GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

seeing red

In report, advocates paint grim picture of city school inequities

Critics of school closures were not the only ones taking aim at the Bloomberg administration’s education policies today. A Massachusetts-based education foundation declared that the city’s schools systematically shortchange poor students and students of color.

Those students, who make up the vast majority of city enrollment, are less likely to attend top-performing schools as a result of educational “redlining,” according to a report released today by the Schott Foundation. The foundation gives grants to education advocacy groups across the country, including New York’s Alliance for Quality Education, a lobbying group formed to help win extra funds for city schools through the successful Campaign for Fiscal Equity lawsuit.

The term “redlining,” coined in the 1960s, refers to the practice of discriminating against people in certain neighborhoods or of certain races when deciding who should receive loans or other services. Writes New York University professor Pedro Noguera in a foreword,

While the term “redlining” might seem strong given that it implies a deliberate attempt to deny certain communities access to educational opportunities, this report will show that evidence of blatant disparities amount to Apartheid-like separations that have been accepted in New York for far too long. Rather than being angered by the language used, my hope is that readers of this report will be outraged by the fact that education in New York City is more likely to reproduce and reinforce existing patterns of inequality than to serve as a pathway to opportunity.

Using a methodology it has applied to other cities and research questions, the foundation assigned each of the city’s 32 school districts an “Opportunity to Learn Index” based on how likely it is that middle school students in the district attend schools in the top quarter citywide. It found that students in districts with many black and Hispanic students had a lower chance of attending top-performing schools.

The report also argues that black and Hispanic students have, on average, less experienced and educated teachers, resulting in lower total education expenditures in some poor districts because teacher salaries total a smaller amount. And it concludes that black and Hispanic students are far less frequently screened for gifted programs — a charge that gained another year’s evidence when the city revealed last week that several low-income districts again had so few students pass a screening test that gifted programs would not open there.

In its conclusion, the foundation echoes language in a recent report by a group that ex-city schools chancellor Joel Klein headed that argued that America’s lagging school performance would induce a national security threat. “The fact that New York has consistently promoted policies that systemically lock out most of its student population from an opportunity to learn is tantamount to the U.S. allowing its national security, democracy and economic strength to rot away,” the Schott Foundation concludes.

The group’s recommendations include restoring extra state funding that has been cut in recent years; screening all incoming kindergarteners for giftedness; and limiting the proportion of inexperienced teachers at schools with low “Opportunity to Learn” indexes.

A Department of Education spokesman, Frank Thomas, suggested that some of the recommendations were impractical and others would undermine the city’s philosophy of funding schools based on students’ academic needs, not their demographics or family income. Plus, he said, the city is already on the right track when it comes to educating black and Hispanic students.

“While there is much more work to do, the reality is that black and Hispanic students in New York City are graduating at their highest rates ever, and continue to narrow the achievement gap year after year,” Thomas said in a statement. “A report that fails to acknowledge this progress is shortsighted and overlooks the gains made by thousands of students during that time.”

The Schott Foundation’s analysis came on the same day that a committee organized by the Coalition for Educational Justice, a city advocacy group, released a report criticizing the Bloomberg administration’s approach to school closures and charging that the closures had concentrated poor students and students of color in low-performing schools. Noguera sat on a panel to discuss the committee’s recommendations this morning, and Zakiyah Ansari, an AQE organizer who emceed the event, urged attendees to examine the Schott report as well.

Asked about the charges of inequity this afternoon at a press event, Mayor Bloomberg said it is not fair to suggest that the city has shortchanged particular groups of students. With a schools budget of $22 billion, “to say that we aren’t devoting resources is ridiculous,” he said.

The full Schott Foundation report, “A Rotting Apple: Education Redlining in New York City,” is below.

  • Guest

    You can bet that the Times, Daily News and the Post won’t make too big a deal out of this study.
    After all, they don’t want to risk Bloomberg raising the price for rental of his financial terminal; AKA the Bloomberg Terminal; his invention.

  • SpikeLee

    But I thought Bloomberg was doing a wonderful job closing the minority gap.

  • http://twitter.com/nycdoenuts nycdoenuts

    I have to say, I didn’t think much of the study after reading the Times piece.I came away with a much different view of it after reading this one.

  • Ken Hirsh

    Apparently, The Schott Foundation received $300,000 from the AFT alone in the 2010-2011 fiscal year.  http://bit.ly/IYVry9

  • Tim

    . . . who in turn used it to produce this report which absolutely excoriates the performance of traditional district schools staffed by unionized teachers and staff? 

    Come on. I know you don’t automatically throw out the results of studies funded directly or indirectly by Gates, Walton, Broad, etc. 

  • Ken Hirsh

    Good to know while reading it, though.  (I also like to know when I’m reading a Gates/Walton/Broad report.)

    Based on my quick read, the report seems to consist of a fairly trivial analysis that shows that there continues to be a large achievement gap followed by a set of recommendations that have no particular connection to this trivial analysis.  (Although nothing would have a particular connection to the analysis since it just tells us something we already knew.)  Recommendation #1 is… drum roll please… to increase school funding.

  • bkparent

    I think its odd that the study uses Stuyvesant as a case study but doesn’t mention that Stuyvesant is a Title I school.  I would think that the financial resources of the student body – or lack thereof — would be relevant to the discussion of opportunities to learn.  In general I thought the study noted data that did not appear to conform to the conclusions (e.g., well-resourced districts like District 15 that nevertheless have relatively inexperienced teachers) without identifying them as anomalies, which I found dissatisfying. 

  • Mr. Flerporillo

    “And it concludes that black and Hispanic students are far less frequently screened for gifted programs — a charge that gained another year’s evidence when the city revealed last week that several low-income districts again had so few students pass a screening test that gifted programs would not open there.”

    I don’t follow this.  The “charge” here is that “black and Hispanic students are far less frequently screened for gifted programs.”  The data released by the city indicate that fewer students in “low-income districts” (our metaphor for black and hispanic students) scored in the 90th-percentile or above on the G&T tests than in previous years.  The data didn’t indicate that fewer of these students were “screened” – I believe the GS story said the number of G&T test-takers in that group was on par with previous years.  

  • Jay1

    Two things:

    1) As for the higher number of inexperienced teachers in low-performing schools – can SOMEONE tell Mr. Pedro that leftist, social justice advocates WANT the 22 year old Teach-for-America newbies?  Obama, Michelle Rhee, Arne Duncan, Klein and Bloomberg and dozens of more left-leaning types have made it the holt grail of education: push out the more experienced teachers in favor of the ‘young’ who can ‘relate’ better to their students.  Well, now you got it: new teachers with little content knowledge but a great ‘social justice’ repertoire.  Are these peolple never satisifed?

    2)  They have ALREADY long ago integrated the schools in nearly every white area of the city with non-white students.  Go to Whitestone, Malba, Brooklyn etc, and even though the locals are all or mostly whites, the schools are all majority non-white.  And because of the population explosion of latino immigrants and African Americans in NYC, now there are just NOT ENOUGH white students to mix into schools to give a shining example to their non-white classmates.  But Asians are getting a free pass!  They score higher than whites.  So instead of driving the last few thousand white students from the city, why not forcibly integrate Asians into every district in the city, not just letting them create centers of hyper-academia in Flushing and a few other places?  Let the black and latino students learn from students with even better work habits and better study skills than the few remaining white students!  If you disagree, then you are a racist!

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

6 comments so far today

Events Calendar

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031