GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

ducks in order

Prep for turnaround process brings principals weekly to Tweed

Principals of many of the schools proposed for radical overhauls this summer have begun trekking each Tuesday to the Department of Education’s headquarters at Tweed Courthouse to prepare.

There, department officials are briefing them on how to shepherd their schools through the next six months during a weekly “Turnaround Schools Institute.” The institute launched several weeks ago, after Mayor Bloomberg announced that 33 schools would be closed and reopened after having their leadership, programs, and teaching staffs shaken up under a federally prescribed process called “turnaround.”

The institute is an adaptation of the “New Schools Intensive,” a six-month training seminar that the department has run for principals of new schools for nearly a decade, according to Marc Sternberg, the department official in charge of school closures and new schools, who himself participated in the new school program when launching the Bronx Lab School in 2004.

The main idea, Sternberg said, is that the principals can work both with Department of Education officials and with other school leaders preparing for an unprecedented school overhaul process this fall. Multiple offices are involved in designing the programming, which borrows also from school overhaul trainings conducted in Chicago and North Carolina’s Charlotte-Mecklenburg district and from efforts by nonprofit groups such as New Visions for Public Schools, which works with some of the city schools proposed for turnaround.

The principals’ first tasks, after getting an introduction to the turnaround concept, were to define their mission and vision for the new school; identify what should be preserved from the old one; and sketch out what to add next year. Some of that thinking made it into the detailed “Education Impact Statements” that the city released this week and some could wind up in the formal turnaround applications that the city must submit to the state in order to get federal funding to support the school overhauls.

At first, the workshops will involve only principals, Sternberg said. But over time, the principals will be encouraged to bring representatives of their support networks or organizations with which their schools have partnered. And once the process to rehire staff begins, members of the school-based hiring committees will be invited, too, Sternberg said.

Principals who are participating in the institute said not every school has been represented at the sessions so far. Under the federal regulations about turnaround, more than a dozen principals would have to be replaced, and some have already been informed that they will not be part of the replacement schools.

A principal who has participated said sessions have begun to touch on the rehiring process and how to craft postings for positions for the new school. Sternberg said all hiring decisions would take place through the 18-D process, set out in a clause of the teachers union contract the city is using to close and reopen the schools. The process requires committees formed jointly between department and teachers union officials to screen teachers who apply to stay on at the schools. But Sternberg said the institute’s work would lay groundwork the committees could use when they are formed later this spring.

The institute will meet through the summer and into the fall, Sternberg said. He also said the department would encourage principals to use any federal funding they receive to bring their entire staffs together for planning and team-building. Because the federal guidelines for turnaround require that at least half of a school’s teachers are replaced, the schools are likely to have many new teachers who will need to be trained. The city has been training a handful of new teachers just for schools that are undergoing comprehensive reform processes, but the 33 turnaround schools could be looking to fill as many as 1,700 positions.

  • JEFF S

    Do I read this right?  Do they expect Principals to work with them to destroy their schools, to get rid of at least half their teachers, to destroy the institutional continuity of x number of years?  And are there actually Principals who will sell their staffs and themserlves down the river?  I don’t get it.  Where is CSA?  Where is the UFT?  And who is this Sternberg person, a man in charge of closing schools.  What is his experience in running schools and knowing anything about education?

    Finally, if my reading of the UFT cntyract is correct, the UFT can stop this mnadness by refusing to participate on the death committee they have to form to choose which teachers gets pushed out.  Where is the UFT and CSA in all this?

  • Vote NO!

     The  UFT  doesn’t  seem  to  be  putting  up  much  of  a  fight  about  anything  these  days.  What  has  occurred  in  these  33  “PLA”  schools  over  the  past  18  months  is  a  tragedy.  The  education  of  tens  of  thousands  of  kids   has  been  hindered.  The  careers  of  thousands  of  staff  members  in  these  schools  have  been  jeopardized.  This  was  all  done  with  additional  taxpayer  money  through  the  SIG  program.  Taxpayer  money  was  used  to  make  things  worse.  “Turnaround”  will  only  cause  greater  upheaval.

  • guest

    The DOE’s only strategy is to close schools. I’m sure the staff that remains will do their best to provide a sense of normalcy and stability for their students – something the DOE could care less about.

  • Transformation Teacher

    It is disgraceful that these Principals have sold out their staffs.  It is clear in the case of 
    many schools, that the Principals even helped write the EIS reports.

  • Sternberg Suxx

    Marc Sternberg??  Oh yes, I remember when he was a principal and he was sleeping with his secretary.  He’s such a nice guy.  (Vomit!)

  • Eveready4

    It seems that this debacle steps up to another level of madness every day.

    Now principals have to attend these meetings to make sure that the deaths of their schools are done as cleanly as possible! And to make matters more bizarre, principals are making plans for a new set of schools they won’t even have any part of! All they can do (or will do) is cross their fingers and hope for the best!

    What guarantee do we have that the DOE won’t renege on the advice and recommendations of the principals as to what will be in the new schools? It’s obvious that they are dealing with both students and faculty in bad faith, since they’re continuing their plans for these schools, even when the significant hurdle to funding (the union vs. the state) was overcome, regardless of how advantageous it is to the state.

    As a student at one of these schools (we were supposed to be under restart), you just can’t help but feel trapped, at the mercy of persons who will do as they please when they please when the opportunity comes, in spite of all the bodies they leave behind in the process.

  • Teach My Class Mr. Mayor

    Weekly meetings have started to touch on “rehiring and how to craft postings for jobs”? In other words, how to word things to get around silly requirements and negotiated legalities like a collectively bargained contract. I have said it once, and I have said it 1000x, the irony that the DOE is housed in the “Tweed Courthouse” is just way too much irony, even for me.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

0 comments so far today

Events Calendar

Archives

June 2013
M T W T F S S
« May  
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930