GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

explainer

City could try to replace fewer teachers at 33 turnaround schools

Two weeks after Mayor Bloomberg announced a plan to to replace half of all teachers at 33 struggling schools, efforts are underway to soften the threat.

Department of Education officials said today that the city is exploring the option of replacing fewer teachers at the schools under an allowance included in federal guidelines for the school improvement strategy known as “turnaround.”

The turnaround process, which Bloomberg announced two weeks ago to sidestep a requirement of other school improvement strategies to negotiate new teacher evaluations with the teachers union, mandates that 50 percent of teachers be replaced. But the U.S. Department of Education makes special allowances for some teachers who have been hired in the last two years.

Now the city is looking to take advantage of that flexibility when it files formal turnaround applications with the state next month.

The catch is that not every teacher hired in the last two years is automatically eligible for the exemption.The federal guidelines make an allowance only for teachers who were selected “according to locally adopted competencies as part of a school reform effort” headed by a principal handpicked to lead it. That means, according to the guidelines, the teachers should have been screened for an ability to “be effective in a turnaround situation.”

It’s not clear how many of the roughly 3,400 teachers at the 33 schools would fall into this category. As recently as Monday, Chancellor Dennis Walcott told state legislators that there would be “possibly up to 1,500, 1,700 teachers” cut loose from the schools.

But there are some clues. Twenty-seven of the 33 schools were already receiving federal funds to undergo the “restart” or “transformation” processes, and many of them received new principals in the process. The city could make the case that the federal regulations would allow any teachers hired since those processes began to stay on, although it could be a tough sell in instances where the school was continuing its regular efforts to replace faculty members who retired, resigned, or moved to other schools.

The argument would be clearest for the dozens of “master” and “turnaround” teachers brought on at the 33 schools. Their salaries were being paid for using the federal School Improvement Grants — they are the only teachers for whom that is true — and their duties were aligned with the grant program’s requirements.

City officials could not immediately identify just how many teachers have been brought on at the schools in the last two years. But the number is unlikely to cut too far into the portion of teachers required to be replaced. That’s because most of the schools have relatively stable staffs, and budget cuts in recent years have required many schools to cut their teaching rosters, not add to them.

One challenge to the move could be how to reconcile the federal requirements for restaffing with the ones contained in the city’s contract with the teachers union. In order to invoke a clause of the contract known as 18-D to restaff the schools, the city must technically close and reopen all of the schools. Because the schools will technically be new, it would be hard for the city to argue that any of the teachers had already been on staff as part of an existing reform effort.

Plus, 18-D requires the new school to hire from the old staff in order of seniority, as long as teachers meet certain qualifications. The turnaround exemption could position some teachers to leapfrog over more senior colleagues in the rehiring process.

Walcott told legislators earlier this week that the city would submit its turnaround applications to the state within weeks. State Education Commissioner John King is responsible for assessing the applications in accordance with the federal guidelines. He has called the general contours of the city’s turnaround plan “approvable.”

  • guest

    Isn’t there a hiring freeze?  So, the only people who they could hire would be the ‘evil’ ATR teachers. 

  • Told ya’.

    This article proves beyond any shadow of doubt that the city is trying to get rid of senior/veteran teachers. The new ATR pool might as well be called, “Accumulated Tenured Rest home”

  • Pogue

    Here’s the same headline with different words…

    “Turnaround schools to fire senior teachers only.”

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Buddy-Bronx/100001292810976 Buddy Bronx

    In regard to poor teachers in the New York City school system, I believe there is one aspect of the problem in which few are recognizing. A supervisor/manager in the NYC DOE has 3-5 years in which to determine whether a teacher belongs in the classroom, requires further development, or should be removed. Mayor Bloomberg believes fifty percent of the teachers should be let go. Interestingly, due to the high turnover rate in the profession, the Mayor and the DOE are responsibile for hiring most of the teachers presently within the system. Additionally, the DOE is given up to five years to pinpoint a “dud” in the classroom and have the teacher removed. Why is the union getting the blame for something that is actually fully in control of the Mayor and the DOE? It is they who are: 1) responsibile for the hiring; 2) responsibile for the direct supervision and training of the new employee; 3) have the power to deny tenure to the teacher up to five years. Therefore, it is possible that the problem for employees that should not be teaching lies more with the hiring, training, and supervision policies of the DOE. They need to look at the hiring process not blame the union. Can we imagine any business organization having at the minimum up to three years and, if necessary, up to five years the ability and power to determine whether to keep an employee or advise the employee to find another career, but not doing so?

  • Nycdoenuts

    And the sub headline would read “UFT Tells Members it Could Have Been Worse”

  • Invictus

    The term ‘hiring freeze’ is an inside joke among principals who jockey, sidestep the hiring process and hire who they ‘see’ or shall I say, ‘feel’ fit with the tacit approval of the DoE.  They simply wait out and run mock interviews of ATReers simply to fulfill some legal obligations.  If the ‘hiring freeze’ was that tight, why do we continue seeing Math, Science and also TESOL teachers still floating around the ATR pool?  

    Another secret that is going around is that many schools often get away from adding ATRs as well as other veteran faculty by hiring per diem subs for long term and give them the programs that can and should be filled by ATRs.  

    The DoE turns the blind eye to this and the UFT has also implicitly allowed such violations by their inaction.  To use the term “hiring freeze” is definitely an inside joke now.  

  • http://ednotesonline.blogspot.com/ Norm

    “That’s because most of the schools have relatively stable staffs.”
    High teacher turnover is an indication of unstable leadership.
    In the world of reality schools with stable staffs are considered good schools because teachers don’t want to leave. When school grades are given that should be taken into account. But it isn’t.
    One of the bid ed deform lies is that experienced teachers leave schools in poor neighborhoods as soon as they can —- the bogus argument to implement fair funding which penalizes a school for having senior teachers.
    In fact teachers leave schools with lousy leaders in droves. They vote with their feet.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Buddy-Bronx/100001292810976 Buddy Bronx

    It has been the “decade of idiocracy” where many people have been aggravated with layer upon layer of bureaucracy. Much money has been spent on outside consultants. Little money has trickled down into the classroom where it may have done some good. It has been a very disappointing decade. Many of us were hoping for better results; rather, we received more layer upon layer on paperwork.

  • Michael M. (parent still)

    More burning the house down to keep the furniture warm, just to a lower degree.

  • Michael M. (parent still)

    Huzzah.

    Just for kicks:

    a) $500 per ipad 2 x 1.1 million kids = $550 million.

    b) Cost per new seat (per Capital Plan) = $80k*. Or 160 ipads. Note there would be a Capital Plan offset as many schools have capital projects to install hardwire networks, rather thatn WiFi.

    c) Cost of ARIS?  $80M* before maintenance.

    * From memory.  Fact-checks welcome.

  • Told Ya’.

    Since these schools are “closing” and then “reopening”, that means they are considered “new” schools. As such, they can hire 1/2 of their teachers from outside of the system. Me says it will all be TFA/Teaching fellows under the age of 25 who will never stick around long enough to get vested with a pension.

  • Truthhurts

    Email6PrintRELATED CONTENTEnlarge PhotoPolice officers stand outside an entrance to News International in London July 10, …LONDON (Reuters) – Police arrested four current and former staff of Rupert Murdoch’s best-selling Sun tabloid and a policeman on Saturday in a probe into suspected payments by journalists to officers for information, police and the newspaper’s publisher said.Police also searched the London offices of Sun publisher News International, News Corp’s British arm, in a corruption probe linked to a continuing investigation into phone hacking at its now closedNews of the World weekly tabloid.News Corp’s Management and Standards Committee, set up in the wake of the phone hacking scandal, said Saturday’s operation was the result of information it had passed to police.”News Corporation made a commitment last summer that unacceptable news gathering practices by individuals in the past would not be repeated,” the committee said in a statement confirming the arrests of four “current and former employees” of the Sun.Three of the employees, all arrested at their homes, were a 48-year-old man from north London and two men from Essex, east of the capital, aged 48 and 56, police said.The fourth man, aged 42, was arrested after reporting to an east London police station.The fifth arrest was a 29-year-old police officer serving with the Met Police’s Territorial Policing Command, who was arrested at the central London police station where he worked.All five were being questioned on suspicion of corruption.Hers is a great example of how ed reform and the post and the news and  wsj work.These people will stop at nothing to get their way

  • Tired

    Let me get this straight: I’ve spent four years working at a school that was on the state PLA list for low graduation rates, a school that was tapped for “transformation” two days prior to meeting the requirements to be OFF the PLA list. Now, with a B on our progress report, having met AYP for Math and English, on track to having a graduation rate over 70% (with 35 kids graduating with Regents honors), we’re going to be “turned around”. We’re going to lose at least half of the adults in our building who’ve worked to make good things happen. The teachers at my school did what they were asked to do: sat through (and led) hours and hours of PDs, gave up weekends and summer breaks to build curriculum maps, welcomed consultants, administrators and officials from the DoE into our classrooms to scrutinize us, gutted out the learning curve of the Danielson framework.

    I’ve been teaching for eight years now in tough schools–by choice–working with kids whose parents are largely absent, whether in the most literal sense or just through a lack of understanding about how to parent a teenager. Our average ninth-grader comes in to our school with a history of absenteeism, low literacy, poor social skills and little or no support outside of school. We work–hard–with what we get.

    I know that the turnaround move isn’t “personal”, that this decision was made for reasons that are entirely political and financial in nature. What kills me is not the idea that the teachers at my school (or, at a minimum, 50% of them) are being painted as the problem. It’s not even that I would have to re-interview and beg to keep a job that is more difficult and requires me not only to DO more but to take more flak than teaching any where else in the city. It’s the fact that there is a move now to keep teachers IF they aren’t in the group that has been working for more than two years to build something for these kids. My job is at risk now because I didn’t decide to leave when this school was labeled by the DoE as a school that needed more help.

    If you’re a first responder, does the city hold you responsible for the heart attack? The building fire? The robbery in progress? Why are the teachers who’ve been working the longest to help these kids the ones who get the blame rather than the praise?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Buddy-Bronx/100001292810976 Buddy Bronx

    Yes, the New York City Department of Education does not seem to be able to find enough perfect teachers to instruct and manage a class to permit solid learning productivity among the students. I do not know why, however. It should be rather easy to find people to hire that have the necessary skills to survive in a highly culturally diversified New York City classroom. Let’s see, how ought the DOE write the job opening announcement? WANTED! College Graduates who are good planners, self-motivated, well organized, possess managerial skills, have the ability to counsel, be a career consultant, a psychologist, a disciplinarian, a police person, a negotiator, a nurse, a correctional officer, a peace keeper, sometimes a mother/father, sometimes an older brother/sister, understand the emotional problems of children, an entertainer (yes, one better know how to entertain otherwise you are boooooring), possess audio/visual skills (computers-projectors-white boards), be an on the spot mediator, have an enormous amount of energy, be prepared for any weird event to happen within the work day and, finally, a touch of courage. So, why is it so difficult for the the Department of Education to find suitable employees to teach in a New York City classroom? I am sure millions and millions of employable folks have the necessary talents and ingredients as mentioned above to last 25+ years.

  • Vote NO!

    “Why are the teachers who’ve been working the longest to help these kids the ones who get the blame rather than the praise?”

    A)  Your  salary  is  too  high
    B)  You  have  tenure
    C)  You  have  vested  into  the  pension  system
    D)  In  the  era  of  “education  reform”..No  good  deed  goes  unpunished.
    E)  All  of  the  above

  • That Flerp Person

    What’s wrong with chalk? The obsession with technology as a teaching tool is something I will never understand.  When I was a kid, there was only one thing you needed computers in a classroom for:  teaching programming (a worthy endeavor, to be sure).  Everything else is basic skills and knowledge.  I fail to see how chalk and books aren’t only cheaper, but vastly better than iPads and laptops for those areas.

  • Mab

    Reform wants technology to sell to schools so they can do away with teachers and make a lot of money. This is all about money and politics. It used to be about books but now tech is the answer. I forgot you knew that.

  • nuff said

    nothing more than an end-around LIFO–call it what it is.

  • nuff said

    or does it mean the new hires don’t count in the stats so he has to fire MORE veterans to meet the 50%—just curious

  • old teach

    If ever there was proof that much of this policy is aimed at replacing or getting rid of veteran teachers and staff this is it.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

1 comment so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031