GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

forward march

Fans of tougher evals urge Cuomo to press forward anyway

After the collapse of teacher evaluation negotiations in New York City and across the state, education reform groups are asking Gov. Andrew Cuomo to install a “shot clock” on future talks.

When the clock expires, a teacher evaluation system devised by the State Education Department would go into effect, according to the plan outlined in a letter signed by 13 reform organizations from across the state and country. The groups — which include Democrats for Education Reform and and StudentsFirst, Michelle Rhee’s new lobbying outfit — argue both that more stringent evaluations are needed and that the state cannot afford to leave funding on the table during tough budget times.

The state’s teacher evaluation law, passed in 2010in order to secure Race to the Top funding, requires districts to adopt tougher evaluations when they renegotiate teachers contracts. But if they want to draw on several pools of federal funds, they have to finalize the new evaluations sooner. Dec. 31 was the deadline for one set of funds, School Improvement Grants. Another deadline, for Race to the Top funds, is coming on June 30.

Now the reform groups want the state to set another deadline — Aug. 31 — and they want it to apply to all districts, not just ones seeking federal funding. The groups are suggesting to Cuomo that districts that haven’t negotiated a plan by then would have to adopt a “default” plan and put it in place by the following year.

In some ways, the proposal is redolent of city Schools Chancellor Dennis Walcott’s request last week that State Education Commissioner John King help the city hammer out an evaluation system without the union’s help. But in this case, both the districts and the unions would be cut out of the process to devise new evaluations.

The proposal doesn’t outline what exactly the default plan would look like. But the lack of a default option makes New York’s evaluation negotiations more complicated than in some other states receiving Race to the Top funding, representatives of reform groups told GothamSchools last year.

Putting a default option in place would require an amendment to the state’s teacher evaluation law, according to SED officials.

The idea of a plan B on evaluations is likely to find a receptive audience in Cuomo, who is expected to propose education policy changes in his second “State of the State” address tomorrow. But the governor, who said last week that he was “disappointed” that districts had not been able to agree on teacher evaluations and urged them to return to the negotiating table, has had mixed results when trying to push specific education policies. In May 2011, the Board of Regents approved a policy change he sought, to make teacher evaluations depend even more heavily on state test scores than the law requires. That regulation was rolled back after a lawsuit by the state teachers union.

The full letter from the reform groups is below:

Dear Governor Cuomo:

We are gravely concerned about New York’s credibility when it comes to living up to our promise of providing every child in the state with an outstanding classroom teacher. As you are aware, labor and management from school districts in many parts of the state have so far failed to implement key provisions of the state’s Race to the Top laws. These laws passed with bi-partisan support in our state’s successful attempt to win $700 million in federal funds for public schools.

It has been widely documented that one of the reasons New York beat out so many other states in President Obama’s RTTT competition was the enthusiastic pledge by leaders of both education labor and management to work collaboratively to implement new teacher evaluations which would highlight the exceptional work done by effective classroom teachers.  See video of New York’s representatives promising to work together to implement the RTTT plan here.

Like other winning states, New York promised it would implement the reforms that came with the money. Nearly two years later, however, all that the students of New York’s public schools have to show for this grand bargain is foot-dragging and politicking by the same grownups who assured the federal government we were serious.

To avert a situation where New York is forced to return hundreds of millions of sorely-needed federal dollars, we urge you to consider introducing “shot clock” style measures to ensure that all school districts will fully implement the state’s new teacher evaluation framework in accordance with the Race to the Top timeline.

New York cannot afford to leave federal money on the table at a time when its schools are already facing budgetary hardships.  Federal education officials have made clear their intention to hold states accountable to their Race to the Top programs, as seen recently in the case of Hawaii.  Hawaii’s failure to secure a collective bargaining agreement with its teachers’ union contributed to it being placed on “high-risk status,” in danger of losing its grant and subject to extensive review and reporting requirements.

Aside from the fact that we believe that implementing these new, modernized teacher evaluation systems is the right thing to do, we are also mindful there are other federal funding streams which could be jeopardized by this high-profile impasse.  New York City, alone, has almost $60 million in federal School Improvement Grants at risk after its negotiations with the United Federation of Teachers around a pilot system for evaluating teacher performance broke down this past Friday.  It is also endangering tens of millions of dollars in federal Teacher Incentive Fund grants earmarked for its teachers, because it has not adopted a system which recognizes and highlights great teaching.

To ensure that the City and the state’s other districts fulfill New York’s promises to its schoolchildren, we request that you introduce a back-stop measure that requires districts to develop teacher evaluation plans by August 31, 2012.  Any district that has not successfully negotiated its own plan by that date will have to automatically carry out a “default” plan, to be created by the State Education Department.  Those districts would have one year (until August 31, 2013) to install and fully implement their default plan systems.

Governor, we thank you for your efforts to date to strengthen New York’s focus on educational  measures and accountability, most recently by introducing your School District Performance Improvement Awards program to incentivize districts to make innovative reforms that improve student performance.

Research studies have demonstrated, time and again, that the most impactful factor on the level of learning in a classroom is the quality of its teacher.  At this critical juncture when the state faces a key deadline in implementing a teacher evaluation framework that will impact its students for years to come, we ask that you step up again to ensure that the task gets accomplished.

Sincerely,

Buffalo ReformED: Press Contact:  Hannya Boulos – Hannya@BuffaloReformED.com716-783-3372
Civic Builders: Press Contact:  David Umansky – Umansky@civicbuilders.org – 212-571-7260
Democracy Builders: Press Contact:  Rev. Jamaal Nelson – jnelson@democracybuilders.org – 646-281-9164
Democrats for Education Reform: Press Contact:  Elizabeth Ling – elizabeth@dfer.org – 646-599-6123
Education Reform Now: Press Contact:  Myles Mendoza – myles@edreformnow.org – 303-912-0267
Educators 4 Excellence: Press Contact:  Sydney Morris – sydneymorris@educators4excellence.org212-279-8510 ext. 10
National Council on Teacher Quality: Press Contact:  Sandi Jacobs – sjacobs@nctq.org – 202-393-0020
The New Teacher Project: Press Contact:  Andy Jacob – ajacob@tntp.org – 347-987-0749
NYCAN: The New York Campaign for Achievement Now: Press Contact:  Christina Grant – Christina.Grant@NYCAN.org – 516-749-9462
Parent Power Project: Press Contact:  Carrie Remis – carrie.remis@parentpowerproject.org585-350-8306
StudentsFirst: Press Contact:  Nancy Zuckerbrod – nancy@studentsfirst.org301-204-9391
Students for Education Reform: Press Contact:  Alexis Morin – alexis@studentsforedreform.org774-258-0024
Turnaround for Children: Press Contact:  Pamela Cantor, MD – pacantormd@tfcusa.org – 646-786-6200

  • Pogue

    If it’s taping kids’ mouths shut with duct tape then yes, Michelle Rhee says “Children First”.  DFER is nothing but a privatizing organization shilling for the 1%.  Educators 4 Ageism?  What a joke.

    Let these reform groups urge this governor and puppet State Commissioner to push their union-breaking, middle-class destroying agenda.

    The lines drawn are getting clearer, it’s students, parents, teachers, true educators, and the few sane politicians vs. this wave of destructive, profiteering, oligarchs and their henchmen.

    Education is in a current state of chaos, and that list above is a who’s who of enablers.

  • Bill

    Wow. Educators for Excellence is on board for this. I’m shocked. I thought they packed their bags and headed to LA since nobody here wanted to deal with them. Why do they even care about what is going in NY anymore? (Oh wait, I forgot that Race to the Top is really all about corporate fat cats trying to privatize education and not about making strides to reduce class sizes or anything else that would be truly beneficial to our schools)

  • Vote NO!

    I  hope  Governor  Cuomo  will   research  what  is  happening  in  Tennessee.  The  first  state  to  try  and  implement  one  of  these  Race  to  the  Top  “student  achievement- teacher  termination  schemes”  on  a  statewide  level.  The  schools  across  Tennessee   are  in  turmoil.   Research  the  difficulty  faced  by  the  schools  victimized  by  the  Federal  school  improvement  grants  (SIG  funding)  The  Federal  government,  through  the  states  is  spending  billions  of  taxpayer   dollars  to  make   the  schools   WORSE  than  they  were  before  they  entered  the  program. 

    These  new  evaluation  schemes  will  leave  state  taxpayers  on  the  hook  for  billions  of  dollars  once  the  Race  to  the  Top  money  runs  out.  They  require  a  massive  amount  of  ongoing  testing  which  will  quickly  exhaust  the  Race  to  the  Top   money.  The  states  will  have  to pick  up  the  costs  to  maintain  the   ongoing  testing  regime  which  the  public  doesn’t  support.  It  would  be  wise  for  the  state  legiuslature  to  repeal  the  APPR  law  before  it  takes   the  New  York  school   system  “off  of  a  cliff.”  If  it  means  returning  the  RTTT  money,   NY  state  would  still  be  better  off  in  the  long  run.

  • http://twitter.com/nycdoenuts NYCDOEnuts

    This is a Mickey Mouse attempt at a political goal and isn’t at all about the kids.
    In addition, it’s probably not helping matters at all.

     Cuomo doesn’t have the power to change a law (that’s the legislature’s job). In the meantime, the law is clear: There is no deadline. There IS, however, a difficult negotiation going on. A “reformer” stunt like this can only serve to drag that out even more and that would set this part of their agenda (and the UFTs agenda of reaching a new contract agreement) back even further. 

    Did they think about this before they suggested something that will very probably be impossible to achieve? Of course not.

    I always knew the DFER crowd was incompetent at education (many of them do, after all, helicopter in from other professions like media, politics and finance), but I am genuinely surprised to learn from this piece that they are, apparently, also pretty bad at politics.

    What a dumb, stupid stunt to pull.

  • Clay

    I’m trying to be optimistic here, atleast we now have a phone number when we catch the urge to write “For a good time call Sydney” on various Manhattan restroom walls.

  • http://www.catchfriday.com/ Tina Pierce

    wow this is interesting..

  • Invictus

    As with all revolutions of any kind, even the revolution leaders, who once thought were at the helm of popular support, ultimately become victims of their own street policies, perhaps Gov Andy will become the new Marat after all is settled.  The opening salvo against entrenched interests, in his speech simply portrayed those in the educational side, without even mentioning the shadowy business/corporate interests at the vanguard of a thinly veiled assault in the working/middle class. 

  • Maria

    What’s good for the goose is good for the gander!

    Let’s develop evaluation systems for politicians, judges, and attorneys.

    Anyone up to it?

  • Yogabbagabba

    I know a few attorneys who post here that Im sure would love it.

  • Los Flerpos

    I think there is one for politicians:  elections.  Same goes for many state court judges.  Federal judges don’t have one, but I’m sure you and Rick Santorum could hammer out a plan.

    It’s hard to find workers with fewer rights than attorneys.  They can (and are) fired by their clients at will, for any reason or no reason.  And unlike any other employee, attorneys are often not permitted to quit.

     

  • Yogabbagabba

    choices people make in their lives 

  • Los Flerpos

    I’m not complaining.  Just putting things in perspective.  Attorneys have a uniquely cynical reaction to any other group of workers who complain about how hard their job is or how their profession is “being disparaged.”  

  • Ginseng4

    Los Flerpos,

    Question: if you think elections constitute a valid evaluation of politicians, then how do you resolve that opinion with Mr. Bloomberg’s purchase – brokered by Christine Quinn – of an overriding of the term limits law?

    The Soviet Union under Stalin and Irag under Saddam Hussein had elections also. Did they constitute valid evaluation systems?

    No one should confuse rigged or bought elections with democracy.

  • Ginseng4

    Los Flerpos,

    Question: if you think elections constitute a valid evaluation of politicians, then how do you resolve that opinion with Mr. Bloomberg’s purchase – brokered by Christine Quinn – of an overriding of the term limits law?

    The Soviet Union under Stalin and Irag under Saddam Hussein had elections also. Did they constitute valid evaluation systems?

    No one should confuse rigged or bought elections with democracy.

  • Los Flerpos

    Clearly I cannot resolve the two points.  The city council amended the city charter to override a public referendum and allow Bloomberg to run for a third term.  It obviously follows that elections are not a legitimate way to evaluate politicians.  I therefore will stop voting.  Because of Stalin. 

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

0 comments so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031