GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

breaking news

City withdraws “turnaround” plans at two high-profile high schools

Students crowded the auditorium at a public hearing last week at Bushwick Community High School.

When the Panel for Educational Policy meets tonight to consider dozens of proposals for school “turnaround,” two high schools with a host of a heavyweight supporters won’t be on the agenda.

Bushwick Community High School and Grover Cleveland High School were among 26 schools that the department had proposed to close and reopen — with new names and new teachers — in an attempt to win federal school reform funds.

Department officials had said the schools needed radical interventions to help them improve. But today the officials said they had determined after listening to public comment and reviewing performance data that Bushwick and Cleveland didn’t need major changes after all.

The schools “have demonstrated an ability to continue their improvements without the more comprehensive actions that are clearly needed at 24 other schools,” said Chancellor Dennis Walcott in a statement.

The about-face comes weeks after the department yanked seven top-rated schools from the turnaround list and just hours before the panel’s scheduled vote. It also comes after the schools received intense political and community support and, in the case of Bushwick, media attention.

Elected officials in Brooklyn turned out in force to support Bushwick, and the New York Times columnist Michael Powell championed the transfer high school. State officials said the school had been snagged unfairly in an accountability dragnet, and City Council Speaker Christine Quinn signed on to the cause in a series of behind-the-scenes phone calls. Even a top department official signaled confidence in the school last week.

In Queens, elected officials had thrown their support behind all eight high schools on the turnaround roster. But Cleveland got extra attention from State Assemblywoman Catherine Nolan, chair of the Assembly’s education committee, who graduated from the school in 1976.

City officials said the decision about which schools to remove from the list was not politically motivated. Instead, they said, Bushwick and Cleveland had each received B grades on recent progress reports and ratings of “proficient” on a different measure of school capacity. A third school with those statistics, J.H.S. 80 in the Bronx, will remain on the turnaround list because its performance has been slipping, officials said.

The eleventh-hour reprieves echoes a similar move in February, when the department withdrew proposals to shrink or close two of 25 schools on the chopping block. One of those schools had received intense support from Harlem politicians.

Bushwick principal Tira Randall said Deputy Chancellor Shael Polakow-Suransky, who had praised the transfer high school during its public hearing last week, called her at home early this morning to let her know the good news.

“The staff and students are so excited. I’m just delighted,” she said. “My assistant put it so eloquently this way: ‘We’re really thankful for this opportunity to turn around without closing.’ … The disruption in the continuity of services that we provide would have probably had some devastating effects on the school.”

But she said the school would not rest on its laurels. ”In realizing that we’ve been given this reprieve we realize there is work that remains to be done,” she said.

Randall attributed the decision to the outpouring of support from politicians and and the press. ”My gut told me that with all the support clearly the DOE would take a second look,” she said.

At Cleveland, Principal Denise Vittor hadn’t gotten word about the department’s decision shortly after 9 a.m. Reached in her office, Vittor said she and her staff were nervously gearing up for a long evening at the PEP meeting, where students and teachers planned to offer public testimony against the plans. “I was very doom and gloom today, so I hope it’s true,” she said.

When official word came from the just before 10 a.m., assistant principals and teachers heard clapping and cheers from her office.

Cleveland science teacher Russ Nitchman said he was relieved to hear the news but said the school has suffered after months of uncertainty about its future. Cleveland was supposed to undergo the “restart” school reform model and get close to $1.5 million in federal grant money this year. But that option was taken off the table and replaced with the more aggressive reform strategy in January after teacher evaluation talks between the city and UFT fell apart.

“It’s great they’re taking it off the list, but the bottom-line truth is the damage has already been done to a school when you’ve been through this much stuff. It’s been distracting our students from learning,” Nitchman said. “What we’re doing at the school next year will be the same whether it’s turnaround or not turnaround. We have our game plan.”

Nitchman said some teachers would lament the missed opportunity to receive extra federal funding, but the tradeoff would be worth it.

“Having less money hurts, but keeping our staff — which is an excellent staff — is probably more important,” he said.

Randall also said the reprieve was worth the loss of federal funding, which the school began receiving last year under the “transformation” model. “You can’t attach a dollar figure to the work that the staff puts in here,” she said.

Nitchman said he had been planning to attend the PEP hearing tonight and might still go to support the other schools. But he and many other teachers and students at Cleveland, he said, have already shared their concerns with city officials during a spring packed with protests.

Dmytro Fedkowskyj, the Queens representative to the Panel for Educational Policy who has proposed a resolution against turnaround that is also on tonight’s agenda, said he was thrilled by the news but would not let it overshadow his support of the seven other Queens schools that remain on the list.

“It hasn’t been explained to me why it came off the list,” said Fedkowskyj, who graduated from Cleveland in 1984. “We still have seven fights to make tonight.”

  • just a question?

    question-will each school get a separate vote? Or will the vote be done as a wholesale lot? Anyone know which school the PEP itself will save to “prove” their independence?

  • Transformation Teacher

    I should have gambled on this my prediction came true! As for JAQ they vote on each one individually, and they have never voted down a proposal ever, so I doubt they will save any. Unless of course Mike gives that order to make people think it became democratic.

  • TeachmyclassMrMayor

    City officials say the decisions are NOT politically motivated. Really? C’mon, it is amazing just how stupid they think we are. I get that no one can do anything about it, but NOT political? I wonder how many times they had to say that to themselves in front of mirrors to get them to believe it themselves?

  • Noah E Gotbaum

    ALL of our schools are deserving of investment as NONE of these plans or
    closing is based on educational value, rational thought or what’s best for our
    kids.  Rather this whole process – including today’s news and the similar
    inclusion and then removal from the list of the original 8 schools with A’s and
    B’s – is yet another example of the DOE putting their own political ends over
    the educational needs of our kids. Think they just figured out that these two schools were deserving or that anything has actually changed other than a cynical political calculation?  If so, I have a bridge for sale. Walcott, Klein and the Ed
    reformers treat firing teachers, closing schools, turning communities upside down, and educating kids as if it’s
    one big game. So sad…

     

  • A Brooklyn Turnaround Victim

    Let me first say congrats to Bushwick and Cleveland….but really, when you stack them up against the remaining schools, including mine, there is no comparison. There is no sane reason for anything concerning the DOE anymore. My school has a grad rate HIGHER THAN THE CITY AVERAGE….and a College Readiness Index HIGHER THAN THE CITY…..so they don’t take us off the list……I am besides myself over this…..there is officially no reason to do this anymore….Did Dewey make too much noise over the last few months or not enough????????

  • anonymous

    Walcott says that the performance of Grover Cleveland HS has shown “positive signs” in the last two years…yet they received an F in “School Performance” on their last progress report (and a D the year before), with the graduation rate dropping 5 points. How is that a positive sign? Compared to, for example, John Dewey High School, which is at the top of the original list of 33 schools in graduation rate, and blows away the others (not to mention city average) in College Readiness. Not only are these moves made without logic or rationale, but they are disingenuous and complete fabrications of the truth.

    I don’t feel that closure is a good policy in general for any school, but the choice of those that have been spared is ludicrous. 

  • A proud student at BCHS

    I am proud till this day, to be a student at Bushwick Community H.S. this school has showed me abundant love. Words can’t express how much this school and the staff mean to me. This school has changed my life completely. We have fought for this school with everything we have, I thank the LORD for listening to my prayers.Thanks to the DOE for making the right decision, and actually realizing that this isn’t only a transfer school.. but a school for transformation. 

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

From Our Jobs Board

Featured Employers
Recent Jobs

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

49 comments so far today

Archives

June 2013
M T W T F S S
« May  
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930