GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

the blue engineer

On Breaking the Class Size Barrier

I know a 15-year-old that has seen somebody die. Some of my students have seen their siblings shot on the street in cold blood, or handcuffed and taken to jail. Some of my students have been arrested themselves. They watch their parents break their backs to make rent, or pay the electric bill, or feed their families. (Many students find it difficult to do homework when their homes don’t have electricity, or on an empty stomach.)

Many of my students have experienced (and continue to experience) all of these things. They are 15. I can count on two fingers— not even a hand — the number of people close to me who had died or been arrested by the time I was 15. Back then, my biggest worry was learning how to record “The X-Files” correctly onto VHS. My students, on the other hand, have much more to worry about.

I have learned this after two months of working at a school in South Bronx. I am a teaching assistant in large classes in the Bronx through a program called Blue Engine, where we partner with district schools and their teachers to build closer relationships with high school students. Blue Engine’s goal, which GothamSchools covered last year, is to dramatically increase academic rigor in the classroom. We want to tackle a growing issue in New York City schools: that we can get many kids to college, but not through college. In fact, the current remediation rate at CUNY schools for New York City residents is 70 percent. That means that 70 percent of city high school graduates that go on to college are not prepared for the rigor and expectations of CUNY classes. They take remedial courses for zero credit, pay full tuition, and take on heaps of loans. It’s no surprise that within six years 51 percent of CUNY students drop out.

The goal of Blue Engine is to increase academic rigor so that students are college-ready — whether or not they will actually end up going to college. The idea is that the skills that make up college-readiness are crucial for students to have because they give students choices.

The core of the Blue Engine model — and what ultimately drew me towards applying for the BETA position in late winter, when it seemed that I wasn’t a good fit for many other straight-out-of-college teacher prep programs — is the way that it re-envisions the classroom. By dividing classes of 34 into small groups of seven (one for each Blue Engine Teaching Assistant, or BETA), we can differentiate more effectively, build stronger relationships with students faster, and more closely track students’ academic and socio-emotional behavior. The lead teacher gives the mini-lessons and plans the curriculum while we help execute instruction in small groups and monitor independent practice. In a classroom of 34, it’s so easy for a child to fall through the cracks. But in a Blue Engine classroom, the stakes are rigged in the student’s favor.

In the first two weeks of school, for example, one BETA at my school observed that one of her ninth-grade students who sat in the back of the room never participated and seemed not care about homework. She realized that he was an English language learner and knew very little English. His native language is Arabic, a language that nobody else in the school speaks. Almost immediately she began meeting with him after school and helping him not only to learn basic English skills but also to develop strategies for success in his other non-English classes (e.g. providing an English-to-Arabic glossary for key words he would see frequently in his math class).

While that BETA took on this challenge, I was struggling with one of my students who was suspended in the second week of a school for three days (which was a full week, due to days off). At the beginning of his suspension, he told me, “I’m going to transfer schools at the end of the year.” In my free time, however, I was able to conference with him and the social worker during my lunch hour, spend time with him every day after school, keep him caught up on the homework, and then help him transition into the classroom routine upon his return this past week. I asked him on his first day back if he still wanted to switch schools. He replied, “Naw, I changed my mind.” A lead teacher alone with 120 students would be hard-pressed to have found time to do all this.

These things are not spectacular. We know that these interventions can be found in every classroom. But the difference is that in our classrooms, there are five times as many interventions happening per day, and they are happening months earlier than they would in a traditional classroom. The 1:7 ratio is crucial for these students because when they count the number of people they know who have died or been arrested they run out of fingers on their hands. They have been through so much, more than any 15-year-old should have to deal with, and because of this I believe they need closer attention, more positive role models, and stronger teacher-to-student (as well as peer-to-peer) relationships. That 1:7 ratio is the key to building towards these goals over the course of the year.

In addition, this year Blue Engine will be piloting a new “social cognition” curriculum at our schools where we will be explicitly teaching non-cognitive skills. We will teach students about goal-setting, how the brain works, how people learn, and how to accept failure and keep trying. This is a lofty goal, but I hope to scaffold my way there by integrating the “social cog” curriculum into other classes whenever possible. I will give a play-by-play over the course of the year about how my students respond to the explicit instruction of these non-cognitive skills, and what this could mean for their futures.

Hopefully, it means that they will come away from high school with more than just knowledge. I remember when I went off to college, I decided to leave all my “X-Files” episodes at home. It was natural, something that I had grown out of. Just as easily, we can grow out of most of our high-school experiences — the friends we made, the identity we carved out, and most of the things we learned.

I don’t know where my students will be going when they graduate high school, nor do I know what they will be taking with them. But I hope to give them something more substantial than the definition of a “motif,” something more meaningful than a basic knowledge of algebra — I want them to have choices.

  • Celt

    My high school is experimenting with a pilot program to use our student Math Peer Tutors to supplement teachers in math classrooms, with two experienced and trained student tutors to a classroom. Most math teachers’ response is, “Can they come more often?”
    Pilot program uses tutor lunch periods as their time in the classroom so this isn’t viable unless these students are programmed with a “tutoring” class

  • Wow!

    An additional issue for some inner city kids is that those with learning disabilities and other learning issues have too-often gone undiagnosed, and thus unhelped with these extra challenges to their education. Parents in the inner city are often particularly suspicious of “labels” being put on their kids.  Others, such as some the author describes, are just not “together” enough to deal with the special ed. system which could, ironically, be of great help if their child indeed has a learning issue or disability.

    While understandable, of course it is a disservice to the child.

    I am struck by how much this Blue Engine program sounds like a sort of “shared Paraprofessional” situation.  Instead of each child-at-risk having a para, each seven children have a shared “BETA” who benefits all seven children in that group — special needs or not.  Of course, the BETA has very specialized training as well, whereas a para may or may not have such specialized training. 

    It sounds like a great program, potentially.

    Here’s wishing you, and Blue Engine, every success!

  • Juggleandhope

    Thanks for this introduction – you give enough details of what you’re doing that we can imagine some of your work – but I’d like more since Blue Engine seems to be one of the most sincere efforts to close the achievement gap that I’ve heard of.  How do you carve up the classroom itself?  Homogenous or heterogeneous grouping?  What does your lead teacher say?  How do you deal with your own diverse skill-sets among the BETAs?  Do you make personal commitments to students – visit their homes – play basketball?

    The end of your piece seemed to reference how irrelevant a lot of school content seems.  I’d be interested in more of your trialogue around curriculum issues (BETAs, students, lead teachers).  Thanks again.  

  • http://twitter.com/leoniehaimson leonie haimson

    I don’t understand this model; 7 tutors each making  $14,400 per year; (according to the other GS article.)  You could easily hire another full-time teacher for this amount, divide the class in half and get a class size of 17. This would be a proven model that leads to more learning, better non-cognitive skills ( or call it “grit”) , narrow the achievement gap, and a host of other benefits.  Why isn’t that a better and more effective solution?  

  • Jlipkowi

    I dunno mike, I agree with leonie I really don’t get it as well. It seems like the model is to put more tutors in the class room rather then paying for one more teacher.  This systems works as longs at they market blue engineer as a prestigious organization. In an effort to grab top talent. Rather then having that talent taking career making jobs that don’t pay below the poverty line.

    It’s kind of funny they they put the tutors in the same situation finically as the parents of the school they are going to.

  • Mr. Flerporillo

    Schools pay only 20% of that $14,400, according to the GS article.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

0 comments so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031