GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

one by one

More city principals, but not many, sign on to evaluation petition

Geraldine Maione, principal of William E. Grady High School, has signed onto a petition opposing the state's new teacher evaluations.

The newest signatories to a petition against the state’s new teacher evaluation system include one of the few principals who actually has experience with the new evaluations.

Geraldine Maione heads Brooklyn’s William E. Grady High School, which is among 33 “persistently low-achieving” city schools that are using the new evaluations in exchange for additional federal funds.

She told me that she opposes the new evaluations because they are so formulaic that they leave little room for principals to exercise discretion.

“When I walk in a classroom, I know when children are learning and teachers are teaching,” she said, adding that tougher evaluations aren’t necessary if principals push struggling teachers either to improve or move on.

“No teacher has a forever job if the principal is doing her job,” Maione said.

Maione is among about 30 city principals who have signed onto a position paper arguing that the state’s evaluation requirements — which require a portion of teachers’ ratings to be based on their students’ test scores —  are unsupported by research, prone to errors, and too expensive at a time of budget cuts. That’s a sharp rise from last month, when hundreds of principals statewide had signed on but only two active city principals were on the list.

The new signatories include some principals of progressive schools where using test scores to make high-stakes decisions is anathema. For example, Herb Mack and Ann Cook, the founding principals of Urban Academy, where students don’t even take most Regents exams, are on the list, as are Julie Zuckerman and Naomi Smith, principals of the Central Park East schools founded by Deborah Meier.

But most of the new signatories are hardly seasoned activists. Several lead small high schools that opened under the Bloomberg administration, and another, Musa Shama, heads one of the city’s few remaining large high schools. Others have kept their heads down as principals of neighborhood elementary schools.

Even with the new additions, city school leaders make up just 5 percent of the principals who have signed the petition, even though they comprise about a third of principals statewide.

Why have relatively few city principals put their name to the petition, even as their union has signaled support? Sean Feeney, a Nassau County principal who co-authored the position paper, offered a couple of theories when we spoke last month:

Feeney speculated that city principals are less shocked by the state’s evaluation requirements because the city has already tried to develop “value-added” evaluations of some teachers using student test scores.

“The city’s been living with this for a while,” he said.

Plus, he said about city principals, “I think they’re a little more nervous” about jeopardizing their jobs by speaking out.

The full list of city principals who have signed the petition is below:

  • Vote NO!

    “She told me that she opposes the new evaluations because they are so
    formulaic that they leave little room for principals to exercise
    discretion.”

    The  new  evaluation   framework  that  is  being  used  in  the  33  PLA  schools  is  just  setting  up  teachers  to  eventually  be  fired.  If  the  Danielson  framework  that  is  being  used  in  the  PLA  schools  becomes  the  method  of  evaluation  for  every  teacher  in  the  city,  NYC  will  experience  a  catastrophic  attrition  rate  among  its  teaching  force.

  • Anonymous

    also check out what Peter McNally of the CSA wrote about this here:
    http://www.nytimes.com/schoolbook/2011/12/01/union-leader-foresees-teacher-evaluation-nightmare/

    He said that NYC principals have not yet been “trained” by NYSED in the ridiculous system; and so are mostly unaware of it. 

    Also it may be that NYC principals are more afraid b/c DOE has signed onto this test-based nonsense more than supers & schl boards in the rest of the state, who see this as a rigid imposition on their ability to decide for themselves when teachers are doing a good job.

  • JEFF S

    The problem is that so many of the New York City Principals are spineless and really are not qualified to properly evaluate teachers.  Many lack the experience of having served enough time as a teacher and an Assistant Principal to be able to learn how to properly evaluate teachers.  They are graduates of the Leadership Academy, set up by the inept civil rights lawyer who masqueraded as an educator for over 8 years destroying the school system at the behest of the Emperor who believes erm limit laws should not apply to him because after all he is indispensable.  Hundreds of qualified teachers and assistant principals who were trying to advance their careers and gain experience were passed over for the so called Principals who know nothing about education but will toe the party line.  Some of these incompetents, after destroying schools such as Lehman High School, are then turned into talent coaches so they show how to implement the nonsense pushed by the Emperor and the latest lackey.  I would hope, for the sake of the children in this city and the many teachers who have devoted years of their lives to help better the kiuds of this city, that the UFT has enough intestinal fortitude to stand up to these incompetents.  They partially caved to try to get the Race to the Topp money and did partially throw many teachers under the bus.  Given these people a toe and they want the whole foot.  Mulgrew, just say no to protect your teachers and more importantly the kids of the city.  The fact that so few “Principals” in this city have the you know whats to sign the petition shows just how inept they are.

  • Philip Nobile

    Having worked under two clueless boobs at the PLA Cobble Hill School of American Studies, I salute Principal Malone’s stand on the pie-in-the- sky Danielson rubrics. I recently ATR-ed at Grady and was pleasantly surprised by Malone’s leadership. I saw her in the corridors sheparding kids to class and heard her P.A. announcements closing with “Remember, you are loved.” I wondered—was this gooey sentimentality or heartfelt emotion from a hardheaded humanist? So I asked a class  of senior boys, “Do you feel the love? They all said yes. Go Principal Malone.

  • Smith

    The problem is not just that our principals have been “living with” value-added for awhile.  It’s that so many have so thoroughly comprised their integrity and distorted their sense of reality in trying to do well on the progress reports that the idea of standing against a policy simply because it is both foolish and unjust is one that exists far outside the scope of their imaginations.

  • Roma Giudetti

    The Danielson Framework the Common Core Standards – all so much nonsense.  Instead of spending money on this nonsense can we spend it in the classroom?  Some of the common core standards are so obvious as to be ridiculous.  RL.9-10.2. Determine a theme or central idea of a text and analyze in detail its development over the course of the text, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details; provide an objective summary of the text.What else would kids be doing as they’re reading – what else would I be doing as I’m teaching?  This is what we spend money on?

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

3 comments so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031