GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

breaking news

State names 123 city schools to improve or close by 2015

New York State’s No Child Left Behind waiver has spawned a new list of struggling schools that education officials could close if they don’t post dramatic improvements by 2015.

That list includes many schools that were identified as struggling by the state in the past and have undergone deep reform interventions or begun phasing out, but now labels them as “priority schools.” In New York City, there are 123 priority schools, nearly double the schools once identified as “persistently low achieving” because their students performed poorly on state tests and posted low graduation rates.

The schools are being called priority schools because their statistics are grim, officials said. The state determined which schools would be identified as priority based on four-year graduation rates (under 60 percent) in high schools and a student growth formula from state test scores in elementary and middle schools that places the schools in the bottom 5 percent of schools statewide, per guidelines set by the federal government.

The districts will have just three years to improve these data points, according to a release the State Education Department published late this afternoon, and must submit transitional plans for each priority school by October. And for the first time, State Education Commissioner John King will have the authority to require districts to close the schools that fail to make gains.

Districts generally have several options for funding reforms in these schools through federal School Improvement Grant and Race to the Top Innovation Funding programs. But New York City has fewer.

Because the city and the teachers union have yet to agree on a teacher evaluation plan, state officials said the city is only eligible to receive funding to implement the most stringent of interventions: school closure over a four-year period, through a process known as phase-out, or school “turnaround.” But turnaround is for now off the table because the city lost a lawsuit over its plans to use the turnaround model in 24 schools earlier this summer. It is appealing the decision, but is not likely to see a resolution soon.

SED spokesman Dennis Tompkins said the city would be eligible to receive funds for priority schools it decides to close in the coming school year, and that officials expect the city to propose closure for some of the schools on the list this fall.

Before priority schools, there were Schools in Need of Improvement (SINI), a list of hundreds of schools that the state required to devise improvement plans under NCLB guidelines. The list grew every year, and schools put on the list never came off it.

The new waiver guidelines mean that far fewer schools will have an improvement status compared to previous years. But the interventions for these schools will be more aggressive and more extensive. Ira Schwartz, SED’s assistant commissioner for accountability, told reporters that the new lists hold schools to higher standards than the SINI list did, but at the same time makes the list of schools under pressure more manageable.

“We appplied college and career standards to create these lists. We were testing against higher standards and [we] incorporated growth similar to what we’re doing with teacher and principal evaluations,” he said. “We think this list is more right-sized.”

School districts will also be able to redirect some funds that were once used to fund after school tutoring to new initiatives in the priority schools. The school improvement plans must include an extended learning day and a small increase in parent engagement program spending.

Schwartz said there is a chance some schools could be removed from the priority list if they post significant improvements in the coming year. But once a school begins implementing a reform program, it must stick through it for three years and be accountable for the end results, even if it shows improvements in the short term.

More than a dozen of the city schools that the state identified for intensive improvement, including Christopher Columbus High School and Jamaica High School, won’t have a chance to try. That’s because the city has already began phasing them out as part of a four-year closure plan.

The other priority schools on the list that will be closed within the next four years are: Norman Thomas High School, Washington Irving Academy, John F. Kennedy, Monroe Academy for Business/Law, Metropolitan Corporate Academy, Paul Robeson, Beach Channel, Samuel Gompers Career and Technical Education, Jane Addams, and Grace Dodge Career and Technical Education.

The state’s list features all 24 of the former “turnaround” schools the city unsuccessfully moved to close this year, and a handful of schools that opened under the Bloomberg administration—some as recently as 2006 and 2008. The list also has one city charter school: Williamsburg Charter High School.

In addition to the priority school list, the state named 70 school districts, including New York City, as “focus districts,” because their ethnic minority students, students with disabilities, and English Language Learners have performed particularly poorly on the state’s reading and math exams, and have graduation rates far below average. From there, New York City selected more than 200 schools as focus schools, where it must now develop school improvement plans that target the populations of students that are most in need of help.

Many of the priority schools are high schools, but most of the schools that the city picked as focus schools are elementary and middle schools. Two charter schools, Opportunity Charter School and St. Hope Academy Charter School made the focus list.

New York City schools also made up a good portion of the state’s list for top-performing schools, called “Reward and Recognition Schools.” Of the 250 schools on this list, 55 were from New York City. These are schools that have either made the most progress on student achievement and do not have significant achievement gaps.

As part of the recognition, the schools will be rewarded between $150,000 and $300,000 to expand their models of success into more schools or more grades. The state education department said it plans to release yet another list this fall, called “Recognition Schools” that meet most, but not all of the criteria.

Teachers union president Michael Mulgrew said the new lists might motivate the city to close more schools, but the focus list is likely to encourage officials to create improvement plans in schools that have never had ones before.

“They’re already saying they want to close more schools, but they’ve never had a plan for how to help a struggling school,” he said in an interview. “If your crowning achievement is closing more schools than ever before before you leave [office,] that’s the single biggest piece of evidence that [Mayor Michael Bloomberg] is doing a bad job.”

David Bloomfield, a professor of educational leadership at the City University of New York, said the new lists do not seem to represent a significant departure from the NCLB criteria, which determines whether schools are in good standing or not based on similar categories, such as the performance of high needs students. But he said it’s possible they could still motivate political decisions in the city this year.

“Here is a newly prominent sign that there are still so many failing schools in New York City, he said.  ”The SINI list became like wallpaper and nobody noticed it. This may encourage the Mayor to close more schools, but it also highlights the number of schools that are still low performing.”

State Education Department Memo on priority, focus and reward schools:

  • a U-rated teacher

    Here’s my story:  I graduated as the valedictorian from JHS 185 in Queens, then went to Stuyvesant HS, then went to Columbia U. undergrad majoring in math.  I then worked in financial companies for a decade and got a masters degree in Statistics from Columbia U during that time.  I got worn out from the finance world, and I wanted to give back to my community, so I became a public school teacher, teaching math at a low-performing public high school.  I worked very hard, earned my tenure.  My students love me, and I’m also the adviser of the biggest student club in that school.  I worked for a very capable and experienced math assistant principal for 7 years, and she loved my teaching, but she decided to retire after 40+  yrs in DOE.  Unfortunately, my new math AP is terrible, very narrow-minded, and she doesn’t like female teachers.  Ever since she took over the dept, half of the dept left.  Recently she made me her new target and gave me a U-rating which I’ve never had before.  This shattered my strong work ethics (which is evident from my life long record of accomplishments), and left me feeling horribly demoralized. I have been praised by other math AP whom I met previous that I’m experienced, highly qualified, effective, and a great asset to out students and the DOE.  Really?  My horrible new AP humiliates me.  Sometime I comtemplate having the New York Times or other media profile what a U-rated teacher is like.  Yes, PROFILE ME!

  • Pogue

     Question: When does Fair become Unfair?

    Answer: When teachers in unions start becoming villains and scapegoats for the ills of education.

  • Abc

    Fair you want the best for your grandchild and it is very important to you as it should. It isn’t the contract that holds back a student it is the preparation that parents families give a child to be able to be sucessful. Teachers get student and many of them are way behind in kindergarden and why is that? There are so many reasons that it would be impossible to list them here. So you blame the teachers and their contract. Have you ever read the contract? Don’t answer I know the answer already. Put the blame where it belongs not where you think it should be. In all the years I worked I never saw a teacher not help a student. But I have seen hundreds of cases where parents didn’t do the right the right thing.

  • Openyoureyes

    Fair—Just one question. Do you believe that the DOE and/or school administrators (principals and AP’s) have the students best interests in mind?

    Sincerely,
    Openyoureyes

  • Public Consensus

    To “Fair”:
    You need to see the big picture here.  Teachers and parents work together to provide the best education for our students.  By antagonizing and blaming the teachers for everything, it destroy the teachers’ morale and jeopardize a happy school environment conducive to learning.  Ultimately, your children/grandchildren’s education is affected because of this teacher scapegoat situation.  The Union’s involvement will insure a fair and happy school environment conducive to learning which will ultimate benefit your children/grandchildren.
    Let’s look at a comparison: If you complain about a doctor for your illness not recovering, is it the doctor’s fault that you don’t recover as well as other patients?  Do we rate our doctors by how well the patients recover and how many recover?  By antagonizing and blaming the doctor, do you think the doctor will appreciate that and continue to make sure to give his/her very best to help you recover?  Please don’t trash our dedicated teachers and doctors if you want the best results.

  • a U-rated teacher

    BTW, I make this comparison because my brother is a doctor.  He and I are both Ivy League educated.  I also graduated from Stuyvesant HS and graduated as the valedictorian from JHS 185.  To read the PROFILE of a U-rated teacher like me, read “Public Consensus” comments below.

  • Mr. Flerporillo

    “No, it is not the Union that protects low-performing teachers.  It is the law and justice that protect every employee and give them their fair trial and due diligence so that nobody is wrongly thrown out without hearings.”

    You’re Ivy-educated, eh?

  • Public Consensus

    To “Fair”: my colleagues and I have spent countless hours UNPAID after school to tutor students.  You like to make false accusations about the Union and many dedicated, hardworking teachers.  You are anti-teacher.

  • http://ednotesonline.blogspot.com/ Norm

    “My primary concern is that my granddaugther is in a decent school where
    parents sign a contract to care and if they don’t – their kids won’t go
    there, period.”

    Who can blame you for wanting to isolate your child from the kids whose parents are not able to offer the kind of emotional support you can? That is exactly what the charter schools have been set up to appeal to. In the days I taught parents like you would have your children isolated in the top classes but that is now a no-no so where else can you go but to a charter, which will toss the kids of parents who won’t follow the contract. So they will end up back in the public schools which Bloomberg and Walcott won’t allow to toss them right back. So we end up with dual school systems. Oh for the day when there are only charters like in New Orleans and no public schools to dump them in. Well, there are always the levees when they are fortunate enough to have a hurricane.

  • Bronx Teacher

    This is an ignorant statement.  There is no one who will stop a teacher from spending extra time to help struggling students.  Blaming the contract is moronic.  No where in the contract does it state that teachers are to work so-so hours ONLY and cannot work a single minute more. 

  • http://ednotesonline.blogspot.com/ Unfair

     Hey Fair, did you know that if a teacher stays one minute more than the contract says, the union cuts off one of their fingers?

  • Listen

    Let’s face it: EVERY public high school in NYC is crap, yes, including Stuyvesant.

    We all know corruption reigns everywhere, so be it. I graduated from some of the cities worst schools and I’m doing fine, you know why? Because many people think just because they graduated from a specialized school, that they’re the next Bill Gates.

    I would never send my kids to ANY public school in NYC under the banner and evil control of the NYCDOE fulfilling one agenda that they have been accomplishing for decades now.

    It’s an eternal downfall. No one really cares about the education, or for our kids. That’s why we’re so behind as a nation. It’s all about money and control, isn’t it? For shame.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000571042513 Rodney Nightingale

    Corruption has been rampart from kickbacks to custodian, gifts to administrators from suppliers to nepotism on school boards and fixing elections. Those who don’t study history will repeat it. I’m a second generation teacher and product of NYC schools. Proud of it too, but it’s mostly been corrupt. The question is why did students do better under the old regime. Somebody in the press should investigate….maybe a Pulitzer in the offering.

  • TeachBK

     Not only are teachers “allowed” to work as many extra hours as they choose to help struggling students, they are mandated by the union contract to spend almost 40 minutes a day doing so at no additional pay. The union doesn’t prevent a single teacher from doing whatever he or she believes will help kids. It prevents school administrators from *requiring* unpaid labor.

  • Guest

    The whole situation is a joke. I just quit the city system because my principal was writing us up if we didn’t pass 80% of our students. It’s the principal’s fault for going along with Bloomberg’s games. We were graduating kids who couldn’t function in a 12th grade setting-forget about college. Leave the teachers alone- get rid of the corrupt principals who have destroyed their schools

  • Public Consensus

    I agree with you 5000%.

  • Public Consensus

    So you think you are doing “fine”.  It’s all relative, depending on your standard, your expectation, and where you are coming from.

  • Sherellsingh

    Brooklyn Collegiate should be one of the schools on the chopping block. This is a horrible school and the teachers are the most uncaring teachers that I have ever seen. please do not send your kids there you will regret it for life.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

From Our Jobs Board

Featured Employers
Recent Jobs

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

16 comments so far today

Archives

June 2013
M T W T F S S
« May  
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930