GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

the admissions test

More children passing the gifted exam, but not in poorer districts

More children than ever passed the city’s admissions test for gifted and talented programs this year, according to data released today by the Department of Education. But the number of children qualifying in the city’s poorest districts has actually fallen in recent years.

In four districts where qualifying scores have historically been so scarce that the city has not opened gifted programs, just 52 children scored high enough to make them eligible for admission.

The 9,416 students who scored higher than 90 percent on the city’s two tests outpaced last year’s total — 7906 — by about 20 percent. The total represents a 77 percent spike since 2008, when the city first turned to a standardized application process for its elementary school gifted programs.

The increase means that more students are eligible to enroll in district-based gifted programs, which require scores in the 90th percentile or above, as well as in five elite citywide programs that requires scores in the 97th percentile. Last year saw a drop in students who qualified for the citywide programs, but the 4,092 students who scored that high this year is 40 percent more than two years ago.

The increase in applications and qualifying scores has been largest in districts with many affluent families. This year, just 52 students posted qualifying scores in in the South Bronx (Districts 7 and 9), East New York (District 23) and Bushwick (District 32) out of 479 test-takers — 27 percent fewer than in 2009.

The Bloomberg administration standardized the admissions process for gifted programs five years ago in an effort to increase equity. Before then, admission standards varied by school and neighborhood, an arrangement that critics said benefited only the most resourceful — and affluent — families. The city also began to make a more concerted effort to provide information about the process to more families.

As a result, the number of children who took the test saw a significant increase in the first year that the reforms were rolled out, but those numbers dropped back down in 2010. The number of test-taking children in high-poverty districts has barely changed since.

Now, the city is developing its own test to screen students for giftedness as a replacement for the tests it currently uses, the BSRA and OLSAT. A Department of Education spokesman said the new test would likely be administered during next year’s admissions cycle.

Robin Aronow, a consultant who helps families navigate public school admissions, said she thought the department was trying again to increase equity in gifted program admissions.

“I think it’s one of the reasons — to level the playing field a bit,” she said.

Aronow attributed the boost in qualifying students to more vigorous test preparation. “There’s been lots of prepping going on to make sure kids are ready for this test,” she said.

Explaining the phenomenon in 2010, she said, “Certainly there is prep that is going on all over the city. There are books out there now for kids. There are independent companies that have boot camps. Can I attribute all of the increase to that? Not necessarily, but I’m sure it played a role.”

As has always been the case, a spot in the citywide programs is hardly guaranteed for top scorers. Last year, 1,803 incoming students qualified for about 325 seats.

This year, 102 fewer children made the cutoff, and education officials said they expected that there would be more seats available. But last year, about 970 students scored 99 or above, “so you still have to be lucky just to get in,” Aronow said.

The number of students scoring in the 99th percentile this year was not immediately available. More than 40 percent of the qualifying students scored at the 97th percentile or higher.

  • TeachmyclassMrMayor

    Anyone still think that the goal of the dictatorship running the city is education? Look at the stuff talked about in this story…they talk to an “admissions consultant, there’s “more vigorous test prep”…are these people doing this for free? And of course, someone (or more than one) person is “developing” a new test. There are new books out for the test…so I say again, all of this is being done for free? I do not think so…

  • ShashaDai

    The 2758 number is the k-3 number for the citywide. For k, the number should be 1803. 

    Other than that this is a well written article. Hopefully breakdown of 99th in kindergarten can be available soon. 

  • Guest

    What is the test called? Where can we see a copy of what determines if a 4 year old is “gifted”?

  • Mr. Flerporillo

    I can’t imagine anything better for the intellectual and emotional development of a 4-year old than preparing for standardized tests. 

    As for “gifted,” I imagine that you get laughed out of the building these days if you show up at the Anderson tour with a “low 99th-percentile” score in hand.  If your child blows a couple questions because she pauses to think like a child, she’s not gifted.  If your child has to go to the bathroom during the test, she’s not gifted.  If your child thinks this test is a waste of time, she’s propably smarter than her parents, but she’s not gifted.

  • Mr. Flerporillo
  • Gdecker

    THanks for pointing this out, ShashaDai. I updated with the accurate numbers. We’ll be looking out for the 99th percentile numbers. 

  • Mama bear

    It is sickening. So many parents spend around $1,000 to prep their kids. It is no wonder education is getting privatized. Parents’ narcissism has helped the test-prep business. And thanks to middle-class and wealthier parents who lowered the standards to get their Kid into the district g-t programs. Their money could get the kid a 90, but may be not a 95.

    So sad this g and t business is starting to look like a kid pageant. Maybe there’s a realty show in all of this.

  • Proactiveparents1

    We looked into tutoring, books and an OLSAT iPhone prep app (Qwizful)- at the end of the day, a small investment as compared to tens of thousands of dollars per annum in tuition at private schools.  

  • Khem Irby

    Please also note, that when DOE took over the testing into these programs they raised the percentile.  It’s not that children are not scoring high on the exam, its just that the DOE has deemed that anyone scoring less than 95% is not eligible for a seat in these programs.  Hence, why charter schools become the closest option and these children are then targeted by charter advertisements.  The test is not for these schools but for charter targeting.  It happens in District 13 all the time.  Who’s to really say that children in poorer neighborhoods are not passing the exams?  Parents don’t review the exam.  All children have some talent and are gifted.  Only a real educator who works with our children on a daily basis can help to identify these talents along with the parent.  A test should never be the “be all, end all” for a child’s academic and life learning experience and successes.  I refuse to put that kind of pressure on my own children.  All schools should have the same ability to offer academic challenges to those children that can handle them and are interested.  If a class seems to be able to move along at a quicker pace then a teacher should be given the opportunity to make it happen with her students.  No test needed.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Leonie-Haimson/1094324158 Leonie Haimson

    I really think you ought to look a bit more critically at the DOE’s concept of “equity”; we and many others knew that the new admissions system based solely on high-stakes testing would lead to plunging nos. of disadvantaged & minority kids in these programs and wrote about it in 2007 — as soon as it was proposed by Klein.  Does that sound like equity to you?

    for more on this , see http://nycpublicschoolparents.blogspot.com/2012/04/results-of-gifted-exams-more-choices.html

  • Angelainnewyork

    Here’s an idea – just make more kindergarten seats available and save G & T for say 8 year olds when the school should be in a position to truly assess a child. 30 minutes with a stranger tests little more than a 4 year olds confidence. Against my better judgment we had our daughter sit the test because we wanted options in case our local school was full. She scored a 97 and shamefully I was disappointed because this gave us no options. What a ridiculous waste of resources when with a score of 97 we won’t get in anywhere. So now no space at our local school and next to no chance of getting a g & t space. Absurd.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

From Our Jobs Board

Featured Employers
Recent Jobs

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

0 comments so far today

Archives

June 2013
M T W T F S S
« May  
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930