<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exclusive excerpt: Paul Tough&#8217;s &#8220;How Children Succeed&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gothamschools.org/2012/09/05/exclusive-excerpt-paul-toughs-how-children-succeed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gothamschools.org/2012/09/05/exclusive-excerpt-paul-toughs-how-children-succeed/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 13:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dancerkkj</title>
		<link>http://gothamschools.org/2012/09/05/exclusive-excerpt-paul-toughs-how-children-succeed/comment-page-1/#comment-380855</link>
		<dc:creator>Dancerkkj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 01:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothamschools.org/?p=90530#comment-380855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been reading literature all day on Mr. Tough&#039;s book, as well as similar contemporary research by Sir Ken Robinson and others....  I am, at the moment, absolutely dumbfounded as to why COMPETITIVE ACADEMIC DEBATE has not been discussed. at all. When I read this piece, I was on the verge of falling out of my chair... Even with all of the awesome things described about chess competition in this article, interscholastic/ urban debate leagues and competitions are hundreds of times more effective, as well as universally applicable. Please pass this info along. Wow. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been reading literature all day on Mr. Tough&#8217;s book, as well as similar contemporary research by Sir Ken Robinson and others&#8230;.  I am, at the moment, absolutely dumbfounded as to why COMPETITIVE ACADEMIC DEBATE has not been discussed. at all. When I read this piece, I was on the verge of falling out of my chair&#8230; Even with all of the awesome things described about chess competition in this article, interscholastic/ urban debate leagues and competitions are hundreds of times more effective, as well as universally applicable. Please pass this info along. Wow. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Harris</title>
		<link>http://gothamschools.org/2012/09/05/exclusive-excerpt-paul-toughs-how-children-succeed/comment-page-1/#comment-378308</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 20:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothamschools.org/?p=90530#comment-378308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;If you believe that your school’s mission or your job as a teacher is simply to convey information, then it probably doesn’t seem necessary to subject your students to that kind of rigorous self-analysis.&quot;

As a teacher who believes as Mr. Tough does, that my job is to challenge students to identify weaknesses through rigorous self-examination, it&#039;s always a little disheartening to read statements like the one above that elude to a kind of false equivalence. Is there really a large countervalent group of teachers who think and teach this way? Or, does the author need to manufacture such a group in order to make his primary examples appear more striking by comparison?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you believe that your school’s mission or your job as a teacher is simply to convey information, then it probably doesn’t seem necessary to subject your students to that kind of rigorous self-analysis.&#8221;</p>
<p>As a teacher who believes as Mr. Tough does, that my job is to challenge students to identify weaknesses through rigorous self-examination, it&#8217;s always a little disheartening to read statements like the one above that elude to a kind of false equivalence. Is there really a large countervalent group of teachers who think and teach this way? Or, does the author need to manufacture such a group in order to make his primary examples appear more striking by comparison?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
