GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

leadership prep

In quest for better leaders, charter sector program looks inward

Niomi Plotkin, center, talks to John Harrison and other charter school leaders during the ELF orientation.

For the city’s charter sector, the task of building better leaders begins with self-reflection.

The project of understanding what makes a good leader — particularly for charter schools, which have some of the highest principal turnover rates — is what consumes the 20-odd educators who gathered at the New York City Charter School Center this week to kick off the sixth year of its leadership training program.

When they return to their schools later this month, the educators will face diverse challenges. One pair comes from a school that has nearly doubled in size faster than expected due to make up a budget shortfall. Another is from a rare standalone school serving kindergarten through 12th graders, which will be preparing its first cohort of students to graduate and apply to college next year.

But on a recent morning, all of the participants were focused on the same question as Heidi Brooks, a professor from the Yale University School of Management, talked them through a platitude-heavy presentation about identifying leadership qualities.

“How would you describe yourself as a leader? How do you describe a great leader?” Brooks asked the group, then began taking down their answers until ink filled a sheet of poster paper.

“Positive,” “self-aware,” and “systems-aware” topped the list of traits.

Finding talented school leaders, and convincing them to stay at a school year after year, has been an ongoing challenge for city charter schools — and a problem that James Merriman, the charter center’s head, lamented at a recent state education reform commission meeting. The center is trying to chip away at this problem for a handful of independent charter schools that need well-trained, effective administrators at the helm as they grow to their full size, but don’t have the same recruiting resources as the large charter networks.

This year, the center has invited seven schools, including the New York Center for Autism Charter School in East Harlem and VOICE Charter School in Long Island City, to send one or two school leaders and teachers through its year-long leadership training program, called the Emerging Leaders Fellowship, with the goal of preparing the participants to become administrators at their schools.

ELF is designed for people who are already working in schools and want to stay there, said its director, Niomi Plotkin. She said those people are already familiar with their school’s cultural norms and can be more committed to its mission.

“It’s a different kind of sweat equity, because you’re already invested,” Plotkin said. “We find that makes for better leaders.”

Past fellows have gone on to create an online summer school and a data analysis system for tracking performance at their individual schools, and about 80 percent of fellows have become principals or administrators.

But the first lessons built into the program had little to do with school management. Instead, they focused on fostering conversations between participants and their mentors (most of whom are also their school supervisors) about leadership styles and the importance of self-reflection.

Plotkin said these questions will lay the groundwork for participants to consider what it means to be a leader as they move into more intensive lessons on how to foster strong school culture, recruit a top-notch staff, and manage student conflicts.

Liz Springer, the middle school director for Hunts Point’s Hyde Leadership Charter School, said she joined ELF program out of a desire to puzzle through those subjects within a network of other charter school administrators, which Hyde lacked. She applied to join the second cohort of the program in 2008, after she and colleagues realized they could use more help at the school, which has been expanding to span all grades. Since then, a half-dozen more Hyde teachers have completed the program, and Springer has returned to mentor more teachers in the program this summer.

“The job of being a principal is hard. We get a lot of awesome, type A, overachieving people in the charter sector, but even with that you can’t do it by yourself,” Springer said. “With autonomy comes responsibility. We have the chance to be completely innovative, but there’s a lot to think about.”

The list of a school leader’s concerns is long, she said, ranging from school culture and finance and budgeting to accountability and community engagement. ELF will cover each of these subjects in Wednesday evening sessions over the next several months. In between, the teachers have reams of photocopied lessons to read about character-building, effective team-coaching and conflict resolution.

Most of the educators who joined in the weeklong orientation said they wanted to grow professionally without leaving their schools.

John Harrison, the director of English and language arts programming at Inwood Academy for Leadership Charter School, said his principal encouraged him to join the program to gain skills he would need to run a high school once Inwood Academy expands beyond its middle school. But first he wants to learn how to define the role of school leader so it isn’t overwhelming.

“I think for me the primary issue for the high turnover rate of charter school leaders and burnout comes from the fact that roles are more loosely defined in our schools because they’re so new,” Harrison said. “We have a lot of freedom, but it’s kind of a blessing and a curse. You sign on to a particular role and you don’t always know what you’re expected to do.”

  • Pogue

    Experienced, many years in the classroom, seen-it-all teachers need not apply here.

    Shortcuts, shortcuts, shortcuts.

  • Anonymous

    Interesting….nowhere in the article is the word “student” mentioned.  I guess that is part ofthe problem. ….they forget that students are part of the equation…..

  • Johnnyquest

    Not sure we want type As running schools. But, I suppose were’re still stuck with that failed idea that schools should be run like businesses. How long until Bloomberg is gone?

  • Matt

    “Another is from a rare standalone school serving kindergarten through 12th graders, which will be preparing its first cohort of students to graduate and apply to college next year.”

    “Plotkin said these questions will lay the groundwork for participants to consider what it means to be a leader as they move into more intensive lessons on how to foster strong school culture, recruit a top-notch staff, and manage student conflicts.”

    Control + F, homie.

  • Clay

    Funny, the Charter Center’s own leader is a snake, how is it going to help others?

  • Guest

    why is this a short cut? genuinely curious

  • Pogue

    To me, it’s like asking medical interns to become heads of staff.  Cops and firemen to become captains after only a couple of years of service.  Someone declared a judge right out of law school.  It is only in education where the novice are preferred and glorified to the detriment of experience, and even then it is only in cities where these reform experiments are taking place.

    Experience in a career counts, and as important as educating should be, developing leaders who are time and classroom tested over years should be the preferred norm. 

    If you don’t believe it just look at the brochures of the private schools the rich and powerful send their children to.  Most boast of small classes and experienced, learned teachers.

    For the rest of us, (especially urban education systems, and especially-especially charter schools)…

    it’s just shortcuts.

  • DM

    The fact that Reformers want us to believe otherwise should make it obvious to all that their motives are not altruistic.

  • Anonymous

    It’s a good idea to have young highly driven people attack the urban Ed conundrum.

    If their solutions are longer than long hours and supreme multi-tasking, then they are neither incorrect nor successful in finding breakthrough methods.

    But the profession shouldn’t have ludicrously high turnover, nor should it be a quick stepping stone to leadership roles or policy work.

    There’s the more modern conundrum in education.

  • Pogue

     Sorry, my reply is separated from your question.

    I’d like to add that I find the rushed advancement of people and things similar to our economic problems…

    Instead of letting commerce build gradually, it seems the PTB want huge profits immediately fast, regardless of who gets left behind.

    There is nothing wrong with a steady career of gradual advancement.

  • Mr. Flerporillo

    “If you don’t believe it just look at the brochures of the private schools the rich and powerful send their children to.  Most boast of small classes and experienced, learned teachers.”

    Clearly that’s a lie, though, right?  They don’t have tenure protections, so teachers must be getting fired constantly at the whim of principals and parents. On the other hand, teachers get paid peanuts at schools like Chapin and Brearley, so maybe that reduces the incentive to fire them.  But with such low pay, the quality of teachers must be much worse than the quality of public school teachers.  That’s probably why they need so many more teachers per student — to compensate for the terrible teachers.  

  • A.S.Neill

    What makes a great principal? Um..well, let’s start with what doesn’t make a great principal: Micromanaging (but blaming teachers when it doesn’t work), playing “Gotcha”, being dismissive of teacher’s innovative suggestions, and did I mention lack of social skills yet?  Yea, low social-emotional intelligence which I guess includes arrogance and vindictiveness.What makes a great principal is really quite simple: inspiration. If you think an extra $15k is key to retaining good teachers (a Bloomberg-Rhee staple), you know nothing about true leadership. Studies about why soldiers are willing to sacrifice their lives in battle show its not because of the flag, patriotism, Mom, they are told to do it, their cause is just, and its certainly not because of the pay. They do it for their squad comrades and especially their sergeant. Soldiers will follow a great sergeant to hell and back. It’s this kind of inspirational leadership that as a teacher I’ve seen lacking in every Principal I’ve ever worked under, and the vast majority of APs as well.  I suggest that future and current Principals may want to ponder this point.

  • Pogue

      This original topic was about leadership, wasn’t it?

    I know you’re pro-privatization, Flerpi, but we’re talking about how experience can be a good thing.

  • http://twitter.com/nycdoenuts nycdoenuts

    Yeah. I think that’s a real problem. Somehow, when the topic turns to education two strange things happen: 1) Experience suddenly doesn’t matter and 2) any numbskull in the country is free to just drop in and expect to be treated as an expert opinion…as we’ve seen just this past week.

  • Pogue

    “If you don’t believe it just look at the brochures of the private
    schools the rich and powerful send their children to.  Most boast of
    small classes and experienced, learned teachers.”

    “Clearly that’s a lie, though, right?”

    Let’s check it…

    http://www.chapin.edu/page.cfm?p=293

  • Tiredofyou

    The master. of disruption.

  • Guest

    the reason people shortchange experience and they shouldnt is bc education is attracting the bottom third of college grads

    if we attracted the top third experience would be more valued bc people would have more faith in the quality od educators

  • Pogue

     Ah, lies, damn lies, and statistics.  You’re good, Guest.

  • http://twitter.com/nycdoenuts nycdoenuts

    Ah, Guest. Pogue is correct. D*mn lies. Lucky for us truthful people in the world, there is Larry Ferlazzo; a teacher who debunked the bottom third myth (/damn lie?) known as the Mckinsey report. Happy reading.
    http://larryferlazzo.edublogs.org/2009/11/15/do-teachers-really-come-from-the-bottom-third-of-colleges-or-is-that-statistic-a-bunch-of-baloney/ 
    PS Guest, college grad rankings are a matter privacy. In other words, no one knows. File that one under “duh” 

    PPS (but if I were to call YOU a numbskull, I’d be wrong, right?
    RIGHT?)

  • Mr. Flerporillo

    Pogue: I thought you were asserting a connection between leadership, experience, and the presence of veteran teachers, using private schools as an exemplar, but apparently I overestimated you once again. You were simply saying leadership is important, got it. In that case it’s totally uninteresting whether private schools do in fact prioritize seniority and, if they do, how they’re able to retain veteran teachers on a salary-benefits scale that’s well below the public school scale.

    I do agree that experience is important, though, so it looks like we’re one on this issue.

  • Mr. Flerporillo

    Guest: For reference, Pogue is easily one of the smartest teacher-commenters on this site. Not a statistically significant observation, but it may give one pause.

    I hate to ask, but what’s the point here? That it’s demonstrably false that teachers (excluding post-secondary) graduate in the bottom third of their class? That we don’t know one way or the other? That NYC’d public school teachers are the best and the brightest? Whatever the data can or can’t verify, you’d think that sooner or later the low pay, disrespect, and ever-declining working conditions would have some impact on recruiting. The consensus seems to be that so far it’s had no impact.

  • Pogue

     After getting through the fluff, I liked your last sentence.

  • Anonymous

    ’twas zeal that killed the beast.

    More I think about it, more I think the charter folks shot selves in feet by pushing so dang hard for glowing results. Cases in point: HSA and HCZ. Unnecessary misery all around. Didn’t and doesn’t have to be that way. Bad, unsustainable working conditions, pressure that affects everyone involved.

    A zeal for results, blockheaded corporate attitudes and ethics, greed for influence, power, recognition, status. Wouldn’t even consider the original purpose for charters, and just had to screw up their distortion of the original and create warfare rather than workable, extendable solutions.

    The deform movement: misguided zeal, poor planning, lack of attention to the details of the human condition, power and money in excess, like B-movie cliches. Where did they go wrong? Like in the movies, they must look within themselves. Leadership? Get their ideologies straight first. And of course how are they going to fit in as part of a larger solution or morass?

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

0 comments so far today

Events Calendar

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031