GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

cheat sheet

NY Mag looks at Stuyvesant culture in light of cheating scandal

This week’s issue of New York Magazine has an in-depth profile of Nayeem ­Ahsan, the 16-year-old Stuyvesant High School student who helmed the school’s recent cheating scandal.

Last June, school officials caught Ahsan using his cell phone to help dozens of students cheat on Regents exams, which students must take before graduating. Since then, the city has launched an investigation and threatened many of the students involved with lengthy suspensions. And the school’s principal has retired, to be replaced by a former network leader who is also a Stuyvesant parent.

In the wake of these events, many GothamSchools readers told us that cheating is more widespread than officials would admit, and expressed suspicions of Principal Jie Zhang’s suggestion that the cheating ring was an isolated incident.

“I have not been made aware … or have a reason to believe that there is ongoing cheating there,” Zhang told reporters in a phone call shortly after being appointed.

The magazine piece also suggests otherwise. In addition to detailing Ahsan’s methods, which included sharing homework answers, procuring exams given by teachers in previous years, and texting students photos of entire exam booklets during last spring’s Regents exams, it describes a culture that encouraged cheating among many.

Ahsan said Stuyvesant’s educational environment put a premium on high-performance and competition. The structure of his classes often presented opportunities to game the system:

“When you get into Stuy, they show you where the graduating seniors went to college and what grades they got,” Nayeem says. “You don’t get to see names, but you get to see their GPA in every subject and their SAT scores.”

But the schoolwork was more difficult than Nayeem expected. He dreaded double-period science days, when he’d come home with nine pages of notes, handwritten back and front, then have to comb through them to complete an assignment. So he learned to set priorities. He knew, for instance, that one of his teachers checked homework once every four days.

“There were days where I had so much other work, I was like, ‘Okay, what are the chances she’s going to check today?’ And most of the time, she didn’t check.”

…By now he realized “how lazy teachers could be. I studied for the first test. But I looked at the new test and last year’s test and they were, like, 75 percent the same exact questions and the same exact answers. So I was like, ‘Okay, why am I studying?’”

In one biology class, Ashan’s teacher promised to raise everyone’s final class grade by three points—enough to push many the equivalent of a full letter grade higher—if they all completed a final assignment and got every answer right. The teacher caught Ahsan sharing his answers with other students online, but did not turn him in for cheating.

He and several other students told the magazine that the need for good Regents exam grades represented only a fraction of the pressure put on Stuyvesant students to take extreme measures to score good grades:

“Kids here know that the difference between a 96 and a 97 on one test isn’t going to make any difference in the future,” says Edith Villavicencio, a Stuyvesant senior. “But they feel as if they need the extra one point over a friend, just because it’s possible and provides a little thrill.”

…Stuyvesant’s 2012 valedictorian, Vinay Mayar, talked about the pressure at the school in his graduation speech. Mayar, who lives on the Upper East Side and just started at MIT, called his classmates “a volatile mix of strong-minded people armed in opposition against one other.” He listed a few things his friends said epitomized the Stuyvesant experience, like “copying homework in the hallway while walking to class,” “sneaking in and out of school during free periods,” and, at the end of the list, “widespread Facebook cheating.”

…“Not everyone cheats, but it is ­collaborative,” says Daniel Solomon, a ­former Stuyvesant Spectator staffer who graduated in June, and is now starting at ­Harvard. “One of my friends told me, ‘School is a team effort.’ That’s sort of the ethos at Stuy.”

Ahsan, who said he spoke to the reporter in hopes that he could make a case to Department of Education officials for returning him to Stuyvesant, called his Regents exam cheating ring an opportunity to help students who were struggling in certain subjects and receive help in return. His expulsion is not yet set in stone, and he has decided to wait to enroll in another high school until a final decision is made, the magazine reported.

In the meantime, Stuyvesant has cracked down on cell phone and technology use, seizing 17 cell phones in the first two days of the school year alone. Zhang is also requiring students to sign on to an academic honesty policy, and urging the student government to write an “honor code.”

  • Current Stuyparent

    “As of this writing, Nayeem has been sitting out the start of the school year, not yet enrolling at another high school in hopes that the DOE will relent and allow him to return to Stuyvesant. He’s hopeful, but far from confident, that will happen. ”

    He CHEATED to get ahead while 99% of the school studied (3000+ kids at Stuy).

    imo – Nayeem Ahsan is a “Narcissist”.  It’s all about him and he doesn’t care who else get hurt in the process of his cheating. 

    Hope that the people at DOE have enough ‘brains’ and ‘guts’ to make an example of Nayeem Ahsan by expelling him and suspending his 66 co-conspirators.

  • hmmmmmmm

    I am curious about the process by which the student was “expelled” from Stuyvesant.  Principals alone do not have the power to transfer students.  Clearly he broke rules and deserves a stiff punishment, however how did Teitel transfer him anywhere? 

  • hmmmmmmm

    I am curious about the process by which the student was “expelled” from Stuyvesant.  Principals alone do not have the power to transfer students.  Clearly he broke rules and deserves a stiff punishment, however how did Teitel transfer him anywhere? 

  • Kristen

    Hi, current Stuyparent,
    I graduated from Stuyvesant HS in ’86 and my son graduated two years ago. I don’t know how involved you are, but your estimation of 99% of kids at Stuy don’t cheat is the complete reverse of the situation. While I never had the guts to cheat (besides the occasional roving eye), back in the day, we weren’t in a pressure cooker to be perfect. These kids talk nonstop about outsmarting their buddies and getting into ivy leagues. I had a difficult time explaining to my son that there may be better schools than the classic club we hear about, which may be a better home for him. Unfortunately, what these counselors don’t go over is that yes the school looks great with an additional kid going to Harvard, but kids shouldn’t be pushed into devoting so much time and energy for something that looks like a badge of honor. Almost all of the kids and perhaps your kid as well has in someway ‘cheated’ whether it be looking up and briefly glancing at the paper next to him or her, or involving banned electronics to do so. To say that you are a ‘stuy parent’ who thinks most of the students don’t cheat is hypocritical. There were probably dozens of cheating rings going on, and this kid’s ring just happened to get caught. The principal came to the room because he was tipped off by another student. Participant or passerby, cheating is so commonplace in Stuyvesant HS, that even Principal Teitel, hero of 9/11 who most likely lightly reprimanded previous offenders, had to resign b/c the evidence from all of the years stacks against him. Hopefully the next generation of Stuyvesant students learn from this example, and don’t give the new principal a hard time.

  • Hadenoughoftweed

    Problem I see in injecting any ethics into these privileged brats is that the whole DOE cheats- even the Mayor who gets around the law for a 3rd term

  • Ask

     I was hoping for a better response. This kid sounds 100% unapologetic. As a Stuyvesant graduate (’98), I fully support this kid’s expulsion. Cheating is academic suicide unless you can convince others that you can be deemed trustworthy again. Sounding like a smarta– and insulting your teachers in interviews won’t help.

  • M. Easton

    Personally , i despise cheating, it is so unfair for those who deliberately studied just to earn a high mark. the academic advantage  got from cheating is useless with no credibility at all. Students like this are just fooling themselves.

  • Anonymous

    Kristen, I think you may right that there was far less pressure a few years ago. I taught English at Stuy in the 1990s and found the students to be very engaged and curious. But then I wasn’t teaching math or science and never used “objective” tests so my experience may not have been typical. I think that the culture at Hunter High School was and is quite different, based on my daughter’s experience there. That may be due in part  to the very different entrance exam at Hunter where passing the essay portion is required. It also may be due to the very difference means of selecting the teaching staff at the two schools.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

19 comments so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031