GothamSchools — daily independent reporting on NYC public schools

on the table

Union open to turnaround plan that cuts teachers based on merit

For the first time, the city teachers union could allow teachers to be removed from schools based on merit rather than seniority, a union official close to the negotiations said today.

As part of his middle schools initiative, Schools Chancellor Dennis Walcott announced in a speech this morning a plan to pursue federally-funded “turnaround” for 10 low-performing schools that would begin next year. The model, which replaces at least half of the schools’ teachers based on effectiveness –  rather than seniority – can only go forward with approval from the United Federation of Teachers.

The union has already been in “preliminary discussions” with the city about implementing the model next year and is “open” to further negotiations, an official said today.

“These are all struggling schools and we are willing to help struggling schools,” the official said. “It’s not a debatable point.”

This version of turnaround, one of four models the Obama Administration has mandated for low-performing schools, has previously been off the table in any past negotiations. Two other models, plus another turnaround version that resembles the city’s school closure policy, are already in place in New York City, but none are as aggressive. Together the 10 schools could get up to $30 million in federal grants.

Specifics about how teacher would be removed are still under negotiations, the official said. But any teachers removed because of the turnaround would remain on the city’s payroll as members of the Absent Teachers Reserve.

The mere willingness to discuss a plan to identify and remove unfit teachers from struggling schools is the latest sign of an evolved working relationship between the union and city.

Last week, UFT President Michael Mulgrew praised Walcott for his decision to end the controversial Teacher Data Reports program. “I can say confidently for the first time I feel that the chancellor of New York City is trying to put children first,” Mulgrew said.

Responding in a statement to Walcott’s speech, Mulgrew did not specifically mention the turnaround model. He criticized other parts of the plan, which included more school phase-outs and new charter schools, because they “did  not go far enough.”

Last summer, New York State received $300 million to fix 57 of its “persistently low-achieving” schools, the majority of which were located in New York City. But it used just a fraction of its allocated funds on the least invasive model because of negotiation delays with the teachers union.

The city said it did not know which middle schools it would target for the Turnaround model. Eleven middle schools are currently on the state’s persistently lowest-achieving list and more could be added in coming months.

 

  • Objective Watcher

    More bias in Gotham Schools reporting: “The mere willingness to identify and remove unfit teachers from struggling schools is the latest sign of an evolved working relationship between the union and city”. Sounds like subjective journalism to me. I know hundreds of NYC public school teachers and I do not think any of them would state that there is an “evolved working relationship between the union and the city”. But then again, teachers are not NYC journalists and journalists are not NYC teachers. 

  • Invictus

    Once again, any teacher that is labelled “ineffective” would be placed in the ATR pool and what would be the effect of such a move on the ATR pool, as well as on the entirety of the Union Membership in general?  If the UFT leadership finds that it needs to ‘change’ with the times in order to survive, then at what cost?

    Any teacher with any common sense fully knows that almost any school and after yesterday’s and today’s announcement of the “grandiose” project of remaking the very ‘mediocre’ public middle schools in NYC, then they should know that nothing is to remain the same.

    If the UFT is really discussing the possibility of such back dealing with the DoE, then perhaps the entire membership will sack all the Unity caucus hacks that have sold the integrity of the union and have thrown the membership under the tracks. 

  • Fsmedu

    Re “Union open to turnaround plan…”
     
    As it now stands and for decades NYC educators are removed from their positions after three consecutive years of unsatisfactory ratings via the 3020a education law .The current UFT-negotiated contracts are the values and standards we go by since they were voted upon by the members. So there is already a process sur place to cut teachers or educators on merit rather than seniority.
     
    What is really needed is a process to help educators address any deficiency they may have collegially.
    Reforming the professional support system to NYC educators is more essential than closing schools and opening new ones. What we need now is a No Educator Left Behind but unfortunately Mulgrew and Bloomberg (Walcott) are not talking about that.
     
    Enable teachers to teach.
    FSMEDU

  • Pogue

    Dear Mr. Mulgrew, no more cutbacks or sellouts.  Hold the line till these destructive educational incompetents leave office.

    Liu for mayor.

  • cl_pixie

    I really wish I could trust Mulgrew, but unfortunately I don’t.  While I agree we need a system that can easily remove ineffective teachers, Mulgrew and Weingarten have gotten into deals that ultimately disregard many of our best teachers–such as the ATR system and using VAM to evaluate teachers.  They also silently agreed to school closings while pretending to be against them.–Jamaica HS comes to mind.

    Gotham’s use of the term “evolving” to describe the union is utterly subjective. The DoE has done its share of hampering true reforms and negotiations in order to completely privatize education and bring down any rights teachers have.  Then again, who now owns Gotham? 
    And I have to wonder, who also owns the UFT??

Tips, questions, feedback?

Contact us at .

Word from Our Sponsor

Follow GothamSchools

RSS
Subscribe to the daily email digest:

Chalk It Up

Recent Comments

7 comments so far today

Events Calendar

Archives

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr  
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031