GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

countdown

School leaders enumerate challenges on the eve of the new year

Chancellor Dennis Walcott visited the School of the Future to hear from department chairs about citywide education policy reforms.

Most classrooms were set up and schedules finalized at M.S. 223 in the Bronx this morning, 24 hours before students would arrive for the first day of school.

But teachers still needed to meet to review the lesson plans they are aligning to the state’s new curriculum standards, the Common Core. As they finished their breakfast and got to work, they were joined by Schools Chancellor Dennis Walcott and his top deputy, Shael Polakow-Suransky, on the first of their two school visits today.

Walcott gave the teachers a quick pep talk before sitting in on their training sessions. But he cautioned that the school’s past successes — which include a strong arts program, summer classes, and a New York Times Magazine profile — were not enough.

“I think this is a tremendous school. You’ve had major accomplishments,” Walcott said. “We need to make sure we model what you’re doing and also improve on that performance as well.”

Like all city schools, M.S. 223 is contending with the new standards, looming changes to state tests, and citywide special education reforms aimed at better integrating students with disabilities.

Today, the teachers focused on a small piece of the sweeping changes: developing performance tasks, or assessments that reflect the Common Core’s emphasis on real-world applications of classroom learning.

“[This] is probably one of the most difficult pieces of the puzzle,” Principal Ramon Gonzalez told reporters. “It’s difficult to think about six-week lessons that build up to a performance task, but it impacts everything the teachers are doing before that. And the Common Core has really pushed this agenda forward.”

Ashley Downs, the school’s special education coordinator, said the English department has set personalizing instruction as a top goal. “We’ve spent a lot of time trying to work with teachers to move away from whole-group mini-lessons to more specific, individual, one-on-one or small group conferences,” she said.

In one classroom, Heather Burns, the school’s literacy coach, was guiding English language arts teachers on how to use a rubric to help students become better writers.

The stakes are high: This year’s state tests will focus more heavily on essays than on multiple-choice questions.

“This spring there’s going to be a lot more nonfiction, and generally they’re making the tests much much harder — very different than the difficulty level we’ve seen in the past few years,” Polakow-Suransky told reporters.

“Chancellor [Merryl] Tisch has said we will see the results,” Walcott said about the state education official who helped engineer the changes to the exams. “They’re not going to necessarily be positive.”

Walcott talks to teachers at M.S. 223 while principal Ramon Gonzalez looks on.

After 90 minutes bouncing among M.S. 223′s academic department meetings, the pair sped downtown to visit another school: School of the Future, a secondary school where students are not required to take most state exams required for graduation.

While teachers waited for their guests to arrive, some discussed a set of major policy changes that are affect only high schools. In February, the Department of Education announced it would tighten the way high schools award credits and assign students to classes.

So for the first time, School of the Future and other high schools won’t be able to let seniors who are close to graduation take shortened schedules.

Because students have flexibility around state exams, School of the Future won’t have to deal with some of the acute scheduling challenges that some high schools are facing, according to Sarah Kaufman, who is spending the year at the school to learn how to be a principal.

But the school is still making some adjustments. For years, the school used an early dismissal on Thursday afternoons for professional development and also to allow students work at their internships, which are an integral part of the school, Kaufman said.

“It was great for our seniors,” she said.

Now, instead of the early dismissal, the school will hold a study hall where students will be able to work on class assignments and get help with college essays and resume writing.

Once Walcott and Polakow-Suransky arrived, the conversation quickly shifted to the city’s special education reforms, which department officials have touted much more widely than the high school policy changes. This year, schools are being required to accept students regardless of their disabilities as part of a push to create more inclusive education settings. The changes are causing anxiety and tension at some schools, but School of the Future teachers said they are prepared for the shift.

“Our school has always used an inclusion model, so it’ll be a smooth transition,” said Whitney Lukens, the school’s special education department chair, a 13-year teaching veteran. “It won’t be as hard for people to wrap their heads around the changes.”

Before he left, Walcott acknowledged the challenges facing a secondary school like the School of the Future, which loses many of its students in eighth grade and enrolls new ones in ninth grade.

“You have a monumental task in front of you,” he said. “But I know you guys are going to do it.”

  • TeachmyclassMrMayor

    I am stunned. I can’t believe that the Chancellor & his deputy did not visit one of the 24 schools that they tried to close. Why does he never face the music? I guess he rally does not have an answer as to why they financially starve the schools that they want to get rid of in their continual attempts to bust the UFT (of course, the union management goes out of their way to help, but that is another rant for another day). Once again, I challenge you Mr. Chancellor, come by yourself to one of those schools, and face the music. Explain where all of the money goes, and perhaps even spend some time showing us how it is done.

  • Shameful.

    These special education reforms are a joke.  In my school, there are students in inclusion classrooms who read at a second grade level, can barely write, and have serious behavioral issues.  Dozens of students were placed into these classrooms regardless of whether or not they are ready.  At least in a self-contained setting, these students had were more time to get their work done and learn in a small community without being judged.  These reforms are about money, not what is best for the child.  I suspect many kids who were in a 15:1 classroom will fall through the cracks because they are either lack the academic skills or cannot handle a large classroom emotionally.  This is a set up, and a disgraceful lack of regard for kids that DOE claims they care about.

  • Celia Oyler

    Although deep prejudices against the disabled have been with European and U.S. cultures throughout most of our existence as humans, there is absolutely no evidence that segregation of the disabled is a successful strategy. This applies to housing (keeping them in institutions didn’t work out) and employment (keeping them in sheltered workshops turned out to be more expensive and very frustrating for the disabled; and disabled employees turn out to have better job performance than non-disabled). In education it turns out that students with disabilities actually learn a lot more when they are given access to the general education curriculum and provided with special education supports. (This is very undisputed after about 30 years of education research.) And the news gets better: when students with disabilities (yes, even those that read many, many years below grade level) are included in general education classes, the achievement outcomes of the non-disabled are not affected. Please do not let old prejudices against people with disabilities harden your heart against their enduring humanity. Students with disabilities are children first and there is ample evidence that self-contained settings produce seriously inferior long-term life outcomes for children. You may want to start with some autobiographical work by people with disabilities. They are people. More like you than not. Most teachers who open their classrooms to students with disabilities find that their teaching improves and that they learn some significantly important life lessons. 

  • Shameful

    Your optimism is nice and all, but I am talking about reality here.  You do not just throw kids into a new setting without preparation and expect everybody to do well.  Inclusion CAN work (I have seen it myself), but the DOE does it all wrong.  Honestly ask yourself if it is fair and realistic to have a kid who reads and writes on a second grade level to join a class where college level writing skills are introduced.  This is like asking a baby to ride a bike before they can even crawl.

    Quite frankly, your implication that I hold prejudice in my heart against students with disabilities offends me.  I have younger relatives who have disabilities and IEPs and I love them very much.  I’ve taught students with disabilities for years so I am not a general ed teacher going through culture shock. I am speaking on what I know, and what I know is that these “reforms” are rushed, and very poorly thought out.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

2 comments so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031