is she the only person they have? I heard that the whole audience of people were from SEIU 32BJ. They were paid to be at this forum. Is that really a community forum? When will the papers start printing and writing the truth. Sad. 

  • Nyr682

    take a hike with your deputy mayor title we know who you are and its not going to work any longer once you doe goons are gone

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

From Our Jobs Board

Featured Employers
Recent Jobs

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

14 comments so far today

Archives

June 2013
M T W T F S S
« May  
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930