GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

breaking

State says districts without evaluation deals to lose funds Jan. 1

The State Education Department will cut districts off from one pot of federal funds within days unless they settle on new teacher evaluations for some struggling schools.

In a move that the state teachers union called “an arbitrary exercise of brinksmanship,” State Education Commissioner John King issued the threat today to New York City and nine other school districts that are receiving School Improvement Grants to overhaul their lowest-performing schools.

King said all but two had not met the requirements to continue receiving the funds — most notably, the requirement to hammer out agreements on new teacher evaluation systems. Those agreements are supposed to be in place by Dec. 31.

In July, city and UFT officials reached an agreement to roll out new teacher evaluations in 33 of the schools, known as “persistently low-achieving” schools. That agreement came a week after the state turned up the pressure on the city and just in time for the schools to receive nearly $60 million in federal funds.

But city officials said today that the agreement was only a “framework” that must be formalized by the Dec. 31 deadline.

If that doesn’t happen, a funding freeze would not only prevent new reforms from being put in place but also could threaten changes that are already underway. Yonkers is warning that SIG-funded teaching positions at some of its schools would effectively be terminated. Some New York City schools have “master teachers” whose salaries are paid out of the federal grant money.

City and union officials say they remain locked in negotiations — which are sure to be tense after a semester when relations between the groups grew strained over the new evaluation system’s rollout.

The stakes are also higher now because a deadline for all city schools to adopt new teacher evaluations is just six months away. King’s ultimatum today applies only to the 33 schools already being overhauled and 11 additional schools that the city must revamp according to federal guidelines. But a similar strategy in June could put hundreds of millions of Race to the Top dollars in jeopardy if new teacher evaluations are still not finalized.

Last month, Chancellor Dennis Walcott said the city would not strike an evaluation deal just to keep federal funds flowing. Today, he said city officials were in talks with the union but left the door open to stalemate.

“For months, we have been in engaged in discussions with the UFT around implementing a teacher evaluation model in the SIG schools,” Walcott said in a statement. “We continue to engage in discussions with the UFT, and all parties are cognizant of the deadline.”

UFT President Michael Mulgrew sounded a similar note in a statement today.

“We have been meeting with the DOE in an attempt to resolve these issues,” he said. “We have further meetings scheduled this week.”

The state teachers union, NYSUT, said a funding freeze would disproportionately affect schools attended by poor students. Instead of cutting off funding to struggling schools, the union said King should ask federal authorities for more time. More than a dozen states have already gotten extensions, according to NYSUT.

But King signaled that he planned to stick to the deadline, no matter the consequences.

“These funds are targeted to help troubled schools. The last thing the students need is to lose resources because the adults who run those schools won’t fulfill their responsibilities,” he said in a statement. ”The clock is ticking. When the ball drops at midnight on New Year’s Eve, the money drops off the table, and it will be difficult to get it back.”

The other districts at risk of losing federal funds are Buffalo, Yonkers, Albany, Schenectady, Roosevelt, Poughkeepsie and Greenburgh 11. Rochester and Syracuse have turned in materials for the state to review, according to SED. The Journal-News reports that Poughkeepsie is on track to meet the Jan. 1 deadline but that Yonkers cannot and would seek legal recourse if the funding freeze takes place.

  • http://nyceducator.com/ NYC Educator

    Are these the same funds, the RttT funds, that may only be used to support “reforms?” Or may these funds be used for things like class size reduction, additional teachers, and things that kids actually need?

  • Vote NO!

    They  should  give  the  money  back!  The  33  PLA  schools  in  NYC  have  turned  into  complete  disasters!   There  is  nothing  more  upsetting  to  the  public  than  the  government wasting  money.   The  pilot  program  for  the  new  teacher  evaluation  is the  greatest  part  of  the  problem.  It  was   implemented  with  haste,  and  has  led  to  a  toxic  atmosphere  among  the  staffs.  Teachers  are  retiring  mid-year.  Some  are  quitting  mid-year. Many  more  are  looking  to  leave.  The  state  should  listen  to  the  over  1000  principals  that  have  signed  a  petition  stating  this  evaluation  is  deeply  problematic,  and  should  be  phased  in  over  time.  The  Master  teacher  positions  in  the  PLA  schools  have  not  been  helpful  for  the  vast  majority  of  teachers,  and  much  of  the  rest  of  the  money  has  gone  to  out  of  state  consultant  firms.  These  firms  have  done  very  little  but  further  demoralize  the  staffs  in  the  buildings.  The  money  is  NOT  going  to  the   classrooms!   It would  be  better  for  the  schools  to  “lose  the  money”  to  restore  order  in  the  schools.

  • Rbpowell1

    When is the state going to take some real action and evaluate superintendents? The real level of incompetence comes from them and trickles down to the schools, In the Bronx we really need a federal investigation into the High School superintendents. Schools are failing and have been due the lack of support and direction…High Schools are getting failing grades because of lack of support and direction from the superintendents. How do you classify a failing school as a “No Touch: model. Why aren’t they required to provide the public with their quarterly reports so the entire borough can see their school findings. How come no one is checking behind these Sups? Why is it Jane Addams went so long before the grade fixing was revealed?

  • http://www.facebook.com/josh.kilroy Josh Kilroy

    I can’t believe that so-called “educators” are still pitching smaller class sizes and more teachers as the solution to the problem of low-achieving schools! Research has categorically disproved this hypothesis. We need better teachers, better ways of evaluating them, and ways of removing bad teachers from classrooms. Bravo to King for standing up for students against the privileges of adults served by the status quo.

  • Tiredofyou

    A kipp person What a surprise.

  • Pogue

    Wow.  What tired drivel.  Where have you been, Josh?  Your spiel is old hat.  You need to come up with new phrases for…

    “low-achieving schools”

    “need better teachers”

    “removing bad teachers”

    “status quo”

    and “Research has categorically disproved this hypothesis” and not backing it up.

    Man, it’s like hot tub time machine back to 2003.

  • Vote NO!

    Josh,

    “Research has categorically disproved this hypothesis. We need better
    teachers, better ways of evaluating them, and ways of removing bad
    teachers from classrooms. Bravo to King for standing up for students
    against the privileges of adults served by the status quo.”

    Sorry,  but  the  “education  reform  talking  points”  have  run  into  the  reality  of  NYC’s  33  PLA  schools…It ” isn’t  pretty.”   The  politicians,  DOE,  and  UFT  officials  are  aware  of  it. The  pilot  evaluation  for  teachers  is  causing  most  of  the problems  in  those  schools.  It  may  seem  counter-intuitive  but  the  new  teacher  evaluation  will  result  in  highly  qualified  teaching  candidates  avoiding  inner-city  schools.  No  one  will  spend  tremendous  sums  of  money  on  a  college  degree  to  work  in  schools  where  they  are  just  being  set  up  to  be  fired.

    I  just  hope  “Obamacare”  doesn’t  do  to  healthcare  what  “Race  to  the  Top”  has  done  to  public  education.  If  so,  we’re  all  going  to  be  in  a lot  of  trouble.

  • Michael M. (parent still)

     Will all parents in favor of larger class sizes, firing their own kids’ teachers, and even more testing please raise their hands.

  • Abc

    These reform robots just don’t get it and I’m beginning to think they will never get it.

  • http://nyceducator.com/ NYC Educator

    From Fernanda Santos in the Times:

    “The money, known as school improvement grants, is supposed to help the schools lift their results through a series of changes, like replacing principals and at least half the staff members; giving teachers extra time for training and preparation; and extending the school day. In New York City, it offers, in essence, an alternative to the most common approach to dealing with failing schools, which has been to close them.”

    This is what the funds may be used for. Articles simply stating we may lose money, without pointing out that this money is earmarked for specific practices. tend to mislead readers. Have any of these practices been proven to benefit students (or even improve test scores, something Bloomberg’s “reforms” have failed to do after a decade)?

  • Los Flerpos

    Note that the clear implication of that paragraph, if you were to take it at face value (which you urge), is that in the absence of these funds, schools will be closed. 

  • Pjg320

    The law contains a remedy the Commissioner has chosen to ignore – he can ask PERB to declare an impasse and appoint a mediator – an eventully a fact-finding panel. To withdrew dollars simply harms kids in the lowest achieving schools – the same Commissioner who cancelled the Jan Regents … endangering the graduation of hundreds of kids. the Regents may have picked a Commissioner who is way over his head … fails to understand his primarily role is to serve the kids not his ego.

  • Michael Fiorillo

    “Research” – buzz, whirr, click – “better teachers, better ways of evaluating them” – buzz, whirr, click – “privileges of adults served by the status quo” – buzz, whirr, click.

    Really, can’t you folks come up with one original thought on your own? Is the indoctrination so complete that you can’t even develop your own take on these arguments, or at least give your talking points some personal character or expression?Or do you just assume that people are so stupid that they will forever be taken in by the same scripted responses, the same ideology and self interest masked as “research?”Perhaps you haven’t noticed, Josh, but the political and economic interests that fund the production of your cliches, are the status quo in education.Before you finish having your cup of coffee in a classroom – if indeed you even are a teacher – consider one simple fact: King, Tisch, Bloomberg, Duncan, Kopp, Rhee, et. al. along with the “Let’s-feel-good-about-ourselves-before-we-go-work-for-Goldman-by-lifting-up-the-worthy-poor-and-creating-Skinner Boxes-for-their-training” folks ARE the status quo, having set the terms of debate for many years now.Absolute mayoral control of the schools has been in place for almost ten years in NYC, and over fifteen in Chicago. The ideology and practice of corporate dominance and monetization of the schools has controlled the discourse on education for the better part of two decades, at least. Yet the ed deform cohort, literally engorged with billions from Gates, Broad, the Waltons and administrations both Democratic and Republican, continues to cast itself as the bold, courageous outsiders willing to take on the big, bad teacher’s unions. That they cast themselves as underdogs clearly demonstrates the deception, self-deception and bad faith at work. The “research” you refer to is in fact little more than pseudo-scientific, content production-for-hire, with an academic gloss. It’s yet one more facet of the Big Lie of corporate education reform. You obviously expect others to believe it, but do you? If so, I wish you great success selling mortgage-backed securities and credit default swaps in the near future. Then again, maybe you’ll be one of those “education leaders” that Wendy Kopp and her husband groom to parachute into an urban district and dismantle the public schools, for which you’ll be amply rewarded. Yes, Josh, in the Brave New World you are a mouthpiece for, there really is money to be made in education.

  • Los Flerpos

    “ed deform” — buzz, click, whirr — “corporate education reform” — buzz, whirr, flerp  . . . 

    i’d say there are enough talking points for everyone here to play nice.

    (and “literally” engorged with billions of dollars? that sounds unpleasant.)

  • Michael Fiorillo

    Los Flerpos,

    “And ‘literally’ engorged with billions of dollars? that sounds unpleasant.”

    Let me assure you from personal and professional experience, and that of my public school colleagues, that the consequences of it are highly unpleasant. Toxic, even.

    And as for “playing nice,” was it not Josh himself who called into question the legitimacy of NYC Educator and others by placing the word ‘educators’ in quotes?

  • http://nyceducator.com/ NYC Educator

    Actually, I’m aware of that. I’m also aware of how effective this practice has proven. My question, which apparently eluded you, is whether these new proposals are any more effective.

  • Los Flerpos

    I enjoy a sharp exchange as much as the next guy.  I just think it’s ridiculous to assert that talking points are out of bounds in this debate.  

    Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’m literally going to go eat lunch. 

  • Michael Fiorillo

    You clearly misread my comments. I never said Josh’s talking points were out of bounds; I said they were unfounded in fact, robotic and cliche-ridden, and a mask for oligarchic interests.

    Enjoy your lunch.

  • Los Flerpos

    Sorry for the confusion.  I tend to think all talking points are robotic and cliche-ridden.  Yours certainly are.  

    I just literally ate a cupcake, so my lunch plans are up in the air now. 

  • Trollsareus

    You just like to hear yourself talk but you really know nothing about the subject. You are here for your own gain and couldn’t care less about the issues.Josh is at least someone who knows something about education and not someone who just trolls this space.
    You have proven time and again that you know nothing about what is going on.
    Your just not a nice person as all of your comments prove.You constantly make this personal.
    Listen you have been out to lunch for years.

  • Marcia

    What do you do as an educator?
    How much experience do you have teaching?
    What are you trying to get across here?
    Why do you always confuse the issues?

  • MB

    You are always out of bounds when you talk about education. Your never sorry about the confusion thats what you want to accomplish.
    You have so much time to spend here I guess that lawyer thing isn’t working that well.

  • bee

    I can’t believe these so-called “education reformers” are still pitching and marketing such hogwash and trying to pass it off as legitimate. “Research” has “categorically” proven no such thing. If you are KIPP related, what will happen when the funds from “philanthropists” dry up? Thumbs down to King and those of his ilk. They are destroying the very fabric of public education. This does not bode well for the future of this country.

  • Vote NO!

    It’s  like  being  on  a  “death  watch.”  Over  the  nest  12-24  hours  the  UFT  will  capitulate,  and  agree  to  a  “deal”  over  the  new  teacher “evaluations.”  This  will result  in   thousands  of  NYC  school  teachers  being  fired  in  the  next  2-4  years.  Very  possibly,  half  of  the  current  NYC  teaching  force  will  be  fired,  or  forced  out  by  the  end  of  this  decade.  Unfortunately  for  the  students  in  NYC  they  will  be  losing  many  of  their  best  teachers.

  • Anonymous

    Actually both research and practice suggest that you are categorically wrong. BTW no current or past research in this area categorically proves or disproves anything; this isn’t hard science by objective parties, ya know.

  • Pingback: City, union declare impasse in teacher evaluation negotiations … | The Union Arbitration

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

From Our Jobs Board

Featured Employers
Recent Jobs

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

45 comments so far today

Archives

June 2013
M T W T F S S
« May  
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930