GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

closing season

City announces plans to close or shrink 15 struggling schools

In the first wave of annual closure announcements, the Department of Education has announced plans to shutter or reshape 15 low-performing schools.

The schools include three elementary schools, three middle schools, a secondary school, and five high schools. The department also announced plans to cut off middle grades at three other schools.

Schools that landed on the chopping block today include Jane Addams High School for Academic Careers, where a crediting scandal has erupted in recent weeks; nine schools in Brooklyn; and a handful of schools that opened under the Bloomberg administration.

One school, the Academy of Business and Community Development, would close rather than phase out over time. Its middle and high school students would be dispersed to other schools next year.

Representatives of the department’s Office of Public Affairs informed members of the City Council about closures in their districts this morning. Simultaneously, department officials were delivering the bad news in person at schools.

The 12 schools were culled from 47 whose academic performance landed them on the DOE’s closure shortlist. Officials said they would announce another list of closure plans tomorrow. Last year, the DOE shortlisted 55 low-performing schools and moved to close 26 of them.

In a statement, Schools Chancellor Dennis Walcott said DOE officials had carefully weighed each school’s strengths, weaknesses, and capacity for improvement before finalizing closure plans.

“These are never easy decisions, but when a school has failed to serve its students well year after year – even after receiving additional supports — we have a responsibility to provide students with better options,” he said. “We are already hard at work creating the great new schools that these communities deserve.”

In September, Walcott committed to opening 50 new middle schools in the next two years. Today’s plans would clear space for at least six of them.

But UFT President Michael Mulgrew, whose union has twice sued to stop school closures, said the department had not in fact given the schools all they needed.

“Rather than doing the hard work of helping struggling schools, the DOE tries to close them, making sure that the hardest-to-educate kids end up concentrated in the next school on the closure list,” he said in a statement.

Mulgrew also said UFT lawyers would be scrutinizing how the department handles the closure process.

“If our attorneys find that the DOE is violating state law in this process, we’ll be seeing them in court,” he said.

Over the next two months, the department must hold public hearings at each of the schools on the chopping block. Then the Panel for Educational Policy must vote to approve the closure plans. The panel has never rejected a city proposal.

Here’s the list of schools the department is proposing to phase out:

And here are the three schools where the department is proposing to cut off the middle grades:

  • Mike

    What do you mean by “low-performing”?

  • Pogue

    I am such a successful education mayor, I annually close many schools I have been in charge of for over ten years.

    What a piece of garbage.

  • Greg

    i’m pretty sure by low performing they mean schools like IS 296 where 10% of 8th grade students passed ELA and 18% passed math in 2011…on standardized assessments in which proficiency is a disturbing low bar….pretty sure you wouldn’t send your child there, nobody should have to.

  • Transformation Teacher

    The fact that we still have to close any schools after 10 years of Bloomberg shows what a failure he really is, and what a shell game he plays.

  • michael

    The DOE would send any low achieving student they could find to that school in order to take over that building. It’s part of the mayor’s master plan.

  • Greg

    Michael, it is not about politics, it is about a child’s education. Spend a minute in one of these schools, like I do all day, and you realize it is failing.  Blame
    Bloomberg, for convenience, but it does nothing to help a child get a
    better education.  This school and
    so many do not fail because of “low performing students” like you
    suggest. Your notion that it is a student’s fault to be low performing
    is disgusting. Failure lies on the shoulder of the adults who run a
    school with no expectations for academic and personal success, zero
    structure or discipline, and no demonstration that there is something worth working for in life.  The children in
    these schools are NOT sent to that school because they themselves are
    ‘low performing’ rather they are victims of a being born into a
    neighborhood where a low performing system has been accepted by the adults that run your neighborhood schools and unions. Don’t like
    it, demand great teachers in every classroom, and demand they are held accountable so teachers who don’t lead students to success are not given the chance to do any more harm. Maybe you’ll realize that we have a responsibility to close a school if it is failing children year after year.

  • Pogue

    I call BS. Your “accountability” “low-performing” ” demand great teachers” “union’s fault” buzzwords were tired years ago, and they’re old hat now.  Thankfully, apologists for Bloomberg are decreasing with each passing day.  Politicians and principals are just waking up to what students, parents, and teachers have known for the past ten years…This administration and his policies are anti-education and anti-children.

    Sooner or later, you’ll stop drinking the kool-aid, too. 

  • Vote NO!

    We  have  to  overcome  the ” knee  jerk”   reaction  of   “education  reformers”  to  blame  the  staffs  in  these  schools.  Today’s   list   of  closures  has  been  released,  and  schools  that  were  opened  to  replace  “failing” schools   are  being  closed.  Opening  and  closing  schools,  and  blaming  their  staffs  will  NEVER   do  anything  to  improve  education  in  the  inner- city.  It  will  just  discourage  many  prospective  teachers  from  ever  seriously  considering   a  career  in  any  school  in  those  neighborhoods,  out  of  fear  that  it  will  eventually  be  closed. 

  • bee

    Greg, it most certainly is about politics! These failures are a direct result of education policy being made by politicians and billionaires instead of educators and  school communities. Bloomberg has had a decade of Mayoral control, and wanted to be held accountable, yet he has done nothing but scapegoat the teachers. He has been like a hurricane of destruction, and he ought to have been fired long, long ago. These schools are failing as a direct result of Michael Bloomberg, his minions and his billionaire buddies. It’s hard to believe that the mayor is as unintelligent as the horse manure that spews from his mouth, which brings one to the distinct impression that this sabotage of our public schools  is a result of insidious scheming rather than mere incompetence.

  • Spqr

    How can you blame the staff when they’re closing down schools where Bloomberg has basically chosen the staff!
    People have to wake up to the dangerous game this computer terminal maker is playing with their kids’ lives.
    He is seriously out of touch with reality, and needs to be booted out of office as soon as possible.

  • Kpsmove

    How much are you willing to pay for this GREAT TEACHER and how many students should he have according to our Mayor a Great teacher should be able to handle 50 kindergartners by themselves we all nknow how low maintenance Kindergartners are.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

1 comment so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031