<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stuyvesant students, parents report mixed messages on tech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gothamschools.org/2012/09/11/stuyvesant-students-parents-report-mixed-messages-on-tech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gothamschools.org/2012/09/11/stuyvesant-students-parents-report-mixed-messages-on-tech/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://gothamschools.org/2012/09/11/stuyvesant-students-parents-report-mixed-messages-on-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-377234</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 11:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothamschools.org/?p=91117#comment-377234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This seems like a wake-up call for the DOE not only to update its cell phone policy but to create a curriculum to teach middle-school and high school students how to responsibly--and ethically--use electronic devices. When I saw &quot;beeper&quot; on the cell phone policy I realized how outdated it really is. As the DOE might acknowledge, electronics aren&#039;t going away, and surely it&#039;s time to not only embrace them in the schools but to make everyone aware of what is acceptable behavior--and what the real, enforceable consequences might be for cheating violations. As the parent of a middle-schooler whose commute of 45 minutes includes two subways, I can&#039;t possibly imagine life without cellphones, no matter what the DOE policy states. But some guidelines on what is and isn&#039;t acceptable within the doors of the school would be tremendously welcome--just as I think the sex-ed curriculum for middle-schoolers is a good idea. And a revised cell phone policy, one that allowed them into the schools--but not into testing situations--would have the effect of erasing barriers between those largely middle-class schools that ignore the policy and those schools that have metal detectors--and children who are often not middle-class. What about it, DOE? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems like a wake-up call for the DOE not only to update its cell phone policy but to create a curriculum to teach middle-school and high school students how to responsibly&#8211;and ethically&#8211;use electronic devices. When I saw &#8220;beeper&#8221; on the cell phone policy I realized how outdated it really is. As the DOE might acknowledge, electronics aren&#8217;t going away, and surely it&#8217;s time to not only embrace them in the schools but to make everyone aware of what is acceptable behavior&#8211;and what the real, enforceable consequences might be for cheating violations. As the parent of a middle-schooler whose commute of 45 minutes includes two subways, I can&#8217;t possibly imagine life without cellphones, no matter what the DOE policy states. But some guidelines on what is and isn&#8217;t acceptable within the doors of the school would be tremendously welcome&#8211;just as I think the sex-ed curriculum for middle-schoolers is a good idea. And a revised cell phone policy, one that allowed them into the schools&#8211;but not into testing situations&#8211;would have the effect of erasing barriers between those largely middle-class schools that ignore the policy and those schools that have metal detectors&#8211;and children who are often not middle-class. What about it, DOE? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
