GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

the big squeeze

DOE’s newest class size data confirms increases across city

Chart showing trends in K-3 class size. From Class Size Matters PowerPoint presentation. (Click to enlarge.)

Preliminary class size data that the city released today confirms what the teachers union has tallied: Class sizes are on the rise.

Classes grew most this year in kindergarten through third grade, where the average size increased by just under one student since last year to 23.1. On average, classes in those grades are now three students larger than they were in the 2006-2007 school year. They are largest in Queens and Staten Island and smallest in Manhattan.

Classes in those grades are now the largest they have been since 1998, according to a PowerPoint presentation prepared by parent activist Leonie Haimson for Class Size Matters, a group that she runs to advocate for smaller classes.

Class sizes have also inched up in upper elementary, middle, and high school grades, but not by as much, according to the city’s new numbers.

In all grades, average class sizes exceed the goals set forth in the 2007 Campaign for Fiscal Equity lawsuit settlement, which required the state to earmark extra funds for New York City schools to use for six different purposes, including reducing class size.

Haimson’s presentation argues that the class size increases show that the city has misused the funds, known as Contracts for Excellence funds.

The city has argued that it has used the funds appropriately but cannot undo the effects of contracting state and local school budgets. When the UFT released its preliminary tally of oversized classes in September, a Department of Education spokesman, acknowledged that class sizes were likely to grow but downplayed the shift’s significance, saying that teacher quality trumped class size.

Today, another DOE spokeswoman, Barbara Morgan, said the increase was not as large as officials had believed possible. In May, when teacher layoffs were on the table, Chancellor Dennis Walcott warned that classes could grow by an average of two students.

“As a consequence of nearly $1.7 billion in state and federal budget cuts, we fully anticipated that class sizes would rise modestly and we are pleased that the increase is below what we initially projected,” Morgan said in a statement.

“We do expect class sizes to rise modestly as a consequence of nearly $1.7 billion in state and federal budget cuts that have forced us to more with less,” Thomas said at the time. “But we believe that getting effective teachers into every classroom is the most important stepping stone to student success, and we will continue to work toward that goal.”

Leonie Haimson’s PowerPoint on Contracts for Excellence spending and class size reduction

  • Gideon

    It looks like Bronx has smaller class sizes than Staten Island, but I
    suspect students do better in Staten Island than the Bronx.  Is there any evidence that, controlling for other factors, class size in NYC is related to student performance.  Also, I think it’s more important to look at what size class actually affects learning, not whether class sizes have changed by a couple of kids.   I’m not convinced that shrinking a class from 24 to 20 kids is the best way to improve public education, though getting down to 15 might be worthwhile (but is hardly affordable).  It would be helpful if Leonie Haimson would say exactly what size classes should be, provide research to support that particular size, and then suggest how we afford that size.

  • il flerpolo

    Slide 15 et seq. is where this presentation starts to break down.  It needs to make apples-to-apples comparisons.  For example, the presentation presents an analysis of C4E funding from 2007 onward, so we should be looking at DOE spending from 2007, not 2002.  Also, you can’t make a convincing argument that school budget cuts are a result of bad priorities at the DOE until you quantify the money the DOE is spending on other priorities and make some showing that it’s both controllable and non-essential.  And the bullet point about the DOE’s previous estimates for the cost of reducing class sizes to targeted goals is extremely opaque and begs all sorts of questions about what assumptions those estimates were based on.  

  • A teacher

    Gideon: As a NYC kindergarten teacher with 25 children in my class, I can attest to the fact that even one student less makes a difference. It’s hardly affordable?
    Given the fact that my principal now has 4 assistant principals, one coach and another full time teacher that spends absolutely no time with any class of students, and even students that do not attend our school, YES! we can afford it.

    The principal of the school has chosen to surround herself with helpers and squeezing out the rest for the students. There are two empty classrooms in the building, yet classes are at the contractual maximum. 

    What’s wrong with this picture?

  • bee

    Perhaps if we spent less money on nonsense like, Tweed beaureocrats,  litigators litigating co-location issues, high-stakes tests, flavor of the week and reinventing the wheel teacher seminars, assistant principals, multiple principles in each school,and the used the millions of $$$$ earmarked by Bloomberg for superfluous no bid technology programs, et al, it could be done. It would also save on future remedial programs, if students are able to get more individualized attention, Besides, wasn’t the DOE supposed to do this anyhow? I guess Bloomberg’s Tweed machine is above the law?

  • bee

    *bureaucrats

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

0 comments so far today

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031