GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

The co-location situation

Looking to 2013, city pitches space plans for Success schools

The school year is only a few weeks underway, but the Department of Education is already hard at work figuring out where to put its new schools in 2013.

Today, the department announced that it had published “Educational Impact Statements” about changes it wants to make at 17 school buildings next year. The statements, which appeared on the department’s website on Thursday, are the first component of a public comment process that legally must precede any major changes to how school buildings are used.

Eight of the proposals are for new charter school co-locations, including seven in the Success Academies network. The network, which has opened 14 schools since it was founded by former City Councilwoman Eva Moskowitz in 2006, was one of two charter management organizations that Mayor Bloomberg said during his State of the City address in January that he would like to see grow.

All of the Success schools, which employ non-unionized teachers, operate in public school buildings and its co-locations proposals tend to attract the most pubic outrage from union officials and school community members. Last year, two separate lawsuits were filed against the Department of Education and Moskowitz for Brooklyn co-location plans. A judge dismissed both suits.

SUNY’s Charter Schools Institute approved the network’s request to launch seven more schools next year, but until now exactly where the schools would open has been a question mark. Two were approved to open in Manhattan’s District 2, which has many high-performing and overcrowded elementary schools. Parents argued that the district did not need another elementary school option and could not accommodate one in any case.

But the city has proposed carving out space in two high school buildings that are located in the district but historically have enrolled few students from the area. One of the buildings, in Union Square, is the home of Washington Irving High School, which is being phased out for poor performance, and several small schools that have already opened to replace Irving. The other building houses the High School of Graphics Communications Arts, which the city unsuccessfully tried to close and reopen using an overhaul strategy called “turnaround” this past summer. Both buildings currently have fewer students than they were built to accommodate.

Already, at least one of the the Success proposals has stirred controversy. District 13 community members said they oppose the city’s plan to open Brooklyn Success Academy 5 at M.S. 265 Susan S. McKinney, a Fort Greene secondary school. The building also houses a District 75 school.

The building currently enrolls 470 students, less than 50 percent of its 1,035-student capacity, according to the city’s utilization estimate. But City Councilwoman Letitia James said she had safety concerns with placing elementary school-aged students in the same building as high school students. She also took issue with the lack of feedback sought by city officials before they proposed the plan.

“There’s really not much of a process,” said James, who attended an information meeting hosted by the department’s Division of Portfolio Planning on Wednesday night. “There has been no deliberation, no consideration, no transparency.”

The eighth new charter school co-location would add a new school in the Achievement First network, Aspire Elementary School, to the P.S. 202 building in Brooklyn’s District 19.

Most of the rest of the proposals the department announced today are grade truncations or expansions meant to bring schools’ grade structure in line with citywide norms. For example, the city wants to lop two grades off of Brooklyn College Academy so that it is a standard high school, rather than serving students in grades seven through 12, as it does now.

The city school board, known as the Panel for Educational Policy, is set to consider the proposals at its Nov. 8 meeting. The date is months earlier than last year, when the panel didn’t vote to approve the Williamsburg Success co-location until March. The panel, whose members are mostly appointed by Bloomberg, has never rejected a city proposal.

  • Former Turnaround Teacher

    It is interesting that you posted this article today. The past two days I was thinking about the idea of co location and hypothesizing that struggling schools are more likely to be colocated. (Specifically schools that are no currently phasing out, which would obviously be more likely.). The fact that Graphics is getting a success school would indicate that this is possibly another DOE tactic to finish struggling schools off, by further starving them. I wonder if there is a data base which has all co locations under Bloomberg listed. I would love to look into this.

  • Nychistoryteacher

    Can we get a link to the DOE’s Educational Impact Statements?

  • GUest

    The plan to put a Moskowitz elementary school in the Washington Irving Campus is rididculous. Having kindergartners in the same building as six high schools is completely unsound. This is the wrong decision for the little kids, the big kids, and the adults that will be left to clean up the mess as this mayor continues to sell public education to private enterprise.

    The six schools that have been jammed into this space in the last four years already compete for space. Throwing little children into this building is irresponsible and dangerous.

  • Dr

    A video of the Los Sures community in Williamsburg, Brooklyn fighting against the Success Academy Corporation last year:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ph7lCgWfzTY&feature=plcp

  • Dr

    A video of the Cobble Hill, Brooklyn community fighting against a Success Academy Corporation Colocation last year:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_Xeelvfbm0&feature=plcp

  • Dr

    A video of Harlem’s PS 30 fighting against a Success Academy Corporation colocation 2 years ago:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rN0F5xWKF3I&feature=plcp

  • Invictus

    There is more to the plans that it truly shows.  The DoE and the Charter Operator is not to be trusted in what they divulge to the public in itself.  I suspect that the public schools that are already there will be sacrificed to the great good of the Pseudo Public Charter school. 

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

2 comments so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031