GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

data dump

Seven takeaways from a closer look at the state test scores

The state released the results of this year’s third through eighth grade tests yesterday, and officials from City Hall to the charter sector lept to celebrate students’ gains.

Some changes were the focal point of the Department of Education’s Tuesday afternoon press conference—like the drop among English Language Learners and the boosts charter schools saw. But they avoided nuances in the results for the city’s new schools, which have been at the center of Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s education reform policies. Beyond first impressions, here are seven interesting takeaways we parsed from the trove of data:

  • Like last year, English Language Learners took a step back. Students who are identified as English Language Learners improved slightly in math, but took another step back from the statistical gains they made on the literacy test (ELA) earlier in the decade, before the state made the exams tougher in 2010. While just under half of the city’s non-ELL students met the state’s ELA standards, just 11.6 percent of ELL students did so. But in math, the percentage of ELL students scoring proficient rose by 2.5 points, to 37 percent.
  • But students in other categories that typically struggle showed improvements. The percentage of students with disabilities who are proficient in math and literacy went up again this year, to 30.2 percent in math and 15.8 percent in English. And although Black and Hispanic students are still lagging behind their white peers by close to thirty percentage points in literacy and math, they also saw small bumps in both subjects. Officials said that new initiatives targeting struggling students, particularly students of color, contributed to the gains.
  • The third-grade math test was the hardest one to ace, according to citywide proficiency levels. Less than 13 percent of third graders earned a level four on the exams, known as “advanced proficiency.” That proportion was the lowest of any other grade and the gap was vast. Twenty-six percent or more of students in grades four through seven—and 19 percent of eighth graders—were rated advanced proficient on the math test. More than 26 percent of students in grades four through seven —and 19 percent of eighth graders — were rated advanced proficient on the math test.
  • Middle schoolers carried the district’s ELA gains on their shoulders. Last year, it was the city’s middle school grades that were one of the sore spots when the state released test score results. This year, they were a point of pride. The largest gains came in seventh and eighth grade. And while overall proficiency still in elementary school was still significantly higher, the gap appears to be narrowing.
  • For the most part, the schools the city took off their closure list, saying they were “poised to improve,” didn’t fare any better than the schools that stayed on the list. Of the elementary and middle schools the city prepped for closure with “early engagement conversations” last year, the lowest performing school was  KAPPA VII, which the department decided not to close in February. Overall, the percentage of students proficient in Math and ELA for schools that were spared closure was nearly identical to the results for their closing counterparts. Those schools will likely be on the hook again this year, when the Bloomberg administration sets the list for its last round of school closures.
  • Mayor Bloomberg heralded new schools’ gains. But Several schools that have opened under Bloomberg’s tenure performed in the same league as schools that are closing — and far behind most traditional schools — with fewer than 30 percent of students scoring proficient in any subject, for any grade level. Bloomberg offered reporters a reason for the new schools’ spotty performance: “You’re starting a new school because the old school isn’t doing the job … so if they make any progress at all it really shows they’re going in the right direction.”
  • Charter Schools bounced back from a tough year in 2010 with significant gains. The charter school sector wasn’t nearly as enthusiastic to promote its gains two years ago, when reading scores slumped. After last year’s results barely budged, many charter school leaders decided to change their approach.
  • Ken Hirsh

    I haven’t reviewed the data yet, but from looking at your graphs, it seems like your last point is an understatement:  ”Charter Schools bounced back from a tough year in 2010 with significant gains.”

    It looks from the graphs that charter schools are now outperforming traditional public schools in NYC by a very large margin — much larger than ever before.  They are even significantly outperforming the rest of the state in math.  Now, these results don’t prove that charter schools are “better” than traditional public schools (most of us know the various alternative explanations) or that we should have more charter schools, but the results are much more striking than “bounced back from a tough year… with significant gains”.

  • Anonymous

    Words are kind of important, huh?
    Even subtleties of understatement!

    It affects things, doesn’t it? Comparisons, morale, treatment of human beings. Talk to the Mayor about it, if you can speak his language.

  • East Sider

    We always look at level 3 (proficiency) and above … kids at level 1 indicates the depth of the problem … anecdotally I’m told the % of kids at level 1 in low performing schools increased … if so, a really, really bad sign … as far as charter schools until there is tranparency we simply don’t know whether the increases are instructional gains or selecting of kids and deselecting of kids.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002397245457 Mary Conway-Spiegel

    While I’m happy the stats are good/improving, in real time, as a public school parent, I experience this as a ten-year-long infomercial.  

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002397245457 Mary Conway-Spiegel

    …that doesn’t measure many aspects of education I value: creativity, physical education, civics, public service, genuine curiosity, community, multi-culturalism and more…so much more.

  • Anonymous

    A disinfomercial.

  • Cyrus

    Don’t worry, New York State is currently working on annual performance tests for physical education, civics, and art. Soon, every aspect of every single minute of the school day will be tested for “effectiveness”. Don’t be surprised when kids are tested on how well they eat their lunches every year.

  • Anonymous

    Why isn’t the demographic of each charter ( ell, sped, etc) broken down and publicized? I thought they were PUBLIC schools.

  • ms. v.

    It is. You can find it here, for instance, in the state’s report cards for each school: https://reportcards.nysed.gov/  The information is digested in various ways in any number of places. Incidentally, the report cards include the student stability rate, which might be a first place to look if you want to see which schools keep students and which don’t. (But be careful… instability could be due to many factors, not just “counselling out.” A school serving large numbers of homeless students would have high instability without doing anything wrong…)

  • Mike

    I was more struck by the fact that only half the kids in charter schools are reading and writing at grade level. What ever happened to the theory that it was mainly “union rules” that were holding kids back? Why are charter schools failing to educate nearly half their students even though they’re mostly union free and, more importantly, what can be done for the students who are not succeeding in charter or public schools?  Is there a Plan B for the wealthy charter backers, now that charters don’t seem to be the answer?  Or is union busting the overriding goal?

  • Mike

    I thought I was replying to Ken here, but it ended up as a stand-alone comment.

  • Tim

    yes, but data for the state report cards is determined from last year’s scores, not this year’s.

    And the ‘student stability’ statistic does tell us something about schools that add kids, it tells us absolutely nothing about attrition–it is simply the percentage of students in the school’s top grade who attended the school at any time during the previous year. A school could lose its entire enrollment, save for one kid in its terminal grade, and have a 100% student stability rate. 

  • Thanks Mike!

    First let me preface this by saying that I do think SOME of the charter schools are doing some good things. (At least the ones who aren’t laundering money) BUT, there is no mention that Charter schools have the ability to remove students from their schools mid-year, where DOE schools do not have that capability. If the charter schools have the ability to remove their top discipline problems (who are also probably lower level learners), say 3% of their worst behaving students and those students get thrown out or forced transfer mid-year to DOE schools, your looking at some inaccurate numbers. 

    Then we know that “new schools” are not counted in DOE statistics until their fourth year, how does this change the overall numbers? But I think has to do more with High Schools. 

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

7 comments so far today

Events Calendar

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031