GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

Meanwhile John Chase still has a job making 6 figured.

Although that’s not what he said. So there’s that, I guess. 

Sure, Bloomberg cares about “the kids::

BLOOMBERG TODAY:  “If city government can’t take care of them, I don’t know who is going to…The teachers union is not there to protect our kids. The
teachers union is there to protect members of that union. They may use
children as pawns, but the bottom line is, protecting the public is the
obligation of the government…If there’s going to be a mistake, I’d rather have it on the other
side than on this side. Our first responsibility is to our
children.”

NYCDOE, FEB 2011: Responding to pressure from federal officials and worried parents, the
Bloomberg administration said on Wednesday that it would replace light
fixtures containing the toxic chemicals known as PCBs in nearly 800
school buildings across the city over the next 10 years.

For months, the federal Environmental Protection
Agency has been pressing the city to assess and replace older fixtures
containing PCBs in all of those schools because of the danger of leaks.
With so many buildings involved — nearly two-thirds of the city’s 1,200
school buildings — the Bloomberg administration balked at the cost,
which it initially calculated at about $1 billion.

…

The new plan immediately drew criticism from school advocates who said the problem is too urgent be addressed over a decade.

“The work can be completed in two years if they decided to make it a
priority,” said Miranda K. S. Massie, director of litigation and
training with New York Lawyers for the Public Interest, which has
represented parents in a lawsuit against the city over PCB contamination
from caulk in the schools. “There’s no reason to subject school
children to PCBs contamination for an extra eight years.”

LINK: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/24/science/earth/24pcb.html

That’s good hyperbole, but it’s coming from a guy who would rather see 10 children assaulted than see one innocent teacher terminated. Good luck with that debate.

Mr. Bloomberg, let me count the ways you have failed our children:

a)  You failed to handle the PCB problems – a real health risk.
b) You failed to invest enough in special education when it was needed most.
c) You failed to support the communities of our lowest achieving students by pooling as many low achievers as possible together so they could collectively be branded failures.
d) You failed to be honest in bargaining with your workforce – see “Turnaround schools” and  their connection to the need for a “teacher evaluation deal”.
e) You failed again when you pushed for the disclosure of teacher evaluation reports EVERYONE knew were faulty – to become the problem of your teachers.
f) You failed several times over by repeatedly threatening the communities of your students with closure, teacher firing, and curriculum reduction at the expense of standardized tests – so you can more adequately attack the teachers rather than the problems facing the students.

Who is really looking out for the students, and who is looking out for their own interests?

If you review the “penalty chart” of how the new process goes, it looks something like this:

Board decides to bring charges – arbitrator rules on charges including on whether they have merit – board (i.e. Walcott) then gets to decide whether the charges have merit.

If it proceeds, arbitrator rules on the case.  Walcott then gets to issue his own ruling regardless of what the arbitrator says.

Both “deciding points” would be controlled by Walcott, and would only be appealable to the state board.  The only thing the arbitrator has control over is the following:

A) Is the employee suspended without pay for the duration of the hearing.
B) Will the employee’s lawyers be paid for (noting that since Walcott needs to sign off on the “frivolous” provision before this kicks in, it really isn’t being decided by the arbitrator since it’s part and parcel of whether the charges should stick or not).

This is one short step from having no arbitrator at all – and where would the line be drawn – once Walcott has this power for one offense based only on accusation, where do we stop it?

Of course no one wants any sex offender in the classroom.  But make no mistake about this–principals will make up phony charges as students have been known to do, and Walcott will make sure the teacher is fired.  We cannot trust Walcott on any of this.  This is just a “get even” tactic after his little publicity stunt on his so-called “perv teachers” burst  because these teachers gave their side to the media. 

Look how Walcott does nothing when a principal is accused of wrongdoing even when the evidence is strong.  Look at Bloomberg’s history.  When his own  deputy mayor cannot handle a blizzard,  he instead had union people fired.  Then when the same guy was arrested , the mayor hid it from the media.  The mayor takes care of his own even if they are incompetent.  That’s why he chose Black as chancellor and would have kept on defending her had the media not made mince meat out of her.

No money.  Because of 25/55.  And it’s irrevocable.  But neither Bloomberg or the UFT will say so.  Because they were both in on it.  The UFT doesnt’ want to tell the truth and claim victory over the children and younger and future teachers.  And Bloomberg does not want to tell the truth and admit defeat.

Don’t want predators in the schools for sure but a person is still innocent until proven guilty. Throwing out the constitution won’t work and will be the biggest mistake for every citizen.
Bloomberg is an arrogant ass.