GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

collaborative thinking

Struggling with special education, charter schools join together

Chancellor Dennis Walcott discusses special education in charter schools at the kick-off conference for a new collaborative.

As the director of special education at the DREAM Charter School, Jacqueline Frey knows firsthand the difficulties charter schools face when serving students with disabilities.

One issue, she said, is convincing the city that her school’s plan to serve each disabled student is sound.

And when she wants to bring her teachers up to date on the best ways to serve students with disabilities, she has to figure out how to compensate for the training that pricey consultants might be able to offer.

“If I’m a mom and pop charter school, I can’t afford to do that for myself,” Frey said. “It helps to find other schools in the same situation.”

Connecting charter schools with similar special education needs is the chief goal of the New York City Charter School Center’s Special Education Collaborative, which builds off of local efforts to boost special education at charter schools that have been going in the Bronx, Manhattan, and Brooklyn since 2007. The $1,500-per-school entry fee pays for monthly training sessions, access to counselors and consultants, and an annual conference.

The citywide collaborative, which about 90 of the city’s 136 charter schools have already joined, comes at an opportune time. Both of the state’s charter school authorizers, the State University of New York and the Board of Regents, are pushing new charter schools to build capacity for more higher-needs students, including more special education students, this year, into their school designs. And at the collaborative’s first conference last month, Chancellor Dennis Walcott said the DOE would be pressing charter schools to “up the ante” in how they serve special education students.

The pushes are in part a response to criticism that charter schools do not enroll a fair share of special needs students. In recent years, the proportion of students with disabilities at charter schools has actually risen to nearly the city average. The challenge now, advocates say, is to serve disabled students well.

One obstacle, they say, is the very lack of bureaucracy that is often cited as charter schools’ greatest efficiency. Where district schools are situated in networks that can provide support and training for special education teachers, charter schools are on their own.

“The DOE has really grown their charter school office, but around special education it’s still a big question,” said Dixon Deutsch, the collaborative’s director.

The former director of special education for the Achievement First charter network, Deutsch said he has seen how charter schools operating on their own sometimes struggle to teach disabled students. When Achievement First schools were just starting out, they had only a handful of special education teachers on staff.

“I realized that we were doing a disservice to the kids and families that we were working with,” he said. “Kids were leaving our system and we didn’t really have the staffing or knowledge to figure out how to serve this particular population.”

By the time the network had grown to 10 schools in two states, he said, it had 60 special education instructors,giving the teachers a larger set of professional resources and colleagues to draw on.

The collaborative aims to replicate that growth, especially for schools whose leaders aren’t shooting to franchise, Deutsch said.

“The role this collaboration can really play is to bring different experts from the field together to learn from each other, to network, to see classrooms in action, to see principals in action, to make sure folks are coming together to improve special education,” he said.

Kevin Pease of the Bronx Charter School for the Arts shows teachers how to use puppets to engage students in storytelling at a breakout session.

More than 150 people attended last month’s conference, which featured seminars on classroom management, teaching literacy, and responding to behavior problems, among other topics. The training was geared toward filling in the gaps in support teachers are receiving from their principals and DOE officials, Deutsch said.

In one seminar, teachers and counselors from a number of city charter schools workshopped potential responses to students’ behavioral issues. One teacher asked the group what she should do when one of her students paces around the classroom to avoid doing schoolwork. The seminar leader, Elizabeth Fong, a therapist, suggested creating a new consequence for the student for doing his work that is more desirable than the pacing—an “avoidance behavior,” that was allowing the student to skip assignments.

Kim Madden, director of legal services at Advocates for Children, an advocacy organization for students with disabilities, cautioned that extra training is no substitute for adding more teachers who are certified in addressing a broad range of disabilities.

“There’s a huge spectrum of disabilities, so a student who needs something more intensive than something that can be done as an add-on to general ed is sometimes a challenge for charter schools,” she said.

But Madden said any effort to serve students with special needs better is a positive step for the city’s charter schools.

“Historically we have seen that charter schools have not served the students with greater needs, so I think it’s great that the schools are making an effort,” she said. “Certainly there’s a lot of room for improvement, in both charter schools and the DOE.”

  • Noryeln

    I guess confession is good for the soul…or for charter school leaders who have ignored students with special needs.  I wish them luck and hope that if they do find some positive ways to work with studnets with special needs that the sharing of protocols is actualized.

  • Doubting Thomas

    What evidence do you have that “In recent years, the proportion of students with disabilities at charter schools has actually risen to nearly the city average.”

  • NYCparent

    Dear DOE and Charter Schools,

    If you want to know what programs are needed to address the needs of dyslexic readers, who account for 20%  of the general population, or approximately 220,000 NYC public school children, you can find a list of providers recommended by the International Dyslexia Association here – http://www.margaretkay.com/PDF%20files/Dyslexia%202010/Matrix%20of%20Structured%20Language%20programs.pdf

    For fuller commentary on this issue see http://www.gothamgazette.com/article/education/20111019/6/3623

  • http://twitter.com/BNiche B

    Good question. Just to add, there is nothing here about the differences in IEPs, students’ needs, and students’ disabilities, especially the number of self-contained students in charter schools as opposed to district schools. That’s a huge piece missing.

    A student receiving special education services for SETSS in a subject is quite different than a student receiving services in an ICT classroom for speech or a student receiving services in a self-contained classroom with a crisis paraprofessional and requiring assisted technology and a scribe to write.

    Hypothetically speaking, if a good number of charters only took students with needs that required SETSS, related services, or, in some cases, an ICT classroom, while more public schools took students who need a self-contained environment, the numbers of SPED students in schools could be similar, but the needs are nowhere near the same. What are those numbers? Kim couldn’t find them last year, how about this year, GS?

  • Michael M. (parent still)

    I finally figured out why the above photo looked familiar:
    http://dailypop.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/1985hawkman.gif

  • bee

    Yes, lets see some evidence and more specific breakdowns of the groupings to which B refers!

  • bee

    *evidence of actual special education population statistics in charter schools.

  • Ellen

    B, please the students are not SPED students but students with special needs or students with IEPs.    Please don’t use that term when referring to these students.

  • Pingback: Top education official urges closure of Imagine schools – STLtoday.com | News Digging

  • Pingback: Top education official urges closure of Imagine schools – STLtoday.com | News One Net

  • http://twitter.com/BNiche B

    Ellen, I only used that term once because I felt my comment was getting a little long. As you can read with the rest of the post, I used “students receiving special education services” throughout my entire post except for one time. My apologies. Edited.

  • Drockeducation

    Hilarious.

  • Pingback: SchoolBook: Students Say Sexual Harassment Is Pervasive in Schools

  • Hawker

    Lets all stop the nonsense where the Charter Schools discipline code is “emotionally abusive” and “medievel”.  Charter Schools do this to weed out the kids who will not “raise” their data on state exams, students who might need help – students with special needs.  What a shame that students are being treated so horribly and the parent’s outcries go unanswered and they actually get away with it.  I ran across this article – read the comments – especially the comment from Carlos (sounds like a staff member at the school – how can you be passionate about teaching or leading with a such a perception).  I am following this school closely and they are setting the girls as well as themselves up for failure.  http://eastvillage.thelocal.nytimes.com/2011/10/25/amid-headlock-allegations-parents-complain-about-disciplining-at-girls-prep/

  • Sonja L

    LAUSD has a Federal Consent Decree to meet outcomes in providing proper service for students with disabilities.  The link here takes you to reports generated by the Independent Monitor’s Office regarding these outcomes.  Several are in regards to Charters not taking their fair share of students with moderate to severe disabilities.  Link here: http://www.oimla.com/reports.htm

    With block grant funding, each child that goes to a charter takes a portion of special education funding – whether that child needs it or not.  As more moderate to severely disabled students are left to the regular public system, there is less special education funding for their needs.  The funding model needs to change.  Funding should follow the child.  While some charters might enroll such a student at the beginning of the school year, come norming day, they are usually “counseled out” and asked to leave on false claims that they cannot accommodate the needs of the student.  Unfortunately, due to the funding model, the charter is allowed to keep the ADA due to the block grant.  Charters bleed the district of funds this way and after pretending to want a child, they kick the student out and the district is then responsible for this student – without any ADA attached.  It’s a racket.  It’s a sham. 

    I’ve collected data for years regarding the inequities of exclusive and discriminatory enrollment of students with disabilities in LAUSD Charters as well as the lack of services provided compared to regular public schools.  We’re still waiting for the “best practices” that charters are supposed to be sharing with our district, but so far it only involves practices that are illegal – discriminatory and exclusive enrollment.  A public school takes all children.  Charters do not. 

    Charters also don’t have properly credentialed teachers for moderate to severely disabled students.  They should not be taking students with autism if there is no one on their roster with a level 2 moderate to severe credential.  They falsely claim to parents that they’re qualified to teach these children when they are not.  Teach for America volunteers do not have special education training or qualifications and seem to be the favorite hires of charters. 

    While this New York consortium may claim to pool resources – they should, in fact be hiring special education teachers with proper credentials as well.  The claim that “In recent years, the proportion of students with disabilities at charter schools has actually risen to nearly the city average” doesn’t tell the entire story.  Charters in LAUSD have higher numbers of the “easy” disabilities on their rosters: Specific Learning Disability. Speech and Language Impairment, etc,  They do not take a child with severe autism, cerebral pasley, blind, deaf and hard of hearing…because those students have more intensive needs that require more specialized services that charters are not willing to pay for.  The special education funding is usually folded into their general fund.  Look at what the numbers represent and then see if New York is playing the same game with our children as LAUSD charters. 

    Note, too that many folks funding this charter movement are rich developers.  They’re after the property.  What better way to fleece the public than to claim you want to educate the (selective) populace.  By siphoning off the easier students, the regular public schools are left with those who bring test scores down, causing them to become program improvement and ripe for take-over by charters that will then “remove” those difficult students.  What is the plan then?  Is the Charter movement’s intent to warehouse those students? 

    And what about foster and homeless youth?  Many Charters (illegally) require families to sign contracts of commitment to volunteer time or donation of money.  Charters also pick and choose the families they want involved with them.  This is not public education and I’m seeing my tax dollars going to organizations that could care less about my special needs child.  Ultimately it’s a land-grab and a way that billionaires have discovered to rip off the government of needed funds for all students.  If they all really cared about education, they’d pay their fair share of taxes, get out of the education “business’ and leave teaching to the academics and experts. 

  • bee

    Well said Sonja!

  • Mariely86

    it seem you all don’t know your fact when it come down to charter school especially when there are students is the charter school system that are still receiving special ed services,  unlike the public school system  they quick to put your child in the special ed class like your child not to smart enough basically saying your child is low, and that what happen to my son. I thank God that my son is in the charter school system, he is going so good, he is reading and they help him to have confident and most importantly promotion our children to “The path to College” i think as parent let stop pointing the finger on what school has the most funding, and what school is not doing so well. What we need to do to figure out what can we do to reform the education system in NYC. It either there aren’t too many parent involve their children education or there are teacher that ain’t doing their job.That y i join a movement to fight for not only my child but every child in NYC to have a high quality education and that including special education.

  • bee

    I’m sorry but I think it is you who doesn’t understand what’s at stake for NYC public school communities. Contrary to what you claim, the special education and English Language Learners are not well served by charter schools. Perhaps you are one of the fortunate few. As for “reforming the public school system, Mayor Bloomberg’s decade of “reforms” have ruined the public school system. He is a politician, not an educator, thus he has no business making educational decisions. There are many people who think that charter schools are a scam, and they do fight for every child in NYC, so that the public school children and communities are not exploited and taken advantage of.

  • Mariely86

    let see, do you have a child in charter school system? I don’t think so, public school get more money then charter school, secondly there too many public school who has low performing grade level, like i said before and i going to say it again, stop beefing about charter school, there many other who like them and don’t. So ask yourself, how can you change the educational system in nyc because talking negative thing about charter school wont help the public school to reform…. Get your resources together!!!!

  • Reach1

    Regardless of what, the entire school system in New York City is in shambles. There are sooo many things that need to be fixed before we can see true change. There’s always a debate about teachers and failing schools but let’s remember that a school does not run itself. Never once have I heard principals or superintendents implicated in any of this drama!

    As a former special educator I found a lack of support across the board. Students were not getting serviced appropriately because there was not only a lack of information but also a lack of respect for the children and families. I believe that there should be more training for all involved. Everybody in the school community should be educated on special education and it’s benefits.

    There’s a lot that the state can’t see. Either that or they don’t want to. Schools are taking students they know they cant service for money. All that has to be done is file some paperwork and the schools budget increases without having to actually provide any services and resources. It’s sad. Then we expect these children to be able to take care of themselves and their families when they don’t have the tools to do so. Very scary .

    I know I tried my hardest to give my students what they needed and went above and beyond for them but my class was never expected to do well. Nor encouraged. I truly hope that there is reform in special education all over . Charters are not always better and that’s from first hand experience. Just because the school seems good on the outside doesn’t mean there sped program is. You have to really peel back the layers to see what’s really going on.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

20 comments so far today

Archives

June 2013
M T W T F S S
« May  
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930