GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

on the air

Phase one of Stuy HS cheating inquiry ends in canceled scores

It’s summer break, so Stuyvesant High School students probably weren’t listening to the radio at 7 a.m. today.

But if they were, 69 of them would have found out from Chancellor Dennis Walcott that they will have to retake the end-of-year Spanish exams they took last month. That’s the number of students that Department of Education investigators concluded had received exam questions in advance via a text message from a classmate.

Walcott announced during an appearance on the John Gambling Show that also touched on the schools thrown into limbo by an arbitrator’s ruling last month and the Department of Education’s new focus on college readiness.

The first phase of the investigation, conducted by the department’s internal Office of Special Investigations, looked only at student behavior and meted out punishments, including some suspensions, according to the city’s discipline code, Walcott said.

The next phase, he said, is to look at whether Stuyvesant’s principal, Stanley Teitel, and his staff followed the appropriate protocol after learning about the cheating on the city exams. “We have to look at the process,” Walcott said. “Once the allegation was made, what happened after that?”

Teitel sent a letter to parents June 20 alerting them to the cheating and informing them that students suspected of cheating would lose some privileges, such as the right to leave campus for lunch. But the city did not find out about the cheating allegations for nearly a week after that letter went home.

The cheating was made possible with a cell phone, even though a citywide policy bars students from bringing their phones to school. Last week, most members of the City Council called on the department to roll back the ban, saying that it is “possibly discriminatory” because it is enforced more often at schools in poor neighborhoods where security is often tighter.

But Walcott said today that the council members are tilting at windmills. “It’s not happening,” he said. He added that while enforcement of the ban is up to individual schools, roving metal detectors mean that students can have their phones confiscated even if their school does not regularly collect them.

The cheating scandal was not the first topic that Walcott and Gambling discussed this morning. The top slot was reserved for the city’s thwarted bid to “turn around” 24 struggling schools by closing and reopening them with new teachers, new programs, and new names.

Two weeks ago, an arbitrator ruled that the city’s staffing plans for the new schools violated its contracts with the teachers and principals unions. He explained his decision in a detailed opinion released on Friday, saying that Mayor Bloomberg and some department officials had helped convinced him that the “new” schools were not in fact new at all.

For the schools to be truly new, Buchheit concluded, much would have to change, including the overall educational visions underlying their leadership.

Walcott used some of that language today as he outlined the city’s appeal bid, set for its first court appearance on Tuesday. The schools were going to have “a new vision, some new staff, a new mission” when they reopened in September, he said.

The decision has thrown months of planning at the schools into limbo and left teachers and administrators unclear about who is in charge and what should be happening. Buchheit’s ruling allows teachers or principals cut loose from the schools to reclaim their positions, but how that will happen is not yet clear.

Walcott said he met last week with the schools’ principals, both “the principals we had identified” as well as those who were already in place. “I let them know that we at central will be there to support them,” he said.

But he said, “It is a fairly tumultuous situation within the schools.”

  • Anonymous

    Walcott,

    Don’t you represent the students, parents, teachers, principals? Were you not supposed to be supporting them all year?

    It is obvious you support the mayor and whatever he decides, not your customers. The tumultuous situation appears to have been created by you and Bloomberg.

    What happened to you?

  • Anonymous

    Walcott,

    Don’t you represent the students, parents, teachers, principals? Were you not supposed to be supporting them all year?

    It is obvious you support the mayor and whatever he decides, not your customers. The tumultuous situation appears to have been created by you and Bloomberg.

    What happened to you?

  • Newtown student

    Based on this article and other information, it seems apparent that the Mayor and the Chancellor have every intention of pushing through their plans whether the people want it or not. They have shown this abundantly over the past several days: when they’ve just filed their appeal against the decision, they press on with their “reforms” as though nothing happened, like keeping the old principals out and continuing the name changes.

    Shouldn’t the decision make them have to at least pause such action until further notice?
    Because in my opinion, I think that would be reasonable evidence to hold Bloomberg and Walcott in contempt of court, no?

  • Farah

    I agree this is upsetting to see. The mayor is to blame! A man of business background shouldn’t have been given the power to change the school system. Now he is treating us students as business. Just disgusting and pathetic.

  • Anonymous

    Can anyone back up or refute Walcott’s statement about new visions and missions for the schools? Was PD money and guidance/support devoted to this during the past school year? Or is this just horse manure as I suspect?

  • Turnaround Teacher

    Seemed like horse manure to me. Our principal at Lehman went to mysterious “turnaround meetings” once a week for about 4 months straight at tweed with other turnaround principals though. Our impact statement also had some very minor changes to our current mission and vision (although it was nothing radical and it could have been done easily without turnaround or SIG money.)

  • guest

    Yet another appeal and court appearance!!!  When will this insanity end?                         

  • Anonymous

    January 2014

  • Anonymous

    Agreed.  I am guessing that these “turnaround meetings” were planning strategies regarding how they were going to put lipstick on the pigs that they called ‘interviews’.  They excessed who they wanted to excess, and it seems like it was mostly tenured teachers…

  • Anonymous

    From NY1 today: “A judge has upheld a temporary restraining order that has stopped Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s plan to shut down 24 struggling city schools and open new ones in their place this summer, marking a legal victory for the teachers’ and principals’ unions.

    The Department of Education argued against the previous arbitrator’s ruling to stop the summer overhauls and wanted it overturned.

    The arbitrator said the plan, which would have forced all faculty and administrators to reapply for their jobs, violated union contracts.

    It was a victory for the teachers’ and principals’ unions and meant staff at those schools could keep their jobs in the fall.

    Bloomberg and Schools Chancellor Dennis Walcott said the arbitrator had no authority to make the decision.

    Both sides are due back in court on July 27.”

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

From Our Jobs Board

Featured Employers
Recent Jobs

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

29 comments so far today

Archives

June 2013
M T W T F S S
« May  
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930