GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

first take

In education-packed speech, Bloomberg vows to bypass UFT

Mayor Bloomberg is attempting to breathe new life into his enervated education agenda today with an ambitious and startling list of proposals that include paying top teachers $20,000 bonuses and bypassing the union to overhaul struggling schools.

Perhaps most interesting is the way that he is outlining, in his 11th State of the City address right now in the Bronx, to resuscitate stalled efforts to transform 33 struggling schools — and still receive the $58 million in federal funds that were supposed to support them. The state cut off the city’s access to those funds last month, arguing that Bloomberg’s failure to reach a deal with the teachers union on evaluations of teachers made the city ineligible for them.

But today Bloomberg argued that the city could still get the federal support without a deal. His plan is to change the city’s approach to overhauling those schools, using the “turnaround” model. That model requires that at least 50 percent of a school’s teachers be removed.

“We believe that when we take this action, we will have fulfilled the state’s requirements and the schools will be eligible for the $58 million in funding,” he is set to say.

The city had originally wanted to use the turnaround model, one of four federally mandated options, to overhaul the 33 schools. But it turned to backup models, “transformation” and “restart,” because the union would not agree. Today, Bloomberg says he believes the union’s current contract permits turnaround, according to his prepared remarks.

In a telephone call before the address, a union official said immediately that that was not the case, auguring a fight that could drag on or even wind up in court.

The proposal is one of several surprising and bold education plans that Bloomberg is outlining today at the city’s oldest high school, Morris High School in the South Bronx. Fully half of his State of the City address is devoted to education.

Other proposals include a $20,000 raise for teachers who get the top rating on the disputed evaluations for two years in a row and $25,000 to pay off student loans for new teachers who come from the top of their college class.

Those policies are designed to attract and retain good teachers, and Bloomberg is arguing that he expects the union’s support for them. The proposals, of course, depend on evaluations that the city and the union have not yet agreed on. And the $20,000 bonuses also represent individual merit pay for teachers, which the United Federation of Teachers has rejected in the past.

The mayor said the city is ramping up plans for the new schools that Chancellor Dennis Walcott introduced in September. Bloomberg said the city will open 100 new schools before he leaves office in 2013, including 50 charter schools. The city will help some charter networks — such as KIPP and Eva Moskowitz’s Success Academy schools — grow faster and also bring in new charter school operators to the city. One of those, a chain called Rocketship that focuses on the technology-infused “blended learning” model, has already accepted the city’s invitation, Bloomberg announced.

And Bloomberg announced new efforts to push students along the path to college, by helping them get financial aid, and careers, through new schools with a vocational focus and a mentoring program involving local businesses.

Bloomberg left lots of questions unanswered: How does the workaround at the 33 struggling schools resolve the conflict over teacher evaluations? Will the state start federal funds flowing now, even though the switch to turnaround wouldn’t happen until September? Where will the funds for raises and loan repayments come from? Are the charter school networks Bloomberg mentions prepared to scale up faster?

We will be trying to find answers to these questions and others this afternoon.

In chronological order, according to the prepared remarks, Bloomberg proposed to:

  • Give new teachers who come from the “top tier” of their college class $25,000 to pay off student loans.
  • Raise the salaries of teachers who are rated “highly effective” for two years on new evaluations by $20,000
  • Use a turnaround program in state law to remove half of teachers at SIG schools, to get federal funding back
  • Open 100 new schools in the next two years, including 50 charter schools
  • Speed the expansion plans of charter networks such as KIPP and Success Academy
  • Recruit new charter school operators to come to the city, such as Rocketship, which has committed
  • Open three new grade 9-14 schools and at least a dozen new career and technical schools and programs
  • Ask local business and companies to offer mentoring and internships for students; Bloomberg LP is in
  • Help students apply for federal financial aid, using assistance from the Obama administration
  • Lead the charge for the New York State Dream Act to help undocumented students attend college

Here are Bloomberg’s complete prepared remarks:

  • Tribeca

    Well played UFT!!!

  • Ms. Real Talk

    Abominable on so many levels…..

  • Guest

    It’s cute to offer teachers a 20% bonus for being highly effective.  However, when principals pay teachers out of their own budget and have been given a directive that only 4% are highly effective under Daniellson, nobody will ever see that money.

  • Mommagames

    Wondering how legal the merit pay comment really is?  Hypothetically, if I taught physical ed in a school and my counterparts were getting 20g more I too may want “in” on that and want to leave the gym and get into a classroom.  Then the principal says “NO, I have no one else who wants to teach gym…you have to stay there next year” and then the grievances start to fly.  I think this is one of the reasons the UFT has fought merit pay (amongst many other reasons) but it really creates an inequity in the schools.

  • Mommagames

    ….and if a principal really wants to play fiscal games, he/she can move teachers around so that they are never in a position for two years in a row to achieve “highly effective”  Clearly this can only happen in lower schools, but it is a real possibility…especially if their budgets are cut just enough that having 1 or 2 teachers earning an additional 20g each means keeping a larger staff or scaling back.  The whole idea of merit pay worries me. 

  • Guest

    Go back to teachers being handled as units and payed by a central administration and you will eliminate that from happening, however you would also abruptly end the ageism that runs rampant right now.

  • Larry Littlefield

    What the heck is he thinking?  He is proposing to not pay the money required into the pension funds, after underestimating what is required to pay into the pension funds.  Where is the money to double down on the bonus plan associated with the 25/55 deal?  What’s next, 20/50.

    Bloomberg’s ego, and unwillingness to accept that his defeat has led to the re-destruction of the city schools at a much higher cost, prevents the UFT from being forced to admit it has “won” this destruction. 

    Who does he want to implement the real cuts?  His successor, or the bankruptcy courts?  And what is the UFT thinking?  When the game is up they’ll eliminate the entire police department instead?

  • Ms. Real Talk

    How about principals deciding to never give ratings of “highly effective”?….evaluations by definition are incredibly subjective tools. Folks act as if there are currently checks & balances in place to question and/or override a principals evaluation. There are not any. They do as they please, so……

  • Los Flerpos

    His successor, clearly.  It would almost, almost be worth a John Liu victory.  

  • NYCParent

    Bewildering — he’s simply “ramping up” (to use the name of one of the DOE’s many ill-fated programs) all of his own failed proposals and  policies!  Well, maybe not so bewildering.  Maybe he thinks he has to keep doing the same thing over and over  until he gets it right.  Or else he’s personifying Einstein’s dictum that “the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.”  

    Meanwhile, is there a mayoral candidate out there NOT taking money from DFER?  Whoever it is, please state your name so parents can rally around you!

  • Mr. Shoop

    PE teachers get yearly ratings as well. What PE teacher would want to go into the classroom to try and “compete” for 20 grand when they can stay in the gym and go for the two effective ratings there? The main point is that if this merit system went into effect NOBODY will be rated “highly effective” and thus nobody would see the money. It is just a big public relations stunt

  • Transformation Teacher

    It seems like people are overlooking what he wants for the PLA schools.  Maybe this issue just hits closer to home for me since I work in one.  However, if all 33 of these schools go turnaround, I would say a minimum of 1000 teachers will be added to the ATR pool this year, and the students in these schools will lose the teachers, that despite the extra pressure of Danielson, and extra high needs students, have stuck it out to try to improve the school.  My guess is the mayor is playing “chicken” with the UFT again.  The “layoffs” wolf cry failed, so this is the new strategy to get us to cave on an evaluation system that will destroy the profession forever.  Let me be the first to say, that even when facing the awful prospect of losing my job in June, or at best losing many great friends and fellow educators, THE UFT CANNOT AGREE TO THIS NEW EVALUATION SYSTEM.  The mayor would literally be taking this money to keep the consultants paid, while half the teachers are out…

  • nuff said

    Here is something to consider. If the Mayor wants to give the highly effective Teachers a $20,000 raise, why not let Principals award the raises immediately to those Teachers they feel have been highly effective for at least 2 years? It seems reasonable that he would accept their reccomendations since he feels they are the best qualified to rate Teachers.–something to think about.

  • Marty

    Now merit pay is ”designed to attract and retain good teachers”?  When did it stop becoming a way to weaken the union, crush dissent, and facilitate corruption? 

  • Marty

    What’s a grade 9-14 school?  Is that for advanced kids or struggling ones?

  • SickofBloomberg

    This is worthy of a Grisham novel.  WOW!  Delusion defined.

  • Marjorie Stamberg

    you bet!  Tell it like it is. Nobody much saw the old merit pay money (oh, excuse me, bonus pay), which I’m proud to say my school UFT chapter voted DOWN, refusing to let our staff be divided by these divide-and-conquer tactics

  • Ms. Real Talk

    Precisely….

  • Pogue

    Didn’t a lot of teachers in Washington DC lose their jobs after being offered more money in exchange for giving up their seniority rights?

    This ed-deform train-wreck just keeps on rolling.

  • Pogue

    If Christine Quinn is to be taken seriously after her “slush-fund” issues and allowing Bloomberg’s against-the-peoples’-wishes 3rd term, then I agree with Los Flerpos…

    John Liu for mayor!

  • jteach

    More scare tactics… When the King finally leaves office in 2 years. every one of us teachers who have made it through should get T- Shirts made up that say “I survived Bloomberg’s Reign of Terror” to show him how ineffective his inquisition against teachers has been over the last 12 years.

  • guest

    when was the last time the mayor had a physical including a brain scan – like an MRI or a CAT scan – maybe he really is in the early stages of dementia .. for truly believing in all of the sludge that spills from his filthy mouth (maybe a dental visit would be in order too)

  • Vote NO!

    If  teachers  were  to  be  rated   “Highly  Effective” under  Danielson,  They   would  have  to  teach  in  an  elite  school,  or  AP  classes.  For  everybody  else  they will  be  like  “Big  Foot”  sightings…Talked  about  but  never  seen.

  • I noticed that…

    If John Liu wins his case before the start of the primary and make it to the election for next year, he will kick Christine’s “slush” right out of the polls!  We need John Liu!

  • I noticed that…

    Mayor Bloomberg, please shut up.  We the people of NYC are tired of you. 

  • http://twitter.com/DCD1976 Dana DiCostanzo

    He suffers from delusions of grandeur…

  • Vote NO!

    Does  anyone  really  think  that  wholesale  firing  of  teachers  will  really  improve  a  school,  or  school   system?  These  33  “PLA”  schools  have  been  screwed  up  so  badly  by  these  foolish  SIG  grants.  Why  would  anyone  want  to  continue  taking  the  Federal  money  just  to  perpetuate  a  disaster? 

  • Invictus

    Now that the ball is thrown at the UFT’s court, it will be interesting to see how Mulgrew and Company will deal with it, defensively or offensively.  

    It is also interesting that even the Principal’s Union president is also calling the system of schools that are labelled failing, the way it is….because he also knows that his small union membership will also be decimated with what the Supreme Leader has proposed…

    North Korea and leadership change=newly developed crackdowns and reshuffling of the upper echelons for 2012.
    NYC Public schools and the same old leadership=just new propaganda and a new excuse to send more people to the re-education camps for 2012.  

  • Tiredofyou

    The two boo boo brothers one thinks the sky is falling and the other thinks he knows everything.
     Could it be that they are the same person?
    What does all this have to do with Bloomberg speech?

    The hidden agenda twins.
    The lawyer without any clients
    The banker without any money
    Gloom and Doom twins

  • guest

    It is time that administrators and teachers everywhere come together and defend our profession.  The end of TENURE is their true goal.  Please remember all the sacrifices made by those who thought to question the “system.”  Without TENURE we lose more than just job protection, we lose the future.

  • Ms. Real Talk

    “We” have already lost the future….

  • guest

    Thankfully I was able to leave one of the 33 failing schools because of our LIFO policy, and I have to admit that a great deal of the staff I worked with don’t deserve the protection our union provides them.  These individuals should be nowhere near children, but, they’ve got tenure so they’ll be plaguing the system for years, keeping our scores low.

    I’m not saying that Bloomberg is correct, but every comment I read on this page fails to acknowledge that there are too many awful teachers in the system and no means of getting rid of them.  Isn’t it sad that no matter how hard I work, I’m just as valuable, if not less, than the “seasoned, experienced” teacher who simply doesn’t care?  And please, don’t suggest that these individuals leave the profession willingly, they’ll collect a paycheck until their 25 years are up.  Let’s cut the naive discussion and be able to view BOTH sides of this debate.

  • Pingback: Bloomberg Defends His Education Agenda – Wall Street Journal (blog) | Best News Feed - Daily News Magazine

  • Pingback: Bloomberg Defends His Education Agenda – Wall Street Journal (blog) | Just Top News – Daily News Magazine

  • kryptonite

    Superman, what you fail to acknowledge is what this whole thing is about.  Clearly you’re the naive, political neophyte here.  This agressive move is a transparent ploy to pressure the UFT into an accepting an evaluation system with no appeals process, an evaluation system which I should add, that the large majority of school leaders around the state believe is highly flawed. 

  • Guest

    Principals around the state have higher caliber teachers on average. We have to deal with the neglectful hiring and tenure practices of the past when the system hired anyone. And it is well documented that poor children do not have equal access to the same quality of teacher as their suburban counterparts

  • Jenriquez

    How is it possible that this man can say and do whatever he wants in a field that he has no experience in. How is it possible that the media can not evaluate this mayor the same way he evaluates teachers. Rate his work as highly effective, effective, developing, ineffective.
    1. Job creation
    2. School management
    3. Budget ( make sure to include all those ppl that lost their jobs because of his political agenda)
    4. Bend mayor term office
    My ratings will be:
    1. Developing 2. ineffective 3. Ineffective 4. Highly effective. Overall grade= Ineffective.
    How is it possible to let a person like this handle the future of our kids….. Please analyze his job from day 1 and sincerely rate him according to his own ways of rating people that chose teaching because of their vocation knowing that teachers don’t have a high pay salary.

  • Valeriebell42

    Our children are or future if we don’t. Teach them this world will not be runing right please don’t let our kids brains go to waste please help the kids to be som one thank you

  • Guest

    Why not put some of the onus on parents and elementary education. The failing students in high schools now are students that were failing in the the system since they were little. A high school teacher can try to turn a child around once they get to high school but the reality is that most of these children are at a point where they cannot be turned around. They have been “passed” through the system and the parents were of no help in trying to make them successful.  

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

From Our Jobs Board

Featured Employers
Recent Jobs

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

49 comments so far today

Archives

June 2013
M T W T F S S
« May  
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930