GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

Try try again

Walcott’s middle school plan puts new spin on old approaches

In his first major policy speech, Schools Chancellor Dennis Walcott called for major changes to the ctiy's worst middle schools.

To shake middle schools from mediocrity, the city is turning to school reform strategies it considers tried and true.

In the next two years, the Department of Education will close low-performing middle schools, open brand-new ones, add more charter schools, and push more teachers and principals through in-house leadership programs, Chancellor Dennis Walcott announced today in a 30-minute policy speech, the first of his six-month tenure.

For 10 schools, the city will ask for $30 million in federal funds to try a new reform strategy set out by the federal government, “turnaround,” in which at least half of staff members are replaced, Walcott said.

The efforts — which the city plans to pay for with a mixture of state and federal funds — are meant to boost middle school scores that are low and, in the case of reading, actually falling.

“People have tried and struggled with the complicated nature of middle schools for decades,” he said. “But the plan I’ve laid out is bolder and more focused than anything we’ve tried here in New York City before.”

Experts and advocates who helped engineer the last major effort to overhaul middle schools, a City Council task force that produced recommendations but short-lived changes at the DOE in 2007, disputed Walcott’s characterization. They said Walcott’s announcement reflects a change in style but not substance.

“Much of what he said is not new,” said Carol Boyd, a parent leader with the Coalition for Educational Justice, which has long urged more attention for middle schools. ”There is a definite party line, except Joel [Klein] wasn’t able to deliver it with the same believability that Chancellor Walcott does,” she said. Boyd sat on the task force.

“There’s nothing new [or] interesting about this plan,” said Pedro Noguera, the New York University professor who chaired the council’s task force and has spoken out against school closures. “It sounds like more of what they’ve been doing, shutting down failing schools.”

In fact, a centerpiece of Walcott’s plan is the creation of 50 new middle schools over the next two years, roughly half of which will be charter schools. And Walcott said he would ask the City Council to redirect funds it has allocated since 2008 to 51 low-performing middle schools to help other schools that have “shown promise but need continued support to succeed.”

But he said schools that don’t make strides would be shuttered. “We will hold our middle school to the same tough standards we hold our high schools,” Walcott said. “If a school is failing its students, we will take action and phase it out.”

Walcott could have a tough time selling his plan to Council Speaker Christine Quinn, who convened the task force to improve middle schools in 2007. Her office reacted to the news with surprise and skepticism.

“We were disappointed that more of the reforms outlined by the Council’s Middle School Task Force were not incorporated into the Chancellor’s speech,” said Justin Goodman, a spokesman for Quinn, particularly its recommendations to extend learning time and training for current middle school principals and teachers.

Ernest Logan, president of the principal’s union, said Walcott’s initiatives could “breathe life” back into the campaign that Quinn started, which he said was “nearly abandoned.

To operate the new schools, Walcott said the city will need to push more aspiring principals toward middle schools, which typically struggle to find qualified leadership more so than elementary and high schools, as well as create a “new class” of Teaching Fellows to work in middle schools.

Among other school improvement policies, Walcott noted two targeting poor literacy scores: plans to expand the Innovation Zone program to a group of middle schools using Race to the Top funding, and plans to purchase more non-fiction books aligned with the Common Core standards using $15 million from the State.

Walcott said he took inspiration from the reform efforts underway at several high-performing district and charter middle schools, which he has spent the past month visiting.

One school Walcott visited last week was Democracy Prep Harlem, a charter school co-located in the P.S. 92 building, where Principal Emanuel George said the chancellor toured classrooms and asked questions about what how the middle school trains its teaching staff and structures its school day.

“He walked into our World Percussion class, and poked into a reading classroom for 5 to 10 minutes. He said his focus was on meeting the leaders that drive schools,” George said.

George said Walcott left him with the impression that there would be more conversations, and opportunities to share best practices with other principals, to come. There is no formal principal advisory group on middle school improvement set up, according to Josh Thomases, the DOE’s deputy chief academic officer, who participated in some of Walcott’s conversations with principals last week.

But he said Walcott will be looking to principals for further guidance. “I imagine [the meetings] will continue with some regularity,” he said. “We may rotate principals. There are a lot of middle schools doing things right.”

Boyd said large-scale middle school improvements are necessary, but she did not think the widespread opening and closing of schools would be sufficient.

“Sometimes the culture of the previous school is so insidious in the neighborhood that even when you phase it out you still have the same host of problems because you are dealing with the same cohort of children and you haven’t addressed the underlying need,” she said.

  • Parent

    Wow, plans to close 50 middle schools, replacing half with charter schools, getting more teaching fellows. (All to be done in the next 2 years) Looks like Bloomcott wants go out in a blaze of glory.

  • enpassant

    What percent of Democracy Prep students passed the last ELA state exam? 30%!!!!! That’s the MS instructional model that we seek to emulate?

  • SickofBloomberg

    Slap some clown make up on Walcott and crank up the organ music, the circus is back in town!!  How is so much wholesale ignorance so easily tolerated in this city?  Bloomcott is poised for another wave of destruction and disruption that will only cause students and teachers to suffer even morethan they are now, if that’s possible.  How about we decrease class sizes from the current highs of 34 and 35 and give teachers some support?  Novel idea, hmmm?

  • http://rantingwoman.wordpress.com rantingwoman

    No new ideas.  Same BS as always. Get rid of the high paid teachers.

  • old teach

    I taught the first third of my career in the middle school. A Title I school in Sunset Park. The hardest day ever in the high school was better than the best day I taught in the middle school. This new plan is really the old party line that this administration has performed in the high schools. I say performed because this is a tragedy that will now be brought or should I say bought with the mayors dollars to the middle school. It will in the end prove as unsuccessful as the real results of his small school initiative has been to the high schools.

  • reality-based educator

    BREAKING NEWS: Mayor Michael Bloomberg, flanked by Chancellor Dennis Walcott and Deputy Chancellor Shael Polakow-Suransky at a City Hall press conference, announced plans to shutter the entire New York City public school system and replace it with charter schools. 

    In addition, Bloomberg plans to move over 1,000,000 million New York City school children out of New York City and replace them with children from higher scoring areas outside the city.

    Bloomberg, fresh from perjuring himself on the stand in the John Haggerty Jr. corruption trial, said that he has had enough of falling test scores, funky graduation rates, lazy teachers and children who “just won’t learn…”

    “It’s time we bring in some children who will!” the mayor said as both Walcott and Polakow-Suransky nodded solemnly in agreement.

    Bloomberg said New York City will close half of it’s schools beginning in 2012 and will complete the entire system closure by the time he leaves office on December 31, 2013.

    New York City school children who are currently deemed “failures” will be sent to “re-education centers”  jointly run by Pearson Education, McGraw-Hill and News Corporation.

    Pearson, McGraw-Hill and News Corp will received $286 million in tax incentives to run the centers and another $550 million in school capital funds.

    New York City’s 75,000 teachers will all be fired and put on a “DO NOT HIRE” list that will be circulated to school districts all around the country.

    In addition, they will be blacklisted from working in any corporation that trades on Wall Street.
    The operation is being dubbed “FAILURE IS NOT AN OPTION
    IN NYC” after a favored saying by the mayor’s friend and charter school
    operator, Geoffrey Canada.

    “We are falling behind as a nation, falling behind as a city, and frankly, the education system is to blame,” Bloomberg told reporters.  “The kids, the teachers – they’re just no damned good.  And failure, well, it’s just not an option for us anymore.”The mayor said once the FAILURE IS NOT AN OPTION FOR NYC operation is complete, New York City will have one of the finest school systems and most educated populaces in the nation.”We’re hoping to get kids in here from Scarsdale, Chappaqua, those kinds of places.  We think that will really give us a leg up on competing with the rest of the nation and the world.”

  • http://twitter.com/MaryConwaySpieg Mary Conway-Spiegel

    Middle Schools Are Next-this has been coming for a few years now; I agree w/Mr. Noguera.  The mantra from parents is the same:  K-8.  K-8.  

    The way Middle School is structured, isolated (for the most part) from it’s elementary roots and high school future has never made sense.  And, that’s why parents have begged for K-8.  What Parents Want:  An investment in Traditional Public School Pre-K & Early Childhood Educaiton, K-8 w/Small Class Sizes + no high stakes testing. 

    I wish this was good news… 

  • Bronx Second Career Teacher

    K-8 is the way to go. Gotham quoted study about this recently. Kids do better in a K-8 or graduating at grade 4 which I found interesting I teach in a K-8 and many of the kids have been there since K and all the teachers know them…great community feel in a public school.

  • Fourth Year Teacher

    This is getting to be absurd.  How can we let this continue?  The UFT needs to stand up and fight these fights hard before it is too late.  Closing more schools to be replaced with Charters, bring in fellows when there are countless ATRs looking for jobs, push more people through the leadership academy?  Bloomberg really is trying to cut off our heads before his time is up.

  • guest

    How about 40 to 50 in some class…That’s what is happening in my school.

  • Anonymous

    One more piece of evidence (in case we needed it!) that these guys have no idea what they’re doing.

  • bee

    That’s an understatement!

  • bee

    That’s an understatement!

  • bee

    ha!

  • bee

    Walcott’s middle school plan is criminal.  Bloomberg’s actions under the guise of mayoral control are criminal. Is there no way to impede the total destruction of public education in NYC?

  • No surprise here

    No surprise from bloomberg and his puppet. They keep rearranging those
    deck chairs while the ship is sinking. Instead of understanding the
    reasons schools are struggling and doing something to actually help
    schools, they opt to do the song and dance of close and open…open and
    close. So tired and so incompetent. Placing blame as their main tool
    to address the struggle in our City schools is only widening the already
    gaping hole in our schooling system and further exposes their very poor
    ability to lead.

    Neither Bloomberg or Walcott have a clue what
    is happening in the schools right in front of them, yet they are going
    to be bolder?

    For Bloomberg’s next act, he should dive right into medicine and try to cure cancer with an axe.

  • il flerpolo

    what would improve the schools?

  • teachteach

    Yes I would like to know what teachers think will improve schools??

  • bee

    Schools could improve enormously if policy makers weren’t hellbent on destroying public education. We have influential policy makers who have no experience or education in education making decisions that are based on faulty premises. More and more, these policy makers are appointing/hiring administrators/ “educators” who are often inexperienced and uneducated in the field of education or Phds who have studied educational theory but have no experience in the trenches. It is absurd to think that this excessive emphasis on high-stakes test is beneficial to any learning population. Teaching and learning are creative processes. If the material that is learned is not relevant or meaningful to the learner, if the teacher is not allowed to use their skill, and spark the natural curiosity, of their students, then the biggest battle of all is lost. Playing musical chairs with students is another bad idea, as is starting a massive quantity of charter schools when the jury is still out on whether or not they are really a panacea, and when there are so many unresolved issues pertaining to charter schools. Increasing class sizes, vilifying teachers, silencing the voices of parents and community, and wasting money an army of lawyers and on “technology,” is surely the wrong road to travel. In short what would improve the schools is the ANTITHESIS of what the Bloomberg machine is doing:
    1) Small classes
    2) Meaningful and relevant curriculum
    3) Enough experienced and educated educators/administrators
    4) Professional and financial support for learning communities
    5) Less emphasis on high-stakes tests
    6) No charter schools
    7) Encouraging real parental and community involvement.

  • bee

    Schools could improve enormously if policy makers weren’t hellbent on destroying public education. We have influential policy makers who have no experience or education in education making decisions that are based on faulty premises. More and more, these policy makers are appointing/hiring administrators/ “educators” who are often inexperienced and uneducated in the field of education or Phds who have studied educational theory but have no experience in the trenches. It is absurd to think that this excessive emphasis on high-stakes test is beneficial to any learning population. Teaching and learning are creative processes. If the material that is learned is not relevant or meaningful to the learner, if the teacher is not allowed to use their skill, and spark the natural curiosity, of their students, then the biggest battle of all is lost. Playing musical chairs with students is another bad idea, as is starting a massive quantity of charter schools when the jury is still out on whether or not they are really a panacea, and when there are so many unresolved issues pertaining to charter schools. Increasing class sizes, vilifying teachers, silencing the voices of parents and community, and wasting money an army of lawyers and on “technology,” is surely the wrong road to travel. In short what would improve the schools is the ANTITHESIS of what the Bloomberg machine is doing:
    1) Small classes
    2) Meaningful and relevant curriculum
    3) Enough experienced and educated educators/administrators
    4) Professional and financial support for learning communities
    5) Less emphasis on high-stakes tests
    6) No charter schools
    7) Encouraging real parental and community involvement.

  • il flerpolo

    1. how small? 

    2. what would be in a meaningful and relevant curriculum?  (i suspect that there aren’t too many people who are out there arguing that we need meaningless and irrelevant curricula.)

    3. i don’t know what this means.  are you just saying “hire more teachers”? or lay off fewer teachers? how many is enough? is there a specific policy that you have in mind?

    4. i don’t know what this means.  what’s a “learning community”?  what kind of professional support are you talking about?  how much money, and for what specific purposes?

    5. less emphasis — but retaining “some” emphasis?  how much emphasis?

    6. the merits are complicated and debatable, but at least this point is clear.

    7. i don’t know what this means. what’s “real” involvement?  what’s “unreal” about about current parental involvement?

    you know, i agree with you entirely about the tests.  but we are where we are.  there is a widely shared perception — and it also seems to be shared by almost everybody who posts here — that students are not coming out of the NYC schools with the kind of skills we believe they should have.  politicians and the public have decided that something should be done to fix this problem, and the tests are probably here to stay. 

  • Youratroll

    Hey Flerp
     How would you fix the school??
     Please tell us how much you really don’t know about education.
    What do you know about curriculum?
    education 101 What is a learning community

    You don’t know what it means because you never worked in the education community.
    You can’t know what real involvement is unless you become really involved.

  • QueenB

    I am so tired of hearing and reading about how well charter schools are doing! Why doesn’t someone pull the curtain back and reveal the true Wizard of Oz! When Charter Schools stop picking and choosing their students and take in who ever shows up at the door (like public schools) teach large class sizes (like public schools) tolerate poor student behavior and not put them out (like public schools) and still be successful with out any parental support (like Public Schools) then and only then do we want to see or hear what Charter Schools have to offer. So why is Walcott visiting charter schools? Why is he putting “aspiring Principals” (code word for NO EXPERIENCE) with the toughest age group, in low achieving schools? That’s proof what a non-educator and know nothing he is. All this at the expense of those students who are already suffering in the name of reform!

  • QueenB

    I am so tired of hearing and reading about how well charter schools are doing! Why doesn’t someone pull the curtain back and reveal the true Wizard of Oz! When Charter Schools stop picking and choosing their students and take in who ever shows up at the door (like public schools) teach large class sizes (like public schools) tolerate poor student behavior and not put them out (like public schools) and still be successful with out any parental support (like Public Schools) then and only then do we want to see or hear what Charter Schools have to offer. So why is Walcott visiting charter schools? Why is he putting “aspiring Principals” (code word for NO EXPERIENCE) with the toughest age group, in low achieving schools? That’s proof what a non-educator and know nothing he is. All this at the expense of those students who are already suffering in the name of reform!

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

From Our Jobs Board

Featured Employers
Recent Jobs

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

29 comments so far today

Archives

June 2013
M T W T F S S
« May  
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930