GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

getting to the core

For math teachers, conversion to new standards may be tough

This year, Jackie Xuereb is teaching her sixth grade math students how to add and subtract fractions with unlike denominators. But next year, new standards will call for students to know that information before they enter her class.

Xuereb, a sixth grade math teacher at Washington Heights Expeditionary Learning School, is among the city math teachers preparing to swap the state’s learning standards for the Common Core this fall. And like many, she is struggling to keep the two sets of standards straight as the new standards move some topics an entire grade-level earlier than in the past.

“A lot of what used to be sixth grade standards are now taught in fifth grade,” Xuereb said. “I feel that I’m going to have to be really mindful and cognizant of this in my planning for next year. The kids are going to have these huge gaps.”

New York City piloted the Common Core standards in 100 schools last year and asked all teachers to practice working with them this year. Next year, every teacher in every elementary and middle school will be expected to teach to the new standards, and state tests will be based on them. Department of Education officials have argued that a full-steam-ahead approach is required because moving slowly would deprive students of the Common Core’s long-overdue rigor.

But some say that this approach will pose a special challenge for math teachers, particularly in the middle school years, as students begin learning advanced concepts that build on each other sequentially. William Schmidt, an education professor at Michigan State University who has researched the effect of the Common Core on learning, said students who miss a lesson the first time around are at risk of missing the concept entirely.

“If it’s done really carefully it might work, but that would be my worry, that this would require fairly careful thought about how to do that across the grades so that what’s happening in one grade will line up with the next,” he said. ”If they’re not ramping this up from first grade on in a logical fashion … then the transition to more advanced math will be horrendous, too.”

The city has offered some help. Two weeks ago it published suggestions for topics teachers might tackle after the state tests, the last aligned to the old standards. And officials recently urged principals to use unused snow days in June as planning days for teachers preparing for the next phase of the rollout, which will feature two Common Core-aligned units and exams aligned to the content of the standards.

But some teachers say they have had to wait too long for clear direction. Molly Elverson, a seventh-grade math teacher at M.S. 228 in the Bronx, said she anticipates many stumbling blocks next year as she reconciles the new curriculum expectations with the realities of what students come to class prepared to learn.

“Integers are in seventh grade in New York State, [but] for Common Core, in sixth grade. So when do we start?” said Eleverson. “It’s all the logistics of it, figuring out when am I going to incorporate this, when am I going to have the time? And when am I supposed to assume they have learned it all?”

Similar shifts abound. For example, the Common Core tells teachers to move their units on computation with fractions  backwards, to fifth grade, even though that unit is now typically introduced in sixth grade. It also moves some concepts forward a year — such as the Pythagorean Theorem, which is taught in seventh grade but will be taught in eighth in the future.

Elverson said she feels fortunate to be part of a small math department of just three teachers who talk frequently. They have met as a group to discuss the rollout and agree upon when to teach integers and other concepts. But Department of Education resources to aid their discussion have been slow to arrive.

Deputy Chancellor Shael Polakow-Suransky said the city has helped schools as much as it can, given that the state has not yet released a “final blueprint” for next year’s math expectations or offered sample Common Core-aligned test questions. For the 80 percent of city schools that are still using the math curriculum the city mandated in 2003, the Common Core is going to mean radical changes, he said.

“It’s true that this is going to be a change in terms of the topics that are taught and the number of topics. Planning for that is difficult given that we don’t know all the information at this stage,” he said.

Polakow-Suransky said the city would be delivering more guidance to schools as it learns more. “I don’t know if it will be as early as everyone wants it to be but it will be before the end of the school year,” he said, adding that the department would allocate funding so schools can pay for curriculum planning sessions, ideally over the summer.

Xeureb said she would welcome the additional resources but is worried about waiting too long for them.

“What I do during my summers is I plan. If they don’t have a curriculum, that’s what I’m going to do this summer. I’ll have to sit down and really start doing it myself in July,” she said. “I can’t just take something and print it out — if they have a curriculum on the internet, I’m going to edit and revise it myself based on who the students are, so it would be nice to have it now, while we’re still in school and can plan as a department more easily.”

Xuereb and the other math teachers at WHEELS will attend a training conference held by the National Council for Teaching Math this summer, and she also devoted some time this school year to preparing her students for concepts that have been moved from seventh grade to sixth.

Tacking Common Core topics onto their existing curriculum increased Xuereb’s workload, but in some ways it was no different from what she does every year to get her students to the same starting point after they arrive with widely varying math backgrounds.

Indeed, some students have always arrived in class in September without adequate preparation, a reality that Josh Thomases, the city’s deputy chief academic officer for instruction, said justifies the city’s speedy Common Core rollout.

“As long as I have been an educator, there have been complaints from schools kindergarten through college about how their students are unprepared,” he said. “This work becomes more challenging in the face of a push towards understanding what it is to have standards. In this city, you can find examples of schools that are figuring this out, with the same resources as other schools, in really exciting ways.”

New York State is rolling out the Common Core in full earlier than many other states, but teachers elsewhere are being asked to adopt the new standards with even less preparation than city teachers are getting, according to Schmidt — making teachers across the country in for a rocky transition, he said.

“Any time you shift — and this is a fairly radical shift — there is no simple, easy way to do this,” Schmidt said. “It’s going to be hard on the kids, hard on the teachers, and when the first set of tests come out it’s going to be a miserable set of results. It’s all part of the process, and this is simply the best chance we have to give our students a good mathematics education.”

Already, teachers say the approach of next year’s Common Core-aligned tests have already wreaked havoc on their students.  Xuereb and Elverson both said questions on this year’s sixth- and seventh- grade exams threw students for a loop by asking them to complete tasks that under the current standards they weren’t expected to know.

“My kids kind of had breakdowns in the classroom because they saw a lot of these questions this year that I had never taught them because it was Common Core,” she said. “I know I had prepped my kids to say there are some field questions for next year, but you could see the effect on my students. They were visibly upset. It made me feel like they lost confidence in me a little bit.”

To avoid test anxiety and smooth the transition, Ryan Hall said teachers at his school, Williamsburg Collegiate Charter School, opted to align all of this year’s lessons to Common Core math standards. That practice-run far exceeds the city’s one-unit mandate, and he said they hoped it would leave students better prepared for high school, where the curriculum expectations are also changing, though more slowly.

“It was tough this year because I had so much more material to cover,” Hall said. “I taught every eighth-grade math standard, I taught every eighth-grade Common Core standard, and I’m trying to teach every ninth-grade algebra Regents standard.”

But he said no amount of planning will be able to compensate for the scale of the changes.

“The transitional years are really confusing because the Common Core is designed assuming a certain knowledge that [students] are coming into the grade with,” Hall said. “It is going to be pretty complicated for the next couple years, to ask, ‘what have they been exposed to, and what gaps will we need to fill anyway?’”

  • http://thejosevilson.com/ Jose

    My big problem with the rollout of the Common Core is that, if some teachers hadn’t read this article, they might have felt like they were the only ones confused about the CCS rollout too. Unfortunately, the isolationism of the NYC Dept. of Ed makes every school feel like they’re competing with each other, so they can’t share confusion or frustrations unless given the appropriate platform. I’m not advocating for a full-out complaint session, but there is something to be said for this many teachers not having a clue what the CCS will do for instruction, assessment, and other facets of pedagogy.

  • Andy Wolf

    New York children are being victimized by a Balkanized instructional control mechanism. Ironically Bloomberg had it right when early on he advocated for a uniform curriculum — his mistake was choosing the wrong one, at the behest of the former Deputy Chancellor for Instruction Diana Lam (remember her?)

    Now principals basically freelance without adequate supervision. District superintendents are toothless figureheads, and the networks and network leaders are beholden to the principals. 

    Without clear expectations, we are left with a formula for disaster.

    And should anyone be surprised that NYC kids, exposed for years to constructivist math, are at a disadvantage and falling behind?

  • Rlratto

    Wouldn’t it make sense to give us examples of test questions linked to the Common Core? Why are they keeping teachers in the dark?

  • Erin

    Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. The CCS do nothing to change the fact that American math education is a weed-out system that does not care whether students ever actually learn how numbers work.

    Just like now, thousands and thousands of students are going to pass the tests, only to enter the next grade without actually learning the requisite prior knowledge necessary to understand what’s going on at the next level. Instead of taking the time to remediate, teachers will continue to be forced to teach to the next level’s test. And so, teachers will be fired, schools will be closed, students will drop out, and math will remain unattainable for the majority of the populace.

    I teach high school math, and it’s depressing how little event the most adept students remember from their middle school math curricula. Fractions? Percents? Ha. I have lower achieving students in grades 10-12 that struggle to do single-digit arithmetic. They pass their Algebra Regents exams though, so who cares if they can multiply or not, right?

  • Mark Twarogowski

    Revolt against the Common Core! This approach to education assumes all students are capable of learning the same concepts at exactly the same time, pace, and intensity at exactly the same age. The “educators” who conceived of this framework ignore the fundamental variation that exists in human development! Enough already with your misguided school “reform” efforts. You do more harm than good.

  • http://twitter.com/ChristinaMLuce Christina Luce

    These conversations are being held all over NYS.  Even the most rigorous programs have gaps. As difficult as this is going to be for us as teachers, imagine the frustration our students are bound to face. I recall the year we implemented Everyday Mathematics, the sixth grade students I was teaching struggled greatly with the change in vocabulary and the gaps in their conceptual understanding. The next two years were not easy.  This pales in comparison to what many will face in the coming years as we move ahead with this “full-steam” adoption.

  • http://www.ltftraining.org/ Kaci

    Rlratto, the teachers at the company that I work for have developed sample lessons and assessments aligned to the Common Core. This might be something that you’d be interested in. Visit http://www.CommonCoreTraining.org to see some of Laying the Foundation’s open lessons and assessments, and send an email to info@ltftraining.org to learn more.

  • ceolaf

    1) The idea of grade level standards for math are nothing new. Don’t blame the Common Core crowd for that. 

    2) The issues with moving around content from grade to grade for the new standards is an issue in math, but it pales in importance/difficulty compared to the rather different approach to literacy instruction in the CCSS. Math still means just about the same thing, even if the sequence is a bit different. Literacy now means something rather different. 

    3) As long as high school math is focused on getting kids to (and maybe through) calculus — instead of focusing on getting kids through statistics (& probability) — schools will be failing in their duty to prepare children for the demands of citizenship. 

  • Saramc9

    Because they haven’t developed them yet!

  • Chaoui

    Ugh!  A call for sanity, please.  Can the common core states please start looking at mastery learning.  I say you need to get rid of grades and grade levels.  It is simple.  Teachers are assigned certain standards that they need to teach.  Students are tested ahead of time and the students go to the teacher who teaches the concepts they have not mastered.  The issue is that they are trying to fit a square peg in a round hole.  Once students master a standard they can move on to the next one.  Sort of a Khan Academy with teachers…

  • stan

    These are just standards.  You would think that we were rolling out a new religion.  The children will adapt or the standards will roll backwards some.  This really isn’t that big of a deal. The only certainty in education is change.  Believe that.

  • AB

    Common Core is not the problem; the problem is the lack of planning and preparation by the state. Teachers are not given adequate training to make the transition as seamless as possible. It’s too nonchalant. It is criminal to me that the state is knowingly creating a gap in math knowledge/skills and not creating a strategy to fill that gap for the next few years. Students and parents already hate and fear math and the decision makers are justifying their fears with their approach to the transition

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

From Our Jobs Board

Featured Employers
Recent Jobs

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

16 comments so far today

Archives

June 2013
M T W T F S S
« May  
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930