GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

peanut gallery

Contempt, confusion, and cheers in State of the City reactions

Minutes after Mayor Bloomberg finished delivering his State of the City address today, reactions started flying about his aggressive slate of education proposals.

The reactions ranged from withering (in the case of UFT President Michael Mulgrew) to bewildered (Ernest Logan, principals union president) to supportive (charter school operator Eva Moskowitz and others whose organizations would benefit from the proposals).

Below, I’ve compiled the complete set of education-related reactions that dropped into my inbox. I’ll add to the list as more reactions roll in.

From Mulgrew:

The Mayor seems to be lost in his own fantasy world of education, the one where reality doesn’t apply. It doesn’t do the kids and the schools any good for him to propose the kind of teacher merit pay system that has failed in school districts around the country.  As far as the ‘turnaround’ model goes, the Mayor knows perfectly well that under state law these kinds of initiatives have to be negotiated with the union.  If he’s really interested in improving the schools his administration has mishandled, he will send his negotiators back to the table to reach an agreement on a new teacher evaluation process.

And Logan:

At first glance, in the public eye, the Mayor’s remarks about schools may seem reasonable, but when you dig down, you realize how many of his proposals do little to help struggling schools.  These schools are likely to continue struggling, not because 50% of the educators are supposedly incompetent, but because of the DOE’s student enrollment policies that place students who are over-age, under-credited, in temporary housing or dealing with involved special education needs in schools that are said to be low-performing.  We must stop this kind of warehousing and give these children what they need to succeed.

Hopefully, when the city presents this plan to us and explains it fully, we will have fewer concerns.

Joe Williams, executive director of Democrats for Education Reform:

What the mayor put forward today is a series of bold yet common sense initiatives to improve our public schools, ideas so obvious that with each one he announced the crowd erupted in applause. Opening high performing schools, paying teachers more and creating an elite corps of educators from the tops of their college classes are all important steps towards giving every child the top notch education they deserve. We should remember those authentic reactions as the special interests do their best to appeal to those applauding today to turn on these ideas tomorrow.

Bob Hughes, president of New Visions for Public Schools, which manages many city schools:

Mayor Bloomberg’s decision to hold his 2012 State of the City address at the beautifully restored Morris Educational Campus—home to four small public high schools—reinforces the success of the small schools movement. Research shows that small schools—our best example of transformative change—are effective at closing the achievement gap. New Visions for Public Schools is committed to building on this success by developing innovative practices that align with Common Core state standards and improve college readiness for all students. While we still have challenging work ahead of us, we’ve seen the promise of pursuing bold ideas. By focusing on improving instructional systems and professional capacity in schools, we can raise achievement even further for our highest-need students.

Moskowitz, whose Success Charter Network will expand more quickly under Bloomberg’s plan:

We’re really encouraged that the mayor is embracing the bolder, faster change we’ve been calling for. Our plan has always been to meet the demand from families in diverse neighborhoods across the city for more and better options for their children. We will work closely with the Mayor’s team to do our part to drastically improve the number of high quality public school options over the next several years.”

Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer:

I support the Mayor’s call for a higher minimum wage, and I am glad that he talked about education. But I wish he had spoken more about the squeeze facing New York’s middle class families. Too many New Yorkers are working harder than ever, but feel like they are falling further and further behind. That’s got to change. We need a clear vision going forward about how we’re going to make this City work for middle class and working families.

If the last nine years have shown us anything, it’s that Mayor Bloomberg can’t improve City schools by himself. The Lone Ranger approach to education has held us back. Mayor Bloomberg also needs input from parents, teachers and principals, advocates and business leaders. This speech did nothing to forge those partnerships.

I support efforts to maximize the value of our assets wherever possible in the City budget. But without consideration of community needs I cannot support the Mayor’s proposal to sell off three valuable city-owned buildings in Lower Manhattan for a one-time budget windfall. As I pointed out in a letter to the Mayor, these buildings could fill crucial needs in an area plagued by classroom overcrowding and a lack of affordable housing.

Michael Haberman, director of PENCIL, which brokers public-private partnerships for schools:

I was heartened to hear a large portion of Mayor Bloomberg’s speech devoted to the true future of this city—our students.  He understands first-hand the importance of getting a leg up and building up ones skill level to truly prepare for college and careers.  He shared a story about the difference an internship made in his life, which put him on a path to where he is today.

PENCIL understands the city’s challenges—to create a 21st century economy and 21st century schools.  PENCIL’s mission focuses on the private sector partners the mayor identified as crucial to meeting these challenges.  We bring NYC business leaders into schools and support meaningful partnerships between the two.

PENCIL coordinates one of the largest city-wide fellowship program that matches high school juniors and seniors with experiential learning opportunities—internships—which give them the tangible skills and resume builders they need to succeed in this highly competitive city.  Many of our Fellows credit these opportunities—like our mayor—with the doors that have been opened for them.

PENCIL Fellows receive career readiness training and guidance from PENCIL, and are placed in full-time, paid six-week summer internships at leading businesses throughout New York City. Through the program, nearly 500 NYC public high school students have been provided with Business Mentors who have shepherded them through meaningful workplace experiences over the past four years. Participants include business such as JPMorgan Chase, Estee Lauder, Ogilvy, State Farm Insurance and Deloitte.

We know internships and mentoring works.  PENCIL has a model that makes a difference for hundreds of students.  And we applaud the mayor for highlighting these actions as core strategies for meeting the city’s goals.”

Zakiyah Ansari, a parent leader with the Coalition for Educational Justice:

Nearly every student in City public schools today started school under Mayor Bloomberg.  These are our children and Bloomberg has run out of time, spin and excuses. All the kids in our schools are ‘Bloomberg’s Kids’; all the results are his to own. Until he makes serious changes and begins listening to parents, he will be ‘Mayor 13%’—the mayor who prepares just 13 percent of Black and Latino students for college.”

As I listened to the Mayor’s speech today, my hope was that he was going to take real leadership and acknowledge the truth of what is really happening in our schools. Unfortunately but not surprisingly, he did not. The mayor missed a major opportunity today to take a big step forward for our children and our school system by listening to the concerns of parents and the majority of New Yorkers who believe his policies have failed, and moving forward with a new set of reforms that will lift our City out of this educational crisis. Instead, the mayor doubled down on bad policies that – after ten years of mistakes – leave just one-in-four City students ready for college and only 13 percent of Black and Latino children prepared for higher education.

In fact, the mayor’s outrageous claim that ‘by almost any measure, students are doing better and our school system is heading in the right direction’ is not only flat out wrong, but a dangerous presumption for this administration to have and promote. The federal government’s National Assessment of Educational Progress Trial Urban District Assessment (NAEP TUDA) test results in December showed that City scores have plateaued since 2009 and the large racial achievement gap persists between Black and Latino students and their white peers has not budged. More than one-third of all City schools are now considered failing by the State. That is not the right direction. We wonder if the mayor is so out of touch with his own constituents that he does not even see the writing on the wall.

The school the mayor chose for his address is itself a symbol of his failed education policies.  Yes, graduation rates have improved at Morris High School—but only because the city cruelly forced out the highest-needs special education students. The old Morris HS had a 14 percent rate of self-contained special education students; the new Morris HS campus schools have an average of just two percent. What happened to all those special education students? They now attend other large high schools like Samuel Gompers and Grace Dodge, which the Mayor is now closing down as well. This ‘warehousing’ of students, according to the state’s chancellor, is happening all around the City to cover up the real problems with City schools.

Over the years, my eight children have passed through the classrooms of at least 50 teachers. I can count on one hand the number of teachers who I objected to. I’m offended by the mayor’s insinuations that the majority of teachers are ineffective and that it is teachers, rather than the last decade of the mayor’s leadership, that is responsible for the state of our schools.”

And Guadalupe Garcia, a youth leader with Make the Road New York who has pushed for the DREAM Act:

We thank Mayor Bloomberg for supporting our dreams and highlighting the importance of ensuring that young people have access to financial resources from the State to pursue their higher education,” said Guadalupe Garcia, a DREAMer from Mexico and youth leader of Make the Road New York. “We look forward to working with the Mayor and our legislators to ensure the passage of the NYS DREAM Act this year.

 

  • Invictus

    In respect to his “educational vision”, 3 yay and 8 nay.  That is quite telling of what the great majority of people who have a stake in the educational system in NYC feels about the Supreme Leader.  

  • Guest

    Mulgrew has been such a fool he set Ed reform up to really get what they want. UFT has zero credibility now

  • guest

    It is time that administrators and teachers everywhere come together and
    defend our profession.  The end of TENURE is their true goal.  Please
    remember all the sacrifices made by those who thought to question the
    “system.”  Without TENURE we lose more than just job protection, we lose
    the future.

  • http://twitter.com/DCD1976 Dana DiCostanzo

         The only comment I connected with was the one of a person directly connected to a school and classroom, Zakiyah Ansari.  The majority seem like shameless attempts at self-promotion.
         I had hoped that residents of NYC would take a stand against Bloomberg and say enough, but I now fear people will begin to take his word as gospel.  This is my tenth year teaching and I have to wonder what incentive will there be to teaching the students who struggle?  The proposed new tenure system inadvertently punishes struggling students because it makes it more dangerous for teachers to teach them for fear of being labeled ineffective. 

  • Larry Littlefield

    Improving schools will take resources.  When 25/55 passed, multiplied by all the prior pension enhancements, not paid for for years with the fund falling further and further in the hole, that took all the money there ever was or will be.  Spending has soared, taxes are up, the city is broke, and it will be cut, cut cut from here on even so.

    Neither Bloomberg NOR Mulgrew is prepared to admit this.  Game over.

  • MM

    Hey UFT! How’s the mayoral control thing workin’ for ya?

  • Larry Littlefield

    Hey Mulgrew.  Don’t you sit on the pension board?  Demand that the pensions be fully funded, to get out of one of the biggest holes of any in the country.  Go on. I dare you.  You got 25/55.  Time to pay for it before the hole gets any bigger, isn’t it?

    That will end any crazy ideas about the schools ever being improved, based on anyone’s ideology, once and for all.

  • I noticed that…

    In 2002 Randi supported Bloomberg in helping him to have mayoral control of the schools.
    In 2005 Randi negotiated the worst contract in history with the mayor, where seniority transfer was eliminated, Open market created, letters in file can’t be grieved, grievance hearing steps was reduced from 3 to 2, 150 minutes of extended time was added, and the professional activities menu replaced the circular 6R.
    In 2007 Randi did not put up too much of a fight about the Children’s First Fair Funding Formula where teachers’ actual salary cost would count and schools with senior teachers used up the majority of the budget, which affected the budget to fund other education services.
    In 2009 Randi decided to leave and become AFT President leaving Michael Mulgrew to deal with the challenges and the mess that she left behind. 
    So two leaders (city and union) ran the school system into the ground.  Casualties are the children, teachers, and parents.  Way to go Randi!  Are you not proud of Bloomberg?

  • Guest

    Dana. I consider myself a hardcore Ed reformer. And while tenure is nuts to me and I was a teacher. I agree where there is more risk there must be more reward. Or else only those w no options will take the job. However if you are assessed on value added. It is easier to move low kids than higher kids. I noticed for sometime schools with A grades on the report cards had more challenging kids than schools with b grades. I recently visited a school where 30 percent of the kids were on IEPs. Good prin. Really decent group of teachers. School had a B. They were doing pretty good to move some tough kids. would I want o teach there. No way. But this group was into it bc the principal made it a good place to work.

  • Guest

    I noticed that mulgrew in one short short period handed to bloomberg the best case ever why to bypass the UFT. I hated mulgrew but recently realized he was the reformers best friend.

    Now I wouldn’t want randi back. She was slowing down change by being a partner. We need to bypass the union. I love mulgrew Ed reforms best friend

  • http://twitter.com/leoniehaimson leonie haimson

    Notice that the #corpreformers — Moskowitz, Williams and Hughes — all use the word “bold”; must be code word for the hostile takeover of public education.  My response is posted here:
    http://nycpublicschoolparents.blogspot.com/2012/01/bloombergs-state-of-city-address.html

  • Guest

    Hey kids graduating in higher numbers …how excited are you that you will be more likely to get a teacher from the top of her class…rather than the bottom.

  • I noticed that…

    Forget another item:
    In 2008 Randi also agreed with the Mayor to implement the School-wide performance bonus program in 200 selected schools where those schools would try to improve student achievement and in exchange would receive a monetary bonus.  That was a joke in itself and an insult.  Schools received bonuses based on student achievement from the watered-down state exams, where cheating was discreetly encouraged.  In one elementary school in the Bronx, the students “improved” from a passing rate of 43% to 81% (more or less).  After the state re-calibrated all the state exams in 2009, that same school’s score went right back to a low score in the 40s.  Everyone was so focused on the money that they forgot about teaching to the children.
     

  • http://twitter.com/BNiche B

    $25,000 from the “top tier” of what? From the same schools Bloomberg ripped apart at a MIT conference a few weeks back, calling teachers the “bottom 20%” of their graduating class and not graduating from the “best schools”?

    If you say “top tier” from undergrad and put them into an alternative teaching program (since apparently, to Bloomberg, teaching schools are worthless), you basically have TFA/NYCTF reincarnate where candidates receive a subsidized Masters degree along with Stafford loan forgiveness after 5 years of teaching at a Title I school ($17K+) and an opportunity to apply for two AmeriCorp grants ($4+ each) which, in many cases, are used to pay back loans. That adds up to over 25K a new teacher through just these programs can receive within five years. I know due to being a Teaching Fellow myself who graduated from the “top tier” and am now working in my third year at a Title I school.

    Despite all that, you can find the numbers for teacher turnover are still high for both programs (TFA recently looked at by EdWeek in an October 2011 article). Why is that? The same issues (poor working conditions, lack of support, etc.) come into play, issues that those smart, young teachers can bypass by leaving education and pursue a job that pays better and offers more than just “loan forgiveness” as a benefit.

    Sounds like Bloomberg is talking from both sides from his mouth, huh?

  • Guest

    Let’s get rid of Mulgrew and let Leonie represent us.

  • Larry Littlefield

    It was all about 25/55.  The casualties are the children, parents, and future teachers.  The pension went from 30/62 to 25/55, and to pay for it the schools will be gutted and future teachers will retire at 65, later than Generation Greed had been promised to begin with.

    Those who benefitted should at least have the decency to declare victory and dispense with the sideshows, even if the Mayor continues to flail his last two years.

  • guest

    Yes, Larry, it’s all about you.  It’s all about your pet project.

    Wake up.  It’s about a power grab and money has nothing to do with it.  

  • Bj

    Yea we won so now that you know what you already knew whats your next issue?
    Its over because you can only speak on one topic.
    You need another issue something other then pensions so if you need one just ask.
    Its about the destruction of the New York City Education System and you obsess over one issue.
    Its certainly about power and money. 

  • Larry Littlefield

    That issue MEANS the destruction of the city school system, unless you want to make the case that money in the classroom doesn’t matter.

    It’s time to stop pretending.

  • JBlom

    OMG….You hit it right on the head!   I agree totally.  She sold us down the river!   So,so true! 

  • JBlom

    OMG….You hit it right on the head!   I agree totally.  She sold us down the river!   So,so true! 

  • Los Flerpos

    Maybe she could split her time between repping the teachers and the bus drivers. 

  • Larry Littlefield

    “Yea we won so now that you know what you already knew whats your next issue?”

    Now that’s better. Now how much did you win, and who lost?

    By my estimate, the 25/55 pension with an inflation adjustment AND a pension based on the last year’s salary rather than three AND lower contributions would cost an extra 10 percent of payroll compared with the 30/62 pension originally promised.
    But what if you say it costs nothing, and don’t contribute anything extra for a decade?  Then you might be looking at an extra 40% of payroll for a decade or more to get out of the hole.  Given that NY already has the highest tax burden, and has already raised taxes on the “millionaires,” and is already deep in debt, and is already allowing its infrastructure to fall apart, where exactly is that going to come from?

    Now let say you implement the plan Bloomberg worked out with the City Actuary, and continue to underfund the pension for another few years — requiring an even huger hit later, when Wall Street might have gotten its comeuppance and is paying less in tax.  Where will THAT money come from.  Remember, the city’s school spending is already high and rising, not low anymore.
    “Its over because you can only speak on one topic.”

    It’s over because that’s the only topic that matter.  Bloomberg’s latest bonus plan will go the way of the last one, and the teachers he hires after forgiving their loans will be laid off, to pay for pensions.

  • JBLOM

    “Mayor Bloomberg’s decision to hold his 2012 State of the City address at the “beautifully restored” Morris Educational Campus—home to four small public high schools…..” as stated from Bob Hughes.  I find it amazing …where is all that money coming from to restore all those “old large high schools” that are being closed. I worked in one of those “large” high schools that was so “beautifully” reconstructed while the closing school and its students watched in amazement the transformation, when none of this could have been afforded during our time as a large high school.  When is the mayor going to realize that the public education system is NOT A BUSINESS!  Stop treating it that way and LET TEACHERS TEACH!!!   So you get rid of all the low performing students (which by the way, this is what happened to us, send them to another large high school so their statistics drop and they become the next school on the chopping block for the mayor to close!) Therefore, making these wonderful High performing schools.  Then every year as schools close and these students have to be placed, no one wants them!!  I call that discrimination!  So much disarray.  That is for students, Next, for the educational staff…..So how does one get a job in the High Performing School, where you will not have to worry about your job!!!  Staff from the closing schools are not wanted.  And those of us that stay to the end who were promised, “don’t worry you will be placed!” BS!! are not wanted, we are called ATR’s who no one wants not because “we cannot teach,” but the reality is because we are discriminated against due to age, and pay!  The new smaller schools want nothing to do with anyone who has been around too long, OR COSTS TOO MUCH.  Also if you know to much of the way it used to be (union rules) forget it!!! When the Principal’s get a printout of who is available from th ATR list, your salary is right there and that is what is looked at first…not your credentials or experience!   Come on…let’s face it…it’s all about the Benjamins!!  Not experience!  I feel sorry for the future students of this city!  So many of the best teachers were forced and are continuing to leave (retiring) or are a “floating ATR” who travels every week to a different school, to sit hall duty, answer phones, lunch duty or maybe even get to teach a little as a substitute! Imagine that!  And now they are going to be observed! Wouldn’t that sound like a plan…aplan to get these teachers out or digusted and retire!  This is something that the mayor created by taking away seniority transfers and making an ATR Pool – now he finds it is costing him a fortune to have these teachers “sit” around, but he wants to call them incompentent (maybe some of them, but not the majority).  Many of the new schools are coming to their first graduation year….hmmm.  Let’s watch their ratings…will they receive an “A.” ….not!!   The mayor does not see the real issue here, these students in the urban high schools come with many problems, issues, broken homes, abuse, shootings, drug problems, gang issues (I actually had the pleasure of having a gang mother and father wearing their colors!, come in to my office).  Why don’t the mayor come into one of those schools and see what really goes on and what teachers have to face everyday instead of the “beautifully restored” school with it’s cosmetic bandaid to the real issues of the schools today!   It’s a shame that the teachers and staff who have put up with this all these years and have the experience to handle it are being brow beaten by our “rich” untouchable mayor!!!  Who is out of touch with the reality.  I’ve seen new teachers from the “small schools” literally run out of the door  in fear of the students.  AFTER FIRST HANDEDLY GOING THROUGH A SCHOOL CLOSING. WHICH SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN CLOSED (as was proven when one of our math statistic teachers went up againt the review and proved them wrong, but it was too late).  When the mayor has an agenda, and you are on it, you are gone!  He needs to stop privatizing this PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM and include the parents, community, and staff alike in his decisions. I agree with Leonie Haimson….HOSTILE TAKEOVER!!!  MOST DEFINITELY!  HE NEEDS TO BE STOPPED!! 

  • Bj

    You said it not me I just repeated what you have said on many occasions.
    No you lost and you lost an election and you perseverate on this topic day in and day out. So who lost???

  • Bj

    game over

  • BronxTeacher

    Mr. Hughes – I actually looked at the “research”.  Remarkable how a study can come up with “estimated” conclusions which are then quoted as Gospel.  Particularly when you’re bankrolling the “independent” research.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

From Our Jobs Board

Featured Employers
Recent Jobs

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

32 comments so far today

Archives

June 2013
M T W T F S S
« May  
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930