GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

planning ahead

For some high school math teachers, a Common Core head start

Math teachers from New Visions schools gather for a Common Core training. (Courtesy Tim Farrell, New Visions)

The city’s teachers union has been clamoring for more time for teachers to prepare for the elementary and middle school state tests, which will be aligned to new curriculum standards this spring. Not so for the city’s high school teachers, who have another year to prepare for new tests.

The Department of Education is requiring high school teachers to align two units each semester this year to the Common Core. But beyond that, some teachers have said that without assessments to plan backwards from, they are at a loss about how to proceed, while others view the extra year as license to delay making more substantive changes.

But some high school teachers are seeking out help with the Common Core now, reasoning that it’s smart to work with the new standards while there’s still time to troubleshoot before students face tests based on them.

For math teachers at 14 Bronx schools, support is coming from the network hired to support their schools, New Visions for Public Schools. With a $13 million, five-year innovation grant from the U.S. Department of Education and the help of the Silicon Valley Math Initiative, New Visions is piloting a Common Core-aligned ninth-grade algebra curriculum in the hopes that it will challenge students more and build teachers’ skills.

In math, the Common Core expects teachers to cover fewer topics and instead push students to understand a few concepts thoroughly and apply that knowledge to solve real-life questions. So the New Visions curriculum, called “Accessing Algebra through Inquiry,” or A2i, provides teachers with abundant multi-step word problems and tasks that require students to think outside the textbook, then explain in writing how they used math concepts to solve practical questions.

The curriculum also asks teachers to structure their units differently than they have in the past, using special group projects and midpoint assessments to check students’ understanding.

Schools using A2i this year get a visit from a New Visions coach each week and send their teachers for extra training at least once a month.

Janet Price, New Visions’ director of instruction, said she expected to face trouble getting math teachers on board with the new curriculum, knowing that they might not see an immediate payoff from it this year.

“The kids still have to be prepared for the Regents, and whoever writes the Regents is not listening to the other part of the State Education Department,” she said. “They’re including a lot of questions on topics that the Common Core suggests should not be part of the math [tests], and that’s creating a big problem for us.”

But at a Friday-morning training at New Visions’ Chelsea offices last month, teachers said they thought the value of pushing their students to tackle more challenging work outweighed the risk of giving short shrift to some topics that will appear on this year’s state tests.

“Asking a student to take new information and make sense of it, and solve a problem that’s longer than a minute, I think that’s really valuable,” said Eric Benzel, a ninth-grade algebra teacher at the New Visions Charter High School for Advanced Math and Science.

“In general I feel like students think my class is a lot harder … but I think they enjoy it,” he added. “Students are used to failure being a really bad thing in math, but this is the first class where failure isn’t necessarily bad. A problem is something you actually have to try, and fail, and try something else, to get the answer.”

The paradigm shift has made for a bumpy start to the school year, some of the teachers said.

“It’s just so challenging because the kids weren’t taught like this before. In the past, the teacher models the problem and similar problems to work with,” said Michaela Pestejo, a math teacher at the Collegiate Institute for Math and Science.

In A2i, “formative assessments” are key to helping teachers get their students through the heightened struggle of learning something new. Two thirds of the way through each unit, small groups of students are asked to complete a worksheet about what they learned up to that point, and whether they can apply that knowledge to new problems.

After the group activity, the teacher returns the assessments to students and allows them to “fix up” their answers, Price explained, giving them a chance to rethink their work before handing it in for grading.

“You’re finding out whether they have the math or not while there is still time to do something about it before that final test and closing the book on that unit,” Price said. “The only way you’re going to know if the kids understand it or not is to look carefully at their work.”

Russell West, New Visions’ senior lead instructional specialist, said what makes A2i remarkable is not its individual elements — many schools already have them in place — but the way they are assembled.

“This is actually nothing brand new; this is stuff people have been working on for twenty years,” he said. “We’re just pulling it all together to support what the teachers are doing around the Common Core.”

The curriculum — which New Visions is rolling out to more of its schools, and in more grades, next year — is mostly new to New York City, West and Price said, though it has been used by a few schools in the past year, including the La Raza Network, which has a school in Brooklyn. The assessments are also being piloted in San Francisco, Chicago, and Georgia. The Shell Center, creator of the math assessments, has created about 60 math Common Core assessments for schools to use this year. It will be making more, and New Visions will be expanding the program to more schools next year.

The expansion will come as students are set to take Common Core-aligned Regents exams in math for the first time. Until then, teachers using the A2i curriculum are hoping that it doesn’t compromise their ability to help students pass this year’s test.

“We’re trying to hit two birds with one stone, in very different areas,” said Francesca DiPietro, another Collegiate Institute for Math and Science teacher. “That makes this year more difficult for us.”

The teachers said their solution so far to keep students from shutting down when faced with the tougher math problems has been to offer more tutoring, and to review lessons over multiple days, but they said it’s hard to do that while also covering the material students will see on exams they need to pass to graduate.

It’s true that the state’s old standards and the Common Core diverge at several points, West said. But he said A2i lets teachers cover their bases by including topics from the old standards as they prepare students to answer more complex questions.

“Triangles are the perfect example of a ninth-grade topic that isn’t in the ninth-grade Common Core,” he said. Instead, trigonometry is a 10th-grade topic. So, West said, “during this transition we’re making sure the kids are being asked to use the skills with triangles in the tasks that we’re giving them this year.”

Benzel said working with A2i has underscored his wish that high school exams would be overhauled faster — exactly the opposite of what some elementary and middle school educators say they want.

“What we’re really assessed on as teachers and students right now is … the ability to solve these single-step, algorithmic, terrible problems that the Regents is built on,” he said. “I’m trying to make the transition, but we’re anticipating the future while we’re still stuck in these 40-year-old assessments.”

  • Abc

    The Common Core State Standards provide a consistent, clear understanding of what students are expected to learn, so teachers and parents know what they need to do to help them.

    Common Core Standards do not tell teachers how to teach, but they do help teachers figure out the knowledge and skills their students should have so that teachers can build the best lessons and environments for their classrooms.

    I don’t understand why New Vision has to revise the way math is to be taught!  this is against the principle of Coomon core.

    To best help students, teachers should model more examples so that their students won’t be lost when trying to do their homework.  We should better learn how Hong Kong, China, South Korea, and Singapore math teachers teach their students. they always model half the time and let the students do the class work the rest of the time!

    What New Vision is doing is a waste of the time!  It makes students lose interest.

  • Dr. Christine Jax

    I was surprised to read that teachers want the assessment in order to work backwards and do their planning.  Isn’t that code for teaching to the test? That is not at the heart of the Common core (which we desparately need).  We must measure our children’s academic growth, but teachers must  be free to teach so that assessment captures what needs to be learned rather than teach as a response to assessments.  Assessment should capture that we have created learners not that we have created test-takers.  Authentic assessments must drive teaching and be offered alongside the Regents exam.  Dr. Christine Jax

  • BloombergMustGo

    As a middle school math teacher, I am vehemently opposed to “teaching to the test” and “test prep”.  However, one of the BIG REFORMS attached to the Common Core Standards for New York City is the use of Understanding By Design to design instructional units.  This method relies strongly on curriculum design based on assessments.
    Now, while it is silly to use “old tests” to decide what to teach, there is little to no guidance as to what the learning and performance requirements are for the new State tests.  Normally, this would not be a major issue.  If students have learned and have understanding of the material, they should be able to master any assessment.  However, considering the high stakes for students and teachers, the lack of information borders on abusive.
    Also, I strongly resent Gotham Schools’ use of the phrase “clamoring for time, as if we are a bunch of hysterical fishwives.  If the State Education Depertment and the City DOE had done their due diligence, we wouldn’t be “clamoring” for anything.

  • old time math eteacher

    Let me throw out something I bet nobody has ever thought about.  Every time, NY State has brought in any of these new things in mathematics, they’ve done it and not consulted with the universities.  They brought in Sequential Math in the 1980′s and CUNY and SUNY laughed at them and continuyed their traditional math curriculums.  Many states imposed some of the fuzzy math courses such as IMP for one and the universities laughed at this and the students who took these programs were placed in remedial math classes.

    In mathematics, there is nothing wrong with teaching for the test if the test mirrors what it is expected the students should know.  And the reasns they should know many of these things is this is what the universities expect the kids to know.  Back in the 60′s when I went to high school, we knew exactly what would be tested on the Ninth Year, Tenth Year and Eleventh Year math regents exams and they were exactly the things I needed to know when I got to college.  So what if I knew question #31 on the Eleventh Year Math regents would ask me to solve a quadratic equation using the quadratic formula to the nearest tenth (at a time when we had no calculators) and then ask me if the variable became a trig function, what quadrants the answers would lie in.  This is what I had to know when I went on to study calculus in college.  The colleges have not changed (nor should they have) and yet we fool around with all these standards malarkey and make asinine decisions (like students should not be taught to factor a quadratic trinomial if the coefficient of the audratic term is more than 1 because it is hard).  I could go on and on how moronic this is and why it is dumbing down American mathematics education but then again let’s not let the facts get in the way of a good story.

  • Guest

    1. There is no HS math curriculums yet, just an outline. (And, not a very good one.)

    2. NYS has said it will be like the CC curriculums but with subjects ADDED to it.

    3. If subjects are ADDED to it, then no one will have time to do the ‘projects/tasks/group work.’

    4. This HS and any HS which is playing games with their current students are doing damage. We lost 5 days and some kids lost more. No one in most math course can get through the current curriculums well because they are too long and now they are wasting time with CC….Can’t wait to see their passing rate. And yes, it matters.

    5. To teach any course you need to see a list and description of each topic.  It also helps to see how they plan to ask questions.  I saw 3 questions, you don’t need common core to answer them, you need to be taught how to do math.

    6. Teaching how to think is a good thing, but getting the final answer is important, too. You need both and now people think process is more important than substance.  Those people are dangerous and very wrong.

    7. Sat through enough CC to know most of the this is a HUGE waste of time and very profitable for book companies and test writing companies.

    8. I plan to take the good, ignore the rest of common core and do what i always do, prepare my students so they are able to take and succeed in all the math classes beyond the ones I teach them.

    9.  I give this 5 to 10 years before something else comes around.

  • mg

    As a HS teacher, I am a strong supporter of the CC in terms of their narrowing the curriculum for each year. However, it is ridiculous to not provide teachers with examples of assessment questions so that we cannot adequately prepare ourselves and our students.

    Every single high-stakes exam that I have ever taken does this: AP, SAT, SAT II, GRE, Praxis, hell even my doctoral entrance exam for my engineering degree.

    This is how it has to be done if you are going to be given an in-class timed assessment. It is simply unconscionable to do otherwise.

  • old time math eteacher

    I will go back more than forty years when I began teaching high school math.  It was wonderful as a teacher having the guidelines provided by the State Regents exams in math of just what to teach and how it would be tested.  It helped me learn how to write test questions.  These exams, produced by other teachers, were rigorous and covered the work designated in the State Ed Department curriculum guides and was in total congruent with what universities expected students to know in mathematics when they entered college.  They were in complance with the math section of the SAT and also with what were then called the achievement tests now known as SAT II’s.  You knew you had to teach kids in Eleventh Year Math how to solve long triangle problems using either the law of sines or the law of cosines so you taught them.  And the fact there were questions on the Regens exams or Achievement tests regarding these topics motivated kids to learn them.

    There is and has never been anything wrong on the high school level of teaching to the test provided the terst was rigorous and in conformity with the course of study.  What happened is we got away from that as some of these fuzzy math courses took over and it was decided that our kids were not smart enough to learn the math on the levbel it was meant to be taught on the high school level so of course the courses had to be dumbed down followed by dumbing down the exams and then the current curve where a kid gertting 28 credits out of 87 on an algebra regents is considered to have passed.

    But as I said earlier, the colleges have never bought into this garbage and thousands of kids enter college and have to take remedial courses to make up for the math they weren’t taught when in high school.  This garbage with the common core will just make the problem worse and start to affect good kids who should be studying math on a much higher level.

  • Sandeepsoni345

    Hooo it unbelievableI was very much surprised to read that teachers want the assessment in order to work backwards and do their planning. Isn’t that code for teaching to the test? That is not at the heart of the Common core (which we desperately need).  We must measure our children’s academic growth, but teachers must  be free to teach so that assessment captures what needs to be learned rather than teach as a response to assessments.  Assessment should capture that we have created learners not that we have created test-takers. 

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

From Our Jobs Board

Featured Employers
Recent Jobs

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

0 comments so far today

Archives

June 2013
M T W T F S S
« May  
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930