GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

weekend update

Parents rally at City Hall, but their protest is directed elsewhere

Keoni Wright, an East New York parent, speaks on Saturday at a StudentsFirstNY backing new teacher evaluations.

The scene was familiar, but the rallying cries and signs were a departure.

More than 100 parents and organizers from StudentsFirstNY filled the steps of City Hall on Saturday to demand that the teachers union cooperate with the city on an evaluation deal before a deadline that could cost the city $300 million in state aid.

“What do we want?” shouted Darlene Boston, who has been working to organize parents in the Bedford-Stuyvesant section of Brooklyn to support StudentsFirstNY’s policy agenda. “Great teachers!” they replied.

“When do we want them?” Boston shouted back. “Now!” they said.

When education advocates protest outside City Hall, it is usually with an ensemble of union leaders, City Council members, and other elected officials. And more often than not, they are criticizing policies favored by Mayor Bloomberg, the man who governs the city from the building behind them.

But no elected officials showed up at Saturday’s rally — and organizers said none was invited. Parents came mostly from neighborhoods in Central Brooklyn and Harlem, areas where StudentsFirstNY is trying to build a base. And while the mayor’s name was not uttered, it was clear that he was not the target of their protest.

The target was the continuing lack of new teacher evaluations in New York City, which StudentsFirstNY and Bloomberg have blamed on the United Federation of Teachers.

While hundreds of districts across New York have submitted locally negotiated deals to the State Education Department for approval in recent months, the city and the union still have not, although union leaders and city officials have said they are “optimistic” about reaching an agreement. The city has until Jan. 17 to have an evaluation system approved, or else it risks forgoing a 4 percent increase in state funding — about $300 million this year.

Last year, negotiations to implement new evaluations in a small subset of schools fell apart just before a different state deadline.

Getting new teacher evaluations implemented is a cornerstone issue of StudentsFirstNY’s teacher quality agenda. The group has used the issue to recruit parents, sending a message that evaluations are the fastest way to bolster their children’s education.

Keoni Wright, an East New York parent who spoke at the rally, said he was troubled by how much better one of his twin daughters was reading in kindergarten than the other, who has a different teacher. He said one daughter received lots of homework during the five days that schools were closed due to Hurricane Sandy, while the other one didn’t hear from her teacher once.

“I can see just from those two children that the reading level is totally different,” said Wright, whose daughters attend P.S. 158. “So I’m pushing for this evaluation.”

The rally was the first public display hosted by the advocacy group, whose executive director, Micah Lasher, is a former top Bloomberg aide. Lasher founded the group to ensure that many of Bloomberg’s policies survive the 2013 mayoral election and beyond. He has said he will try to raise $10 million annually for the next five years to accomplish that goal.

Many labor leaders and education advocates in New York City would like to see Bloomberg’s cornerstone policies change after he leaves office and they have created their own group, New Yorkers for Great Public Schools, in response to the criticism lodged by StudentsFirstNY. StudentsFirstNY, whose national organization was founded by former Washington, D.C., schools chief Michelle Rhee, has drawn fire from these progressive groups because some of its funding comes from Republicans who publicly backed Mitt Romney for president.

Zakiyah Ansari, a longtime parent organizer who works for the Alliance for Quality Education, a group funded in part by the the state teachers union, characterized the size of the rally as “small” and said it did not represent the views of most families in New York City.

“Parents know StudentsFirstNY is defending Bloomberg’s failed education record and expensive gimmicks on behalf of wealthy special interests,” said Ansari, who said she was speaking as a spokeswoman for New Yorkers for Great Public Schools. She said her opposition to the state’s evaluation requirements is that “value-added” measures based on standardized test scores are not reliable measures of teacher quality.

Charter school parents have emerged as a potent force in political action, and last year, a rally to support charter schools drew thousands of parents to the street outside City Hall. But organizers for StudentsFirstNY said they have not sought to involve parents from charter schools, which are not required to implement teacher evaluations.

Instead, the group has been recruiting district parents to join. To organize them, it is also paying people to attend month-long training academies, then hiring some of those attendees to build up its organizing infrastructure. The majority of those who complete the  $2,000 academy come from political campaigns or other organizing backgrounds. Boston is the exception as the only public school parent to be hired as an organizer.

After the rally, Shawnette Facey, whose fourth-grader attends P.S. 202 in East New York, said she attended because of issues that her son was having at school that she thought could have been related to his teacher. Lately, he’d been coming came home from school disinterested.

“In the beginning of the school year, that’s when you catch them. But if not, you lose them and they go astray,” Facey said.


  • BloombergMustGo

    Well said.

  • TJ

    MG.

    There is a difference between a paid organizer and a parent. There were like 5 or 6 paid organizers at the rally and HUNDREDS of parents there voluntarily. I was proudly at the rally. And we were not paid. We took the bus down there on our own free will. 

    This is not about hating teachers. There were teachers there with us. Some of us used to be teachers. And none of us is above criticism. Parents or teachers. But we do need a better teacher evaluation system. Nobody was saying that the parents need to do the evaluating. President Obama says that we need teacher evaluations all the time. Why can’t you support a rally of parents? Why would you want to put us against teachers? Why do you want to call us names and say we are deadbeats? We work hard and we want the best for all children. 

  • TJ

    You don’t know him. I know him! HE is a good man. You are entitled to an opinion no matter how mean it is. What a shame. What a shame. We are parents who don’t even read this blog. I was excited to read it today and then to see so many people saying that they are teachers talking so bad about us is bad. SFNY is not about dividing and conquering. We are here to push for changes. Feel free to join us but keep the bad attitude at home!

  • BloombergMustGo

    The sad thing, and the root of the problem, is that the people who have the loudest voices and need to understand what you have written the most, are usually the least able to.
    What is not being said, is that the ignorance about the teaching profession, and in regard to statistics specifically, is the key to the success of Bloomberg/Klein/Moskowitz flawed and borderline criminal agenda.

  • Former Turnaround Teacher

    To clear something up, I am not a former teacher, I still teach for the DOE, just not in a Turnaround school.  I consider myself a really strong teacher, and I work extremely hard.  As many others did, I left my Turnaround school, which I loved and fought hard for, because there was literally no help or appreciation from the administration.  Instead they chose a top down approach, and when turnaround came, they thought it best to go along with the DOE and blame all the teachers for the problems in the school, in order to save their own skins.  The UFT lawsuit might have saved many good people from being excessed, but nothing could repair the damage done to the morale and culture of the once great school.  So I transferred to a school, where I now feel supported by an adminstration, that actually cares about the teachers and students.

    There are hardworking and dedicated teachers in every single school in NYC, including every phase-out and turnaround school.  Just as there are some weak teachers in every single school, including all charters, “A” schools and specialized schools.  One bad teacher out of dozens that every student will have in their lifetime will not ruin their entire education.

  • Nyr683

    you must have attended nyc schools demonstrating the education you received

  • Nyr683

    we just need to remove this corrupt mayor and his phony drones and tweed…ive never seen so much corruption and hopefully the people have learned a lesson…how did we put this mayor in for the third term…i just cant believe we did that….learn people learn

  • Mr. Flerporillo

    Man, you really dislike parents.

  • http://twitter.com/JohnCapFoster John Foster

    Most of those people were there for one reason: They, or someone close to them, is being paid to do this, by StudentsFirst, or by a group, directly or indirectly funded by a Hedge Funder or the Broad, Gates or Walmart (Walton) Foundations. 

  • Keoni

             I am Keoni, I am a proud member of Families Taking Action, East New York a project of StudentsFirstNY. No one is blamming the great teachers. That is why this Teacher Evaluation is so important because it can help the teachers that may not be up to par, see where they are so they can improve, it can give the great teachers little incentives for doing a great job and with that the school would get more resources, the out come equals smarter children.
             No one is saying that the parents should be let of the hook, but we know that not every parent a great parent no matter how we slice it. Me and my wife have full time jobs and 5 children and we manage to go to work, do PTA, FTA, go on field trips, do security at the school, do homework and help college kids when necessary but every child does have that kind of support. We know just because you a child it doesn’t mean you should be parent. Some parent may had teachers that just come to school.     
             A teacher has a college education, they have spent money to do this job this is what they specailize in so it should not be a problem with getting an evaulluation. I have been on the job for 24 yrs an every year I get an evauluation every year  an from that I always know where stand. Evaulations can only help the teachers,the children and the schools how? Better Teachers, Better Resources, Smarter Children. As far as parents,maybe if some parent could go college for a couple of years to become better as parents or people that might make it better.  PLEASE FOR EVERYONE INVOLVED DON’T LET  DOE, TEACHERS, STUDENTS  SCHOOLS LOSS OUT ON THIS $300 MILLION on January 17, 2013. Lets try to reach some kind of an agreement. 

  • Pogue

     Dear Keoni,

    Teachers are already evaluated.  Principals can go into a teacher’s classroom anytime they want, no matter how many times they want.  Principals can help teachers and get rid of teachers who may not be up to snuff.

    That 300 million has nothing to do with helping children nor is going to children/classrooms/schools directly.

    This is all a privatization/profit-making ploy.  Your children’s school may need that money…the test-makers, on-line software companies, and privatizers don’t.

  • Keoni

    Hi Pogue
       Thanks for your comment, but does that mean that the pincipals are failing or that evaluation system is not working?

  • Pogue

     Hi Keoni…

    Currently, I’d say those in charge of principals are failing.  The powers that be would want you to think there’s a crisis in education.  If there is then putting business people in charge of it is no way to help it.  Personally, I’d like to see business people fix the economy first.  Since they’re doing a poor job of that, I don’t trust them sticking their noses in children’s education.

    As far as I know, taking poverty out of the equation, our country is very strong educationally.  With poverty taken into account, there are stronger issues to be dealt with.  And, making kids take more tests to grade their teachers is no way to deal with it. 

  • Atee

    Pogue,
    I am a former NYC teacher and you and I both know that teacher evaluations are a joke.  Yes, principals can go into a teacher’s classroom anytime they want as much as they want but do they really take advantage of this? NO!  It is as unfortunate for us teachers as much as it is students.  Yes, you may get lucky and get a principal who does his/her job but this is rare in the traditional public school system.  Lets keep it real.  

  • Atee

    And you have proof of this how?

  • Atee

    ANd the charter schools are educating kids with larger classroom sizes how exactly?  I think we need to get real here.

  • Atee

    BK – I think you should stop making excuses for lack of teaching…Yes, I am a teacher. 

  • district13parent

    Are they?  Where is the proof of that?  The studies show that most charters have advantages over traditional public schools – self-selected population, more affluent, fewer ELL and special ed students, etc.  Not to mention funding and budgetary advantages that should be taken into consideration.  And even then most charters underperform their traditional district counterparts.  There are some outliers of course, but overall the evidence does not currently support that charter schools educate kids any better.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

0 comments so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031