GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

Pace of change yields mixed reactions at Bryant closure hearing

Bryant High School teachers and students rally outside the school's 31st Avenue entrance before the closure hearing.

Over a hundred teachers, students, and alumni converged at from William Cullen Bryant High School closure hearing last night to warn city officials that undergoing “turnaround” next year would harm the school.

But some teachers said that rapid changes are already hitting the school under the hard-charging leadership of first-year principal Namita Dwarka.

Bryant is one of eight Queens schools proposed for turnaround, which would require them to close and reopen this summer with a new name and many new teachers. The school counts former schools chancellor Joel Klein among its graduates, but it has struggled in recent years to meet the city’s expectations. It landed on the turnaround list because of its lagging graduation rate, which last year was 56.5 percent, slightly lower than the city average.

City Councilman Jimmy Van Bramer invoked Bryant’s century-old legacy in a press conference outside the school and during the hearing. Sporting a lapel pin with the school’s mascot, an owl, and other alumni, Van Bramer said the school’s tradition of excellence brought pride to the community and should be preserved.

Many teachers who spoke at the hearing shared his concern. But others expressed enthusiasm about changes at the school. The conflicting feelings reflected some of the tensions that have arisen since Dwarka took over as principal in September and, according to at least half a dozen teachers who have spoken with GothamSchools, began issuing low ratings to teachers who had never received them before.

Dwarka, who arrived when Bryant began a less agressive reform process last year, has the Department of Education’s support.

“We stand behind Namita Dwarka’s leadership, and we believe she is the right person to be the proposed new leader of the proposed new school,” said Deputy Chancellor Laura Rodriguez, to shouts and boos from students in the crowded auditorium. “In her time here at W.C. Bryant she has shown commitment and a strong will to improve student achievement and learning.”

One way that Dwarka has shown that commitment, according to the six Bryant teachers I spoke to in the last month, is by offering more bracing criticism than most teachers have gotten in the past.

“I was always satisfactory,” one teacher who asked not to be named told me by phone. “This is the principal’s first year and she never, ever observed me, not even a first time.”

“The environment in the school is not good,” she continued. “Many people complain. I get depressed, I cry. I personally believe that I work very hard during the whole year and every day, every class I try to do my best.”

The half dozen teachers said they learned in recent weeks, via letters from assistant principals who conducted classroom observations, that they would likely receive “unsatisfactory” ratings this spring. The U-rating is the first step in a contractual process that could lead to job termination. Last year, 2,118 teachers received unsatisfactory ratings citywide.

The news came as a shock to several of the teachers who testified last night — but none of them mentioned the U-rating spree they fear was underway in their public comments.

A handful of teachers did testify that they have brought a strong work ethic to the school but were not given enough time to meet the administration’s rising expectations. In private, several told me that they thought the new principal was laying the groundwork to reopen this fall with fewer veteran teachers.

Cracking down on subpar instruction is a typical first step for new principals, and one teacher who asked to remain anonymous  said Dwarka was working to help teachers improve by adding professional development sessions and more classroom observations.

But the teacher also said Dwarka’s leadership had caused a rift in the teaching staff, and rumors were swirling that many teachers would receive unsatisfactory job ratings in June, which could cost them their positions at Bryant.

The rumors have been exacerbated by the city’s approach to rehiring in turnaround schools, which will be conducted according to a process outlined in the city’s contract with the teachers union. The process, known as 18-D, requires that at least half of applicants to the new school from the old school must be hired according to seniority — provided that they are qualified. The hiring committees won’t be formed and the qualifications can’t be set until after the turnaround plans have been approved. But union officials have said in the past that the committees could reasonably decide to exclude from consideration teachers who have recently received U-ratings.

“With the present administration we’ve seen a sharp rise in unsatisfactory reviews — there’s nothing to compare it to. And the number of people who have been told officially that they are in danger of getting an end-of-the-year unsatisfactory rating is extremely high,” Sam Lazarus, the union chapter leader said in an interview. “These are veteran teachers who’ve never received an unsatisfactory. [The principal] is insisting on these decisions.”

Dwarka did not speak at the hearing, where she sat next to Rodriguez on stage and smiled as student athletes praised her leadership, the school culture, and their teachers during two and a half hours of public comments. She declined to comment on her leadership philosophy and referred all questions to Department of Education press officials.

Dwarka’s approach has won her support from within the school. Alyson Roach, an English teacher, testified that Dwarka has “not been afraid” to push teachers and had set the school on a path toward improvement.

“We have a great school, but of course we have areas where we could improve. We are fortunate enough to have an energetic new principal who is herself an alumna of Bryant,” she said. “I believe everyone here would describe Ms. Dwarka as someone who is truly transforming our school. No one can question her relentless quest for excellence. Why then, after marked improvement, after only six months, have we been threatened with the possible closing of our school?”

A second school whose turnaround hearing took place Tuesday night also has a brand-new principal who was handpicked to lead the school through a reform effort. Brendan Lyons took over at Manhattan’s High School for Graphic Communications Arts in September, before that school had been selected for any reform process.

“Every crisis is an opportunity,” Lyons said when the turnaround plans were announced in January. “I’d like to show how our school is a model turnaround that other schools can learn from.”

  • the truth shall set you free

    Ah another way around rehiring veteran teachers-just give them a “U” and voila–not eligible. The UFT has no idea how these guys play the game or how ruthless they are.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/OPVDF2HUH6BSDO3DC4ESDWX4YI Mike

    Sad to see that the new principal is following the same old model of going after teachers. I’ll be curious to see if any serious professional development is brought in for the redesigned school. Programs like those run out of Teachers College can make a real difference in quality of teaching but that will require real collegiality of principal and APs. If Ms. Dwarka and not teaching 1-2 classes, she ought to start there and open her classroom to visits by her staff.

  • Arne Dunkin Donuts

    Qqestions every ed reporter should ask a teacher:
    1. Ask the teachers to show you their observations. Check to see if the principal actually gives specific evidence of a particular deficiency and exact instructions on how to remedy it in context of the observed lesson. This is a fancy way of saying: Did the principal provide evidence and offer a way to fix it without using ed jargon like “differentiate more” thus failing to provide concrete steps to improve. You can bet that given the DOE’s “brilliant” planning and overturning of wisdom and skills sets that many master teacher/principals used to have, you will find more often than not observation reports that are ill-conceived and done improperly. The DOE is building a new machine. More and more teachers have no idea what building capacity inside of a school looks like and feels like. And that suits the DOE fine.  

    2. Investigate the background of the principal. How many years did he or she teach? Ask teachers if the principal has ever modeled a lesson for the staff? Does the principal ever teach a class? There is so much underneath the surface. Very few people care to ask the right questions. Perhaps they are not interested???

  • Anonymous

    Many good experienced teachers are being sacrificed with very unfair subjective reports. There seems to be a quota of unsatisfactory teachers to be met by the school’s administration and everybody knows that. Why would there be an increase in observations and why some teachers were told that the principal is going after them?. It is shameful that they are destroying so many teachers’ careers in the period of two or three months.

  • Cat

    My students tell me I am a good teacher, but also my colleagues but I got two lessons rated U in a period of 5 weeks. Something does not smell right and teachers are being demoralized. It is a very negative environment to work in, unfortunately with so many teachers streesed out the students are suffering.

  • Melanie

    Why is the UFT not filing a joint grievance because we all now what is really going on? Teachers are used as scapegoats and the Aps are rating teachers U so they do not get rated U.

  • Bird

    Leadership is shown by working with teachers, and by not by portraying good teachers as unsatisfactory so that their careers are destroyed and not rehire.

  • Bird

    We believe that someting wrong is happening and the same teachers are unfaily rated U, it started in february.

  • AS

    I taught math at Bryant for 16 years and am recently retired. I have gotten reports from the math teachers about what is happening in the math department. There is no question that senior teachers are being targeted by the principal for U ratings at the end of the year so that they can be replaced in the turnaround as being not-qualified. These are teachers who have never received U ratings and have outstanding credentials and outstanding achievements with the students that they have taught. After 10 or 15 or 20 years of being rated as satisfactory teachers they are suddenly being rated by the same assistant principal of mathematics Sonia Buzwatiuk as being unsatisfactory? Please believe one thing: what we have here is the verdict first and then the trial. The principal told Buzwatiuk who she wants out, and this shameless woman goes about it by writing mindless observation reports to do this dirty work.

  • Save our school

    Under the leadership of Ms. Dwarka we have seen a certain amount of senior teachers in each department rated unsatusfactory, the DOE is clearly discriminating against senior teachers beacause they were not be rehired if they get a U rating by the end of the year under the 18-D process. These teachers were never rated unsatisfactory not even before february, and now Us are ordered from the principal’s office to the Aps who are so afraid that they follow orders. This has created a very bad atmosphere since the anouncement of the closing of the school.

  • Save our schools

    This is a very negative environment, and a lot of good professionals are leaving the school and the system. This is not leadership at all, a supportive and professional environment creates a productive environment.

  • Save our schools

    It is just unbelievable 2 or 3 teachers who are targeted to be rated unsatisfactory were observed on the last day of school. They are doing everything they can to rate a certain amount of teachers unsatisfactory.

  • Concerned Teacher

    What is the UFT and/or your chapter leader doing about this?  I can guess.

  • Save our schools

    They believe since this has happened in other schools before, even though is wrong it is acceptable that this happens in W, C, Bryant High School. It is acceptable for the UFT to sacrifice a few teachers as unsatisfactory after so many years of haed work, and it is acceptable for the APs to go after teachers that the principal wants out.

  • Save our schools

    They believe since this has happened in other schools before, even though is wrong it is acceptable that this happens in W, C, Bryant High School. It is acceptable for the UFT to sacrifice a few teachers as unsatisfactory after so many years of haed work, and it is acceptable for the APs to go after teachers that the principal wants out.

  • Save our schools

    Mr. Montalvo, a good AP is being forced out. What a sham all this turnaround model? We will always respect you Mr. Montalvo, Mr, Drier, Ms, Virzi, etc…

  • Save our schools

    Unsatisfactory lesson ratings should not be preplanned, assistant principals should not be forced to rate a certain quota of teachers unsatisfactory or they may be in trouble themselves. Welcome to the new Bryant High School, but the old one was much bettter. It was more supportive and more professional.

  • Save our schools

    Mr. Tanalski stood up to the principal and did not want to destroy the careers of good experienced teachers. We respect you Mr. Tanalski, we are happy that the Science Department did not have any unsatisfactory teachers this year.

  • Hdkghdkjhdgkdfgh

    The Social Studies department had suffered the greatest loss of all departments. Teachers with 15+ experience have suddenly been laid off because this new principal thinks they are no longer good enough to be a part of the staff. As a parent, I’d like to know how did no one stop this or fight for these teachers?

  • Tabitha0g

    How does a “principal” with less than five years of in class teaching experience determine what works in a school setting?

  • Save our schools

    They do not care if the teachers are good or bad. It is all a sham! She only wants teachers that stay quiet and do their jobs. She does not even care if the teachers are well liked. She came to W.C.Bryant to clean up house, and this will not be the place it was once.

  • Save our schools

    “Great teachers” can only be great when the school Administration supports their teaching staff not work against them as what is happening in the school I am in now.

  • Tabitha0g

    That is the exact problem! There is zero support for any of us. Assistant principals are working against us, not with us. How can you run a school without any counselors? Because that is what exactly happened. All school counselors were laid off. Where is the UFT in any of this? We pay union dues apparently for no reason.

  • Tabitha0g

    Add to the list, Ms.Lignou, Mrs. Stylianou, Mr. Matthews, Ms. Diluciano, Ms. Aprigliano, etc from the Social Studies department have also been axed. Teachers with over 10 years experience, all of a sudden not good enough for Ms.Dwarka 

  • Save our schools

    Many good experienced teachers and professionals will not return home to W.C.Bryant High School. Their crime growing old and working hard in a system that discriminates you instead of rewarding you for loyalty and hard work. That is the reality we are losing and have lost many good people because they maybe at times too outspoken for an administration that was to control everything. Too much power in only one person is never good. Those of you who got rehired, please do not let the new administration manipulate or intimidate you. Stand for yourself or forever be part of the silent majority. Good luck to all of you!   

  • Save our schools

    Mulgrew should have visited and lift the morale of so many good prople. but the Union is selling us off little by little. Sheriff Bloomberg is in charge and what he says, his puppets always do, including our Union.

  • Ka D’Argo

    Remember, that under Bloomberg our 3 Chancellors, combined, have had less classroom time than the harpy you now have as a principal. It is amazing how young and relatively inexperienced the APs in my school have been in my Queens HS in recent years.  Experience means little in the Bloomberg school system. In the old days your principal would have been seen as being too inexperienced to be and AP! Obedience and a willingness to follow the DOE line without question is all that counts.

  • Ka D’Argo

    I always thought that APs had quotas- Have any APs spoken out about this?

    Were certain APs not asked back because they would not comply with a quota system (meaning that they “refused to follow orders”)?

  • Save our schools

    Well Ms. Virzi retired in the middle of the year, and we all know she was an AP with integrity. That is why she gave her people a recommendation letter, and not Us. Also we know Mr. Tanalski is retiring, and stood up so the science teachers were the chosen ones this year. But next year when the principal has full control, the quotas of Us will continue. Remember she wants full control. and she does not care if her staff is happy.

  • Tabitha0g

    Bring back Chris Peletieri!
    A man who was not only a great employer, a fantastic principal, but also a real person who cared about the students. He never used Bryant as a stepping stone to move up the ladder in the DOE!

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

4 comments so far today

Events Calendar

Archives

June 2013
M T W T F S S
« May  
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930