GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

tightening the screws

NCLB progress reports show steep increase in sub-par schools

Last month, state education officials warned the Board of Regents in their monthly meeting that New York State was facing a “tsunami” of new schools that would be out of compliance with federal guidelines.

Today, the first wave hit.

The number of new schools that failed to show sufficient progress skyrocketed by more than 700 percent this year, state officials announced today. They identified 847 new schools statewide – compared with just 102 new schools last year – that need to improve in order to meet the state’s proficiency standards. The total number of schools on the list is now at 1325, up from 501 a year ago.

Just 23 schools showed enough progress to be removed from the list.

Schools that need more improvement won’t face immediate penalties. The list is considered a way to measure adequate yearly progress (AYP) as part of the federal No Child Left Behind law, which has a requirement of achieving 100 percent proficiency in 2014.

Those expectations have widely been acknowledged to be unreasonable, however. In October, President Obama announced that states could apply for a waiver from the 2014 proficiency goals as long as they agree to comply with new standards that are more in line with his reform agenda. New York State officials have quickly moved to apply for the waiver and plans to submit to the federal government next year.

But even as they work on the waiver application to opt out of the NCLB measurements, state education officials struck an urgent tone that the growing list was “further evidence” that schools were not improving fast enough.

“These numbers show that too many schools are moving in the opposite direction,” said Board of Regents Chancellor Merryl Tisch in a statement. “If student performance doesn’t improve, schools must be held accountable. We are watching.”

In New York City, the list of schools in need of improvement more than doubled this year, from 302 to 640 and just 12 schools were removed from the list. All but one school district – district 26 in Queens – was tagged as in need of improvement.

The huge spike reflects changes being made at the state level to make students more prepared for college and professional careers. Two years ago, the state raised cut scores on its English language arts and math standardized tests for grades 3-8 while at the same time making them less predictable. In addition, the state raised the percentages of students who must graduate.

Eighty-two percent of the new New York City schools on the list this year were elementary and middle schools that were cited for low performance on English language arts exams, reflecting the increasing difficulty of that test. All schools on the list will be required to undergo School Quality Reviews.

City officials said today that the NCLB measures were flawed because they distorted actual progress being made by its schools. They cited that more than half of the 350 new schools added to the NCLB list earned either an A or B on this year’s progress reports.

“We support strong accountability measures, but those that look at absolute proficiency alone penalize schools that are making progress,” Chancellor Dennis Walcott said in a statement today.

 

 


  • nuff said

    So Obama says the rules are blatantly unfairn then blackmails the States to reform schools with HIS agenda—-and you wonder why people want the Federal Government out of local school business completely.

  • Anonymous

    The Lake Woebegon effect … in 2014 all schools must be above average … of course with the NCLB Waiver we can move the fences … or, under a Perry presidency abolish the Department of Education and outsource schooling … or maybe staple that chip in the earlobe at birth

  • Michael Fiorillo

    Now that NCLB has done what what it was intended to do, namely, stigmatize virtually every public school as failing – after all, achieving on 100% proficiency is a statistical  impossibility – Obama and Duncan try to come in as “reasonable” people, extorting communities into accepting privatization, teacher evaluation schemes that are guaranteed to eliminate tenure and seniority, forcing force people out of the system, and a Microsoft/Pearson-generated “curriculum” that is a pretext for even more testing.

  • Ellen

    Maybe someone should figure out why NYS and NYC are having trouble with the standards.  NYC gave these schools As and Bs, NYS says they are failing and NCLB backs up NYS.   What’s happening here?  I feel like I am in some ugly nightmare!

  • I noticed that…

    NYS granted Bloomberg mayoral control.
    Mayor breaks large schools into small theme schools and phase out large schools.
    Small theme schools accept only the best of the best students and they are exempted from all sp.ed./ESL criteria.
    Small theme schools hire only TFA or TF’s teachers, where Damocles’ sword is over their head to pass every child.
    Small theme schools get A’s and B’s; there’s a correlation between student credit accumulation and untenured teachers.
    Large schools receive all the special needs, ELL and disadvantaged students from those phased out schools.
    Large schools receive no extra resource or support from the DoE, but the DoE gives those necessary resources to small theme schools.
    Large schools are struggling to help these emotionally challenged, low socio-economic, level 1 students who are placed in the school carrying very little credit accumulation.  These students have not passed the regents or have passed 1 or 2 and many are overage.  The schools must have them graduate in 4 years.
    DoE spends an exorbitant amount of money on the Predictive Assessment Test and teachers are required to test to the test.  DoE pressures Principals; Principals pressure teachers.  Credit recovery is used and abused, where the granting of credits will keep the schools open at the cost of an education for each child in this Ponzi scheme called NCLB and Mayoral Control.
    Regents exams are water downed so much during the Mayoral elections (2005 & 2009) that a 6th grader can take the regents and bubble any answer and still get a 65.  Money can buy anything even a repeal of term limits and getting the state regents to make the cut scores on regents low enough to make Forrest Gump a valedictorian.
    Mayor Bloomberg is in favor of term limits.  Cut scores on regents are increased.  Students were not allowed to learn to think, but to bubble in the answers.  The failure rate is higher now than ever, and colleges are inquiring about the students’ lack of college-readiness that the Bloomberg’s Children First Initiative has produced.
    Budget cuts are imposed at the schools, but the DoE gets more funding.  Three Chancellors have been incompetent and they are lackeys to the mayor.  Parents have been shut-out or ignored; the majority of the PEP members are lackeys to the mayor.  The no-bid contracts of hundreds of million of dollars never trickled down to the schools, but to these corporations of “syndication”.  Charter schools co-locate in existing public schools, squeezing the life out of the public school.
     
    I wonder why the schools are sub-par as per the NCLB law which is a senseless, incomprehensible, punitive, ridiculous law.  Mayoral control does ensure that every child gets an education; it only guarantees the mayor’s political career stays alive and strong as public schools are destroyed.

  • Todd

    Comment for M. Tisch:
    While teaching George Orwell’s novel Animal Farm this week, I will be using your “we are watching” comment to illustrate to students exactly what real educators are up against. When one of the New York state board of regents can’t extend a hand to educators there really isn’t anywhere to go. Yes, your tin sabre rattling may make you feel like you are a get tough politician but in actuality you probably just don’t have any idea what to do. Threats are the last vestige of a weak and bankrupt bureaucracy.
    Your threats may make you feel like you are protecting your position, but here’s a tip for you: we are watching you. If you don’t do anything except point fingers, you will have no one left to blame when the hook comes for you. It is patently obvious that the real culprit here is not educators but indeed those who hide behind an ill conceived and terribly damaging law. Instead of standing by “watching”, you ought to be rolling up your sleeves and getting to work like the rest of us and backing legislation that actually helps the education process.
    By the way, what are you “watching” for exactly? In twelve months nearly one hundred percent of the schools you are supposed to be leading will be “failing”. My guess is you aren’t worried about watching teachers but rather you are worried about who is watching you. As you should be.

  • il flerpolo

    I’m pondering how depressed I would have been if my High School English teacher used a discussion about Orwell as an occasion to illustrate “what real educators are up against.”  

  • Mab

    Just can’t be that dense. So far over your head.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Follow GothamSchools

RSS

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

0 comments so far today

Events Calendar

Our Twitter Updates

Archives

May 2012
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031