GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

honesty policy

Dozens of Stuyvesant HS students suspended for cheating

A dozen Stuyvesant High School students will be suspended for as long as two weeks and more than 50 others could face short-term suspension for cheating.

The punishments are only one component of the school’s renewed response to a broad cheating scandal that broke this summer. Stuyvesant’s new principal, Jie Zhang, is also requiring students to sign on to an academic honesty policy, urging the creation of an “honor code,” and cracking down on student cell phones.

Department of Education officials announced in July that they had determined that 71 students had cheated on final exams, with all but two receiving answers in advance to a city Spanish exam. They said at the time that a student who provided the answers would be suspended and not allowed to return to the school, the city’s most elite. They also said more punishments could come this fall but did not say how many students faced suspension.

Today, the city announced that the number is 66. Zhang informed the students and their families today about the suspensions, which for some students will start on Monday.

A second phase in the department’s investigation into the cheating, which is ongoing, is looking at the school’s original response. The department did not learn about the cheating until nearly a week after then-Principal Stanley Teitel sent a letter to parents informing them that some students had been punished, and the penalties the school levied did not match those outlined in the city’s discipline code.

Teitel barred students who had cheated from participating in graduation activities. But city policy calls for more stringent punishment. Now, 12 students will receive a superintendent’s suspension, which is meted out for more serious offenses and can last for up to 10 days, according to the department. They will have to report to special centers that the department operates for suspended students. Another 54 could face shorter-term principal’s suspensions. In a letter to the students and their families, Zhang said the punishments would be finalized in “suspension conferences” starting next week.

Teitel retired abruptly last month and Zhang was appointed to replace him a week later. She said at the time that her first goal would be improving the school’s “culture” so that cheating does not take place.

“I have not been made aware … or have a reason to believe that there is ongoing cheating there,” Zhang said. “However, my top priority is to create a positive school culture that ensures integrity and zero tolerance for cheating.”

Changes were palpable on the first day of classes, students said as they left the building Thursday. Some reported being required to sign contracts in each class saying they would not cheat or plagiarize. The contract, which the city provided to reporters today, asked students to confirm that they had read an academic honesty policy and understood that cheating would result in no credit and possible suspensions.

One student told GothamSchools that teachers were also stricter this week about whether students could use electronic devices, such as iPods or cell phones, to take notes.

City policy bars students from bringing cell phones to school, but in some schools such as Stuyvesant where there are no metal detectors, the policy has not always been enforced. Teitel had petitioned the city for temporary metal detectors during testing periods, but the city turned down the request. The student who initiated the cheating scandal did so by taking a picture of an exam with his cell phone.

Zhang said she would enforce the city’s policy. During the first two days of classes, school officials confiscated 17 student cell phones, according to the Department of Education.

In a letter to families, Zhang said she is urging the student government to craft an honor code as “a public sign of our commitment to uphold academic integrity at Stuyvesant High School.” In the wake of the scandal, some have criticized the school for breeding a culture of competitiveness in which cheating is inevitable.

Walcott said today that he was satisfied with Zhang’s handling of the disciplinary issues.

“As we said at the start of this investigation, we have zero tolerance for cheating or academic dishonesty of any kind, and the students involved in this incident will now face disciplinary action,” he said in a statement. ” I want to thank Principal Zhang for her assistance and for the steps she has already taken to restore academic integrity.”

 

Stuyvesant Letter

Academic Honest Policy

  • Legal Rights

    Watch this all blow up.  EVERY one of those students has rights, that include having a conference WITH the Principal within a tight frame.  The Principal can  not delegate her attendance at EVERY conference.  Every student has to be judged individually.  The post indicates that the Principal announced that the suspensions will begin on Monday.  Were all those hearings already held?  She held 66 hearings in the last day?

  • Ksletch

    The hearings have been held over the summer. This is being handled very carefully. 

  • Frank Jackson

    The principal shall have authority to suspend a studentwhen the principal determines the student’s behaviorpresents a clear and present danger of physical injuryto the student, other students or school personnel, orprevents the orderly operation of classes or otherschool activities.” Does this fit what happened hee?

  • Know

    I find this all deeply disturbing. If our elte students don’t learn to cheat effectively in high school, how can we expect them to cheat when they get into college?

    Cheating? At Stuvesant? I’m shocked! Shocked!

  • Legal Rights

    According to reporting from the NY Times all the hearings were NOT held over the summer. Only the Superintendent suspension hearings were and now the Principal has 5 days to hold 54 suspension conferences which she must PERSONALLY attend. 

  • Guest

    No. One. Cares.

  • BK

     Who are you? One of the students or parents involved? to be honest you do not know what you are talking about. There is no “hearing”. What the school does is look at evidence of something and hand out punishments accordingly (supposed to be). Then at either the beginning or end of the suspension, usually the end, there is a conference. Not a hearing. This conference is usually done with someone who represents administration, the parent, the child and possibly the guidance counselor. It does not have to be the principal him or herself. They or you got busted. Simple as that.

  • A443

    If you read my comments carefully, I was quoting the reporting by AL Baker from the NY TImes.  Certainly you agree the superintendent suspensions require a hearing.  The next part of my comment explicitly refers to suspension conferences. Let me quote the Chancellor’s regs “(1) The school principal shall conduct the conferenceand may not delegate the responsibility to attendeven if he/she was not present at the time of thedecision to suspend.At the conference, students or their advocate or their attorney may present evidence at the informal conference.  And then the principal decides if the suspension is/was justified. Please read the regs carefully.  They are actually very detailed and in such a high profile case as this, it will be difficult to follow them with so many suspensions.  The truth is few schools follow them.
    (1) The school principal shall conduct the conference
    and may not delegate the responsibility to attend
    even if he/she was not present at the time of the
    decision to suspend.

    At the conference, students or their advocate or their attorney may present evidence at the informal conference.  And then the principal decides if the suspension is/was justified. Please read the regs carefully. 
    They are actually very detailed and in such a high profile case as this, it will be difficult to follow them with so many suspensions.  The truth is few schools follow them.

  • Anonymous

    Oh, come on. You people make such drama out of this. This is so unnecessarily formal. Too formal, as if this was the Supreme Court or something. Stop treating Stuyvesant like some school full of celebrities. WHO CARES! They cheated, whatever.

    Stuyvesant (like many other schools in NYC) is at a downfall, and is slowly declining. Hey, it happens to every school, sadly. 

  • BK

     Why are you so fixated on “hearings”. Are you from the ACLU??? They are guilty. Plain and simple. Your quotes are for superintendent suspension. Not Principal’s suspensions. Principal suspensions require an in-house suspension. Which means the student reports to their school but is held in a suspension room and is given work. It is basically a slap on the wrist.

  • A443

    I know those pesky regulations can be so annoying!  Obviosuly you have been misapplying the regulations in your own schoo lenvironemt.You can read the entire regulation here http://docs.nycenet.edu/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-22/A-443.pdf

    But here is the main part:
    (l) Principal’s Suspension Conference
    The suspension conference presents an opportunity to
    assess the facts surrounding the incident for which a
    suspension is being sought; determine whether or not a
    suspension is justified; devise collaboratively
    satisfactory solutions for the student’s return to his/her
    program; and prevent further disruption of the student’s
    education.
    Suspension conferences shall be conducted in
    accordance with the following procedures:
    (1) The school principal shall conduct the conference
    and may not delegate the responsibility to attend
    even if he/she was not present at the time of the
    decision to suspend.
    (2) If the parent’s preferred language or mode of
    communication is not English, the parent may bring
    a translator or interpreter to assist him/her.
    (3) The conference will be held on the scheduled date
    unless the parent requests that it be rescheduled.
    Every effort shall be made to secure the student
    and parent’s attendance. However, if the student
    and/or parent, after appropriate notice, do not
    appear at the conference, the principal may hold
    the conference in their absence on the scheduled
    date.111111

  • BK

     Mr. ACLU, who you and your cronies are the ones that actually ruin the system- from your own website:
    YOUR RIGHT TO REQUEST A CONFERENCE WITH THE PRINCIPAL

    For a short-term suspension, this informal conference is the only way
    you can defend yourself. You must request the conference—it is not
    automatic.

  • Anonymous

    Stuy cheaters simply followed the lead of a Mayor who breaks laws and codes of ethics right and left when it comes to education. And he’s pretty blatant about it. He’s a role model for lying, cheating and abusing power.

  • Hadenoughoftweed

    There are rules and then there are rules when the news media picks up on something. Trust me I know. One news story and Tweed throws the rule book out the window.

  • JQP

    Rumor has it that one day this week will be Judgement Day for the corrupt Principal of Fort Hamilton H.S. I’m shocked but not surprised that it has stayed out of the reach of the powerful media. She must have some incredible connections to keep the Press SILENT. Oh well. Anyway, for those who care about the children, I predict that she will get a slap on the wrist or maybe pay a fine or something and go right back to what she knows best. Cheating the system. Sorry kids. That’s just how things work at the DOE. 

  • NYC Parent

    The Stuy administration is now confiscating laptops and tablets. Since the Stuy library is under renovation, students now have no way to use computers in the building. Seems like getting all students to put their cell phones at the front of the room during tests would stop cheating more than confiscating computers during the first week of school. Is there a rule against having computers at school?

  • Jay

    I wonder what the ethnic makeup of the cheating students was.  Are there any patterns?  Is there some kind of racism or discrimination going on?  Given that the school is majority Asian, are Asian kids being held to a higher standard than everyone else?  I expect to see a public march on this.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

14 comments so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031