GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

departures

Amid sweeping changes, state’s testing chief resigns suddenly

The State Education Department official who has supervised the state’s testing program since 2004 — through skyrocketing scores, a brutal crash, and the dawn of an overhaul — has resigned.

David Abrams, the State Education Department’s assistant commissioner for standards, assessment, and reporting since 2004, announced his resignation today. His resignation is effective immediately, shocking some people who had expected to participate in meetings with him this week.

Abrams’s departure comes at a time of robust efforts to overhaul both state tests and how their scores are used — and of robust criticism of those efforts. Most recently, principals across the state have launched a rebellion against the state’s plan to use student test scores in teacher evaluations. This week, a plan to lengthen reading tests to four hours was released prematurely, then rescinded the next day amid backlash.

The department has yet to find a replacement for Abrams, according to SED spokesman Dennis Tompkins. He said other department officials would fill in for Abrams for now, as would members of a privately funded group that has been advising SED on implementing Race to the Top commitments, which include redesigning student assessments and teacher evaluations.

“Obviously [Abrams] will be missed, but we do have a really strong team that can fill in,” Tompkins said. He declined to comment on the reasons for Abrams’s departure.

Abrams supervised the state’s testing program during a period of controversy and change.

For the first several years of his tenure, test scores skyrocketed, even as experts warned that the tests were not accurate gauges of student performance. In 2010, ex-Commissioner David Steiner, then in his first year as state education chief, acknowledged that the scores were inflated and promised to toughen exams, first in a series of incremental changes and then with entirely new tests in coming years.

Some argued that fundamental improvements to state tests could not happen as long as Abrams remained at the department. Last year, a New York Post editorial pegged Abrams with responsibility for grade inflation on state tests, and Manhattan Institute fellow Sol Stern wrote in the conservative National Review, “It is dismaying to discover that David Abrams, the Albany bureaucrat who was squarely in the middle of the test-inflation scandals of the past few years, is still New York’s state testing director.”

But others saw Abrams as having a role to play in improving the testing program. In the same Post editorial that criticized him, In the editorial, Steiner and Regents Chancellor Merryl Tisch described Abrams as “a valued member of New York’s assessment team.” And an educator who has worked with Abrams on student assessment issues but does not work for the state said today that Abrams is ”very passionate about testing and getting it right.”

Abrams did not respond to requests for comment today.

  • Ticked-Off Taxpayer

    Maybe he had a sudden fit of conscience.  Better late than never.

  • Anonymous

    about time!  this is probably the final straw that caused Abrams to be fired:
    http://goo.gl/1Tt5C

  • Sol

     What is the justification for calling the publication I wrote my article in “the conservative” National Review? Do you identify the New York Times as “liberal” or the Nation as “leftist”? 

  • Lisa Donlan

    I bet Leonie is right- that last stunt cost him his job.
     Not sure what is different compared to the inflated test score debacle – was it cumulative bad faith, hubris and incompetence or are the times a changin’?

  • Ellen

    And all this does is point out yet again that the Mayor/Chancellor’s boasting about improvements is illusionary..or delusionary, depends on where you stand.  What will the P)ST and NY DAILY News have to say now?  How can we as a community continue to ignore the reality of these lies…and the cost to the children who are currently in school?

  • Mook

    Or the New York Post as “dishonest”?

  • Nycdoenuts

    I don’t wasn’t to detract from the big news. But I would like to say that I really really love it when I see conservatives complain about being labeled.

  • Nycdoenuts

    I’m not at all happy to learn that part of his work is going to fall to a ‘privately funded group that has been advising SED’.

    Public education needs to be a public venture. That requires public servants, not servants of some ‘privately funded group’ to help pick up the slack until a resplacement is found.

  • I noticed that…

    Thank goodness that the children will eventually have some “time-out from testing”.

  • Abc

    Are any of your educations who received his email on Monday?  Did you actually see the 45 page testing document from McGraw-Hill?  You really think Abrams did this alone without prior vetting by NYSED superiors?  Its amateur hour at State Ed, and all public school children, teachers, parents, and administrators are set to lose.  The tip of the iceberg, people!

  • Pjg320

    Abrams is falling on his sword for Kings failures, I.e., Jan Regents, Teacher Eval, Schl Psychol now testing, all King missteps, he is arrogant and tone deaf and facing increasing hostility from the field, maybe some college presidency will suddenly open up ..
    you can’t piss off 4500 schools & hope to succeed.

  • Philip Nobile

    Let’s not forget that David Abrams biggest failing was covering up the notorious 65 bulge on Regents exams that allowed, and worse encouraged, a decade long crime spree that spat out thousands and thousands of worthless diplomas for our neediest minority students. And who was his direct superior? Now Commissioner King. No wonder that King appointed an independent investigator to probe only NYSED procedures and not NYSED and DOE officials. N.B. When the Wall Street Journal asked Klein to comment on its 65 bulge scoop, he declined (Feb 2). What does that tell us about the integrity of his regime and Bloomberg’s dishonest boast of an historic 65% grad rate for the class of 2010?

  • UCG93

    Just the first of the Jenga pieces to fall… King is an arrogant know-nothing about public education stooge.  Just another attempt by the private sector to destroy public education, not improve it.  But, they have been trying for decades and clearly the vast majority people believe in publics schools.  He and his Teach for America cronies should return from whence they came.

  • Carl

    Because self-styled conservatives founded and run the Review?  Are you kidding?

    And yes, I would hope the Nation would be described as social democratic, if not “leftist”

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

11 comments so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031