GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

chancellor checklist

Almost all mayoral hopefuls say educator should lead schools

Mayoral hopefuls, from left to right, Christine Quinn, Bill Thompson, John Liu, Tom Allon and Bill De Blasio, discuss city education policies.

When the five leading mayoral candidates were asked on Monday how they would select the next schools chancellor at a forum on city education policy, the presumed longshot had the most specific answer.

Newspaper publisher Tom Allon, who recently switched his party affiliation from Democrat to Republican, was the only candidate to name names — and his shortlist contained an eclectic mix of people.

He started with Eric Nadelstern, a former Department of Education deputy who is bullish on school closures and other Bloomberg administration policies, then moved to Hunter College President Jennifer Raab before naming Linda Darling-Hammond, a Stanford University education professor who has been critical of policies favored by the Bloomberg administration. To round out his list, he named John White, who became Louisiana’s school superintendent not long after leaving the city Department of Education in 2011.

Allon’s list elicited laugher and whoops of surprise from the audience, as well as a disapproving remark from Comptroller John Liu, who was sitting beside Allon on the stage.  The forum was hosted by Manhattan Media, the company that Allon owns, with help from GothamSchools. (View the entire event.)

The one thing all of people on Allon’s list have in common is that they have experience working with schools and educators, which Mayor Bloomberg’s three chancellors have not had. Bloomberg’s first and longest-serving chancellor, Joel Klein, drew criticism because he had come from the corporate world, and most of the candidates were eager to say they would not make the same decision. Liu, Public Advocate Bill de Blasio, and former comptroller Bill Thompson all promised to choose an educator to lead the schools.

City Council Speaker Christine Quinn was the only outlier. She said she did not think the next schools chancellor should necessarily have an education background.

Quinn cited Raab, one of Allon’s suggestions, as a prime example of someone who could lead an educational institution without prior experience in education.

“Raab has done an amazing job in my opinion at Hunter. She had no educational experience before getting to that job,” Quinn said. “So if we said, ‘Only an educator,’ Jennifer would never have become president of that school. I think you need somebody with education experience, education know-how, but I don’t want to rule anybody out who may have had different types of experience … I don’t want to limit us.”

The likely candidates were unanimous in not wanting to limit their chancellor search to people outside of the current Department of Education, who would be most likely to bring a new approach to the department.

Thompson made the strongest case against hiring internally for the job.

“The policies that have been put forward by the Department of Education have not helped our children, and I think we’d have to look outside to find our next chancellor,” he said. But, he added, “I wouldn’t go as far as to say that I would exclude everybody.”

Public Advocate Bill de Blasio said that, whether or not his pick came from within the Department of Education, he would want to create a “serious, public screening” process around selecting the chancellor. Bloomberg’s three chancellor picks were each a surprise because he never named publicly the candidates he was considering.

“No one said mayoral control meant mayoral inability to communicate,” de Blasio said. “We need a chancellor who is presented to the public, not just pushed down our throats.”

Liu, who spoke after Allon, said he too has “a shortlist” but would not reveal it yet. Like de Blasio, he emphasized the role the public could potentially play in picking the next chancellor.

“I would also engage the public more in terms of what the schools need, what communities need, what families need,” Liu said.

He also cautioned against writing off current department officials too quickly. “There are a lot of people at the DOE with experience levels that we could draw from,” he said.

  • Pogue

    “City Council Speaker Christine Quinn…said she
    did not think the next schools chancellor should necessarily have an
    education background.”

    And, she likes the Newark contract because of merit pay.

    I see Bloomberg and I see marionette strings.

  • Former Turnaround Teacher

    Unfortunately Diblasio, who will likely be her closest contender also praised the Newark contact. How is that wait out Bloomberg for a better contract looking now UFT?

  • noryeln

    None of them made a great case for the PEP as currently constructed.  What will, if anything will, replace the PEP?

  • DisgustedNYCTeacher

    A ventriloquist’s dummy.

  • noryeln

     So true, so true!

  • Nyr683

    EXACTLY,,,,DO NOT VOTE FOR QUINN….REPEAT DO NOT VOTE FOR CHRISTINE QUINN UNLESS YOU WANT BLOOOMBERG IN A DRESS

  • Nyr683

    PLEASE PEOPLE, DO NOT DO WHAT YOU DID 47 YEARS AGO BY ELECTING THE MAYOR TO AN ILLEGAL THIRD TERM…..DO NOT VOTE FOR CHRISTINE QUINN UNLESS YOU WANT BLOOMBERG IN A SKIRT IN THE MAYORS OFFICE

  • Nyr683

    right on pogue….get the word out to not vote for christine quinn unless they want bloomy all over again instead this time in a skirt dress h eels

  • Nyr683

    thompson and liu are the leading candidates are you kidding me?? diblasio?

  • A.S.Neill

    I believe if you listen carefully, de Blasio did not “praise” the Newark contract but said he was interested in those parts of it which would pay teachers more money for working in troubled schools. On a  voluntary basis, that is not the same thing as “merit” pay. In fact, every single candidate voiced interest in that kind of extra pay for teachers.

    Moreover, de Blasio was the only candidate who voiced strong support for expansion of pre-K, the only reform issue mentioned by any candidate that might likely save schools long term.

    Quinn was the one who “heralded” the Newark contract, and is obviously the fourth term Bloomberg golem but with a smiling face and without temper-tantrums.

    Both Lui and Thompson will clearly end the Bloomberg wasted years in education. Lui in fact, was the only candidate who was strongly against the “value added” model in evaluations, but neither of them have offered so far any clear alternative reform vision, other than to clean up the mess that Bloomberg left as his ed legacy.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

0 comments so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031