GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

battle of the bulge

City: Rate of just-passing Regents scores has dropped by half

Percentage of Regents exams scoring exactly 65, from 2010 to 2012.

A series of changes to the way Regents exams are graded has dramatically slimmed down the number of scores that are exactly passing, according to the Department of Education.

In 2010, 7 percent of exams citywide received the lowest passing score, a 65. This year, that proportion was just 3.5 percent, officials said.

The number of 65s awarded on the five exams required for graduation rose sharply between 2006 and 2009. The recent decline came as the city implemented several new rules prompted by the bulge in the number of 65s, which suggested that teachers might be bumping up the scores of students on the verge of passing, sometimes illicitly.

Department officials said the reduction in the number of 65s showed that the policy changes had successfully curbed incentives to pad students’ scores.

“Even if the higher percentage of 65s wasn’t due to intentional cheating but well-meaning people making sure kids have the best chance to graduate, what we see … is that there isn’t that incentive to push a score to 65,” said Deputy Chief Academic Officer Adina Lopatin.

The department released the data in response to a new report by the Independent Budget Office that looks at Regents passing patterns for students who entered high school in 2005. Confirming conventional wisdom and a slew of recent studies, the report found that the more Regents exams a student had passed early in high school, the more likely he was to graduate on time.

The IBO’s analysis found that students were more likely to score exactly 65 the later they were in their high school careers, reflecting both the relatively low academic proficiency of those students and their schools’ added incentive to push them over the finish line to graduation.

The IBO also found that nearly a third of students had received one or more 65s in half of the 265 high schools where at least a quarter of their graduates earned Regents diplomas in 2009.

That finding was in line with the department’s own recognition that some schools were inappropriately awarding passing course grades and exam scores. This spring, department officials re-scored Regents exams with scores just over the passing threshold at 60 schools last year as part of a broad audit of academic data. At 14 schools, exams in at least one subject received passing scores when they should not have, according to the audit report. At four of the schools, the inflation swept across multiple subjects, the department found.

That change followed state mandates about Regents scoring in 2011. That year, the state began requiring schools to scan students’ answer sheets before grading, increasing accuracy and reducing opportunities for cheating. It also prohibited teachers from re-scoring exams that had not passed, a practice that had previously been required in some subjects for scores between 60 and 64.

That year, the proportion of 65′s awarded across the city dropped to between 4 and 4.5 percent, according to the Department of Education.

The state also told districts to stop allowing high school teachers to grade their own students’ exams. The city took the directive one step further and began rolling out a new Regents scoring system in which teachers do not score any exams from their own school. Last year, when 160 high schools participated in “distributed scoring,” the proportion of 65s fell to 3.5 percent.

Lopatin said department officials expect the proportion of 65s to decline yet again this year, when all schools will participate in distributed scoring. Principals are attending trainings this week in each borough to prepare them for January’s Regents exams, the first time that about 300 high schools will have their exams scored under the new system.

Teachers who participated in the distributed scoring pilot told GothamSchools this summer that they thought the arrangement would generate lower scores, on average. But the educators were divided on whether the deflation would be fair, with some arguing that graders should know context about students and schools before judging students’ performance.

“I’m concerned my students who chose to write about [the Venetian salt trade] were graded unfairly because the teacher didn’t know that information,” said Peter Lapré, a social studies at Park East High School who said he covered the unorthodox topic extensively.

Other teachers said they doubted colleagues from other schools would be as attentive while grading about preventing careless scoring errors from costing a student the score he needs to graduate.

“Because it’s not their students, will they care as much as we care?” said Monica Mazzocchi, who teaches at New Utrecht High School.

The IBO report suggests that scores increased when teachers and schools had more reasons to care about whether students passed their exams. In 2007, the city began giving high schools an annual letter grade based in part on their students’ Regents passing rates and on their graduation rates. Schools with low grades faced closure.

At the same time, students were being required to earn more grades above 65 than ever. Students who entered high school before 2005 were only required to post 55s or higher to graduate. But as part of a decade-long process to eliminate a less rigorous diploma option, the state began requiring entering students to pass one more exam at a 65 each year. Students who entered in 2008 were the first to be required to earn five 65s.

According to the IBO, 3.8 percent of math Regents exams received 65s in 2006. Three years later, that figure was 8.3 percent. In English, 4.9 percent of students received exactly a 65 in 2006. A full 10 percent of students got 65s in English in 2009.

Another 2 to 3 percent of math and science exams in 2010 received a 66, one point over passing, according to the IBO’s data.

The Department of Education is set to release high schools’ 2011-2012 letter grades next week.

  • guest

    This is what they’re proud of?  Please.  I mean the grading of free response questions is so accurate that there is no possibility of an error?  There is also no possibility that two completely honest teachers can come up with a slightly different score on an individual question and both could be justified?  And you think this is fair to students?  Some student gets a 64 because he had a hard rear end marking his or her paper while the next student submits essentially the same paper and gets a 66?  Really makes a lot of sense and is really fair to the students.  Of course if the morons running the schools didn’t thnk that exams such as these which were never intended to do so, should be used to evaluate teachers and Principals, this is the inevitable result.  For those of us who spent supervising high school edjust what a farce this is. 

  • East Sider

    State Ed provides scoring rubrics and anchor (sample scored) essays ..(http://www.nysedregents.org/ComprehensiveEnglish/Archive/20010614scoringkey1.pdf) … if schools follow the detailed guides provided by the State grades should be consistent from school to school and teacher to teacher …

  • Nina

    The regents are a total waste of human resources. Let’s explain why: 1. They serve no education value nor do they teach our kids anything. 2. Many kids get stressed over these worthless exams that (which is ridiculous) do not let you graduate high school if you fail them, and you have to retake, retake, and retake them until you pass. Who’s bright idea was that? Keep in mind, not all kids are good test takers, so if you fail a regent exam multiple times, it does not make you stupid. 3. They’re a waste of tax dollars, paper, and time. Many states do not have these trashy exams. States that do, like Texas for example, has the TAKS. The student who takes these TAKS (Texan version of NYS regents) gets an unlimited amount of time to complete them. That sounds much more logical.

    Just get rid of the regents entirely already. This “advanced” and “regular” regents diploma is a joke. A complete joke. The classes are even titled “Regents Chemistry” or “Regents Geometry” where the students are literally being taught all year how to answer questions for an exam at the end of the year. Where’s the thinking outside of the box teaching? These stupid regent exams remove all this independent study. No wonder our kids are bored and find school to be tedious, if they’re just basically taking in all this unnecessary information just to find themselves taking an exam at the end. It makes no sense.

  • Tim

    I love it how teachers will insist that there’s no such thing as a ‘bad apple’, but when the conversation shifts to the possibility of having someone else proctoring their kids’ exams or grading their Regents, suddenly there’s a lazy, cruel, dishonest, or ignorant teacher lurking around every corner. It’s amazing. 

  • common sense

    just a thought-the new rule about not having a second check for scoring errors is just plain wrong. The States original common sense approach that MANDATED regrading all tests between 60 and 64 worked fine. The nonsense about getting EXACTLY a 65 is because once a kid gets a 65 he passes so the rescoring basically stopped then–reality isn’t as dark as they would have you believe. Now a careless error won’t be detected and the student unfairly penalized.

  • guest

    Regents exams in specific secondary school subjects have been around in New York State since the turn of the last century.  Thier purposes for a long time throughout the 20th century were two fold.  One was to set up a uniform curriculum throughout the state so a kid taking geometry in a school near Buffalo was getting the same course as a kid tking the subject in Brooklyn.  Also they served the same purpose as were later taken over by SAT II i.e. to help college in the SUNY system to validate grades.  Period.

    They were never intended to evaluate teachers and principals.  It was never intended they be taken by all students.  As such they served their purpose very well until bureacrats who know nothing aqbout education started harping on their favorite words, teacher accountability and evaluation and began using these exams for purposes for which they were never ever intended.

  • A.S.Neill

    Very correct perspective (the first algebra Regents was 1890, you can take it at jmap.org). Regents diplomas were meant for an elite academic group of students and passing was set at 70%. What most people don’t know now when all students must take an academic curriculum, is that the passing raw score on the Algebra Regents is currently only about 32%, which is then just automatically scaled to “65″. It should come as no surprise therefore that just passing the Algebra Regents today does not indicate college readiness, nor even that much algebra. Of course, we are in the days of Alice in Wonderland educational reform so really nothing should surprise us anymore.

  • Guest

    A lot of kids ended up with 64’s.  No second look is ridiculous. 

  • guest

    Absolutely not so.  In math, teachers are given sample answers and recommendations how the rubrics apply to the students’ answers.  First of all, they cannot possibly cover every variation of an answer student might give.  If the student answers the queston perfectly, fine.  No problem in assigning full credit.  But two completely honest people can look at the same student response say on a 3 credit free response question and one might say 2 and another 1 and both could defend their judgment.  Also regents regulations and State Education law clearly indicate the chief rating officer in a school is the Principal who has always been allowedf to exercise professional judgment as long as it is consistant with the rubrics.

    When I worked in a high school grading math regents exams, we often found questions where we thought the recommendations of the teacher panel making up these suggested scores on student responses were wrong.  That was within our professional judgment and we wouldn’t dream of  cheating.

    No matter what you are brainwashed to think, it is an inexact science and kids deserve better than to receive a score of 63 and not have somebody look at the paper and ask is there any possibility the student could receive the benefit of the doubt.  Only in the minds of hte bureacrats who don’t have a clue about education is that a crime.

  • Sjw

    In the city the papers were scanned and I believe the originals were schredded. How can a student apeal if the scan skipped 2 pages. Also, the previous instructions for grading regents were to review 60-64, not 60-70 so of course there will be a disproportionate number of just passing papers. Lastly, in science and other subjects there are examples in extended response questions that are correct, but unusual, and many novice teachers may incorrectly mark these wrong. The teachers should evaluate competence, not an exam.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

2 comments so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031