GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

mind the gap

Panel: Path to college-readiness paved with hard-to-fund plans

Panelists discuss obstacles to college readiness at an event hosted by the Center for New York City Affairs.

In an ideal world, the Department of Education would install dedicated college counselors in each city high school, according to Deputy Chancellor Shael Polakow-Suransky.

But doing so would cost the city more than $600 million, he said, so the department is trying instead to close the college-readiness gap with free or low-cost solutions, including training staff members at each school to offer college advice and tweaking the way school performance is measured.

Polakow-Suransky made the comments last week while appearing on a panel on college-readiness hosted by the Center for New York City Affairs. The center is set to release a report next month about why so few city students graduate with the skills they need for college — and what can be done about it.

Interviews with hundreds of students at struggling high schools conducted as part of the center’s research revealed that most had high aspirations for themselves, but few understood that simply graduating from high school would not ensure success in college. The findings reflect a dim reality: In 2010, when the city touted a 61 percent four-year graduation rate, just 21 percent of students who had entered high school in four years earlier met the state’s college-readiness standards.

The city’s main strategy for closing that gap is the Common Core, new learning standards that are supposed to push students to develop critical thinking skills required for college-level work.

But making sure students have the academic skills and knowledge to hack it in college is necessary but not sufficient to ensuring that they succeed there, said David Conley, a researcher who students college readiness. They also need “soft skills” such as persistence and “transition knowledge” about how to navigate the admissions process, he said.

Ideally, a dedicated college counselor in each school would provide the full complement of college-preparation skills, agreed the panelists. But even if the city could afford it, there is actually no way to get counseling training that’s focused on the college admissions process, said Richard Alvarez, the head of admissions for the City University of New York. Instead, licensed guidance counselors must juggle other responsibilities alongside managing college applications for hundreds of students.

Nonprofit organizations shoulder some of the burden, helping students develop study skills, visit colleges, and apply for financial aid. Some even supply full-time counselors for individual schools or campuses. “This is like an alternative that really works,” said panelist Fernando Carlo, who runs an activist group that helps staff “Student Success Centers” that supply college preparation training at some campuses.

Polakow-Suransky said the department is in the middle of training point-people at each school to offer college advice to students and teachers alike. He said the department is also encouraging schools to look to peers who have been more successful at promoting interest and energy around college attendance.

As an example, Polakow-Suransky pointed to Washington Heights Expeditionary Learning School’s annual parade to the local post office to mail college applications. ”Those kinds of culture rituals and making it at the heart of the school’s community don’t actually cost money,” he said.

The city is also starting to measure whether schools are teaching the “soft” skills students need for success in college, he said. On this year’s quality reviews, reviewers will look for the first time for evidence that students are being encouraged to ask for help and try again after falling short, both markers of whether a student has the inner resources for tougher work in a different environment.

The department is also poised to factor a set of college readiness metrics into each high school’s annual progress report for the first time this fall.

“We’re trying to put pressure on [schools] through a number of means, by offering them these resources but also saying to principals, ‘Your grade on your progress report is going to depend on how many kids actually enroll in college,’” Polakow-Suransky said.

“Principals are not totally happy with us about this because they feel that, ‘I can get a kid into college but then that period from May to September when they’re supposed to go, all kinds of things that are outisde of my control can happen,’” he added. “And what we’ve been saying is, ‘Yes, that’s true. But if you lay this foundation well and you see this as part of your responsibility, a lot more kids are going to get there.”

Sheena Wright, who heads the Abyssinian Development Corporation in Harlem, said lead time alone was inadequate preparation for the new accountability metrics.

“With the … stick that schools are going to be held accountable in terms of how their students persist through college, there really does need to be a complementary investment in the resources,” she said. “I don’t think training is going to be sufficient — you know, kind of identifying a leader that already exists in the school that already has five other jobs — but a real investment in someone who … that’s what they do.”

And Wright said she doubted that principals would be eager to share what works in their schools when they know that the city’s accountability system measures their performance against a “peer group” of similar schools. She proposed that schools get credit for how schools in their communities perform in the aggregate, to create incentives for sharing.

“That’s been very challenging for us in our neighborhoods,” she said. “It’s been extremely difficult to break down the walls with some of the school leaders to say, ‘You’re doing a great job. How do we share it with the school down the street?’”

Polakow-Suransky said he had heard that concern before, but that it was misplaced.

“Actually there’s very little to be gained by not sharing information with other schools,” he said. “People don’t necessarily understand that. … Each year when we do the training on the progress reports, we try to explain it again.”

 

  • Student

     This is on another topic, but is there any news at all as to the turnaround arbitration?

    According to an article from the end of May, it should have ended today.

  • Copernicus

    OOh, OOh, how about we fire all the useless consultants, Tweed administrative bozos, and stop funneling money to Moskowitz and Klein, and actually do something helpful for our students?  Naah, so much better to line the pockets of the 1% and find “low cost” methods to make believe we are actually helping students.

  • parent first

    It seems short sighted to focus solely on high schools. College readiness begins in elementary school. Ground work starts being laid much earlier and the development of the critical thinking skills necessary for academic success should be encourage from the earliest grades. 

  • guest

    I’m surprised that the morons at Tweed all got into and graduated from college.  When are 
    they going to realize that every single teacher in the system – hates them – hates them with a passion,  They don’t know anything about what we have to deal with in our classrooms.  HEY MORONS when are you going to wake up and realize that not every student should go to college – not even should every student be in an academic  high school.  I really wish they would just all go away – they are useless at best and dangerous at worst

  • Paladin55

    (To principals) “Your grade on your progress report is going to depend on how many kids actually enroll in college,’” Polakow-Suransky said.”
    This  comment, and  Polakow-Suransky’s complete misunderstanding of how things work in the real world,  just blows me away with its burst of ignorance.

    Think of all the things that graduating HS students can do in life and in the work force which do not require a college background or the immediate enrollment into a college. A school won’t get credit for creating young men and women who can be good citizens and find employment in a terrible economy if they are not enrolled in college?  Makes no sense.

    I also agree with “parent first” and his/her comment about college readiness beginning in the elementary school system, and would add that parental support must also play a roll, especially in combatting the harmful influences many forms of peer pressure can have on the academic performance and world/job readiness of some students.

  • Mike

    $600 million???

  • East Sider

    Decision due Friday

  • East Sider

    one guidance counselor in every high school would cost about 30 million … a zero here, a zero there … and Suransky was a Math teacher

  • Someday teacher

    The DOE’s plan to judge high school efficacy based on the college readiness of their students is inherently flawed, and even reckless when it comes to the future welfare of the students. Even if new empirical measures of college readiness are to be put into place, it would be irresponsible to use only test data to deem students college-ready. Low income and minority students need assistance to acquire the social and cultural–”soft”–knowledge that college students must have to succeed. Until all students have access to adequate resources to prepare them in non-academic areas, even those judged college-ready by empirical data face the possibility of post-secondary academic failure.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

17 comments so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031