GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

departures

Top UFT official to leave for union’s Washington, D.C. think tank

United Federation of Teachers Vice President Leo Casey at a public hearing about Opportunity Charter School's charter renewal in November.

A top United Federation of Teachers official who has been the union’s leading intellectual voice in recent years is heading south.

But he won’t be going as far as Florida, a common destination for union members who retire. Instead, Leo Casey, the vice president of academic high schools since 2007, said today that is taking a new position this fall as the director of the Albert Shanker Institute in Washington, D.C. The institute is a research arm of the American Federation of Teachers, the national union to which the UFT belongs.

In his role at the UFT, Casey has been both an intellectual and a seasoned activist. He has represented the union on various panels, forums, and debates on education policy and blogged prolifically for the union’s news and opinion site, Edwize. But he has been just as comfortable protesting at public hearings, where he was known to deliver fiery speeches against school closures, co-locations, and other policies that the union opposed.

In moving to the Albert Shanker Institute, a progressive think tank focused on education and labor policies, he will focus on research. Casey, a city teacher for 27 years, said that he hoped his legacy at the UFT would be of pushing against school reform that is driven by non-educators.

“I think one of the most important things that has driven my time at the UFT is to provide a voice for classroom teachers and that far too much of education policy making today is in the hands of folks who don’t understand what it’s like to teach,” Casey said.

AFT President Randi Weingarten, a close friend and former colleague who helped hire him as a board member on the Shanker Institute, called Casey “an exquisite choice.”

“I could not be more pleased that someone who has been a teacher and a union activist and a leader in the UFT all these years would agree to take over this very important think tank,” said Weingarten, who worked and co-taught with Casey when she was president of the UFT.

People who have worked closely with Casey over the years said today that his departure would leave a major hole in the union and that he would be difficult to replace.

“Leo’s very, very bright. He’s very much a public intellectual,” said education historian and activist Diane Ravitch, who sits on the Shanker Institute’s board.  ”I think there should be somebody who can kind of be the intellectual and policy face of the union.”

Casey has also been one of the UFT’s staunchest defenders. In February, Casey used Edwize to take on Ravitch and Carol Burris after they criticized the union for endorsing a teacher evaluation deal that they believed counted test scores too heavily. Casey challenged their grasp of the complex issue and believe their public writings on the subject were misguided.

“Unfortunately, complexity has provided a fertile ground for commentaries on the New York teacher evaluation framework that reach alarmist conclusions, with arguments built on a foundation of misinformation and groundless speculation,” he wrote.

Casey also butted heads with activists who were traditionally aligned with the union. At a Panel for Educational Policy meeting earlier this year, Casey drew heat from Occupy the DOE protesters who wanted the union to join them in a united rally.

Yet even traditional enemies of the union said they respected him.

“This is a big loss for the UFT,” said Gideon Stein, a vice chair of Success Academy Charter Schools. “Leo is their leading intellectual and probably best writer.”

Stein, president of Future is Now Schools, was also on the other side of the negotiating table when Green Dot Charter High School teachers recently signed an updated union contract.

“I really liked working with Leo and while we certainly have don’t see eye to eye on a lot of issues, he’s a very decent guy,” Stein added.

Casey currently teaches global studies at Manhattan’s Bard High School Early College. Previously, he taught at Clara Barton High School, including a stint when he co-taught with Weingarten.

“For me, it’s all the same movement,” Casey said of his decision to leave the UFT. “It’s the same purpose. I’m just doing it in a different place.”

He added, “I have something important to add on the policy side and to really speak with some authority. I think in some ways it’s a job that I am particularly well-prepared for.”

Below: Watch a video of Casey arguing with Brian Jones, a teacher who is active in the Grassroots Education Movement, about protest tactics for a PEP meeting where school closures were on the table.

  • Clay

    Slightly silly reporting.

    I’ll start caring about Gideon Stein’s view of Leo Casey when you start including Charles Barron’s opinion of Eva Moskowitz in your Harlem Success articles.

  • Jjkemp

    Farrakhan may also have some important views on the matter. No serious paper can ignore them

  • Gideon Stein

    Hinestly, no one cares what Looking fwd to Hakeem beating him next week.

  • Gideon Stein

    Oops. That got mangled. Meant to say that it’s a bit ridiculous to compare me to anti-Semite Charles Barron. I’m looking fwd to Hakeem beating him next week. Barron’s hated will not and can not be tolerated. -Gideon

  • bee

     And Hakeem, by pandering to charter schools, is hateful to to public schools. Many of us will not be voting for charter enablers. We are sick of the destruction and exploitation of our neighborhood and magnet public schools.

  • bee

     And Hakeem, by pandering to charter schools, is hateful to public schools. Many of us won’t be voting for charter enablers. We’re sick of the destruction and exploitation of our neighborhood and magnet public schools.

  • Philip Nobile

    At risk of repetition, my parting thoughts on Leo’s relocation: He was my mentor when I was Chapter Leader of the Cobble Hill School of American Studies (’03-’09). I respect some of his hardcore stands against ed deform. When he’s good, he’s very good, but his soul belonged to the corrupt Unity gang and his Godmother Randi.  One keen example: in 2007 I asked Leo to help me fight a corrupt SCI report that overruled OSI’s solid substantiation of my allegations of Regents tampering and cover-up at Cobble Hill. He pooh-poohed my 142-page, point by point annihilation of SCI’s ludicrous re-investigation. In contrast, Michael Mendel, NY TEACHER reporter Jim Callaghan, and NYSUT attorney Chris Callagy enthusiastically endorsed my j’accuse. I pressed Leo to explain his inexplicable dismissal, but he shrank from citing a single objection.
    His shocking refusal to admit SCI’s obvious fraud was stupefying. Special Commissioner of Investigation Richard Condon claimed that Cobble Hill’s principal did not cover up my allegations even though the principal failed to report them to SCI as required by city law and SCI’s own Reporting Obligations. Instead the principal conducted an illicit internal investigation with the connivance of LIS Kathy Pelles. No surprise, no Regents cheating was found. This breach of the law disturbed Leo not at all. “Principals conduct investigations all the time,” he said with a straight face. “Not criminal investigations in their own schools,” I replied. “They can’t even investigate corporal punishment without OSI’s okay.”
    What was behind Leo’s intellectual dishonesty and betrayal of solidarity? Randi gave the order to stonewall me because she owed Condon a favor for squelching Chancellor Klein’s smear campaign against her when she was still in the closet.

  • bee

     And Hakeem, by pandering to charter schools, is hateful to public schools. Many of us won’t be voting for charter enablers. We’re sick of the destruction and exploitation of neighborhood and magnet public schools.

    P.S. Gotham Schools, this is the third time I’ve posted this comment because the prior ones “vanished.” Why?

  • Mike

    What was Condon’s angle? Why would SCI protect a principal that OSI was willing to go after?

  • Philip Nobile

    I wish I knew. I think Condon wanted to queer OSI more than exonerate the drop dead guilty Cobble Hill gang. The best way to do that was to smear OSI’s probe that dared to treat Region 8 Superintendent Marcia Lyles and new Deputy Chancellor of Instruction Carmen Farina as suspects in the cover-up. Another mystery is why Klein kissed Condon’s corrupt report and wiped out OSI’s top management as punishment for backing my oh so true and substantiated allegations. Thanks for asking

  • Just wondering.

    The UFT’s “intellectual voice?” What an oxymoron! While we’re at it, here are a few more: Reagan memoirs, cafeteria food, Justice Thomas and…union workers! Yes, seriously.

  • KitchenSink

    It sounds like a spy novel.  I can’t say if it’s true or not, but your words feature an omniscient third person narrator with a lot of insight into the thoughts of individuals.

  • Corey

    I don’t know much about Leo. However, I did read his blog regarding the new NY State teacher evaluations a while back. He seemed like a master spin doctor for Unity by saying how it is such a “good” deal for teachers. Even though the new evaluations have not been finalized in NYC, all thoughts are pointing in the direction that it is not going to be a “good” deal for teachers at all.

  • WinniePooh4u269

    This article was about Leo but yet Nobile brings up his crap once again. Get some medication please. you are making a clear case why you should brought on some charges. Godspeed Leo- hopefully you encounter less nutbags ( that you tried to do the right thing for but obviously couldn’t keep themselves out of trouble) in DC.

  • Promiseteach4231

    If you didn’t have such a sexy bald head I would call you a jerk. Jerk!

  • Larry Littlefield

    As a valedictory, here is Leo’s end zone dance celebrating the recreation of the educational devastation of the 1970s by securing 25/55 after decades of focusing primarily on that, while pretending to care about the actual quality of the schools.  (Some of that is me reading between the lines).

    http://www.edwize.org/the-lessons-of-55-25

    “In the late 1970s, at the height of New York City fiscal crisis and before many of today’s teachers were born, the law governing the pensions of New York City public school educators was changed for the worse.”

    So what caused the fiscal crisis?  Debts yes.  And problems in the economy.  But also something else.  What was it?

    “For the better part of three decades, the UFT fought to bring equity to the different pension tiers and to restore the Tier 1 pension benefits — especially 55-25 — to all New York City public school educators. On two previous occasions, we were successful in passing legislation through the NY State Assembly and State Senate, only to face a gubernatorial veto. Each time we suffered a setback, we renewed the battle. Now, at a moment when few would have predicted it and against the larger trends in American society, we have been successful.”

    The fact that other workers are losing retirement benefit, reducing the cost of goods and services an increasing the relative standard of living of retired teachers, makes it all the sweeter.

    “Our success shows the importance of the savvy use of collective bargaining, starting with the inclusion of 55-25 in the 2005 contract and concluding with a contract implementation agreement last fall which made the implementation of school-wide bonuses contingent upon the passage of 55-25 legislation.”

    That is, the best time to become better off at other people’s expense through a retroactive pension enhancement is when some New York politco (Lindsay, Pataki, Giuliani, Bloomberg) wants to run for President.  The state legislature never cares about public services, since they are owned by producers.

    “Together, all of these levers of power, painstakingly built through union solidarity, brought victory.”

    So who lost?  And where was the solidarity with future members?  I guess we are finding out.  AGAIN!  Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me.  Believe that more funding will provide decent schools a third time?  In the meantime, shame on me.

  • Larry Littlefield

    One more point.  Those who received Tier I pensions did not get an inflation adjustment.  They contributed far more to their pensions than those who suddenly got 25/55 retroactively.  And their life expectancy was shorter.  So the 2008 deal, multiplied by the 2000 deal and perhaps other deals, was for more lucrative for the retired than Tier I.

  • Philip Nobile

    It is counterintuitive that Condon’s team of attorneys, detectives, and interns under the supervision of Special Counsel Eileen Daly would dish out a brazenly fraudulent report that covered up the original Cobble Hill crimes, acquitted sure as shooting wrongdoers, bleached Superintendent Lyles’s obstruction of justice, ignored the suspect amnesia of Deputy Chancellor Farina, harshly censured the OSI team of Director Theresa Europe, Deputy Tom Hyland, and Investigator Lou Scarcella, and painted me as a false accuser without or recommending reprimand of any kind. Why would an agency set up to root out corruption in city schools corrupt itself via a rigged review that shockingly skipped the basic step of auditing the disputed exams and interviewing George? SCI’s motive eludes me, the rest is speculation.

  • Philip Nobile

     
    My crap? Did I tell you about the time that Klein’s bumpkin cops found me guilty of sending “racist” Obama XMAS  cards to chapter members. The card was a reproduction of Barry Blitt’s New Yorker illustration parodying the First Couple as the father and daughter in Grant Wood’s “American Gothic.” The not bright at all OSI guy was so flustered that he walked out of our interview without hearing my defense including  the New Yorker’s splendid history of race writing and editor David Remnick’s friendly Obama bio. DOE lawyers were so embarrassed by OSI’s cultural illiteracy that they shredded the finding. Is that what you mean by crap?
     
    Brought up on charges? For what? Don’t get your point. Yes, I could have laid off Leo, but let’s not pretend that he’s anything but a party-liner.

  • Clay

    You miss the point of my comment, Gideon Stein.

    What the heck do you know about the internal workings of the UFT that you should be quoted in this article saying “Leo is their leading intellectual and probably best writer”?

    Simply silly.

  • Jjkemp

    Is there really that much competition?

  • Jjman36

    The fact that Leo went against Diane Ravitch speaks volumes about his “intellectualism.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

0 comments so far today

Events Calendar

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031