GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

paradigm shift

Complaint targets elite HS admissions process, not just outcome

A chart in a civil rights complaint about the city's specialized high school admissions process shows the acceptance rates for students of different racial groups. (Click to enlarge.)

It seemed like a good strategy: To boost the tiny number of black and Hispanic students at the city’s most elite high schools, the city this year expanded access to programs meant to prepare eighth-graders for the schools’ admissions test.

But that approach is fundamentally broken, according to the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, which today filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Education against the Specialized High Schools Admissions Test.

“More tutoring and more test prep is not the answer,” said Damon Hewitt, LDF’s director of education. “We need a real paradigm shift.”

The complaint calls for a new way of admitting students to the city’s eight specialized high schools. The schools have long screened students by ranking their performance on a one-time exam, a practice that was written into state law in 1972 for the three schools that were then open.

But that approach has yielded student bodies that do not reflect the city’s demographics — or even the demographics of the students who take the test. Last year, black and Hispanic students made up 45 percent of test-takers, but they represented only 14 percent of admitted students. At Stuyvesant High School, the most selective and least racially diverse, just 25 black and Hispanic students were offered seats.

Along with several community groups and legal groups, the Legal Defense Fund — which sprung from but is not actually part of the NAACP — is asking the federal Office of Civil Rights to push the city to advocate for changes to the admissions process. The office cannot mandate changes, but it can make the city’s federal school aid contingent on changes to the admissions process to make it more equitable. The office has 180 days to respond to the complaint.

The complaint suggests several alternatives to the current admissions process. First, it says the city should adopt a “multiple-measures” approach to assessing applicants, by looking at their grades, teacher recommendations, extracurricular activities, and life experiences. Although the process could seem onerous when 30,000 students take the high school exam each year, many other selective schools already assess students according to multiple measures, Hewitt said.

The city should also compel all of the specialized schools to participate in an expanded version of a program that has allowed black and Latino students who score just below each school’s cutoff to win admission by participating in a summer program, the complaint argues. Currently, the city’s most selective schools opt out of this program.

And the complaint argues that the city should also reserve some seats at each school for top students from across the city. In 2010, Stuyvesant High School’s ninth-grade included students from only 22 of the city’s 32 school districts, leaving large swaths of the city unrepresented. The final component hews closely to what John Garvey, a former CUNY administrator, proposed in a 2010 piece in the GothamSchools Community section.

“The woefully small percentages of black and Hispanic students at the city’s specialized high schools is not a new development, but that doesn’t mean we can’t do something to change it,” Garvey wrote at the time. “Here’s my suggestion: The Department of Education should adopt a proportional admissions plan for the exam schools that would offer admission to the highest-scoring students from each of the neighborhoods of the city.”

City officials say they couldn’t do anything about the admissions process even if they wanted to.

“State law requires that admission to specialized high schools be based solely on an exam, and we want all of our students to have opportunities to prepare for the test no matter their zip code,” said Erin Hughes, a Department of Education spokeswoman, in a statement.

Hewitt contested that argument. Only Stuyvesant, Bronx High School of Science, and Brooklyn Technical High School are named in the 1972 Hecht-Calendra Act. The other five specialized schools, which all opened under the Bloomberg administration, have been designated as specialized schools but do not have to remain that way, he said.

“The city could change its policy today,” he said. “There’s no reason why the city and the state and complainants and experts can’t come to the table and hammer out a workable, fair, just, nondiscriminatory policy. This could change as fast as there is political will.”

The change has some allies in Albany. Last year, Bronx Assemblyman Karim Camara was one of several legislators to initiate bills that would alter the Hecht-Calendra Act. Those bills didn’t make it into law last year, but Hewitt said he hoped lawmakers would try again this year when the legislative session begins in January.

Because the specialized schools contain only a tiny fraction of the seats across the city’s high schools, changing their admissions processes would affect very few students directly. But Hewitt said large numbers of students would benefit nonetheless.

“The message that this longstanding discriminatory policy sends is a very horrible one — it’s that even if you work harder than the next person and even if your grades are better than the next person, you still might not get the opportunity that that person gets,” he said.

The NAACP Legal Defense Fund’s complaint is below.

  • Bonniepbl

    Here is when I agree with the mayor. The tests are colorblind.i don’t want to see quotas. If the minorities could be lifted out of poverty there would be some more,most likely in these schools.

  • Esther

    This lawsuit is absolute nonsense.  It is common knowledge that the specialized high schools are not easy to get into and that the test requires preparation and motivation.  If a child is motivated enough to want to go to an elite high school, he or she will go to the library, check out a specialized high school exam preparation book, and study.  This lawsuit is likely the byproduct of the NAACP having not enough work to keep its attorneys busy.   Using NAACP’s theory, since Stuyvesant High School is 71% Asian, that means that the specialized high school entrance exam discriminates against all non-Asian students.  Therefore, by design of the exam the NYC Board of Education is discriminating against all White, Black, Hispanic, Middle Eastern, Native American, Eskimo, Aleutian, Inuit, etc, individuals.   Rather than lowering the bar for admission by way of a frivolous lawsuit, perhaps the NAACP should engage in activities (e.g. providing funding for extra tutoring) that will help the “affected” individuals gain admission to these elite high schools. 

  • Guest

    How about improving middle schools and grade schools.  How about home life, libraries, food.  

  • Guest

    I was a hispanic who was accepted into one of these schools. I hadn’t known about these schools until 7th grade, and the majority of the material on the test was not taught in my school. I passed by having to intuitively figure out the math and logic on the spot. After I was accepted I had noticed that my peers nearly all had huge head starts that were not available to me, such as test preps for the SHSAT and being able to take high school courses and regents in middle school. I was a year behind in math compared to most of the students. Don’t force a bunch of minority students into the schools, if they aren’t even being taught to par. They aren’t getting in not because they aren’t smart, not because they are being discriminated against, but because the schools are not preparing them enough or supplying them the knowledge needed to pass the exam. 

  • sosps

    It’s worth noting the high percentage of students in Stuyvesant and Tech qualifying for free or reduced lunch.  We’re not talking about millionaire’s kids.  Plenty of families at Tech have non-English speaking parents (from many different countries) whose kids are at a specialized high school because they studied for the test.  I think this complaint is really off the mark – the NAACP Legal Defense Fund seems not to have a clue. 

  • Cantheydomath

    Require that any kid who takes the test and is offered a seat must take it. That would reduce by 20,000 the egomaniac parents who insist their kids take the test to prove what good parents they are. It would also curb the growing industry of prep centers for these tests,

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002397245457 Mary Conway-Spiegel

    How about mandatory enrollment of a cross-section of level 1-4 students City-Wide?  Not popular, but maybe better than warehousing the Level 1′s and isolating the best/brightest in pressure cookers…? 

  • sosps

    I don’t think any of the specialized schools are under-subscribed, so it is not clear how that would help. The high scoring kids who accept the seats would still outscore other kids – it would just be a smaller pool.  Brooklyn Tech has actually had too many students accepting seats in the last few years, and ended up with more students than expected.  If it is true that students take the test without intending to enroll – which is annoying and a waste of the City’s money if it is still happening (I thought that changing the admissions schedule so the SHSAT takers would not get advance notice of placement would fix that) – requiring students to accept a seat if offered one is not going to fix this problem.
    and a waste of the City’s money

  • Tim

    Why stop there? Hey, Cal Tech, Haverford, Rice? From now on, one half of your entering classes must be kids who scored less than the national average on the SAT. 

    Harvard, Stanford, Chicago? 1/2 of your admits must have high-school GPAs lower than 3.0. 

    Michigan, Berkeley, Virginia? Your admissions offices must now view suspensions and disciplinary infractions as a positive, not a negative!
    The problem here isn’t the test, or that some proportion of the city’s highest performing students are isolated in pressure cookers. The problem is that segregation, poverty, NCLB, and good old-fashioned ineptitude have rendered a large number of districts virtually incapable of identifying and educating academically advanced K-8 children.

  • Anonymous

    Or, we could use some basic math here.  These tests likely have a 2-3% margin or error for measuring how capable students are of meeting the rigorous academic standards of these elite schools.  That likely means that students who score within a given range are statistically the same.  If that’s true, the city should set a cut off for specialized high schools and assign seats based on a lottery, not how students rank on the test (since within a bandwidth, students are statisically the same).  I wonder how that would re-shuffle the mix…

  • DM

    Here is my take on it: http://drmandler.wordpress.com/2012/09/28/new-yorks-specialized-high-schools-in-danger-of-elimination/

  • Mr. Flerporillo

    Do you ask your students to call you “Doctor”?

  • sosps

    I agree that muddled thinking
    underlies the complaint.  The complaint focuses much animus on Stuyvesant,
    but of course, Stuyvesant is one of the three schools that must use the test,
    as mandated by State law.  So what is
    this really about?  Is the point to
    increase black and Hispanic enrollment at Stuyvesant and Bronx Science and Brooklyn Tech (scarcely mentioned), or the
    Specialized High Schools that are not mandated by the State to use the test, or
    all the Specialized High Schools?  If it
    is about Stuyvesant, Bronx Science and Brooklyn Tech, the first stop should be
    the State legislature. If it is about the other Specialized High Schools — the
    ones that are not mandated under State law to rely on the test – then it is
    worth pointing out that some have significantly higher percentages of black and Hispanic students:  HSMSE (which has a higher cutoff score than Brooklyn
    Tech), and Brooklyn Latin (which has a lower cutoff score).   Is the complaint complaining about those schools too?  Should they be interviewing thousands of applicants about their life experiences rather than relying on the SHSAT? 

     

    If
    the point is that some groups do not have an equal ability to prepare for the
    test, then it must be noted that Stuyvesant has Title I status because of
    the high number of students who qualify for free or reduced lunch.  (Tech too, I think.) In other words, there are plenty of kids who
    come from poor families.  They do,
    however, prepare for the test, whether by taking a prep class, or by buying a
    book and doing a bunch of practice tests.  Yes, not every student spends years prepping.  This is because a student
    with a sound basic education can do pretty well on the test without a lot of
    prep.  Maybe to get into Stuyvesant, it
    is necessary to have taken Algebra, but the reading and logic part of the test
    is simply not that difficult for children who read a decent amount.  You do not have to spend thousands of dollars
    on test prep.

    If
    the point is that black and Hispanic kids are not encouraged to take the test
    and apply to the Specialized High Schools, or given basic information about how
    to do prepare for and take the test, that is bad – but it is not a problem with the test.  It is a problem with outreach. 

    If
    the point is that in some areas of the City, the combination of living in
    poverty and being black or Hispanic means that students are not getting the good
    basic education that is needed as a starting point, even before the student
    begins to prepare for the test, that is also bad.  But criticizing the test, and attacking
    Stuyvesant and Bronx Science, seems to be starting at the wrong end. 

  • Djharkavy

    If the students are not academically prepared to enter the specialized high schools, then we are not doing them any favors by accepting them.

    The work is rigorous and difficult, and even among those who have the skills to get accepted, some of them are unable to keep up.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

20 comments so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031