GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

annual appeal

UFT: City’s special education reforms causing class size crunch

UFT President Michael Mulgrew, flanked by NYC Museum School teachers and Leonie Haimson of Class Size Matters, discussed this year's tally of oversized classes during a press conference this morning.

One in four city schools have overcrowded classes, and the number of oversized special education classes more than doubled since last year, according to this year’s class size tally by the United Federation of Teachers.

Union members reported 270 special education classes with more than the mandated number of students in the early weeks of the year, up from 118 last year.

During a press conference outside a Chelsea school building, UFT President Michael Mulgrew said the city’s special education reforms, which are meant to move more students with disabilities into general education classes, were “clearly and solidly behind” the too-large special education classes.

“We’ve never seen numbers like this before,” Mulgrew said about the oversized special education classes. “Principals are telling us they are being mandated to do things they cannot do, and this is going to be a big problem.”

The union’s contract with the city sets class size limits in each grade. When classes exceed the limit, the union can file grievances against the city to get the classes reduced in size — a process that can take months, Mulgrew said.

This year, the union identified 6,220 classes over their contractual limits in 670 schools during the first weeks of the year. While the number of oversized classes was actually down 11 percent from last year’s recent high of 6,978, the number of schools with oversized classes grew slightly, and the union estimates that nearly a quarter of all city students are spending all or part of the day in overcrowded classes for the second straight year.

Two large Queens high schools, Benjamin Cardozo and Forest Hills, have about 250 oversized classes each, according to the union’s tally. Two Queens middle schools, M.S. 210 and M.S. 226, also topped the list of primary schools with the most overcrowded classes.

Parents regularly cite class size reduction as a top priorities on the Department of Education’s annual surveys, and teachers say they could help students more if there were fewer of them in each class.

“We have the ability to be wonderful at 34 students, but the quality we can give our students is nothing like last year, when we had smaller classes,” Amanda Fletcher, a teacher from the Museum School, said today.

Citing both logistical constraints and research that has documented achievement gains from smaller classes only in limited contexts, the Bloomberg administration has never made class size a priority. Last year, in comments that were more pointed than usual but not a departure from sentiments he had expressed previously, Mayor Bloomberg said he would like to fire half the city’s teachers and pay the rest more to supervise twice-as-large classes.

The city’s contract with the UFT limits classes to 25 students in kindergarten; 32 students in elementary school; 33 students in middle schools and 30 students in middle schools with many poor students; and 34 students in high schools. Even with the limits, city schools have by far the largest average class sizes in the state, according to Leonie Haimson, executive director of Class Size Matters, who appeared with Mulgrew at the press conference.

Special education class sizes are determined not by the teachers union contract but by students’ Individualized Education Plans. Some students’ IEPs require them to be in classes of no more than 12 students, for example.

The city’s new special education policies require schools to accept students without considering their special education needs. So a school that might have sent students who required classes of 12 to another school in the past must now create classes to accommodate them — but educators and advocates have said the schools are not always getting the resources they need to do so.

Principals are “not being given the budget to open the appropriate number of classes,” Mulgrew said. “That’s an untenable situation.”

City officials said early data show that the Department of Education has brought on 700 new special education teachers this year to help schools share the task of serving students with disabilities. The Department of Education official in charge of the reforms told parents last week that her office is working to smooth road bumps as they emerge in the reforms’ early days.

Special education classes that are too large for their students but not so large that they exceed the teachers union’s contract can only be addressed by filing a complaint with the state, something Mulgrew said the union was considering doing.

The union will soon file a contractual grievance against the other oversized classes, and many of the classes will shrink as schools shuffle students around in the coming weeks, as typically happens at the beginning of the school year. The city issues its own class size report each November, after schools set their official registers for the year, often confirming the trends the union has noted but not their magnitude.

But union officials said addressing the violations is often a long slog. Last year, officials said, arbitrators ultimately supported 95 percent of the union’s class size grievances. But a school’s first violation yields only a warning, and higher-stakes judgements for repeat offenders often do not come down until February or March.

“Why do we need to wait seven months when it should have been done on October first?” Mulgrew asked today. He added, “This is not a priority of this administration.”

After the press conference, Brooke Jackson, principal of NYC Lab School, approached Mulgrew to tell him that she appreciated that he did not blame principals for maintaining oversized classes.

“I want to thank you for understanding that our hands are tied,” she said. “Honestly, even if I worked on class size, I wouldn’t have the space to put the children in, literally. … And I feel like [the] enrollment [office] flips in more and more students each year above our target, and the building doesn’t get bigger.”

Department of Education officials said the union could free up funding for more teachers who could reduce class sizes by agreeing to cost-cutting proposals the city has put forth. Erin Hughes, a department spokeswoman, pointed to the city’s proposals to buy out teachers who do not have permanent positions or limit their tenure in that role as a first step.

“If Mr. Mulgrew does in fact share this concern, he should accept our many proposals to stop paying those in the Absent Teacher Reserve pool who are draining resources that could otherwise be used to put permanent, effective teachers in the classroom,” she said.

Chicago teachers tried but failed to get class size limits written into their contract during their strike this month, and New York City remains one of few large urban districts with contractual limits. Mulgrew said today that teachers had forgone a raise to get the limits that are in place now and that the union would look for ways to reduce class sizes more when it next negotiates a contract with the city.

  • East Sider

    How many schools with oversize classes have vacancies which they have not filled, not wanting to hire ATRs, and hoping that Tweed will lift the hiring freeze?

  • Mr. Flerporillo

    I would like to know how Quinn, Thompson, Stringer, and every other mayoral candidate intends to lower class sizes.  Not just a statement that class sizes should be lower.  How, in detail, with numbers and dollars.  How much space needs to be built or leased, how many teachers need to be hired, and how all that’s going to happen.  Until I see that, I’ll continue assuming that nobody is serious about this problem. 

  • Ellen

    Kids are zoned for schools.  For too long it was the policy of the DOE to ship kids all over the place.  It was rare that they attended the zoned school, with their brothers and sisters, their cousins and friends, their neighbors.  Can you imagine?  They were going to walk to school.  They weren’t being put on “the banana bus” and shipped out. 
    I, as a parent can go to  PTA meetings in the neighborhood for all of my kids  I, as a parent, will get to meet the teachers and staff at the school instead of running to two different schools.  If I have the time to volunteer, I can do it much more easily at my local school. 
    And, not for nuthin’, the kids with special needs who are the first to attend their local schools are kindergarten aged, 6th graders and 9th graders.  Yet this coverage makes it seem as if every school is being engulfed in a wave of kids with special needs.

    The DOE is trying to address the issue, albeit after the NY State Ed. Dept. pushed them on it.  They deserve no kudos,  Yey,  here is the President of the UFT citing my child with an IEP as the reason a school is over crowded.  Nice goin’ Mikey.  Add some fuel to that fire. 
    You didn’t win any friend here.

  • http://twitter.com/leoniehaimson leonie haimson

    “Parents regularly cite class size reduction as a top priorities [sic] on the Department of Education’s annual surveys”  No, parents regularly cite class size reduction as THE top priority on the DOE surveys.  See “For 5th Year In A Row, Parents Indicate Desire For Smaller Class Size, Survey Says” at http://shar.es/uN851 via HuffPo.

    I also don’t know what this means: “Citing both logistical constraints and research that has documented
    achievement gains from smaller classes only in limited contexts, the Bloomberg administration has never made class size a priority. ” Only the last part of that sentence is true.  There are literally scores of studies showing gains from class size reduction; and the research on this is crystal clear, as the Institute of Education Sciences points out.  86% of NYC principals say that they are unable to provide a quality education because of excessive class sizes.  Allowing the DOE to claim otherwise is giving them a free ride.

  • Mr. Flerporillo

    This may be the start of a side-project of mine.  See the attached screenshot.  Fiscal 2011 wages paid to DOE employees.  Very interesting. Thank me later.  

  • Mr. Flerporillo

    My final post today on this motherlode of data.  Ever wonder what the breakdown is on the money DOE spends on “pedagogical” employees?  Wonder no more, and see below.  I couldn’t paste in the breakdown on “administration” employees, because the list of job titles goes on forever.  For those wondering, there were 26 “aspiring principals” on staff in fiscal 2011.

    12 Month Special Education Asst. Principal: $21,782,074
    12 Month Special Education Supervisor: $2,323,168
    Administrative Education Analyst: $57,986
    Adult Educat Teach – Reg Sub: $718,964
    Adult Education Teacher: $14,352,916
    Adult Educator Assistant Coord: $185,152
    Aspiring Principal: $2,407,899
    Assistant Principal : $356,652,822
    Assistant Principal Assigned: $167,907
    Assistant Superintendent: $16,300,556
    Community Supertindent: $4,705,883
    Cse Chairperson: $1,446,686
    Deputy Assistant Superintendent: $374,904
    Deputy Chancellor: $67,667
    Deputy Community Superintendent: $1,191,115
    Deputy Regional Superintendent: $896,412
    Director: $189,618
    Educational Administrator Csa: $76,021,686
    Educational Administrator Uft: $560,380
    Guidance Counselor: $233,265,105
    Guidance Counselor Assigned A: $1,840,345
    Guidance Counselor-Reg Sub: $27,430
    Lab Specialist/Assistant: $10,512,835
    Local Instructional Supervisor: $6,554,043
    New Leader: $647,186
    Principal: $232,691,287
    Principal Assigned: $2,401,383
    Psychologist In Train – Reg Sub: $711,953
    Regional Instructional Superintendent: $956,678
    School Medical Inspector: $175,260
    School Medical Inspector – Reg Sub: $69,103
    School Psychiatrist: $73,196
    School Psycholgist: $104,727,723
    School Psychologist – Reg Sub: $41,816
    School Secretary: $173,053,187
    School Secretary-Reg Sub: $38,205
    School Social Worker: $126,324,041
    School Social Worker – Reg Sub: $25,198
    Supervisor: $5,199,517
    Supervisor Assigned: $2,430,497
    Teach Asst Vocation – Reg Sub: $1,571,553
    Teacher: $4,229,742,811
    Teacher Assigned A: $33,811,632
    Teacher Assistant – Reg Sub: $802,787
    Teacher Attendance: $29,701,926
    Teacher Resource Room: $220,590
    Teacher Special Education: $1,310,863,992
    Teacher Special Education-Reg Sub: $1,435,962
    Teacher Trainer: $939,233
    Teacher-Reg Sub: $8,062,434

  • East Sider

    How much does it cost to reduce every class in the city by one student?  I seem to remember with benefits about 100m

  • Larry Littlefield

    Why do we have the highest class sizes in the state if our per student spending on teachers is so high?  Win for the UFT, loss of the children.

    “Mulgrew said today that teachers had forgone a raise to get the limits that are in place now and that the union would look for ways to reduce class sizes more when it next negotiates a contract with the city.”

    That’s something we can talk about when the pension fund is out of the hole from the last set of retroactive enhancements.  Except that while the talk is going on, the UFT will just tell the state legislature to push through the next set of retroactive pension enhancements instead.  It really ticks me off when the head of the union protests against the structure of spending it has created.

  • East Sider

    Over the last few decades budgets have targeted grades for class size reductions, early childhood grades (K-2) and 9th grade English and Math classes (for a few years capped at 25) … currently class size is not a leadership priority.  Add to this the principal as CEO philosophy … this is no monitoring except by the filing of grievances. The current administration spends hundreds of millions on accountability, not class size.

  • common sense

    hmm-or they could give the 1800 teachers in the ATR pool permanent assignments and that would reduce class sizes dramatically without costing ANY additional money–they are already being paid–this is not rocket science just logic. And at 150 students per Teacher we are talking servicing 270,000 students—that should help alot!

  • Tim

    So the annual operating budget (19.7 billion) contains about a billion for charter schools and 2 billion for special ed contracting. Take out your 9 billion, and that leaves 8 billion for busing, physical plant/energy, food, after school programs, supplies, and safety officers? is that right? 

  • Duh

    Yea, except there no classrooms and schools available for ATR’s to teach these kids.

  • Mr. Flerporillo

    More or less, but the detail on the nonwage expenses is sometimes elusive. And don’t forget the contracts for pre-k and “corporate” schools (mainly religious institutions). I’m thinking the cleanest picture may come from combining salary and contacts, but there will still be gaps of $4 billion to $5 billion in on the data sources I’ve found. I’ll get it eventually, though.

    One thing that’s clear is that the “admin” expenses that Bloomberg and the DOE publish look severely understated, perhaps by 200 or 300 million dollars. Maybe it’s not “central admin,” but it’s “admin.”

  • Larry Littlefield

    Really, if we were starting over, I’m not sure even the union would want this:  high spending, high class sizes, teachers bitter and de-motivated about their pay, even though a very high share of school spending (compared with other places) is on teachers.  Moenitst teachers wouldn’t want it.  Parents would be outraged if they knew the entire financial situation.

    But there is no going back.  Actually, for NYC back was as bad or worse, unless you perhaps go back to 1950.

  • Mr. Flerporillo

    Sorry, I forgot about fringe benefits (health insurance, largely).  That’s anywhere from $3 billion to $4 billion on top of salaries and wages.   So you’ve got  something close to $9 billion in wages, and then benefits takes it up to somewhere between $12 billion and $13 billion.  

  • Jannagage

    sure there is plenty of room, I read it all the time when a charter school needs space.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

From Our Jobs Board

Featured Employers
Recent Jobs

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

0 comments so far today

Archives

June 2013
M T W T F S S
« May  
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930