GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

reading list

A leading teacher of teachers says feedback should be used fast

Good teachers are not born; they’re made slowly, over time, through sustained and deliberate practice.

That’s the theory behind “Practice Perfect,” the new e-book by Doug Lemov, managing director of the Uncommon Schools network of charter schools and author of “Teach Like a Champion,” a 2010 book with 49 concrete strategies for improving student engagement and classroom management. (GothamSchools’ Elizabeth Green wrote about Lemov and his approach in a 2010 New York Times Magazine story.)

“Practice Perfect” aims to provide similarly user-friendly ideas — 42 of them — for attaining  incremental improvement. Lemov and his co-authors, two of Uncommon Schools’ top educators, say the strategies would be useful in any field — but they are particularly apropos for teachers, whose performance carries high stakes for their students and, increasingly, for themselves.

The city’s current teacher evaluation system lets educators know whether they are considered satisfactory, but it doesn’t tell them about their strengths and weaknesses in the classroom, or how to build on them. The city is piloting an observation model now that would give teachers more feedback about their performance.

But feedback is meaningless if it does not change practice. In an exclusive excerpt from “Practice Perfect” in the Community section today, Lemov outlines ways to make feedback more useful.

He describes testing out a teacher observation protocol in which teachers received one item of praise and one suggestion for improvement immediately after delivering a three-minute lesson — and then were required to repeat the lesson incorporating the feedback right away. Lemov writes:

One benefit of this structure was its implicit accountability: it was hard for teachers to ignore the feedback. For one thing, it was public. Six or seven people had heard them get it; they were explicitly asked to try it just a minute later. It would be egregious not to try it at all. Another benefit was that after the feedback, the role play went back to the beginning — it was a replay of the same situation, not a continuation of the role play in which the requisite situation may not have occurred. This made the opportunity to use the feedback a reliable event. A third benefit was that the coach got to see right away if his or her feedback was effective — and this was important too since we were training instructional leaders whose job was to give effective feedback.

Read the entire chapter in the Community section. “Practice Perfect” is available as an e-book now.

  • Michael Fiorillo

    I somehow doubt that Mr. Lemov describes one way to magically improve your teaching and metrics: counsel out low perfroming students, something Uncommon Schools is notorious for doing

  • Guest

     Don’t throw the baby out with the bath water. His pro privatization agenda stinks, but I don’t know how you could argue with the excerpt above.

  • BloombergMustGo

    The fatal flaw here is in the phrase ” ..after delivering a three-minute lesson.”  What exactly is a three minute lesson?  Once again, the words of an unqualified hack are treated as gospel.  A lesson is a complicated, living, breathing entity.  It is not a script, but rather a framework that must include improvisational elements.  The idea that a “drive by” observation can evaluate a leasson that probably took two or three hours to develop is ludicrous.  In addition, is the “evaluator” highly qualified to be in their position?  Or, as is usual, is it someone who no longer wishes to deal with the difficulties of the classroom looking for an escape.  Before we can discuss evaluation systems we must ensure that the evaluators are experienced pactitioners (at least 10 years) in the specific subject they are evaluating.  THAT will make a difference.  Without that foundation the rest is self serving jibberish.

  • Michael Fiorillo

    I disagree. In practice I can easily see this devolving into a perfunctory compliment – which is so often used as the the lead-in to the intended purpose of criticism – followed by a “gotcha, now dance to my tune,” dynamic.

    As BloombergMustGo pointed out, the “three-minute lesson” is borderline absurd, and that teachers are put on the spot and must jump to could easily be used for administrative power trips and humiliation. It almost makes you think of the criticism/self-criticism ritual abuse that Maoists used during the Cultural Revolution.

  • Gordo

    Control, control, control. The cult-like fetish of constant “data” and “feedback” are sucking the life out of the pure enjoyment of learning. (For students and teachers) Not everything in life has to have a warning label or directions attached to it. 

  • Unfairly blaming the teachers

     RE:
    “In addition, is the “evaluator” highly qualified to be in their
    position?  Or, as is usual, is it someone who no longer wishes to deal
    with the difficulties of the classroom looking for an escape.”

    Furthermore, we need for the public to be more aware that there is an additional reason that the “evaluator” may not be so highly qualified to be in their position: The “evaluator” often has little or no teaching experience–if they were hired during the Bloomberg administration, where the Leadership Academy has too-often been used for patronage and other inappropriate purposes which do not serve true education.

  • Gregory

    Do his schools have a low attrition rate among teachers?  I would want to know that before buying the book.  If teachers won’t work for him, I don’t want to take him too seriously.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

0 comments so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031