GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

solidarity

Event unites charter, district teachers under instructional focus

Courtesy: KIPP

A few months ago, teachers from KIPP charter schools approached the network’s co-founder Dave Levin to say that they were restless with the training they were getting. Despite weekly observations and extensive support, the teachers wanted to talk to educators from outside the KIPP organization to find out what they considered best practices for classroom teaching.

Levin took that idea and developed it into the “What’s Works in Urban Schools,” a conference that took place Saturday at New York University. The purpose of the event, Levin said, was to forge better working relationships between district and charter school teachers.

“Too often the broader structural debate has nothing to do with the great things that are happening in classrooms across New York City,” Levin said. “Whether you teach in a charter school or a district school, good teachers have the same goals.”

On Saturday, hundreds of teachers braved inclement weather, an early morning wake-up, and a $35 entry fee to attend the event, which was sponsored by KIPP, Google, TNTP (formerly The New Teacher Project), Teaching Matters, and Scholastic.

Education experts led more than 30 instructional workshops for the teachers over the span of the day. They included sessions about the Common Core standards (hosted by their architect, David Coleman), positive psychology and positive education, and high quality, project-based student work.

In the session on project-based work, Ron Berger presented dozens of professional-quality projects that students from low-income neighborhoods had produced — home energy audits, environmental field guides, advocacy campaigns and glossy science magazines. As he passed them around, Berger, a program director at the Expeditionary Learning organization who is a carpenter on the side, stressed that building and completing projects — in this case, academically rigorous ones — was a crucial catalyst to make students want to learn and achieve.

“Scholars don’t keep copies of their tests after they’ve graduated from college,” Berger said, but they do hold on to projects we looked at.

Organizers of the event said that more than 500 New York City teachers attended (I counted fewer in the morning assembly) and said the ratio of public school teachers to charter school teachers was about 3:2. A handful of independent and private school teachers also attended.

But the day wasn’t about discussing the differences that divide school communities in New York City, Levin said. Co-location battles, teacher evaluations, and the growing presence of charter schools were not the point of any of the sessions.

“Today is about great teaching. It’s about what works in classroom,” Levin said. “It’s not about policy. It’s not about politics.”

But the event was filled with teachers who were passionate about their profession — they sacrificed a weekend day and paid out of their own pockets to attend — so conversations occasionally drifted toward some of the hot-button issues that are currently dominating headlines.

In between sessions, a teacher from Banana Kelly High School, a school that the city is trying to close, said that he disagreed with Mayor Bloomberg’s education policies.

“They can’t just keep doing this to these big high schools,” the teacher said, “because who knows where the kids will end up?”

And at least on session resembled a policy hearing. Teachers attending a workshop on special education reform in the city, hosted by a Department of Education official, Laura Rodriguez, raised questions about the city’s push to include students with disabilities in mainstream classrooms. And one teacher accused charter schools of not meeting the needs of special education students.

“As a public school teacher, I’m really offended by the fact that charter schools aren’t held to the same standards as my school is,” the teacher said.

In fact, state law requires charter schools to enroll numbers of students with disabilities at a rate comparable to that of the local district. Sixteen percent of students in district schools require special education services, compared to 12.7 percent in charter schools, according to city statistics.

Whether solidarity endures between the teachers remains to be seen. Levin said he hoped it would develop into a “working community” with an annual conference.

“What this becomes ultimately will be up to the teachers who are here,” he said.

Other efforts are also underway to bridge the divide between district and charter schools. A Gates Foundation-funded “collaboration compact” launched last year.

  • ggw

    Good stuff.  

  • Gotham shills for charters

    Can you please direct me to the statistics that show that 12.7 percent of charter school students RECEIVE special education services?   Can you refer the readers to the type of special ed services offered?

  • Maggie

    It is a known fact that Dave Levin has consulted numerous behavioral/social control experts in the early years of forming KIPP. (Dominic Randolph, social management guru, Angela Duckworth, PhD, who helped develop a “grit scale” that was tested on military cadets at West Point) The treatment of students and staff at KIPP schools is considered by many as mild brainwashing. These schools have their own language and cult like mentality where there is no now, only an unrelenting/overbearing push to reach college through constant chants, rituals, and behavioral control. Students and staff at KIPP schools are taught not to think for themselves but rather to give in to the school mantras over any personal lives that they may have had in the past. Just ask any kid what KIPP really stands for and they will say: “Kids In Prison Program) At the end of the day, if this is the type of school that a parent wants to send their child or a teacher chooses to work in, well, this is America and I respect that right. However, take a look at the turnover rates at these schools and it shows that they must be very hard to sustain.

  • Tim

    I would like to see a cite for the 12.7 percent, period. Granted, I haven’t done any formal research, but every single time I’ve compared an individual charter school’s state report card number to those of the district where it is sited, the charter’s special ed numbers aren’t even close to being in the same ballpark as the district’s.

    Geoff, would you mind clarifying? 

  • Luke

    I once asked a ninth-grader what her KIPP middle school was like.  Her answer:  “It was prison.”  The sad thing was that this girl came in with good test scores but was extremely low functioning in class.

  • James Horn

    I fear Maggie has it exactly correct, based on the emerging picture I am getting in my research to understand the KIPP teaching experience.  My only disagreement with Maggie is with her word “mild” next to “brainwashing.” KIPP’s use of learned helplessness and learned optimism techniques has been documented, and its constant surveillance, constant instilling of corporate positivity training and messaging of mission and exceptionalism among children and staff, and its total compliance environment with sure punishments for any breach, are all techniques applied to the cultural and psychological sterilization of children in these apartheid learning lockdowns, and all of it is done under the same progressive banner that was waved a hundred years ago when elites at the Ivy League schools and the uber philanthropists like Andrew Carnegie were acting to protect society by encouraging elites to have more children, while leading the charge for medical sterilization of those deemed defective.  See Michael Selden’s Inheriting Shame . . . or Edwin Black’s War Against the Weak. . .

    It’s obvious from the spread of the Gates Compact, now a part of most urban school systems, that he and Seligman and the other neo-reform eugenics advocates cannot wait to see if KIPP can be scaled up.  In fact, this effort last Saturday provides evidence that the outreach has begun in earnest to spread the KIPP poison into every urban school where the minority and the poor need bright line tactics for behavioral neutering. For every one of these children in these total compliance classrooms who makes to and through college with some sense of individuality and autonomy intact, there are many others who are being permanently damaged and discarded because they have absorbed the message that they did not work hard enough and were not nice enough to climb the KIPP pyramid.  Children and teachers, too.

  • Guest

    If you think the culture of the typical doe middle school isn’t a mess you have your head in the sand. We are teaching anti bullying all over the city. Wouldn’t it be better to be teaching grit. Perserverence.

    Positive Student culture is critical. Public schools are the ones that are neutered with bland cultures afraid to take a stand around shaping student culture.

  • Guest

    Catholic schools do this all over the city and they have been the schools of choice for years

  • Guest

    If you think the culture of the typical doe middle school isn’t a mess you have your head in the sand. We are teaching anti bullying all over the city. Wouldn’t it be better to be teaching grit. Perserverence.

    Positive Student culture is critical. Public schools are the ones that are neutered with bland cultures afraid to take a stand around shaping student culture.

  • Gdecker

    Hi Tim, 
    I double-checked my figures and confirmed that the rate of students in charter schools who receive special education services is 12.7 percent (The NYC Charter Center rounds up http://www.nyccharterschools.org/about). 

    According to a DOE spokesman, who updated me on the 2011-2012 school year enrollment the special education rate is actually 16.2 percent. I’ve updated the story and am trying to get a link-able citation for that figure. Will let you know if/when I get it. Thanks! 

    Geoff

  • http://twitter.com/leoniehaimson leonie haimson

    I’m really replying to Geoff but can’t figure out how to do this.  First of all, I don’t trust charter school self-reported data, for a lot of reasons.  Secondly, the number of children with serious disabilities –needing segregated classes — is far fewer.  Not all special needs kids are the same.

  • Tim

    http://gothamschools.org/2012/01/25/event-unites-charter-district-teachers-under-instructional-focus/#comment-421753277

    Thanks for the response, Geoff. I share some of Leonie’s skepticism, and I suspect this is analogous to the free/reduced issue, where charters are educating higher percentages of reduced/least-restrictive and lower percentages of free/most-restrictive. 

    I don’t understand why in this digital day and age charter school demographics aren’t as readily available as district schools. Is there any consequential or practical reason charter schools shouldn’t be required to make data available on a page like the following, easily accessed and updated in real time?

    http://schools.nyc.gov/SchoolPortals/03/M165/AboutUs/Statistics/register.htm

  • That Flerp Person

    Although they don’t get public funding.  

  • Gdecker

    Hi Leonie, 

    For what it’s worth, the charter school rates were confirmed by a DOE spokesman. That said, I’m still waiting to see a link on the DOE web site that shows this. Their enrollment page is useful (http://schools.nyc.gov/AboutUs/data/stats/default.htm) to see demographic numbers and enrollment over time, but it’s special education numbers are off. 

    As for your second comment, it’s an interesting point. Do you know if the DOE tracks IEP students based on the degree of their disabilities? It would make sense if they did ( a student requiring self-contained services is much different vs. one who receives inclusive services). I will ask. 

  • Tim

    Geoff, you can get LRE/MRE for any city school and for the entire city using the register feature I linked to below. Click “citywide” for system-wide numbers (which, predictably, don’t align with what the DOE spokesman is telling you):

    http://schools.nyc.gov/SchoolPortals/03/M165/AboutUs/Statistics/register.htm

    Then there’s this register page, which gives very specific data going back to 1996, but I find the application slow and cumbersome:http://schools.nyc.gov/AboutUs/data/stats/Register/default.htm 

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Follow GothamSchools

RSS

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

0 comments so far today

Events Calendar

Our Twitter Updates

Archives

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829