GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

Take Two

From Charlotte, a vision for NYC’s second try at parent training

The parent training program that Schools Chancellor Dennis Walcott promised to launch last night would be new to New York City. But it wasn’t supposed to be that way.

In 2009, over the objections of some members of the Assembly who said doing so would waste scarce resources, state legislators passed a bill to create a parent-training center in New York City. The bill was one of four amendments that Senate Democrats required before they would agree to renew Mayor Bloomberg’s control of the schools.

That center was supposed to cost $1.6 million, which the city and state would jointly supply. It would have been housed at CUNY. And it would have trained parents who normally wouldn’t get involved to serve on community education councils and school leadership teams.

But it never got off the ground. The Department of Education said at the time that it was unwilling to pony up its portion of the costs unless the state contributed, too. And the state’s funding never materialized.

This time around, the city won’t be relying on the state for its parent training center. Walcott did not name a price tag for the new initiative, which will start in 2012, but he said the city would pool public and private funds to pay for it. A DOE official said the public funds would not come from the same pot that would have helped fund the CUNY training center.

A similar initiative in North Carolina’s Charlotte-Mecklenberg school system, which DOE officials said is a likely model for the program that the city will put in place, has been funded entirely with private dollars from local and national foundations and companies.

Charlotte parents said the district’s Parent University, which offers open training courses at schools throughout the Charlotte-Mecklenberg school system, has brought more parents into the schools and equipped them with skills, knowledge and resources to help navigate their child’s education. More than forty course titles offered for Fall 2011 include “Homework Without the Headache” and “Creating a College Timeline.”

Paula Finn, a parent of a sixth grade Charlotte-Mecklenberg school system student, has attended over twenty courses since the program launched in 2008.

“Before, I didn’t have any idea about the school system,” Finn said. “The Parent University classes have helped me answer questions that I wouldn’t be comfortable asking people.” For example, she said she felt odd asking her son’s teachers and principal about the purpose of standardized testing and was thankful when that was addressed in a Parent University course.

Finn said that since Parent University courses are hosted at schools throughout the Charlotte-Mecklenberg school system – ranging from the affluent to the impoverished – there is a cross-section of parents being brought into conversation with each other.

Over the years she has attended courses on topics that are directly relevant to her son – like transitioning to sixth grade and gifted education. She has also attended workshops on topics like gangs, which don’t immediately pertain to her son, but which keep her in tune with broader concerns in education.

Madelyn Miller, a family advocate at Reid Park Academy, a low-income school in Charlotte, said she had been running workshops for parents even before Parent University launched. But she said the city’s effort had allowed her to advertise more widely and attract a larger audience. And she praised the city’s program for spreading courses across the district and bringing programs to parents upon request.

“They make it convenient. No excuses – that’s what we try to put out there,” Miller said. “Parents don’t have an excuse not to attend.”

  • Anonymous

    Hmmm…. “she felt odd asking her son’s teachers and principal about the purpose
    of standardized testing and was thankful when that was addressed in a
    Parent University course.” 

    Sounds to me like propaganda to convince parents tow the line, not training to further empower parents.  this is probably the model that the DOE wants to pursue; yet another opportunity to try to snow parents as to the wisdom of their wrongheaded policies.

    In contrast, among Charlotte parents, there has been a vehement protest movement  vs. the rampant proliferation of standardized testing.  And the superintendent who ordered 52 new tests for their schools, Peter Gorman, left to work under Joel Klein, running Murdoch’s for -profit education division.

    http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2011/03/31/2184641/gorman-defends-cms-testing-as.html

  • NYCparent

    No need to follow some other city — I still have the pre-mayoral-control School Leadership Team training documents if anyone wants to see what “parent involvement” is supposed to look like.  If parents are interested in reasserting control over their own schools, look not to a “Parent University,” but to the next NYC mayoral election!

  • http://twitter.com/kreshleman Kristen Eshleman

    I’ve not attended these but will in order to address your suspicion about propaganda. It’s possible, but I doubt it based on the topics I’ve seen.

    On the issue of standardized testing and Pete Gorman, there is a full scale revolt against Broad/Gates “reform” policies. We vote very soon, and the candidate list is long. Almost every candidate is opposed to a Broad graduate for our next superintendent and insistent that person be a leader from within the community.

  • Anonymous

    The DOE has and continues to marginalize the role of parents. School and District Leadership Teams, a meaningful role in the principal slection process,etc.,  parents as partners not the charade of training parents to be parents. It’s insulting.  The NYC school leadership still sees cookie sales as the main role of parents. The DOE has choen to keep parents outside the tent, now they are peeing into the tent.

  • Anonymous

    see the work of Anne Henderson, the leading authority on the role of parents in schools:

    http://www.ncpie.org/pubs/AnneHendersonTestimonyExecutiveSummaryApril2010.pdf

  • Michael M. (parent still)

    Surely, this is intended as humor:

    “For example, she said she felt odd asking her son’s teachers and
    principal about the purpose of standardized testing and was thankful
    when that was addressed in a Parent University course.”

  • http://www.facebook.com/jw.devor Jim Devor

    Thanks for the (quite accurate) history lesson.  I was rather astonished that no one else has brought up the empty promise of a Parent Academy that was made two years ago. 

    Also, anything that gives parents more knowledge empowers them – even if that is not the intent of the perfessers.  That’s why, for example, in ante bellum South Carolina it was illegal to teach slaves how to read the Bible.

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

14 comments so far today

Events Calendar

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031